Comments for Pooyie 07.28.10 at http://www.theind.com , comment 1 to 4 out of 4 comments http://www.theind.com Sat, 18 May 2013 11:11:00 +0100 FeedCreator 1.7.3 http://www.theind.com/pooyie/6641-pooyie-072810#comment-9191 Webster's Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary: john n [fr. the name John] (ca. 1932) 1: Toilet 2: a prostitute's client Seems an apt, as opposed to "classless", description of our lawbreaking senator according to the latter sense of the word, and also apt as to the former sense when applied to where his "leadership" has gotten us. - hmmmmm Thu, 29 Jul 2010 08:45:30 +0100 http://www.theind.com/pooyie/6641-pooyie-072810#comment-9180 Booo Yaaa: MY personal politics is not spineless. Note #2 of my comment, or did you not bother reading that far? - RCajunRunner Wed, 28 Jul 2010 11:15:50 +0100 http://www.theind.com/pooyie/6641-pooyie-072810#comment-9179 RCajunRunner, Vitter loves the ladies of the night. Most of the religious right chooses to overlook his indiscretions, but when Billy gets a Lewinski, you inpeach. Calling him a John isn't classless but turning a blind eye because of your personal politics is spineless. - Booo Yaaa Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:52:45 +0100 http://www.theind.com/pooyie/6641-pooyie-072810#comment-9173 Way to be witty, IND. 1) You choice to refer to Sen. Vitter as a "John" is classless. You must be taking notes from the classless leftist who has been appearing on KPEL on Weds. 2) Check your own blog from a few weeks ago. Vitter and Traylor are not the only Republicans running in the primary. Dr. Nick Accardo is also. So no, Republicans don't have only the two "sleeze balls" you reference to choose from. I usually find your paper very informative (mostly due to Jeremy Alford's pieces), no need to get in the name-calling and potshot business. - RCajunRunner Wed, 28 Jul 2010 04:53:09 +0100