<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>LCG resumes fighting its junk vehicle ordinance</title>
		<description>Comments for LCG resumes fighting its junk vehicle ordinance at http://www.theind.com , comment 1 to 6 out of 6 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.theind.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 15:52:44 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/9435-lcg-resumes-fighting-its-junk-vehicle-ordinance#comment-25131</link>
			<description>Salud to all insurance lobbyist, an INSURANCE JUICER = A DOUBLE SHOT OF ROUNDUP WITH A TWIST OF LIME. - NORTHSIDIAN SHOTGUN</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 10:00:01 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/9435-lcg-resumes-fighting-its-junk-vehicle-ordinance#comment-25076</link>
			<description>RAT TURDS: This is the new LCG promoted scam for the insurance companys by Joey! I am restoring a classic, and I am not going to purchase insurance when this car is inoperable and anyone want to enforce joeys dying swan scam for the insurance companys come to my home and get a load of buckshot in your butt.....MR. C.S.JOEY, thou has a VIP pass. - HARDHAT</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 00:17:07 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/9435-lcg-resumes-fighting-its-junk-vehicle-ordinance#comment-25071</link>
			<description>This is a load of crap.  &quot;lawfully inoperable&quot; includes cars that do not have insurance.  

 If I have a classic car that I want to restore one day,  I should be able to keep it on my property without having to keep it registered and insured.

This smells like the work of insurance lobbyists, who should all do us a favor and kill themselves.



 - Facist Acadiana</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 19:32:30 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/9435-lcg-resumes-fighting-its-junk-vehicle-ordinance#comment-25070</link>
			<description>And I'm starting to have some serious doubts about the legal advice that LCG.  Shouldn't they be heading off all these legal controversies? - ragin_cajun</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 18:36:58 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/9435-lcg-resumes-fighting-its-junk-vehicle-ordinance#comment-25064</link>
			<description>&quot;Mr. Phillips was directed to request a hearing from the chief of police but, after doing so, was informed by Lafayette that he was supposed to contact a different department to request a hearing&quot;

So the whole process for enforcing this cool new law was not really thought through.  Kinda like the way they did SafeSpeed.  I hear that the permitting process in Lafayette is kinda like this, too.  Sounds like we have weak administration of City-Parish business?

I bet not a single person that cast a vote for Joey Durel could have told you on election day whether or not the Durel administration did or did not have a solid record on actually administering the laws and business of the Parish in an efficient and cost effective manner.   - ragin_cajun</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 13:58:04 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/9435-lcg-resumes-fighting-its-junk-vehicle-ordinance#comment-25060</link>
			<description>The Staff @ The Ind should be worried about this law.  The '71 Pinto Walter is driving may qualify.  - Always Ragin</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 13:35:00 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
