Comments for Mills takes it in the first at http://www.theind.com , comment 1 to 5 out of 5 comments http://www.theind.com Sun, 19 May 2013 16:07:17 +0100 FeedCreator 1.7.3 http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/7658-mills-takes-it-in-the-first#comment-14266 It's really nice to see someone that ran a positive campaign win, and even more impressive for a republican. Take note future Acadiana republican candidates, we are sick and tired of your negativity. Take the high road like Freddie and you just might win big... - TW Thu, 27 Jan 2011 03:50:50 +0100 http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/7658-mills-takes-it-in-the-first#comment-14265 Seriously? Obviously you haven't lost interest in the publication so you can share with the others. FYI, the author was absolutely on target. - Really... Wed, 26 Jan 2011 23:20:51 +0100 http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/7658-mills-takes-it-in-the-first#comment-14199 Another disappointment for Theind? - Cajun Yodeler Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:57:43 +0100 http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/7658-mills-takes-it-in-the-first#comment-14198 Oh lordy, another CLOWN! I hope that they undo everything that Obama is trying to do to help the common man. Look at this guy's physical profile-he exudes hate. - LAFAYETTE NATIVE RESIDING IN CA Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:51:00 +0100 http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/7658-mills-takes-it-in-the-first#comment-14197 Only a couple of these elected officials have actually spoken out and said who they supported. The others are mere speculation by the opponents and incorrect, for the most part. The IND should discontinue their bias when writing an article, as shown throughout all articles produced regarding this campaign & election. It's not professional & I personally know many individuals who have lost interest in this publications due to this. I have a feeling that the certain authors have close ties to certain politicians. There was no fair and/or equal distribution of publicity for ANY of the candidates, except for one. - Seriously? Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:35:22 +0100