<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>$80 million federal broadband grant is history</title>
		<description>Comments for $80 million federal broadband grant is history at http://www.theind.com , comment 1 to 19 out of 19 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.theind.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 07:20:02 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/9345-80-million-broadband-grant-is-history#comment-24642</link>
			<description>&quot;There is a history of Cox, Bell/AT&amp;T, etc lobbying to block progress in this state for decades to keep their monopoly afloat.&quot;  Yes, there is.

&quot;This is an incentive package to private business to build cheaper communication mechanisms.&quot;  Yes, it is.

So you say private businesses have been blocking progress, and that's why we should have used federal tax dollars to incent some private businesses to build A SECOND public network in this state, to compete against other smaller businesses in rural areas.  

I can see how your logic is less silly than mine.... - ragin_cajun</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 09:45:39 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/9345-80-million-broadband-grant-is-history#comment-24631</link>
			<description>Ragin.  You cannot see past your bias.  Truly appalling but you are like the majority that vote.  Applying your silly malformed principles to this issue does not work.  Corporations look for a high speed access as a reason to join.  There is a history of Cox, Bell/AT&amp;T, etc lobbying to block progress in this state for decades to keep their monopoly afloat.  Schools without cheap access will continue to be forced to spend $1000+ a month for a 1.5MBps T1 line.  So your silly logic (if you can call the silly bile you spew day in and out logic) fails.  This would have reduced the cost to the state in the long run.  This is an incentive package to private business to build cheaper communication mechanisms. - ragin be quiet</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 17:45:49 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/9345-80-million-broadband-grant-is-history#comment-24600</link>
			<description>Layne:that is one of the reasons ya boys at LPSB wanted a tax increase. They build em, but don't take cayre of em. But the private schools do. Because they know they can't keep getting  a tuition increase every year. Read ragin_cajun post again &amp;again if you don't understand!
 - the original northsidian</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 16:52:45 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/9345-80-million-broadband-grant-is-history#comment-24594</link>
			<description>&quot;Private companies weren't willing to provide it&quot;

They do. There are private companies providing &quot;broadband&quot; Internet access just about everywhere in the state.  You just don't know who they are.

&quot;Money changed hands. Shills were employed. &quot;  Prove it, then prosecute.  That would be illegal, wouldn't it?

&quot;Jindal ignored the needs of the people and agreed to hold it for them.&quot;  Explain that.  We're not talking about oil leases here.  Anybody can provide Internet access anywhere they find it profitable to do so.  Jindal isn't handing out exclusive licenses to operate in rural areas. What the hell are you talking about?!

&quot;Assuring that citizens have access to quality education and medical care is quite legitimately the concern of government&quot;  No.  It's not.  You and your ilk might like to think so, but it's not what governments were instituted among men to do.  

Now, if you want to institute a command economy, abolish private property, and turn all citizens into wards of the State, then you might have a point.  But, in a free country, people secure their basic needs themselves, and government stays out of the way.  - ragin_cajun</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 14:05:37 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/9345-80-million-broadband-grant-is-history#comment-24590</link>
			<description>Layne St.Julien &quot;education and medical care is quite legitimately the concern of government, and broadband access&quot;
----------------

That logic is why Greece and Italy are falling apart.  It is the reason Cuba is stuck in the limbo of perpetual misery.  It results in a country like Zimbabwe going from exporters of food to importers.  Ironically, we must look to China as example of what free markets can do.   - James Melancon</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 13:58:58 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/9345-80-million-broadband-grant-is-history#comment-24589</link>
			<description>Assuring that citizens have access to quality education and medical care is quite legitimately the concern of government, and broadband access is an essential component of that, especially in remote areas. Private companies weren't willing to provide it, but they did want those areas reserved for their use in case they should change their minds. Jindal ignored the needs of the people and agreed to hold it for them. Money changed hands. Shills were employed. The second-poorest state in the nation walked away from an $80 million federal grant. This was NOT about protecting &quot;basic human rights.&quot; - Layne St.Julien</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 13:29:21 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/9345-80-million-broadband-grant-is-history#comment-24583</link>
			<description>Layne --

&quot;they have no legitimate ground to object if the government does it&quot;

A centuries old recognition that there must be limits of the role of government is legitimate ground, wouldn't you say?  2,500 years of Western thought and evolution in human society, of trial and error, of getting it wrong and learning from the mistakes of the past, are very legitimate ground to object to government involvement in private industry.

There are very valid economic arguments for limited government.  There are ultimately basic human rights at stake.  

Also, you are all patently incorrect that for-profit companies are not providing high-speed Internet to these rural areas.  It may not be 40 Mbps, government-funded fiber to every house in every sparsely populated home in every corner of the State.  But there are wireless Internet providers, both big and small, that serve these areas and will be put out of business if they are forced to compete with low rates from government subsidized competitors. 

That's probably what most of you want to see.

This is an incomplete listing of wireless providers in Louisiana...
http://www.wispdirectory.com/index.php?option=com_mtree&amp;task=listcats&amp;cat_id=20

Also, there already IS a government funded optical network spanning the state of Louisiana.  We don't need a second one.  Jindal's right aboutt this.  
   - ragin_cajun</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 12:36:15 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/9345-80-million-broadband-grant-is-history#comment-24581</link>
			<description>If for-profit companies don't want to build into sparsely-settled areas, fine, but they have no legitimate ground to object if the government does it, and our elected officials shouldn't even acknowledge such objections. Broadband is essential for modern educational and medical institutions, etc. to function. Jindal et al conspired with corporations to prevent citizens from getting it. Louisianians pay federal taxes and were in a position to get back some of that money as a grant to improve the quality of life in our state. After this fiasco, that money's going to someone else. How can anyone consider this an instance of responsible governance? - Layne St.Julien</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 11:59:27 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/9345-80-million-broadband-grant-is-history#comment-24577</link>
			<description>Bob Elam &quot;When the market fails to provide needed services there is no other recourse than to collectively provide that service for the common good.&quot;
---------------------------

The market did not fail.  The market responded and there was not enough demand support the investment. 
  - James Melancon</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 09:27:01 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/9345-80-million-broadband-grant-is-history#comment-24574</link>
			<description>The gum't should also open an oil company?
That's what they do other countries, then the
price of gas would be lower, right? You can't have it both ways! I am against gum't competing in private enterprise 
on my nickle (taxed). We will see how much you love
LUS after fiber fails and we will be on the bailout hook! My God man, they don't even know where the fiber is buried.


 - the original northsidian</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 08:56:44 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/9345-80-million-broadband-grant-is-history#comment-24568</link>
			<description>Once upon a time, electricity did not run from sea to shining sea... govt programs, and some brilliantly formed co ops, ran elec poles &amp; wires and the United States became a becon of progress.  Same principal with broadband.  Except that Louisiana has a governor bought &amp; paid for by big corporations, like Cox.  Louisiana's education system isnt int the crapper enough, the governor says no to 80 million...  FACE IT PEOPLE, JINDAL DOESN'T CARE ABOUT YOUR KIDS IN THE LEAST.  He couldn't care less if the poor or indigent receive an education.  In fact, better your kids don't do better... it leaves more uneducated for his friend to hire on the cheap.  I didn't vote for that monkey the first time.  I figured if he didn't do anything for Louisiana during Katrina, when he was up Bush's butt, he sure wouldn't do anything to improve the state as governor... and he hasn't. - Roger</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 07:37:59 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/9345-80-million-broadband-grant-is-history#comment-24564</link>
			<description>Providing broadband is like providing a road. Private businesses use the roads everyday. The difference here is that Cox cable is trying to hold onto a market that would open up to other content providers. I'm surprised that you all don't see that. The broadband access is highly desirable for all kinds of business activities, but rural communities can't afford to install it themselves. I'm surprised that new content providers have not appeared in Lafayette as yet, or is everyone so lacking in imagination that they just don't see how to utilize this valuable asset. Schools, hospitals, county governments, etc are all in need of high speed access.  Sorry to hear Bobby Jindal is such a shrill for one company. - Hugh Robertson</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 21:24:26 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/9345-80-million-broadband-grant-is-history#comment-24559</link>
			<description>This is like telling the interstate people they should skip Opelousas and head toward Lafayette.  Just plan Opelousas level stupid - holeinthedonut8</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 19:01:39 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/9345-80-million-broadband-grant-is-history#comment-24549</link>
			<description>Providing 21st century technical progress to all of America's citizens is the only way to have a chance of staying competitive in the world economy. I know it is hard for a political party who has waged a brutal , archaic war against science to accept this but if the Republican party does not crawl out of the cave it is living in we as a nation are in serious trouble. - scottman</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 16:30:47 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/9345-80-million-broadband-grant-is-history#comment-24543</link>
			<description>Jindal probably sees the failing LUS Fiber
as an example of  Gum't competition with private 
enterprise. I don't agree with Jindal most of the the  time but, on this issue I do.   - the original northsidian</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 15:30:44 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/9345-80-million-broadband-grant-is-history#comment-24536</link>
			<description>No broadband for those North Louisiana folks, but they shouldn't be offended, because after all Jindal did get them a chicken plant and all the fine employment opportunities that go along with it. With so many fryers to process, why would they waste time fretting about whether their libraries, schools and medical institutions have access to the world wide web? - Layne St.Julien</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 14:36:17 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/9345-80-million-broadband-grant-is-history#comment-24534</link>
			<description>Is it really necessary to point out the difference between hair cuts and systems of communication?  When the market fails to provide needed services there is no other recourse than to collectively provide that service for the common good. - Bob Elam</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 14:20:51 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/9345-80-million-broadband-grant-is-history#comment-24529</link>
			<description>Broadband access to the poor?  Is it necessary to provide everything to everybody?  What is next?  Free haircuts? 

The Federal financial mess is the result of such nonsense. No wonder we are going broke. - James Melancon</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 13:24:10 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/9345-80-million-broadband-grant-is-history#comment-24523</link>
			<description>Congratulations Cox, y'all did it again with the help of Louisiana's greatest friend our very own Governor Bobby Jindal, who, of course, always has the best interests of all the citizens of our fair state.  

Go, Bobby, go! - Just a Taxpayer</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 12:49:04 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
