<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Loaded and Coded</title>
		<description>Comments for Loaded and Coded at http://www.theind.com , comment 1 to 6 out of 6 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.theind.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:24:14 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/re/9735-loaded-and-coded#comment-25790</link>
			<description>I agree with Walter, and this sums it up nicely:

&quot;All this talk about fiscal responsibility is really just code for fiscal priorities...&quot;

It's clear that there is actually no problem with fiscal responsibility, based on the data provided.  So, what's the problem?

Rather than repeat &quot;fiscally irresponsible&quot; buzz words that don't actually apply, let's hear TEA Party politicians tell us what it's really about--stripping spending that TEA Party politicians don't like.  Let's do have a debate on whether our local government, with its sound ledgers and budget surplus, should spend a little to promote our uniquely rich culture and arts.

I fail to see how it's possible to govern based on what &quot;some&quot; people like or don't like.  Let's say 15% of people don't like LGS spending money on recycling.  Do we take that away?  It's got to be put in context.  If we were deep in the red, then it'd be a different story.  So what's the goal?  A few more cents in your pocket?

There is probably money being spent on something that I don't want to support, but I'm OK with it.  Why?  Because overall, Lafayette is a great place and there is no problem with our fiscal responsibility. - Justin Price</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:47:19 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/re/9735-loaded-and-coded#comment-25748</link>
			<description>The so-called &quot;conservatives&quot; were duly elected by their constituents as a reflection of their values. The people have spoken.  Welcome to our republic, whether you like it or not. 
Your attempt to set the standard for the community, espousing The Inds point of view, at times, borders on arrogance. I never hestitate to commend The Ind on its good work. I hold it accountable for when it isn't. - Sterling LeJeune</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 16:22:52 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/re/9735-loaded-and-coded#comment-25735</link>
			<description>Could I have some Lea and Perrin with this piece, please and a little Tabasco. - chano leal</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 09:40:30 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/re/9735-loaded-and-coded#comment-25720</link>
			<description>The Arts patrons in this town are actually known as freeloaders, lets have cake and brownie sales by the Ladies Auxiliary Patrons of the Arts, as they do in Paconville, where the Ladies Auxiliary painted the fire hydrants lavender and rose and their sponsors paid for the artistic touchups - chano leal</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 22:31:56 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/re/9735-loaded-and-coded#comment-25715</link>
			<description>The arts and culture spending has had a net positive ROI (return on investment) a term all you fiscal conservatives love to use. There are many small arts and culture ventures that would never happen without some governmental support. There are many worthwhile things that make a city enjoyable that sometimes don't pay for themselves at all times. Not everything should have to be a pure business decision. If the majority are for it so it shall be. - Hugh Robertson</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 11:00:14 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/re/9735-loaded-and-coded#comment-25712</link>
			<description>I agree that the arts and culture of Lafayette make it a much more desirable place to live.  

However, what you are saying is that you are for continuing to have the government take tax dollars from those who may not want to support the arts and culture and subsidize our enjoyment of same.  After all, the arts and culture wouldn’t have to go away; it’s just that the patrons would have to pay the full cost to support them.
 - David Prejean</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 16:06:14 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
