Comments for Speculative Development at http://www.theind.com , comment 1 to 3 out of 3 comments http://www.theind.com Wed, 19 Jun 2013 05:17:08 +0100 FeedCreator 1.7.3 http://www.theind.com/business-cover/6298-speculative-development#comment-8143 If Mike "managed to avert the Stanford Group disaster," and withdrew his funds just before the Stanford collapse, he is likely being investigated for illegally withdrawing those funds and he will be slapped with a claim by the SEC within a few months - not the receiver he has already managed to squeeze by with the Fifth Circuit's ruling last fall. He was tipped off and that is highly illegal. The state and the SEC are moving in on that according to recent filings. - Preferential Treatment is Illegal Tue, 08 Jun 2010 22:53:58 +0100 http://www.theind.com/business-cover/6298-speculative-development#comment-7906 FREDDIE BOY READ THE 8TH. PARAGRAPH OF THIS ARTICLE, " Moreno managed to avert the Stanford Group disaster", but you are half right and the other half, HUH ? "MORENO WAS A PRIVILEGED-INSIDER AND THERFORE HE DID"T TAKE A LOSS ! Like i said, half of your post is on the square, The first half ! - NORTHSIDIAN SHOTGUN Fri, 28 May 2010 08:29:30 +0100 http://www.theind.com/business-cover/6298-speculative-development#comment-7866 "Mike is a smart guy" If he was that smart then what happened to his money at Sanford? - Frederick Peachie Wed, 26 May 2010 18:17:15 +0100