The INDsider -> Mary Tutwiler FRI, JUL 17 10:15AM by Mary Tutwiler

Nutria, the coast, and the numbers

Yesterday, a story about nutria in Louisiana hit the AP wire, and has been reprinted all over the country, from KATC TV-3 to the Chicago Tribune. The story says that the state’s latest survey of wetlands damage by nutria is down by about 3,000 acres, and credits the good news to the success of the state's Coastwide Nutria Control Program.
A report by the Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries says nutria damaged an estimated 20,333 acres of wetlands between the spring of 2008 and this spring, or about 3,000 fewer acres than the previous annual survey.
Hunters are paid $5 a piece by LDWLF for nutria tails.

Saving 3,000 acres of wetlands is a remarkable number, especially when you look at the coastal land loss figures. According to the numbers in the joint federal and state wetlands Web site, LaCoast.gov, Louisiana has lost up to 40 square miles of marsh a year for several decades. There are 640 acres in a square mile. So if you do the math, two years ago, nutria damaged 32 square miles of coastal marsh. This year they only ate 27 square miles. 

Those numbers seem to point the big stick at nutria for causing more coastal land loss than any other item, such as oil field canals and salt water intrusion, lack of siltation, subsidence or ocean rise. It leads us to believe we can trap our way out of coastal erosion.

However there are a lot of caveats when you take a closer look at the complexity of the big picture. First of all, nutria graze, move on, and vegetation regenerates in many cases. So the damage is not permanent. Second, hurricanes are big killers of nutria. If you had travelled the coast roads right after Katrina, Rita, Ike or Gustav, you would have seen thousands of drowned swamp rats (along with other wildlife) because they can’t survive in the salt surge that covered the wetlands. More hurricanes last year, fewer nutria. Third, the state’s land loss figures come from satellite images, a snapshot based on tides and winds at any given moment.

Now I’m not saying that the nutria news isn’t good, or that coastal land loss isn’t as enormous as stated. I’m just questioning putting out numbers into a vacuum, with no context. Coastal restoration is a giant problem; it helps no one when you only get a little nibble of the picture without understanding what the numbers mean.





Comments (3)add
...
written by Bot , July 17, 2009 - 12:34 pm
Useful info, Mary. I hope other people take the time to question numbers thrown at them by government. Even when well intentioned and presented in good faith, people can make mistakes. Fact checking gives everybody confidence.
...
written by anonymous , July 20, 2009 - 08:26 am
Word is alligator skins aren't selling, alligator farmers don't want eggs this year and many alligator hunters may not hunt this year. Look for nutria numbers to drop further in the next few years as the alligator population increases.
...
written by C4Uself , September 07, 2009 - 12:05 pm
Mary, the Nutria is a HUGE problem that report just scratched the surface of. When you say:

"First of all, nutria graze, move on, and vegetation regenerates in many cases. So the damage is not permanent. Second, hurricanes are big killers of nutria. If you had travelled the coast roads right after Katrina, Rita, Ike or Gustav, you would have seen thousands of drowned swamp rats....."

You are over simplifying the problem, and are mistaken in asserting that the damage is "not permenant". The following excerpts from a USDA APHIS report outline additional effects of this menace:

Damage
Nutria damage is evident to varying degrees in
every area they are found. The most noticeable damage
is the result of burrowing. Nutria are notorious in
Louisiana and Texas for undermining and breeching
water-retention levees in flooded fields used to produce
rice and crawfish. Nutria burrows can also damage flood control levees that protect low-lying
areas; weaken the foundations of reservoir dams,
buildings, and roadbeds; and erode the banks of
streams, lakes, and ditches.
Nutria damage, however, is not limited to burrowing.
Depredation on crops is well documented.
In the United States, sugarcane and rice are the primary
crops damaged by the nutria. Grazing on rice
plants can significantly reduce yields, and damage
can be severe in localized areas. Other crops damaged
by the nutria, include corn, milo, sugar and table
beets, alfalfa, wheat, barley, oats, peanuts, various
melons, and a variety of vegetables. This depredation
can lead to significant losses, especially for small
farmers.
Of critical importance, is the negative impact this
invasive species has on native vegetation and associated
wetlands. In Louisiana, some nutria feed on
seedling baldcypress with such intensity that the trees
cannot survive."

So please be careful how you wield the pen.....Our coast was built up over millenia without the Nutria, as it is native to South America. It's eradication is extremely important and the success thus far of that program should be highlghted as progress and a milestone in coastal restoration, thus encouraging further steps and continued diligent actions.
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
Advertisement
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it