<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Is Jindal eyeing ‘recess sale’ of OGB?</title>
		<description>Comments for Is Jindal eyeing ‘recess sale’ of OGB? at http://www.theind.com , comment 1 to 6 out of 6 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.theind.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 11:49:08 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/8603-is-jindal-eyeing-recess-sale-of-ogb#comment-19348</link>
			<description>&quot; privatizing everything that moves &quot;

What's wrong with that?  Why DON'T we get the government out of the benefits business?  My company doesn't adminsiter a pension and benefits plan.  They pay me, I buy health insurance.  I contribute to my 401K plan.  Why should government employees get anything different?   - ragin_cajun</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 10:52:33 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/8603-is-jindal-eyeing-recess-sale-of-ogb#comment-19345</link>
			<description>OGB has worked for decades.  In all this talk there is no mention of the program being poorly administered. In fact it is exceptionally well-run.  As an example of how health insurance can work it is a threat to Jindal's ideology.  As a governmental agency under Jindal's authority it is an opportunity for him to remove that &quot;bad&quot; example and further his philosophy of privatizing everything that moves.  Nothing else matters.  - rambeaux rawlings</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 07:56:08 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/8603-is-jindal-eyeing-recess-sale-of-ogb#comment-19338</link>
			<description>by RODEOCLOWN &quot;state employees pay for a portion of the total cost of their group medical insurance.&quot;

----------------------

That's my point; State employees should pay for insurance, all of it.

As for the private sector: (RAND study) &quot;businesses with 10 employees or less, about 43 percent of the companies that had been running for more than 20 years offered coverage, while only about a quarter of those that had been in business for less than five years offered coverage.

Correction made, Hmm that Walter. - Colon Flow</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 06:57:40 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/8603-is-jindal-eyeing-recess-sale-of-ogb#comment-19316</link>
			<description>Correction made, &quot;Hmm...&quot;
Thanks. - Walter Pierce</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 09:04:23 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/8603-is-jindal-eyeing-recess-sale-of-ogb#comment-19311</link>
			<description>ColonFlow, what makes U think the state employees are not paying for their insurance?  Where is U're evidence to make such a statement?  State employees pay for their group medical insurance just as private employees pay for their group medical insurance.  Just as in the private sector, state employees pay for a portion of the total cost of their group medical insurance.     - RODEOCLOWN</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 21:00:54 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/8603-is-jindal-eyeing-recess-sale-of-ogb#comment-19295</link>
			<description>Sounds good.  Let state workers pay for their own insurance. - Colon Flow</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 14:21:59 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
