<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>CPC tightens noose on downtown bars</title>
		<description>Comments for CPC tightens noose on downtown bars at http://www.theind.com , comment 1 to 9 out of 9 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.theind.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 04:09:43 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/6339-cpc-tightens-noose-on-downtown-bars#comment-8011</link>
			<description>Did not City Parish Government issue the occupational licenses for each one of these bars?  And the liquor licenses?  Through greed, incompetence, or mistake, LCPG created this problem.   

How much money has LCPG spent on consultants to help with planning and zoning?  They didn't see this coming?  Doesn't take a soothsayer to see that too many bars in too small an area would lead to crime, violence, and pissing in the streets.  Especially not in a city where people have been moaning about the EXACT SAME THING a mile up the road--McKinley Street stip.

I think these bar owners should hire an attorney and take the city to court over this.  Is this new ordinance not an ex post facto law?     - ragin_cajun</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 16:33:44 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/6339-cpc-tightens-noose-on-downtown-bars#comment-7987</link>
			<description>This is double taxation and so selective!  The only policing of vagrants happens after serious injury; otherwise they are ignored.  The residents are not properly protected from the far more serious problems of the free roaming criminals, chronically mentally ill, unsupervised 1/2 way and 3/4 houses, etc. all drawn to the area by the non-tax paying, but tax taking social agencies.   - realitychecks</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 06:36:35 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/6339-cpc-tightens-noose-on-downtown-bars#comment-7985</link>
			<description>CSB-
Not sure I follow-
 &quot;The downtown authority...city council..kicking their ass when...a large developer comes in and builds an entertainment center..&quot;
  It would seem to me that they would be very happy if that would happen...more development, more tax revenue; then:&quot;all the big bar owners and restaurants would be willing to leave in a hurry&quot;
   And go where exactly? River Ranch? You think they'd put up with their crap for two seconds?Do they really have the acumen to be something other than bar keeps? And why would the restaurants move? They don't pay a levy. 
 Then: &quot;downtown would go back to a what it was...a place for bums and drugs&quot; Maybe it would not go back that far...maybe it would just go back to the place of hope and promise before it got puked and pissed all over.
 Then: &quot;it's going to happen. There have already been talks about it&quot;.Talks about what, among whom?  Where exactly you going with that? Cause you know, talk is cheap. And talk can proceed easily without constraint of much in the way of logical construct,if you follow me.Which you don't. - meetzmurder</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 20:29:41 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/6339-cpc-tightens-noose-on-downtown-bars#comment-7980</link>
			<description>&quot;...and suddenly a profound silence fell over the once loud and proud...&quot;
  Kapitan Dieter Dietz, commenting on the reaction of the Germans High Command to the news that the Allies had succeeded in their invasion of Normandy  - Blicero</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 15:03:49 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/6339-cpc-tightens-noose-on-downtown-bars#comment-7975</link>
			<description>CSB-
 Well, at least it will get rid of the bums and drugs IN the bars, no? - Buckley</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 12:24:22 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/6339-cpc-tightens-noose-on-downtown-bars#comment-7974</link>
			<description>The downtown authority and city council will be kicking themselves in the ass, when a large developer comes into lafayette and builds an entertainment complex. All of the big bar owners and restaurants are willing to leave in a heartbeat in order to not have to deal with this BS. Downtown will then be back to what it once was, a place for bums and drugs. It is going to happen. There have already been talks about it. - CSB</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 11:42:06 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/6339-cpc-tightens-noose-on-downtown-bars#comment-7972</link>
			<description>Property owners should bear in mind that a property serving as a bar can never again be a bar if it does not operate as one for one year. That's how the downtown ordinance reads. - Word up</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 10:56:40 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/6339-cpc-tightens-noose-on-downtown-bars#comment-7969</link>
			<description>&quot;&quot;&quot; Whereas, Whoseas ?  Huh ?  Something is definitely missing in this scenario...Oh, its Thoseas, Dore and Theriot &quot;THE ALPO KIDS ! - Northsidian Shotgun</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 07:56:50 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/6339-cpc-tightens-noose-on-downtown-bars#comment-7961</link>
			<description>Noose?  It not the use of that word illegal in Louisiana? - B. S. Skinner</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 20:46:31 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
