<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Author of controversial fracking report retires</title>
		<description>Comments for Author of controversial fracking report retires at http://www.theind.com , comment 1 to 2 out of 2 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.theind.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 11:59:25 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/business-news/acadiana-business/12251-author-of-controversial-fracking-report-retires#comment-27520</link>
			<description>You have liberal &quot;foundations&quot; and liberal congressman funding studies that, surprise, surprise, find there is zero doubt about man-made global warming.  Yet no one ever questions whether that reporting is biased.  

What does a university researcher with a million dollar grant really want?  Answer:  another million dollar grant after the current one is over.  Maybe, just maybe, that desire is going to tilt in favor of finding there is a serious problem that needs more study.

I'd like to see a truly non-partisan study but am also not really sure that can exist.  Everyone brings a bias to start with.  But I know one thing, the people who think that just because it is hotter this year than it was last year and therefore man-made global warming is to blame are ignoring the fact that the globe has been getting hotter and colder naturally for millions of years before man came along.

Maybe millions of years ago two dinosaurs were sitting around, one saying &quot;it's really getting hot nowadays&quot; and the other decides it must be something they and all the other dinosaurs are doing that is causing it.

All the best,

Soop - Tom Reagan</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 04:15:42 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/business-news/acadiana-business/12251-author-of-controversial-fracking-report-retires#comment-27514</link>
			<description>Can we say &quot;conflict of interest&quot;? - Greg Foreman</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 09:20:35 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
