<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Jindal tax plan expected to include cigarette tax</title>
		<description>Comments for Jindal tax plan expected to include cigarette tax at http://www.theind.com , comment 1 to 2 out of 2 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.theind.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:32:16 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/12804-jindal-tax-plan-expected-to-include-cigarette-tax#comment-27665</link>
			<description>“Muhl said anti-smoking groups are seeking a $1-per-pack increase on cigarettes and corresponding rates for other types of tobacco, which would raise an estimated $223 million annually.”
The above revenue projection just doesn't “add up”.  Net tax collections from cigarettes alone amounted to $3,374,608 per cent of tax charged  ($121,485,891/36 cents per pack) for 2011.  The projected increase of $223 million dollar from an additional tax $1.00 per pack would translate to a tobacco revenue of $2,230,000 for each cent of additional tax ($223,000,000/$100 cents of increase).    

It is difficult to accept that such an increase would result in revenue reduction of $1,144,608 of collections(a 33.92% revenue reduction).  Especially, when one realizes this projection is for “cigarette and corresponding rates for other types of tabacco”.   This projection is simply totally off base.  Granted, demand would be tempered by any increase in the tabacco tax, however, not to the degree predicted. - Greg Foreman</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 02:47:36 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/12804-jindal-tax-plan-expected-to-include-cigarette-tax#comment-27653</link>
			<description>As George Bush and Jindal both said, and went back on their word: &quot;No More Taxes&quot; - Michael A. Moss</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 08:18:23 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
