<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>For now, Lloyd’s must pay Stanford’s defense</title>
		<description>Comments for For now, Lloyd’s must pay Stanford’s defense at http://www.theind.com , comment 1 to 1 out of 1 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.theind.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:57:30 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/5885-for-now-lloyds-must-pay-for-stanfords-defense#comment-6498</link>
			<description>WELL OF COURSE A FEDERAL GOVERNMENT'S DEFINITION OF A &quot;MONEY LAUNDERING CHARGE WOULD NOT ENCOMPASS SUCH A BROAD COVERAGE, AS THE DEFINITION OF &quot;MONEY lAUNDERING, BY AN INSURANCE FIRM SUCH AS LlOYDS OF LONDON, AFTER ALL SOMEWHERE DOWN THE YELLOW BRICK ROAD
( SURELY, YOU KNOW WHAT THE YELLOW &quot;GOLD&quot; BRICK ROAD, IMPLIES ). THE BILLIONS SANFORD BILKED THE PEEPS FOR , SHALL HAVE TO SURFACE, EVEN THOUGH THE POWERS THAT BE ( MEANING : THOSE WHO WILL LATER SHARE IN THE PIE ),SHALL DRAG-ON COURT PROCEEDINGS UNTIL THE COWS COME HOME,ALL THE WHILE ORDERING LlOYD'S TO COVER ATTORNEY'S FEES TO KEEP THE &quot;BOOTY, AS MUCH INTACT AS POSSIBLE........
 - NORTHSIDIAN SHOTGUN</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:06:15 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
