The INDsider -> Leslie Turk MON, JUN 8 6:09AM by Leslie Turk

Stanford victims tape their heartbreaking stories

Fifty-nine-year-old Troy Lillie of Maurice this morning tells the INDsider he was among the youngest of Stanford victims who went to state Rep. Bodi White’s legislative office Sunday to tape their stories about losing their life savings in what the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission alleges was an $8 billion Ponzi scheme. An SEC official characterized the scheme as “a fraud of shocking magnitude that has spread its tentacles throughout the world.”

“A good many of them were Exxon people,” says Lillie, himself a retired ExxonMobil employee. “Some of them I had never met. There were people in their 60s, 70s. It’s unbelievable, people at this age. I understand several of them did break down.”

The Advocate reported today that dozens of people who had lost their retirement savings invested with Texas billionaire Robert Allen Stanford's companies all wanted White, other state legislators and members of Louisiana’s congressional delegation to know how the fall of Stanford’s "bank" on the island of Antigua has devastated them.

The case, which involves so-called CDs held by the foreign bank, affects thousands of people in Baton Rouge, Lafayette and other Louisiana cities.

Lillie says his adviser, Michael Word of Baton Rouge, told him the investments were safe, liquid deposits, a claim Lillie says Word’s assistant reiterated when Lillie called the office in November. He was concerned about the safety of his CDs.

“His assistant said the CD money was safe. She was very adamant about it, that it was rock solid, the safest place to have it,” Lillie continues. “[Word] called me back in December and had changed his tune. He told me we ought to take it out. He said we’ll put it in a money market account and it will be insured by the FDIC in an account in the United States."

Lillie's money, about $900,000 of his life’s savings, today sits in the money market account but has been frozen by the feds. It may be subject to a clawback provision.
“They were CDs in name only,” Lillie says. “I’ve heard at best they may have been hedge funds.”

According to The Advocate, several victims who taped their stories asked for tougher regulation of financial markets, imprisonment of any criminal offenders and help in recovering Stanford assets around the world.

“I hope that all of the evidence on what happened comes out,” Lillie is quoted saying. “If there are criminal actions needed, I hope they go to the people who are guilty here.”

The INDsider will post the video online as soon as it is available. Read the rest of The Advocate story here.



Comments (12)add
...
written by Zip Your Pants , June 08, 2009 - 01:27 pm
CDs paying 5 times the national rate? No one thought this odd? How does that go about a fool and his money?
...
written by Woody , June 08, 2009 - 02:30 pm
Pigs get fat hogs get slaughtered.
...
written by Baton Rouge investor , June 08, 2009 - 03:03 pm
I can assure the two previous posters that in our wildest dreams we were never offered CDs at 5 times the national rate? I would also suggest to the uneducated contributors you might try to EDUCATE yourself BEFORE making a total fool of yourself. I might suggest that you are possibly involved with, be or be kin to a broker. How else could you ever have such a slanted, ignorant view to the total devastation caused by these brokers and the the "powers that be" within the upper echelon of the Allen Stanford Companies, (over 200 companies to be exact.)
I might also suggest to the simpletons who chose to comment on something so complicated to take at least, oh let's say, at least 4, that's FOUR months out of your life to dedicate to trying to recoup the money you worked 38 years to save, invest, and retire on. We did not seek to become rich from these investments, they were not presented to us a "Get rich quick" schemes, just safe steady investments. We were doing business with AMERICAN
BROKERS, in AMERICAN CITIES, with an AMERICAN COMPANY, in the
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. We were ASSURED THEY WERE SAFE AND INSURED.
My agent assured me three seperate times my funds were insured.
We did our due dilligence in investigating Stanford Companies and our broker. Never were we informed that the company was being investigated as early as 1999. This information was nowhere to be found on a public forum that we had access to.
So ZIP and WOODY, do YOUR homework. Quit taking the word of someone that has been or is currently involved in Stanford companies and become an educated contributor. Then and only then will you have anything that is worth the space you chose to waste on this site.


...
written by Northsidian , June 08, 2009 - 05:06 pm
Baton Rouge investor. Did you sue your advisor yet? And if not, why?
...
written by Baton Rouge investor , June 08, 2009 - 06:40 pm
Northsidian,
Not commenting on personal actions or group actions I or anyone I associate with is involved in at this time. That has absolutely no bearing on the facts of this case. If I do or have chosen to take action against my former broker he can assume I simply played the hand he dealt me.
...
written by Baton Rouge investor , June 08, 2009 - 07:32 pm
I will not comment on any legal action that I may or maynot be involved in at this time. That has absolutely no bearing on the facts of this case. As far as my broker is concerned, he can be assured I am playing the hand he has dealt me.
...
written by Zip Your Pants , June 08, 2009 - 07:57 pm
ââ?¬Å?The SEC said Stanford International Bank offered CDs paying anywhere from 7.45 percent to 10 percent annual interest rates, often more than double what rivals offered. The SEC said Stanford Group advisers, who were paid hefty commission fees, aggressively marketed these CDs to investors around the world.---- Washington Post Wednesday, February 18, 2009ââ?¬Â

Using today�s rates, it was 4 or 5 times.

"I might suggest that you are possibly involved with, be or be kin to a broker."

Sorry, no.
...
written by Baton Rouge investor , June 09, 2009 - 08:15 am
Sorry Zip,
We did not invest today...... the rates given to us were nowhere near that.
...
written by Baton Rouge investor , June 09, 2009 - 08:21 am
Broad spectrum comments are absolutely unwarranted in this situation.
Some of these investors, such as myself have been in this company for years. I was invested at 1.5% above the CD rate offered in my bank at the time of investment. Fact remains, I paid a broker to protect my interest and keep me informed as to the stability of the company(s) I had investments in.
HE DID NOT. He did however spin a very compelling tale of stability,
liquidity within the holding bank, and INSURANCE.
So Zip, are you an investor? Can you speak with knowledge from within? I am anxious to hear from you.
...
written by Zip Your Pants , June 09, 2009 - 12:56 pm
"So Zip, are you an investor? ...to hear from you".

I do have investments but not at Stanford. Over the years, similar scams have come and gone, and I avoided them. One I remember was buying life insurance on people who had aids (I didn't have any, insurance or aids).

To make you feel better, three times I lost money in public companies (they went under) but I have made money too. Since October 2008, I have been buying equities. At the time it went against emotion but it is starting to pay off.

As to your broker (Stanford I presume), Stanford was not in the mainstream. As such, I was not surprised when the story broke.

It took a few years but I learned the two most important things about investing; risk and probability. Stanford investors are now getting a big lesson on these two subjects.


...
written by Baton Rouge investor , June 09, 2009 - 02:22 pm
I can assure you it does not make me feel better that you lost money.
At least now I know that you do have an inside scope on what we are dealing with. I am very happy that you have recovered. You are correct in the assumption that we are learning a big lesson. But I ask you as an American Citizen, is this lesson necessary? I have learned that I cannot trust a government that sanctions, license and bonds a company and then does not police this entity. There is a distinct difference in a downward spiral of the economy and out and out grand theft. I will recover, make no doubt about that. I will do what is necessary to recover. I have never been a "victim" in my life and I refuse to adopt that mentality. Granted I felt that way for a while, but then I just got really angry. I am past the anger for the most part, now I am seeking justice. This I will have too, both criminally and civilly. I just hope that my country and state does not let me down on this also. Best of luck Zip.













...
written by Zip Your Pants , June 10, 2009 - 09:41 am
written by Baton Rouge investor , June 09, 2009
"I have never been a "victim" in my life"

You are lucky (up to this point at least).
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
Advertisement
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it