<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Jindal's Fuzzy Math</title>
		<description>Comments for Jindal's Fuzzy Math at http://www.theind.com , comment 1 to 5 out of 5 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.theind.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 01:41:40 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/cover-story/10462-jindals-fuzzy-math#comment-26678</link>
			<description>Why aren't the Jinalista's who march lock-step with Jinal commenting?  No Testa-Kallies? - Michael A. Moss</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 16:33:09 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/cover-story/10462-jindals-fuzzy-math#comment-26656</link>
			<description>Greg, your verbalized clearcut observations on the failure of Government officials to manage affairs in a profitable return of investment as the private business sector, could not be any better explained. The decisive behavior of our government to diminish surpluses immediately with untettered expenditures in their first term in office by these, 
&quot; two for one inept couillions to repay campaign interests are just unimaginable.
we sit and wonder how we could be so damn gullible to vote such un-business types into office and the answer lies before our eyes, when one selects one enept candidate against another enept candidate on the basis of his rhetoric, is like eating a dish of Blue Bell vanilla ice cream or eating a dish of Borden's vanilla ice cream, the two party system offered up to the voters, past and present being democratic or republican, are just that &quot; Vanilla. One and the same, and this is the most complete, biggest ruse, ever designed by man.
We need not wonder, why a two party system need not worry that a third party could ever win an election and lead this country, when every third party candidate ever offered up for our consideration, has been just a watered down version of plain vanilla.  - chano leal</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 16:34:40 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/cover-story/10462-jindals-fuzzy-math#comment-26648</link>
			<description>Jindalista's, that's BILLION, with a B!! - Michael A. Moss</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 00:41:44 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/cover-story/10462-jindals-fuzzy-math#comment-26647</link>
			<description>Greg, I totally agree with you. What do the Jindalista's have to save about their boy?  Ya'll luv him, now what is the reason for pissing away the surplus? - Michael A. Moss</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 00:40:24 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/cover-story/10462-jindals-fuzzy-math#comment-26636</link>
			<description>The basic problem-just one of course, not all- with Jindal is he has never worked for a private company.  His entire work experience from day one has been in the governmental sector.  He has never had to make decisions concerning the &quot;life and death&quot; situations occuring in a &quot;true&quot; business enviornment.  He has never lived in the &quot;real&quot; world.  Bobby Jindal is the ultimate consumate politician--and then a poor one at that.  As such, he is totally ignorant, totally blind to the what can and what will make an operation,  successfull.  In Jindal's mind, the resolution to the financial challenges facing Louisiana are simple--terminate employees, reduce services, privatize operations, provide untethered, unaccountable subsidizes to attract business to the state.  In the words of Buggs Bunny, &quot;what an 'idiotit&quot;. - Greg Foreman</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 13:35:29 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
