<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Incumbent Protection Plan, AKA La. congressional map, approved</title>
		<description>Comments for Incumbent Protection Plan, AKA La. congressional map, approved at http://www.theind.com , comment 1 to 6 out of 6 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.theind.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 22:04:13 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/8125-incumbent-protection-plan-aka-la-congressional-map-approved#comment-16634</link>
			<description>The State lost a Congressman because our population did not keep up with the rest of the country. But the area of the state that LOST population - North Louisiana - was protected, whereas the area of the state that GAINED population - South Louisiana - has to lose one of its Congressmen. What a joke. The title of your article could have been &quot;North Louisiana Protection Plan...&quot;.  - LCG</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 13:06:36 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/8125-incumbent-protection-plan-aka-la-congressional-map-approved#comment-16633</link>
			<description>Non mais, does it matter who's on first ?  - NORTHSIDIAN SHOTGUN</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 12:57:59 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/8125-incumbent-protection-plan-aka-la-congressional-map-approved#comment-16623</link>
			<description>The ways I looks at it, the Southwest district is the only one that has a lick of geographic and cultural continuity and affinity, the rest of these are nonsense.  The legislature needs to be slapped by DOJ to fix this.  The earlier plan for the I-20 district, like the I-10 district is a must.  All of CENLA plus some fringes should be the remainder.  But then, just look at the Southeast.  What a disaster.  This is a rightwing Republican preservation plan. - Unempirical Observer</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 09:38:21 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/8125-incumbent-protection-plan-aka-la-congressional-map-approved#comment-16617</link>
			<description>It is just plain crazy that Monroe got its &quot;own&quot; district.  Monroe in same district as Opelousas and Washington Parish?!  All because the Legislature didn't want to put Fleming and Rodney in the same district.

All the best,

Soop - Soop.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 06:33:54 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/8125-incumbent-protection-plan-aka-la-congressional-map-approved#comment-16612</link>
			<description>JK, thanks.  - Walter Pierce</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 20:32:10 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/8125-incumbent-protection-plan-aka-la-congressional-map-approved#comment-16606</link>
			<description>Landry vs. Boustany.  That's pretty much what everybody has been thinking would happen for a while, isn't it? - ragin_cajun</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 18:10:23 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
