<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Aw jeez, Agenda 21 is back</title>
		<description>Comments for Aw jeez, Agenda 21 is back at http://www.theind.com , comment 1 to 8 out of 8 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.theind.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:26:59 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/10322-aw-jeez-agenda-21-is-back#comment-26769</link>
			<description>Yes, Walter, Agenda is real. No body &quot;needs to&quot; lead your Horse's Ass to water, you are computer literate, do you know what it means to &quot;Google&quot; a Term? Your stubborn snideness can mean only one thing, You are Paid to Cover Up for the &quot;Environazis.&quot;
 - JohnnyJazz Bernays</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 23:03:24 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/10322-aw-jeez-agenda-21-is-back#comment-26536</link>
			<description>Read the EARTH SUMMIT AGENDA 21 book online at the United Nations for free:  http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/agenda21.htm
Then there's the NEW &amp; MORE INCEDIOUS upcoming Uber Super Rich Elite's Gathering at the Rio +20 Earth Summit this year in Rio De Janeiro, Brazil. It has been 20 years since the Agenda 21 Summit and they will be adding more anti-human implementation via the Agenda 22. - Cry Meariver</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 16:23:34 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/10322-aw-jeez-agenda-21-is-back#comment-26511</link>
			<description>Yes, Joan, you need to say MORE. 
Tell us how Agenda 21 &quot;is being covertly pushed into local communities throughout the United States of America through the International Council of Local Environmental Initiatives,&quot; as the bill asserts.
Lafayette Consolidated Government isn't a member of ICLEI.
But, then again, if it's covert ... - Walter Pierce</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 16:07:19 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/10322-aw-jeez-agenda-21-is-back#comment-26510</link>
			<description>&quot;.....current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class - involving high meat intake, use of fossil fuels, appliances, home and work air conditioning, and suburban housing are not sustainable.&quot; - Maurice Strong, Secretary General, U.N. Conference on Environment and Development, 1992. (Also known as the Rio Earth Summit, where Agenda 21 was unveiled.) ........need we say MORE ?  - Joan Beduze</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:55:43 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/10322-aw-jeez-agenda-21-is-back#comment-26504</link>
			<description>Agenda 21 is a Confucius propagandistic subterfuge, birthed onto the world stage by the United Nations, the puppets of pseudo democracy, and propped up by the same major capitalist whose glutinous appetite for all the wealth on this earth cannot be realized until you the people are without.
Agenda 21 was instigated and fueled for the main purpose to  cause confusion among the working class, to deceive all, and like a sleigh of hand motion the working class is transfixed on what is before their eyes and this is the last step to the end result seeked by the proponents, all is not as it appears on the surface, beware its true purpose is yet to be exposed.....    - chano leal</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 09:02:27 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/10322-aw-jeez-agenda-21-is-back#comment-26494</link>
			<description>Gene,

The people of District 43 did not elect Mr. Bishop.  He qualified to run for office in the open primary of this state, paid a filing fee (I'll have to check if there are other qualifications required, such as signatures) and  was subsequently elected unopposed.  Given that voters are not allowed a none of the above option when they cannot know by the deadline of filing that none of their fellow citizens even chose to chance a contest, they can't I believe be faulted for electing a person whose name they never once have seen on a public ballot anywhere, or barely covered in media.  They can however choose to &quot;Re-Call&quot; the person holding the seat and bring said person in for another vetting.  I believe such to be unlikely.  Nonetheless, Mr. Bishop to my eye and opinion is out of step with his home city which embarks upon long term sustainable development planning now, and furthermore he is incorrect.  The policy guidelines presented at the Rio Summit 20 years ago have no binding power.  Those are advisory only.

The real point here is whether or not we choose an unsustainable path, squandering our limited resources, or if we shall develop in a sustainable manner.  All citizens should not be subjected to a &quot;One-Size-Fits-All&quot; city and parish.  Some of us want a diversity of uses, of residential places, transportation modes, local and regional agriculture, art, and the type of work we recruit to and nurture in the area.  This does not entail mass removal of the single family sub-urban ranch house.  It does envision not privileging the developer of that mode of housing, the apartment compound or the big box store, to the detriment of all others.  It is a balanced approach.

Communities have always planned for their expansion and rheir internal redevelopment.  For years we've done they to the preference of one mode at the exclusion of all others.  Thankfully that is coming to a close,  Mixed use, and overlapping mixtures of complementary uses and densities will be the future.  Ask a young person, they want options. - Jason Faulk</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 19:06:37 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/10322-aw-jeez-agenda-21-is-back#comment-26493</link>
			<description>I must admit ignorance of Agenda 21.  This is the first time I've heard of it.  The most frightening thing is that we have a person of such ignorance (possibly even stupidity) as Stuart Bishop representing us.  What a bird he must be to introduce legislation like this.  And, remember, the people of Lafayette elected him. - Gene Broussard</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 17:52:47 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/10322-aw-jeez-agenda-21-is-back#comment-26492</link>
			<description>Agenda 21, pg. 349: &quot;Existing national and international mechanisms of information processing and exchange, and of related technical assistance, should be strengthened to ensure effective and equitable availability of information generated at the local, provincial, national and international levels, subject to national sovereignty and relevant intellectual property rights.&quot;

Sure sounds Communist to me... - Simon Mahan</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 12:34:51 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
