<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Bar appeals deferred. What now?</title>
		<description>Comments for Bar appeals deferred. What now? at http://www.theind.com , comment 1 to 1 out of 1 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.theind.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 18:15:20 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.theind.com/news/indreporter/9755-bar-appeals-deferred-what-now#comment-25732</link>
			<description>This subject is very interesting from the standpoint that such a &quot;surcharge&quot; on a specific category of businesses just &quot;ain't&quot; right.  Why should bars and only bars in a specific area be subect to the &quot;surcharge&quot;.  Police and fire protection is financed by a combination of property and sales taxes, not by &quot;surcharge&quot; taxes enforced because of the extra protection or attention needed in a specific area.  If such is the case, then what is to keep the city, i.e, any city, from charging homeowners for increased survelliance required in &quot;high&quot; crime areas.  After all, the print on police cars reads &quot;TO SERVE AND PROTECT&quot;, not &quot;to serve and protect--at a price to be negotiated&quot;.  Such charges are wrong, illegal and should be stopped immediately.

 - GREGORY  FOREMAN</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 12:25:33 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
