Comments for AT&T/T-Mobile Good for State at http://www.theind.com , comment 1 to 5 out of 5 comments http://www.theind.com Sun, 19 May 2013 01:44:38 +0100 FeedCreator 1.7.3 http://www.theind.com/mais-oui/8579-atatt-mobile-good-for-state#comment-19566 As an owner of a GSM phone using T-Mobile, this merger *must* be blocked. Prior to using T-Mobile, I was an AT&T customer who disliked their service. I switched to Cingular and was much happier with that company until they were eaten by AT&T at which point everything except cost degraded. Rural coverage will not instantly appear simply because AT&T gains a monopoly and controls more cell towers. In fact, with no competitor in the market they have no reason to build more towers. Currently, you may have better coverage with one provider versus another given a particular location. The only change will be a tyranny controlling all the coverage. For more realistic information reat http://www.shreveporttimes.com/article/20110625/OPINION0106/106250311/Steven-K-Berry-T-T-Mobile-deal-would-harm-rural-Louisiana-consumers - bitwiseshift Mon, 11 Jul 2011 11:57:12 +0100 http://www.theind.com/mais-oui/8579-atatt-mobile-good-for-state#comment-19387 Being an iPhone and iPad user. This merger only makes using them easier, more efficient. and with more access everywhere. - cherelle1216 Wed, 06 Jul 2011 07:38:44 +0100 http://www.theind.com/mais-oui/8579-atatt-mobile-good-for-state#comment-19278 Looking forward to stronger reception for iphone and internet services. - Donn Fri, 01 Jul 2011 11:53:33 +0100 http://www.theind.com/mais-oui/8579-atatt-mobile-good-for-state#comment-19266 Thanks for getting us better service. - Lacey Thu, 30 Jun 2011 22:24:06 +0100 http://www.theind.com/mais-oui/8579-atatt-mobile-good-for-state#comment-19238 Great to hear that better coverage is on the way! - Margie Allen Thu, 30 Jun 2011 15:15:58 +0100