<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Couillons on da loose: House committee OKs campus guns</title>
		<description>Comments for Couillons on da loose: House committee OKs campus guns at http://www.theind.com , comment 1 to 6 out of 6 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.theind.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 04:14:31 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/home/4377#comment-1068</link>
			<description>&quot;It is currently against the law to conceal a weapon while intoxicated.&quot; 

It's about time we have a law against everything. - What else is new</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 18:44:52 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/home/4377#comment-1065</link>
			<description>It is currently against the law to conceal a weapon while intoxicated.  This rule applies to citizens with or without a concealed carry permit.  - AReese</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 13:17:01 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/home/4377#comment-1060</link>
			<description>This is RS 40:1379.3
http://www.legis.state.la.us/lss/lss.asp?doc=97451

Read the law before you jump to conclusions. College students under the age of 21 cannot carry concealed. That means only college seniors for the most part could carry. This law specifically excludes whackadoos.

The only issue I have with the concealed carry is that an honorably discharged Armed Forces member should be allowed even if under age of 21. If you could trust them to carry a fully auto weapon in Iraq or Afganistan or elsewhere, you can't trust them on campus, using their GI bill for education?

The key problem in the active shooter scenario is for the police to distinguish friend from foe. Require that concealed carry holders work with campus and local police in training, so that the police can easily identify the good guys by working with them. - Phil</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 23:36:11 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/home/4377#comment-1057</link>
			<description>I hope wiser heads prevail. More security on campus, I can support.  Guns on campus could result in more murders and suicides. I don't like the idea of sending my children to university with a bunch of impulsive young people who might be packing. And that's considering before those young people are chemically enhanced. - Only3togo...</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 17:29:35 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/home/4377#comment-1056</link>
			<description>&quot;Packing Heat,&quot; it seems that most school shooters kill themselves.  And how much tougher can you get in punishment than the death penalty?

I hope this ridiculous bill dies a miserable death.  The thought of a bunch of frat boys carrying around concealed weapons is scary. - JP</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 16:20:07 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/home/4377#comment-1053</link>
			<description>2 places where shootings happen often, guns and post offices. Why? Because guns aren't allowed there.

There's already a law saying don't kill people. Will making one saying don't do it at school stop someone? More laws is not the answer, tougher punishment is. - Packing Heat</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 15:19:08 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
