The INDsider -> Nathan Stubbs TUE, DEC 8 10:10AM by Nathan Stubbs

Vitter faces $300 million dilemma

Sen. David Vitter has been a strident opponent of national Democrats' health care reform efforts in Washington and, in advance of his 2010 re-election, is seen as one of the GOP's most reliable votes on the issue. But, POLITICO reports the senator will have a difficult time deciding how to cast his vote on an amendment pushed by Republicans to strip some $300 million designated for Louisiana from the bill. (The artilce also notes Vitter broke with many in his party last week in voting for a bill guaranteeing preventive screenings for women.)

Last month, Vitter's Senate colleague, Mary Landrieu, inserted language in the health care bill that would provide up to a third of the estimated $900 million shortfall Louisiana is facing in its Medicaid budget. The issue has been a top priority for the Louisiana delegation, but Republicans say the issue is being used to "buy" votes on health care, with some conservatives going so far as to call Landrieu a "prostitute." Louisiana is facing the Medicaid shortfall due a to skewing of per capita income that occurred post Katrina, increasing the state's share of the costs. From POLITICO:

“I’ll have to consider it as it comes up for a vote,” Vitter said of an amendment by Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) to strip the money from the bill.

Vitter, who has a chilly relationship with Landrieu, told POLITICO that he’s “extremely uncomfortable with it being on this bill — in particular, it is essentially buying support and buying votes on this bill.” On Monday, Landrieu strongly rejected the notion she was bought off, saying that “there was not a quid pro quo for that vote” and that it was the “No. 1 request” of Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, a Republican, to get the additional Medicaid money.
Informed of Vitter’s comments and asked how Vitter should vote, Landrieu said tersely: “Vitter should help his state, is what he should do."



Comments (9)add
...
written by yomamaspajamas , December 08, 2009 - 05:29 pm
Just for the record, Vitter pay whores for sex. Case closed
...
written by Plumpy , December 08, 2009 - 05:51 pm
yomamaspajamas...I don't care how many whores Vitter buy's. As long as he doesn't turn into a commie loving liberal . I'm still supporting him...
...
written by Solutions? , December 08, 2009 - 07:30 pm
And what is wrong with paying whores for sex. I guess your definition of freedom contains the words "unless I have a problem with it." I bet you bought your wife dinner on the first date.
...
written by northsidian , December 08, 2009 - 10:43 pm
Amazing how the do-gooders find a way to spin a whoremonger into a saint!! This is the ultimate of the power-elites b.s. But, I won't judge Vitter!! What pisses me off is he is the ultimate do-gooder hypocrite and his country club buddies are cut from the same cloth. I have been around those boys all of my life. Sex, power, money!! That is the name of the game. I know criminals, pimps, and whores with more integrity than those yahoos!! P.S. Solutions, ARE you calling your wife a WHORE?
...
written by Really? , December 09, 2009 - 12:43 am
No, just referring to the blatant hipocracy on both sides of the aisle. You can buy a girl dinner and get lucky, but she isn't a whore. Yet when two adults make a business transaction out of it, it becomes morally reprehensable. So what if Vitter got lucky?

Also, my definition of freedom is the ability to pursue pleasure without the fear or repurcusion. Under both parties, this isn't allowed.
...
written by yomamaspajamas , December 09, 2009 - 02:24 am
its the hypocrisy stupid!
...
written by Phil , December 11, 2009 - 03:08 am
A little dab here, a little dab there, that's how you pass Obamacare. Medicaid is for people who have children who can't pay for their healthcare. There are a lot of unfortunates caught up in the mix, but free healthcare, which I don't qualify for, is taking from the taxpayer, who is presumed rich and giving to the poor. Bread and Circuses. And don't forget the State matching payment for the increased Medicaid, a sudden, hidden tax.
...
written by NORTHSIDIAN SHOTGUN , December 11, 2009 - 04:32 am
LOCK, YO MAMA UP !
...
written by NORTHSIDIAN SHOTGUN , December 13, 2009 - 11:46 pm
PHIL, Move back ta MAMOU

Yomamas too! This is, a capitalistic nation ! IF YOU KNOW OF ANY LADIES OF THE NIGHT GIVING FAVORS FOR YO FOOD STAMPS, PLEASE DO TELL.............Ya, ALSNO !
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
Advertisement
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it