<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>NGO funding debate rages</title>
		<description>Comments for NGO funding debate rages at http://www.theind.com , comment 1 to 2 out of 2 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.theind.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 12:19:58 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/home/4686#comment-1891</link>
			<description>Discussion of how to spend money absolutely does NOT need to stop.  YOU call it bickering and I don't agree with you. I call it responsible representation by elected officials.  Just because YOU don't like the discussion, or maybe the direction the discussion takes, doesn't make you correct. It also doesn't mean there aren't some out here who believe some of these NGOs absolutely CAN take care of themselves. Some of these listed have absolutely enough money to support themselves, or access to donors who would support them. As long as they are on the public dollar, the donors will not feel it necessary to support the organizations. I, personally, believe what raises money for the community, what contributes to the general fund, should be supported. I, for one, do not ever want to see the discussions stop. - Myrick6</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 10:03:38 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/home/4686#comment-1875</link>
			<description>By a 3-1 margin by word count? LOL

Lies, Damed Lies, and Statistics.

Blantant Bias - ItzMe</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:03:08 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
