<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>RE: Unnatural Selection</title>
		<description>Comments for RE: Unnatural Selection at http://www.theind.com , comment 1 to 6 out of 6 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.theind.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 00:27:40 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/re/8406-unnatural-selection#comment-18641</link>
			<description>Soop, assuming by apples and oranges you mean that one is science and the other is non-science...excellent comment.

Actually, I would say that ID proponents do try to say &quot;how&quot; it happens, by claiming that a supernatural designer has a hand in things and by claiming that &quot;irreducible complexity&quot; is a legitimate concept. - Resident</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:04:13 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/re/8406-unnatural-selection#comment-18553</link>
			<description>Soop --

Excellent comment.   - ragin_cajun</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 08:30:39 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/re/8406-unnatural-selection#comment-18443</link>
			<description>I think most people realize the debate over evolution vs. intelligent design is arguing over apples and oranges.  One speaks to how and the other speaks to why.  I've never thought those two terms were mutually exclusive.  This is really a non-issue but when one side feels it needs to rile up the other, up comes the E/ID debate.

And the LSEA is not why LA schools are underperforming.  But the fact that some people THINK that is the reason probably has more to do with the overall problem than anything else, ie ... the more we argue about LSEA is the more we ignore the real underlying problems.

All the best,

Soop - Soop.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 06:33:42 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/re/8406-unnatural-selection#comment-18421</link>
			<description>thanks for ALL of your great articles - - Judi Pautz </description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 20:39:38 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/re/8406-unnatural-selection#comment-18261</link>
			<description>MISSISSIPPI has made great strides in removing the stigma of leading the nation in illiteracy by handing the laurel down to their neighbor, the great state of LOUISIANA, now known as first and foremost the nations leader in failure, failure to provide above average education to the children of the state's taxpayers, failure to give equivacal accountings of government funds proposed to elevate the educational standard of the state's 4 year schools, and reduce the drop out rate which has greatly increased surpassing the state of Mississippi, Florida, and Alabama combined.........  - NORTHSIDIAN SHOTGUN</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 15:36:30 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/re/8406-unnatural-selection#comment-18246</link>
			<description>Unnatural indeed, Walter.  Great piece.  Louisiana is a third-world country when it comes to education, disease prevention, literacy, gay rights, pollution, political corruption, and so much more.  Maybe we can all take a break from patting ourselves on the back about the &quot;uniqueness&quot; of Louisiana to open our eyes and see how backwards this place is. - Colin Miller</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 12:23:51 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
