Comments for NYT: Allen Stanford, 4 others, indicted at http://www.theind.com , comment 1 to 3 out of 3 comments http://www.theind.com Wed, 19 Jun 2013 17:53:01 +0100 FeedCreator 1.7.3 http://www.theind.com/home/4565#comment-1427 Because the bill is in Committee, and hasn't been marked up yet. Would you want to unconditionally support a bill that has yet to undergo changes in a committee headed by Rep. Frank? It could come to the floor substantially different from what it looked like when it was introduced. - Tom N Sat, 20 Jun 2009 13:03:21 +0100 http://www.theind.com/home/4565#comment-1425 I would like to thank the politicials who signed the letter to the SEC. (on both sides of the isle) - politics Fri, 19 Jun 2009 21:40:46 +0100 http://www.theind.com/home/4565#comment-1415 CHARLIE IS running against David Vitter. My question is why did Charlie NOT push for the HR 1207 that makes The House able to audit the Federal reserve Bank (for the first time in American history). AL - ALPEAUX TRAUTMAN Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:46:24 +0100