The INDsider -> Nathan Stubbs TUE, AUG 11 10:17AM by Nathan Stubbs

Melancon’s global warming trip draws scrutiny

Sunday's Wall Street Journal scrutinized a 10-member congressional delegation’s trip to the South Pole over New Year’s 2008. Louisiana Congressman Charlie Melancon was on the 11-day, six-stop trip that included a bit of snorkeling at the Great Barrier Reef, a cable car through the Australian rain forest, a visit to a penguin rookery and one night’s stay at the Royal Hawaiian Hotel in Waikiki. Melancon was one of six members to bring along his spouse, though his wife’s traveling expenses were only partially covered by taxpayers. A Journal analysis shows congressional trips overseas are on the rise, with legislators and aides having reported spending about $13 million on overseas trips last year, a nearly 10-fold jump since 1995.

The South Pole trip, led by Rep. Brian Baird (D., Wash.), ranks among the priciest. The lawmakers reported a cost to taxpayers of $103,000.

That figure, however, doesn’t include the actual flying, because the trip used the Air Force planes, not commercial carriers. Flight costs would lift the total tab to more than $500,000, based on Defense Department figures for aircraft per-hour operating costs.

Lawmakers say the trip offered them a valuable chance to learn about global warming and to monitor how federal funds are spent. 'The trip we made was more valuable than 100 hearings,' said Rep. Baird, its leader. 'Are there members of Congress who take trips somewhat recreationally? Perhaps. Is this what this trip was about? Absolutely not.'
Congressman Melancon’s spokesperson Robin Winchell has issued the following response:
As a representative of a coastal state that is suffering from rising
seas levels and more intense, more frequent hurricanes, Congressman
Melancon is very concerned about climate change.  He participated in the
Congressional trip to Antarctica to gain first-hand and academic look at
the science of this issue, and learn from scientists who are on the
cutting edge of studying climate change. 

He believes we must work together as a nation to reduce the carbon
pollution causing this climate change, but not on the back of
Louisiana’s energy industry that provides good jobs to hundreds of
thousands of workers in our state.

While he was not able to support the climate change bill that passed the
House in June, Congressman Melancon is committed to working with his
colleagues on a comprehensive energy policy that will meet the shared
goal of reducing pollution, while also protecting the economy of his
state.

As for Mrs. Melancon’s participation, I think it’s important to emphasize that Congressman Melancon and his wife wrote a personal check for all additional expenses incurred by Mrs. Melancon’s participation. Congressman Melancon’s wife has been his partner for 37 years, and he
values the insight and perspective she offers.



Comments (16)add
...
written by Advocate for Life on Earth , August 11, 2009 - 05:57 pm
I am glad Mr. Melancon is willing to do what others in our Congressional delegation won't do, that is, to not bury his hand in the proverbial sandy strata of the soils of this state of ours; at least he is taking a look at this issue.

As anyone who has ever travelled can tell you, it simply isn't possible to appreciate something empirically, without the added power of direct witness. That goes for cultural concerns, as well as scientific. Science offers us a way to understand our world, directly, and remotely. However, as any wetlands soil scientist or biologist can tell you, sometimes you do just have to go dig in the mud to find what you are looking for.

We have only 435 members of Congress for 300 million Americans. On an issue of this gravity, it's a good thing some of them at least have their minds open to consideration on this issue. It would have been preferable to see the Congressman vote for a bill that made our country a more efficient, less polluting user of energy resources. I trust that he will still do this in the short and long terms.

To do so, will in the long view, make our state richer and more secure through renewable energy systems, such as algal oil, and less of the polluted, exploitable industrial tail-pipe of this country that it has been.
...
written by justwandering , August 11, 2009 - 05:58 pm
Seems we're being told everyday by the President and Congress that we're going to have to make sacrifices to 'fix' the econ0omy and healthcare. Seems this message hasn't gotten down to the people we elected, who actually work for us.
...
written by Fat Check , August 11, 2009 - 06:31 pm
Hey, the trips will get better once ol'Charley becomes Senator.
...
written by Gulf Aaron , August 11, 2009 - 07:22 pm
Of course, this would be a bit easier to swallow if he actually voted for action to avert a climate crisis, as opposed to just using his key committee assignment to negotiate a weaker and weaker bill while ultimately voting against it. Oh well, at least his rhetoric is thoughtful.
...
written by Phil , August 11, 2009 - 09:11 pm
Global warming is a myth. The peak year for temperature is 1998, it's been dropping since, with a big drop in 2007. The ice packs are up to 1980 levels, about a 5% increase. Hope you enjoyed the trip Charlie, did the Easter bunny, Santa Claus, and an honest lawyer go with you? (Since you obviously believe in fairy tales) Vote the bum out.
...
written by JP , August 11, 2009 - 09:56 pm
I was waiting for someone to chime in with the "myth" or "hoax" cliche. Here's an interesting read. The same people who spread disinformation that coal pollution does not cause acid rain, that CFC's do not deplete the ozone layer, and that cigarettes do not cause ill health effects are the people who began the campaign against the scientific consensus on anthropogenic global warming.
http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/CPNSS/projects/ContingencyDissentInScience/DP/DP0801OreskesChallengingKnOnline.pdf
...
written by ragin_cajun , August 12, 2009 - 03:54 pm
Global warming and congressional junkets are both peas from the same pod--arrogance. To state man-made carbon emissions are what cause global warming is simplistic and arrogant. The complexity of planetary ecology defies understanding, and anyone who dumbs it down to this extent is hustling you.

As for congressional junkets, I don't see how anyone can even TRY to defend the practice. Congressmen defending it is outrageous. But for taxpayers/citizens, who are ultimately being exploited by them, to defend the practice is pathetic.
...
written by Phil , August 12, 2009 - 08:33 pm
Got a couple of sites for readers to look at.
http://www.globalwarminghoax.com/news.php
http://www.drroyspencer.com/global-warming-101/

JP's article is more concerned with philosophy of dissent, and starts out addressing the "climate change deniers". It presumes that global warming is a given fact, rather than examining the scientific basis. Again global warming is a "myth" and a "hoax".
...
written by ragin_cajun , August 12, 2009 - 09:34 pm
Phil--

I saw that quote from Eisenhower in the lower left window, and I was shocked. That's the second quote from Eisenhower I've seen that is just chilling--like he had a crystal ball or something. I've decided I'm gonna read the biography of perhaps the most boring president ever :)

...
written by Phil , August 13, 2009 - 12:43 am
I missed the Eisenhower quote. It had a quote from Putin when I looked.
...
written by Phil , August 13, 2009 - 12:48 am
Was it this one?
If you want total security, go to prison. There you're fed, clothed, given medical care and so on. The only thing lacking... is freedom.
Dwight D. Eisenhower
...
written by JP , August 13, 2009 - 01:09 pm
Phil, the article is not about the "philosophy of dissent" and is not intended to examine the scientific basis for AGW. It's an in-depth review of the people who are behind the disinformation campaign against the scientific consensus. The Marshall Institute was created during the 1980's to combat expert opinion on Reagan's "Strategic Defense Initiative" (weaponizing space). When that fell by the wayside (the expert opinion won out), they moved on to spread disinformation about other things that threatened big industry--coal plants causing acid rain, CFC's causing ozone depletion, and cigarettes causing health problems. They didn't win on those either; now they and the many spinoff groups (like the websites you link to) are spreading disinformation about the overwhelming scientific consensus that humans are mostly responsible for the observed global warming over the past century.

The article doesn't "presume global warming is a given fact"; the article presumes that the vast majority of climatologists are correct in what they say.
...
written by ragin_cajun , August 13, 2009 - 01:43 pm
No, the quote I saw was Eisenhower warning of a type of tyranny of experts caused by subsidized researchers with compromised objectivity. It was an indictment of excessive government funding of scientific research. Just amazing.
...
written by Advocate for Life on Earth , August 13, 2009 - 07:02 pm
Most compromised researchers are those being paid by corporate interests to produce results, not our government compromising them.

Though, the world is a balance of self-correcting forces. All eggs should never be in only one basket.
...
written by Phil , August 14, 2009 - 05:23 am
the majority of climatologists (650) stood up in Poland and said global warming is a hoax. The "overwhelming scientific consensus" is that the Sun, and natural cataclysms like volcano eruptions affect global temperatures more than puny human enterprises. Acid rain, CFC's, and cigarettes are the byproduct of a failed fear-mongering style of governance. Create a catastrophe, then legislate against it.
And tax it. Mother Earth is IN-sensitive to your climate assault.

As per your reference to Reagan's SDI, that was the feint that brought the Soviet empire down. With a moribund economy, they could not challenge a non-existent science. Ha-ha, jokes on you.
...
written by Phil , August 14, 2009 - 05:23 pm
by "jokes on you", I mean we forced the Soviets to spend money they didn't have to compete in SDI, which was totally fabricated. Biggest practical joke I know of.

But back to the original matter at hand, Melancon took a world pleasure cruise at the expense of the taxpayer. And he justified the trip, by citing "global warming".
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
Advertisement
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it