The INDsider -> Jeremy Alford MON, OCT 26 10:03AM by Jeremy Alford

Natural gas getting fired up

A bipartisan group of congressional lawmakers have created a new caucus that’s dedicated solely to advocating and promoting the use of domestic natural gas. The Congressional Natural Gas Caucus is the first association of its kind and includes two members from Louisiana: Rep. John Fleming, R-Minden, and Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-New Orleans.

Landrieu will serve as the caucus’ first co-chairperson, alongside Republican Sen. Saxby Chambliss of Georgia. She says the post is an important one, especially since the production of natural gas can directly contribute to producing jobs in Louisiana. “A reliable and affordable supply of U.S. energy has profound impacts on every sector of our economy and is the backbone of the U.S. employment base,” Landrieu says. “Natural gas is a clean burning, low-carbon fuel that is predominantly produced here at home.”

Among other roles, Landrieu says the caucus would serve to investigate and debate the economic and national security implications of the newfound abundance of natural gas in the United States. That charge, too, has implications for the Bayou State — the Haynesville Shale in north Louisiana is positioned to become the nation’s top-producing natural gas field within the next six years.

The formation of the caucus also shows that members of Congress want to usher in a greater independence when it comes to energy needs, according to a prepared statement from T. Boone Pickens, a billionaire businessman and natural gas advocate. “We’ve got to get off foreign oil, and the only immediately available transportation fuel that can replace it is natural gas,” Pickens says.

The caucus’ timing couldn’t be better, especially since the Senate is giving more attention to natural gas in its climate-change legislation, which is backed by President Barack Obama and more widely known as the cap-and-trade bill. The legislation, authored by Democratic Sens. John Kerry of Massachusetts and Barbara Boxer of California, includes some financial incentives for natural gas-fired electricity. If adopted, the cap-and-trade is also expected to increase demand for natural gas.

Natural Gas Supply Association CEO R. Skip Horvath says that’s all the more reason for a new caucus to be formed and for natural gas to take on more spotlight in the national media and Washington policy debates. “By conservative estimates, we have at least another century’s worth of supply,” Horvath says. “Natural gas is the key to our country’s energy future.”

Natural gas is produced in 33 states and relied upon as an energy source in many others. In fact, over 20 percent of the electricity in the United States is generated by natural gas. Natural gas is also an important feedstock in chemical and fertilizer production; is used to eliminate soot in clean diesel fuel; and used as a raw material that goes into lightweight cars, wind power blades, solar panels and energy-efficient materials.

In 2008, nearly 90 percent of the natural gas consumed in the United States came from domestic U.S. supplies. Thanks to technological advances, the U.S. now has triple the amount of natural gas than was estimated in 1966 and 40 percent more than believed just a couple of years ago.

Approximately 1.3 million people are employed directly by the companies that drill, ship and supply natural gas to American consumers, with another 2.7 million Americans employed in supporting positions indirectly created by the development of America’s domestic energy supplies. The combined economic impact of natural gas development, exploration, production and usage to the U.S. economy in 2008 was $385.5 billion.



Comments (3)add
...
written by Cajunrunner , October 26, 2009 - 04:16 pm
Sorry, the Obama Administration won't go for this promotion of natural gas, even though it burns clean and would help reduce our dependence on foreign oil.

Why?

Because with increased use of natural gas, the "evil" oil & gas industry would benefit, especially the domestic independents here who hedge most of their success on natural gas exploration and production.

This is not the industry that the Obama Administration wants to see profit.
...
written by JP , October 26, 2009 - 06:26 pm
Even though the bill would give incentives for natural gas fired electricity and is expected to increase demand for natural gas, some would rather buy into partisan talking points. This is the cognitive dissonance that Fox News "conservatives" embrace.

Reducing a complex issue into empty cliches like "Obama thinks oil and gas is evil" doesn't serve anyone's interest except partisan hacks.

If the information in this article is correct, then I look forward to a boon for the Louisiana economy as natural gas makes up a huge portion of our production.
...
written by Jason D Faulk , October 29, 2009 - 05:58 am
I agree with JP's assessment. While the art of the political process is quite an interesting one to watch from afar, and even more interesting to see up close in a Congress member's conference room, or at a townhall forum, that does not necessarily imply that the only outcome will be the outcome one person expects to occur, filled with name calling and petty behavior.

I fully expect that even with the President's campaign statements in favor of so-called "Clean" coal, that such statements on other issues have not shown that he is completely inflexible when the time for policy making comes around, (as evidenced by his willingness to pick up John McCain's position for taxing health insurance benefits, which were initially given exemption in the early 20th century as a perk benefit, because employers in large industrial manufacturing businesses were subject to a wage freeze at the time.) With that flexibility in mind, I expect, at the end of the day that Methane production will be enhanced in the national energy portfolio, along with significant incentives for efficiency and conservation, and solar, wind, geothermal and other alternative developments. I expect agricultural biofuels to be of a lesser importance than we thought several years ago, while Algae based fuels will see expanded research, as they are expected to be the greatest area of liquid fuel from living sources available in the future.

One has to keep in mind, that all our gains in production of other sources of energy are going to be wiped out if we each personally keep consuming more and more every year (when the economy fully recovers) and all of our gains are going to be wiped out if this country does continue to grow to 400 million persons living as the 300 million of us have been.

Methane is a valuable resource, let's hope we continue to use it in a wise manner. Burning it directly where it is needed usually, in a thermodynamic sense, is more efficient than buring it in a power plant, to send electricity down a line, where someone might happen to cook or heat with it. Buring methane in a car directly, rather than plugging that car into the grid, powered by CH4 burnt at a central plant, would be more efficient. Prioritizing for example, solar water heating 1st, natural gas water heating 2nd, electrical grid powered water heating 3rd, would then be an example of where policy should follow the science and guide our decision making process as a society.

Speaking on Coal for a moment, which is why I mention the President's flexibility on policy, vs. electoral politicking, is an example of a fuel source which is horribly polluting. The by-products from scrubbing coal smoke stacks are not regulated now as a toxic waste, which they are. The open pit mining of coal is a hazard to the communities, and wildlife (including the migratory birds) where it is performed, particularly when the open pit mine, measuring in the hundreds to thousands of acres, fills in with water after the active operating life of the mine is concluded.

Picture something the size of Lake Chicot or larger, full of heavy metals laden water, filthing your drinking water? Does that help?

So let's drill the gas for now, but keep a mind towards where this is all leading us. Also, let's keep a mind to how long this is going to drive revenue to the State of Louisiana and federal governments....when does it run out? What is our back up plan? Let's do as Mark Zappi called for, and develop our alternatives as well. If we don't now, it's akin to developing a hurricane evacuation plan the night before the storm hits.
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
Advertisement
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it