Comments for CPC denies appeal, paves way for subdivision at http://www.theind.com , comment 1 to 7 out of 7 comments http://www.theind.com Sun, 19 May 2013 06:18:54 +0100 FeedCreator 1.7.3 http://www.theind.com/home/5272#comment-4359 AND you couillie "JAY", "YOU MAY GET IN FRONT OH DA LINE AT DA WELFARE TROUGH"! - NORTHSIDIAN SHOTGUN Fri, 27 Nov 2009 14:43:38 +0100 http://www.theind.com/home/5272#comment-4358 Planit, Your post makes for great read, we deserve just what we elected, and because your statement carries so much truth, IT SHALL BE IGNORED BY THOSE IN A POSITION TO MAKE SUCH A PLAN A REALITY!! - NORTHSIDIAN SHOTGUN Fri, 27 Nov 2009 14:41:12 +0100 http://www.theind.com/home/5272#comment-4356 They certainly care more about building a prosperous Lafayette than you do. - Jay Bienvenu Thu, 26 Nov 2009 21:19:56 +0100 http://www.theind.com/home/5272#comment-4352 The Council Pres. needs new clothes ta cut da ribbons and da lil couille councilmen need freebees meals, and free boudin from Don's Market, wha wants da mo residences ta buy his boudin balls, - NORTHSIDIAN SHOTGUN Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:29:39 +0100 http://www.theind.com/home/5272#comment-4347 Well Plumpy, this is a money where our mouths are issue. Residents of the unincorporated areas of the parish, must be willing to elect representatives who will adopt a land-usage plan. Any such plan ultimately would offer direction to developers as to where they can and can't develop. More accurately, such guidance through a "plan" of some sort would show what scale and level of development is expected and planned for a given area. Such a plan should be based upon a variety of criteria, such as topography, existing development, farming, urban, greenspace potential and need for each areas. Basically, I think we have a lot of what I'll term 'unfocused' property development in these parts. When this happens, the public as a whole misses the opportunity to make the best use of our tax dollars. The new residents are equally underserved by moving out to a rural area, driving on the same neglected commons, (i.e. the roads) that the developers are not responsible for upgrading along the miles long length of travel it takes to deliver a resident to their new abode. Unless such a plan exists, it will be difficult to hold the housing developers accountable to a standard which doesn't exist. Ultimately, this is what happens when the laissez-faire commercial attitudes of the public towards government manifest themselves in the form of public policy. *Almost* Anything goes anywhere, anytime. Literally, you get what you vote for. And all the residents politely speaking out reactively, rather than proactively won't get you very far. - PLanIT Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:25:38 +0100 http://www.theind.com/home/5272#comment-4342 AY, it takes money ta dress lak JODU'NT ! - NORTHSIDIAN SHOTGUN Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:03:58 +0100 http://www.theind.com/home/5272#comment-4334 Oh geez...Another subdivision.. More people , more traffic and more noise...When it comes to money. Parish Council doesn't care about the people... - Plumpy Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:49:23 +0100