Comments for Kopplin wins “Friend of Darwin” award at http://www.theind.com , comment 1 to 3 out of 3 comments http://www.theind.com Wed, 19 Jun 2013 18:31:59 +0100 FeedCreator 1.7.3 http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/10049-kopplin-wins-friend-of-darwin-award#comment-26141 "...you can't create information with misspellings, not even if you use natural selection.” You are confusing human written language with biological systems; the two function entirely differently. And John Sanford is a young Earth creationist who fails to understand – among many other things – that even if evolution were falsified tomorrow, Jesus would still be a myth. At least in this post you were smart enough not to use Malcolm Muggeridge as a scientific authority; he was a satirist, you know, not a scientist. - John Grimes Fri, 09 Mar 2012 10:46:04 +0100 http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/10049-kopplin-wins-friend-of-darwin-award#comment-26140 "[R]eal, credible scientists," as opposed to Nobel laureates in the sciences, Theo? - Walter Pierce Fri, 09 Mar 2012 10:08:53 +0100 http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/10049-kopplin-wins-friend-of-darwin-award#comment-26139 Getting an award from National Center for Science Education is nothing to be envied. They are meant to be furthering science education - but they are doing the opposite when they push for Evolution to be taught as propanda. “Evolution” is a vague word. Micro evolution is minor changes within a species, this is real and observable and uncontested. The conflict pertains to Darwinian/Macro evolution which asserts that: 1) All living things had a common ancestor. This implies that your great….. great grandfather was a self replicating molecule. 2) The observable world has come into existence by totally natural, unguided processes and specifically WITHOUT the involvement of an intelligent designer. The vague and changing definition is poor science and a thinly disguised strategy to make it easier to defend and propagate. Do a YouTube search on “kansas evolution hearings” to hear real, credible scientists, present powerful arguments which debunk Darwinian/Macro evolution. Dr John Sanford (Geneticists and inventor of the GeneGun) said . “The bottom line is that the primary axiom [of Darwinian/Macro evolution] is categorically false, you can't create information with misspellings, not even if you use natural selection.” - Theo Tsourdalakis Fri, 09 Mar 2012 03:33:35 +0100