News -> Cover Story

Sales Call

20090819-cover-0101.jpgMatt Savoy found out LUS’ fiber-to-the-home phone, cable and Internet service was being offered in his neighborhood the ol’ fashioned way: word of mouth from a friend down the street. “They didn’t really do any advertising,” says Savoy. “I actually went and sought it out just because I wanted to see the difference.” 

It took three weeks before LUS Fiber could make it out to his home, but he was eventually hooked up with the company’s most basic cable and Internet service: 20 channels and 10Mbps upload and download Internet for just under $50 a month. 

Savoy says his monthly bill is exactly the same as it was with his former provider, Cox Communications. He now gets a few less channels on his TV but says that has been a worthy trade-off for the added speed of having his computer hooked onto a fiber network. “I’m paying the same price for 10 times the Internet [speed],” says Savoy, who often goes online to upload image files and download video and music. “It is the fastest and most reliable Internet I’ve ever had,” he says. “It’s insane.” 

Savoy is one of the few Lafayette residents now able to buy LUS Fiber service. Six months after its February launch, business is admittedly slow. Monthly financial reports (see sidebar) obtained by The Independent Weekly through a public records request show revenue running significantly behind projections. LUS refuses to release its actual number of customers, or any information related to its “take” rate — the percentage of customers offered the service that have purchased it — citing the right to withhold competitively sensitive marketing information. 

However, it isn’t hard to extrapolate from its revenues that LUS Fiber’s customer base may still be struggling to crack the 1,000 mark. According to its most recent financial report, LUS Fiber brought in $49,612.48 in cable, phone and Internet sales for the month of June. If you assume $85 — the price of the most basic ‘triple play’ or bundled service — as the average amount spent per household, it would mean LUS Fiber had just 584 customers as of June 31. 

That’s far less than the 3,000 households it had originally projected to have signed up by July. In its feasibility study, originally completed in 2004 but then updated in 2007, LUS forecast its fiber business to launch in January and add 500 new households each month through its first year, ending ’09 with 6,000 customers. This year, LUS Fiber did not officially open for business and start signing up its first customers until February. It’s first billing cycle was March, for which revenue did not start coming in until April. Business is starting to pick up. May revenue was up 67 percent over April; June revenues represent a 41 percent increase from May.  

LUS Director Terry Huval says the original goal of having 6,000 customers by the end of the year isn’t likely to be met, but he remains confident in the company’s overall time line and business plan. He says the feasibility study purposefully skewed first-year projections on the high side so the business wouldn’t run into early budget limitations. 

20090819-cover-0102.jpg
Tiffany Schleuter is one of two door-to-door sales reps working for LUS Fiber.
Photo by Robin May
 
“Our plan was to do a very careful deliberate rollout to hopefully try to contain some of the anticipation in the market,” Huval says. “A lot of folks want us to provide the service today to them. It’s not all ready today, and so we’re trying to manage expectations.” 

The engineer and public utility director has put a premium on making sure the system is running smoothly and is fully prepared to handle increased customer service and maintenance before making its big splash in the market. Despite public pressure to rev up the engine and roar passed the checkered flag, Huval and company have held their Ferrari fiber service back in first gear with the caution of a pace car driver. 

The business is yet to do any major advertising; thus far, that’s been limited to some direct mail and door hangers in select service areas. And while the actual fiber lines are now installed and ready to go throughout practically all of the Phase 1 area of service, the company is currently only offering service from two of the four substations in Phase 1. One of the substations serves an area that runs from the Broadmoor neighborhood south past the Acadiana Mall to the city limits; the other substation services a section of North Lafayette that runs from the Louisiana Avenue and I-10 interchange south to Oakborne Country Club. Huval says the remaining areas of Phase I, which include the Saint streets and neighborhoods on the Western side of the city along Ambassador Caffery and north of Congress Street, can expect to see service being offered in the next few months. 

According to Huval, the main delay in rolling out the service relates to the prolonged time it has taken to recruit and train staff. Other delays and glitches have added to the setback. Some customers have seen their cable set-top boxes unexpectedly freeze or automatically reboot — problems that have become top priority for LUS Fiber technicians. Working with Alcatel Lucent, their main hardware and software provider, LSU Fiber has already run several software upgrades on the system. But many times, problems have been sourced to the wiring in a customer’s home, in which case LUS Fiber has actually gone in and fixed malfunctioning relays and bad wires, free of charge, in order to get the system working properly. Frank Ledoux, LUS’ engineering power and communications manager, believes LUS Fiber now has a handle on all the glitches that have been occurring.  

“Until you hook this system up to more than just a couple of customers,” he says, “and you load it up, then all of a sudden you run into different circumstances. But we’ve gotten really proficient at going into a house, doing a test, taking care of the problem. A lot of that has been related to wiring issues [in the house].” 

“You’re going to have some things happen from time to time,” Huval adds. “That’s true of any utility type of service. Anything that we find that’s not exactly where we want it to be, we’re pursuing it pretty aggressively to get that rectified. It’s just the nature of that business to some extent. But people are very used to us having a high reliability of service, and we want them to feel that we have that same standard on the telecommunications side.” 

“So what’s happened so far this year,” he continues, “is we’re not going to have 6,000 customers by the end of this year because we took this very deliberate approach, but when we start cranking into next year, we’ll be at a point where we can start opening up the gates. In fact it’s going to be happening soon.” 

 

20090819-cover-0103.jpg
 LUS Director Terry Huval
 Photo by Robin May
 

In order to step up marketing efforts and pitch a fiber network touted as state-of-the-art “future proof” technology, LUS recently began enlisting yesteryear’s most tried and true marketing agent: the door to door salesman or, in the case of Tiffany Schleuter, the Avon lady. 

LUS Fiber’s Schleuter is one of two full-time door-to-door sales people walking the streets for the past month now. A year ago Schleuter would never have thought she’d be knocking on doors making sales calls. “It’s been cool,” says the 26 year-old, who moved to Lafayette from Monroe 12 years ago. “We’ve gotten a pretty awesome response from it, partly I think because people probably aren’t expecting it.” 

At her initial sales call, Schleuter sometimes sets up follow-up appointments and says she has spent up to two hours discussing the service with potential customers. “It’s the personal touch,” she says. “It goes back to that LUS-Lafayette customer service. Terry Huval, everybody, has been very involved and hands on, and I think that the people of Lafayette find that very important.”  

Huval says that the idea for door-to-door sales came from discussions LUS had with other municipalities that launched municipal telecom businesses. “Their most effective marketing was the door to door,” he says. “When someone knocks on the door and says, ‘Hey, I can answer any question you have and we can talk about it,’ that goes over very well. That’s what those other towns have done, and we’re finding equally good success on our end, too.” 

LUS will soon be adding two more full-time door-to-door salespeople to hit the streets. LUS Fiber is also welcoming longtime local radio exec Mary Galyean as the one of the newest members of its sales team. Galyean, who most recently served as General Manager of Citadel Broadcasting, is sales and marketing analyst for LUS Fiber. 

“She’s going to be an important part of the sales side of this,” Huval says. “She’s going to be helping us direct our sales strategies and be involved with our field people that are selling and people taking calls as well.” 

The feasibility study’s target of signing up 500 new customers a month is still the goal, one which Huval says he now expects the business to hit by the October 31 end of the fiscal year. LUS Fiber has only recently been begun building up its sales staff to full strength. While the business started with just four customer sales reps, it now has nine listed in its 2010 budget. 

Spring 2010 is also the new projected opening date of LUS’ planned retail showroom. The grand opening for the retail space, located in the Acadian Village Shopping Center on West Pinhook Road, was originally slated to happen this year, but was pushed back when LUS re-evaluated plans for the space amid high renovation cost projections. The Independent reported earlier this year that LUS will have already spent more than $225,000 in rent on the space before it opens (“Occupational Hazard, 4/28/09). Huval contends the waiting has been beneficial because construction costs have dropped significantly.  

Any lag in the rollout becomes critical with looming deadlines for bond repayments. LUS borrowed approximately $20 million more than it needed for the fiber project, which provided some cushion to paying off debt in the first two years as the business got ramped up. Debt payments are also scheduled to increase. Due Nov. 1, 2011, is a principle and interest payment of $8.6 million, up from the $5.5 million owed this year. LUS Fiber will also have to cover that 2011 payment solely from its operating revenue.  

The advent of these hefty loan repayments, combined with the slower than expected rollout, has led to some alarming new projections in Lafayette Consolidated Government’s proposed 2010 budget. The budget ­— prepared by LCG’s finance department based on the most current financial reports from LUS Fiber ­— forecasts LUS Fiber will have a $1.3 million operating shortfall going into 2011. This is a stark contrast from last year’s projection; LCG’s ’09 budget predicted LUS Fiber’s 2011 retained earnings would be $8.6 million.  

Huval stresses these new projections should be viewed as worst-case. “We have budgeted on the high end,” he says. “We want to give ourselves enough cushion so that if we do move at an aggressive pace, we get more customers signing on, that we’re not in a position where we have to stop. So the numbers I think are somewhat fluid. They’re fluid, but they fit within the business plan that we began with.” 

LCG’s 2010 budget also projects that LUS Fiber will take out $11.4 million in new loans over the next three years. Huval points out that the source for this loan money is actually revenue from LUS Fiber. As part of the complicated financial terms mandated in the state’s Fair Competition Act, which regulated LUS’ entry into the telecommunications market, LUS Fiber is required to pay imputed taxes equal to that of private telecom companies. Huval says LUS Fiber is paying that money to the utilities system, which in turn will be loaning the money back to LUS Fiber as that money is needed. These loans are all regulated and approved by the state Public Service Commission, and LUS Fiber must pay the utility system back for the loans with a fair market interest rate.   

In an ironic twist, Huval notes that rules put in place to prevent LUS from subsidizing LUS Fiber have actually resulted in LUS Fiber subsidizing LUS.  

The 2010 budget also shows LUS Fiber cutting back on some expenses. The business is now cutting $464,177 previously budgeted to expand its wireless network. “Our priority is the fiber,” Huval says. “Once we get to some point where we’re not tying up all our technical expertise on that, then we’ll start to work on wireless.” 

While some of these numbers may paint a somewhat daunting picture, Huval says they don’t tell the whole story. He points out that LUS Fiber has kept expenses in check and spent less than projected from its capital budget. It also recently re-affirmed its early projection of only needing to sign up 23 percent of the market to break even with the business. This amounts to a little more than 14,000 out of approximately 62,000 total potential customers in the city of Lafayette (approximately 51,000 of which are residential). 

“This business is very different from a financial perspective than our utilities,” Huval says. “This business depends on a whole lot of variables. How fast we market it, how fast customers take it, certain things that come up on costs, equipment that we might need earlier in the year rather than later in the year. It’s very, very dynamic.”  

“Everything’s staying within the limits of what the bond issue is,” he adds, “but the timing of what actually moves first can change numbers in an instant.” 

In addition, Huval says that while staffing and technical delays have slowed expansion of LUS Fiber’s service area, the actual build-out and installation of the fiber network is running ahead of schedule. “We’re going to be ready to serve a lot of customers sooner than we said we were going to be able to serve them,” he says.  

Concurring with Huval, City-Parish President Joey Durel emphasizes that people will start seeing more from LUS Fiber in the coming months. He adds the public should keep in mind all the factors involved in launching a new business, especially one of this scale. 

“I think anybody,” he says, “who’s ever started a new business, you always open up anywhere from one to three months before the grand opening because you have training and you know you want to get the bugs out. So this is not any different other than it being a much more complex business. Obviously it’s not perfect, but to me there have been no great surprises and not anything that was completely unexpected.”

 

20090819-cover-0104.jpg

 

 20090819-cover-0105.jpg

 

 



Comments (32)add
...
written by Myrick6 , August 19, 2009 - 12:55 pm
I'D BE ON IT IN A MINUTE IF I HAD A CHOICE !!! I HATE COX !!! Its slow, incompetent, inconvenient and SUPER EXPENSIVE. I live out in the country though, so I don't have much of a choice. If ever the day comes that I can choose my electricity, my garbage, my other utilities like I can my phone, SOME COMPANIES WILL BE SO SURPRIZED how fast I switch !!!
...
written by LafayetteGrapevine , August 19, 2009 - 01:48 pm
Two variables that should be mentioned are the marketability and technology advances in three years once everything is in place that will push LUSFiber revenues way past its 8.6 debt payment. Think about it.
Customers soon will be able to obtain 100Mbps of Internet connection from LUSFiber, which essentially allows for universal, unlimited computer applications. Think e-paper, Mission Impossible-type clear boards where documents are moved with the touch of your finger. Everything you touch can be computerized. Think of real-time video from a homeowner with a broken water pipe to a local plumber who diagnoses the problem over the Internet and is able to obtain the parts for the job because of real-time video before ever going to the customer's house.
My point is we have to wait for our ROI from LUSFiber, then no one will complain that we lost money in the first 1-2 years.
...
written by CommonSense , August 19, 2009 - 02:15 pm
In the last paragraph, Joey states, “I think anybody,” he says, “who’s ever started a new business, you always open up anywhere from one to three months before the grand opening because you have training and you know you want to get the bugs out. So this is not any different other than it being a much more complex business. Obviously it’s not perfect, but to me there have been no great surprises and not anything that was completely unexpected.”

Private businesses can do that without public scrutiny because PUBLIC DOLLARS, TAX PAYER DOLLARS are not on the line.

How is local government competing with private telecom companies any different from the federal government wanting to compete with private health insurance providers??? People who suppor either endeavor are clearly in favor of socialism.
...
written by tea4all , August 19, 2009 - 02:45 pm
http://www.theadvertiser.com/a.../908150322

Mike Stagg compares Obamacare to the LUS FIBER project.


...
written by ragin_cajun , August 19, 2009 - 03:42 pm
LUS has alot to learn about building networks, and more importantly, running, maintaining, and selling them. LUS is in the phase of this that is most easy to outsource, the build-out. The decisions and problems that come up now are purely technical. Later, the problems will be economic, administrative, and personal. Those problems are less clear and answers have less certainty. The economy isn't helping either. As for Mike Stagg's assertion that LUS has already made Cox and AT&T better companies, that's laughable. Compared to what is technically possible, AT&T and Cox haven't improved much at all. AT&T could deliver a triple play over existing phone lines in a few months. They haven't. Cox could improve video quality pretty easily, too. They haven't. If either one of them does improve their service in Lafayette, LUS would be in a very uncomfortable position.
...
written by JP , August 19, 2009 - 04:04 pm
Getting LUS Fiber is worth it for the internet speed alone. Basic package is much faster and cheaper than anyone else can offer. And you get 10mps UPLOAD as well as download. And the 100 Mps transfer between fiber customers has awesome potential, especially for business.

I had the DVR box until we decided to get rid of subscription TV altogether. TV is a brain-drain. But I have to say, the DVR interface was severely lacking in capabilities. Maybe they have upgraded the software by now, but all in all the television service/DVR didn't seem like a better deal then the competitors and the interface sucked. The phone deal is also kind of frustrating because you get a bunch of features (mostly useless) EXCEPT caller ID, which you have to pay an extra $6 a month for.

And really, what is it with these people who are obsessed with Obama and "socialism" so much that they have to relate it to LUS Fiber? Get a grip.
...
written by ADS , August 19, 2009 - 04:07 pm
Never did like the idea of government competing against private industry. The fact of the matter is that private companies always perform better in terms of customer service and quality. Too early to tell how LUS will do vs. Cox or the SAT companies at this point. I don't know any people that have made the switch over in our subdivison even though the service has been available for 6 months. LUS not making projections is consistent with them not advertising agressively or in this case...not at all. Mark it down as iving the "field of dreams" fantasy, "build it and they will come". Not so much.
...
written by Kilroy was here. , August 19, 2009 - 05:43 pm
"it would mean LUS Fiber had just 584 customers as of June 31".

June 31? Really?
...
written by tea4all , August 19, 2009 - 07:29 pm
Nathan can we get some real in dept interviews from current customers of LUS Fiber? And what their thoughts on the customer service, and issues or non issues they have with the fiber services.
...
written by Ms. Moist Towelette , August 19, 2009 - 07:56 pm
LUS/Fiber will be successful when it gets a monopoly; like they have in electricity. Besides, technology has a way in changing. Fiber is likely to be the Beta Max of future. Then what? Well I guess we all could eat more fiber.
...
written by ragin_cajun , August 19, 2009 - 08:03 pm
I think that the obsession with Obama and Socialism related to LUS fiber is germane. LUS is losing money, and that will put stress on LCG budget according to the article. The point is that Obama's healthcare will do the exact same thing on a federal level. They are noticing a pattern of behavior from government. They create a government run business, tell us how it'll make/save money, and keep private companies honest by forcing them to compete. Then a year or two later, the program is implemented and it's losing money and taxpayers are making up the difference.

Personally, I think it's a bit early to tell whether LUS can make money with this or not. But if LUS can't get this thing making money pretty damn soon, there's gonna be big bond payments and angry tax payers :) Hope everyone thinks fast Internet is worth it, because it might get really expensive next year :)
...
written by JP , August 19, 2009 - 09:42 pm
Well, when you say "making money" it's not as simple as you portray. A prime objective of the LUS Fiber is to make Lafayette one of the first cities in the nation to have fiber optic communications, which should be attractive to companies looking for someplace to base operations. Fiber optics offer a lot of potential in the business, medical, and education fields.

Just at the whole "Obama socialism" thing is a simplistic cliche, attempting to boil LUS Fiber down to a six month balance sheet misses the bigger picture.
...
written by Ms. Moist Towelette , August 20, 2009 - 02:49 pm
Written JP "Well, when you say "making money" it's not as simple as you portray."

The trouble is that you can run out of taxpayer's money. In which case, I hope LUS/Fiber dies on the vine before they get into my pocket.
...
written by ragin_cajun , August 20, 2009 - 05:17 pm
JP--

"A prime objective of the LUS Fiber is to make Lafayette one of the first cities in the nation to have fiber optic communications, which should be attractive to companies looking for someplace to base operations."

That's ridiculous. If that's the real stated goal of LUS fiber, then I'm sorry I missed the debate on this a few years back when the referendum was voted on.
LUS has been selling high bandwidth fiber connections to businesses since 2002, and I don't think businesses ever flocked to Lafayette to get it. There were very few subscribers, and business was pretty anemic. That's a fact. Undeniable.

Also, making money is very simple. You either do, or you don't. It's a very simple thing to measure. And LUS-Fiber better start doing it. LUS said they would make money, many people doubted they would, and now LUS is saying that it's not as easy as they projected. If it loses too much money, people might start moving out of Lafayette to escape high taxes:) What if AT&T starts offering Triple Play services in St. Landry, or St. Martin Parish? THAT would be funny :)
Granted, 6 months is not very long, and we're still very early on with this, but this does NOT look good so far. People have every right to be upset if it's losing money and coming out of the taxpayers' pockets.


...
written by ragin_cajun , August 20, 2009 - 07:14 pm
Also, Obama IS a Socialist. That's not just some cliche--it's a fact.

"Socialism refers to various theories of economic organization advocating state, public or common worker (e.g. through cooperatives) ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods, and a society characterized by equal access to resources for all individuals with an egalitarian method of compensation."

Are you telling me that you don't think that Obama's policies fit that definition? Based on that definition, is it not reasonable and valid to label Obama a Socialist? If you want to argue that Socialism is better than Capitalism, then go ahead. But if you want to aruge that Obama is not a Socialist, well that's just plain irrational.
...
written by JP , August 20, 2009 - 09:46 pm
Nothing ridiculous, ragin cajun. I guess you did miss the debate. See here: http://www.lus.org/site184.php
"Direct fiber connectivity is the foundation of the LUS project which will bring vastly increased bandwidth between educational institutions and students' homes, allowing them to benefit from a world of education now beyond their reach. This advanced infrastructure will also give local businesses an opportunity to compete on a global scale that would be unobtainable without this technology, creating new jobs and attracting new businesses to the area.
NuComm International, a Canadian company that provides technical and service support, customer care, billing and data management to companies, announced on August 8, 2006, that it would be building its 14th and largest customer contact center in Lafayette. Company officials cited the city's technological developments, namely the LUS fiber telecommunications project, as a principal reason for locating here."

They don't mention the benefits to the medical field, either. Ultra high speed data transfer has huge potential for the future. I'm curious to know more about this high bandwidth that's been offered since 2002, and specifically how it compares to the current LUS Fiber.

Some people are so obsessed with bitching about government and taxpayers' money, yet our quality of life is really good here and we now have one of most advanced data and communications networks in the country.

Regarding Obama and socialism, it's off topic, but I would first ask for your source on that definition of socialism. Then I would say that the definition leaves a lot of room for interpretation. Then I would say that we have always had a mix of socialism and capitalism here in the U.S. Then I would say that Obama is not a socialist. Just one example is the secret meeting he had with health industry execs; they agreed to cut costs by $80 billion and Obama dropped his insistence on negotiating prices and dropped his insistence that we be able to import drugs from Canada. Indeed, he and the Congress seem to be caving to the industry, which makes sense since they (Reps and Dems) have gotten millions of dollars from the industry. So, no, I wouldn't call it socialism. I'd say that we've steadily been moving toward a corporate fascist state where big money industry virtually writes legislation.
...
written by ragin_cajun , August 21, 2009 - 01:27 am

JP--

This "high bandwidth" that's been offered since 2002 IS LUS fiber. There has been a "dark ring" of fiber around town for many years. The fiber was mostly hung on telephone poles in the air. Sometime after 2000, LUS bought hardware and contracted consultants to configure that hardware. So my guess is that around 2002, fiber was available to businesses in Lafayette, and it was called "LUS Fiber". I don't know what the price was, but I know for a fact that you could get 10 Mbps fiber connections from LUS in 2004 in the downtown area, and off Kaliste Saloom. LUS put the CPE (Customer Premise Equipment) in, it had an LUS sticker on it, it was fiber. The encapsulation on the link was ethernet, so that means that at that time it could have provided 10 Meg, 100 Meg, or 1 Gig depending on the optics installed in the network gear. Ten Gig optics are now available.

So most of these benefits to business, and to the medical industry, were already available from LUS long before the referendum for Fiber to the Home passed. And they're also available from AT&T and Cox, and in other cities around the country, and even other cities in Louisiana. So this is not quite as revolutionary as you and the marketing slick make it sound.

As for Obama, you're right. It's off topic. My source for the definition of Socialism was Wikipedia. I used it because it was the first link the search engine returned.
...
written by Taxpayer , August 21, 2009 - 02:33 am
Despite all of the unfounded, rhetorical noise, no "taxpayer" dollars have been used to fund this fiber project at all. That is unless you consider any dollar paid by a taxpayer as a "taxpayer" dollar. Using that definition, every dollar any of us pay for groceries or for anything is "taxpayer" dollar - because each of us is a "taxpayer", get it?

Now back to the substance of the article which was written based on income and expenses from only 3 months of bills - where only a very small part of Lafayette can being served...Does anyone reasonably believe any conclusions can be derived from that at all? The fact that the article points out that "May revenue was up 67 percent over April; June revenues represent a 41 percent increase from May" sounds pretty encouraging. In addition, the $1.1 million LUS Fiber has received from wholesale revenues from February through June is nothing to sneeze at.

Cox would not be making the improvements it is making in its Lafayette market if LUS Fiber was not here. Remember when Cox would tell customers "We do not have crews working on weekends, so we cannot respond to your cable outage until Monday"? That attitude has changed and Lafayette consumers are better off.

In my book, LUS has shown alot more responsibility and accountability on how it runs its business than Cox or AT&T ever have. "Think" hurricanes.

Whether you support this project or not, the LUS Fiber system is "our" system - it is owned by the citizens of Lafayette. Who would you rather send your money to, your company or somebody elses?

...
written by fiberless in lafayette , August 21, 2009 - 04:51 am
Possibly NuComm International is not all it was made out to be.
There are several postings here for the Lafayette center as well
as other locatons in the US and Canada.(view all 5 pages for more lafayette postings)

http://www.jobvent.com/companyBrowse.php?CompanyID=3459
...
written by CommonSense , August 21, 2009 - 03:08 pm
NuComm was given $1 million to "secure the investmen" in Lafayette. The money came from the state's Rapid Response Fund, a fund put in place by then Governor Kathleen Blanco to make Louisiana competitive with neighboring states. NuComm coming to Lafayette because of LUS Fiber is simply someone's public relations spin on the deal. Both Cox and AT&T have nationwide fiber backbones and more fiber than LUS - fiber that actually goes OUTSIDE the CITY OF LAFAYETTE. I'd like to know how closely NuComm has come to its estimated $115 million economic impact on Lafayette.

http://www.businessfacilities.com/bf_06_09_news4.php

...
written by LowerLafayette , August 25, 2009 - 02:11 pm
As a former Cox employee, I can assure you that Cox has always intended to upgrade its service. Upgrading is a constant process in the telecommunications industry and anyone that thinks the Cox upgrades are purely because of LUS Fiber is only listening to half of the story.

I remember reading a report on bandwidth testing about 5 years ago that proved existing hybrid fiber/coax networks could provide sustained bandwidth up to 500 Mbps. Still, networks have been upgraded since then. Don't believe the LUS hype. There is no such thing as "Future Proof." History is filled with dead businesses that thought they were future proof. Technology marches on.
...
written by ragin_cajun , August 25, 2009 - 02:51 pm
LUS Fiber is not "our system". It is LUS' system, LCG's system, and they will be charging taxpayers a monthly subscription fee to access the network, AND they will probably be charging city taxpayers if they don't run in the black.

Also, Cameron Communications has had "fiber to the home" for many years now, triple, IPTV, everything that LUS Fiber is just now trying to implement. Let's ask ourselves what Cameron Communications' service has done to spur economic growth in Cameron Parish.
...
written by Taxpayer , August 26, 2009 - 03:02 am
I remember prior to the fiber election that Cox insisted Lafayette did not need fiber and that Cox's existing system was providing all the bandwidth needed by Lafayete citizens and businesses. Now, roll the calendar to just a few months ago when Cox chose little Lafayette to roll out its over $100 per month 50 Mbps download (5 Mbps upload) system. If LUS Fiber did not exist, Lafayette would not have gotten Cox's attention. If you look at other Cox markets around the country, they now lag behind what Cox is offering in Lafayette. This means the power of competition has forced Cox to offer better services - a positive development for the community.

As a self-proclaimed geek, I understand the "Future Proof" nature of the LUS Fiber infrastructure is based on having the fiber throughout the system. As broadband demand increases, LUS changes electronics on each end of the fiber, not the fiber itself.

Because of a number of factors, Lafayette offers much more for economic growth than does the Cameron area. Numberous objective assessments suggest Lafayette as the most economically and culturally progressive city in the state. The fiber system adds to that uniqueness and opens doors to Lafayette that no other city can achieve.

It seems like some have a vested interest in seeing the city fail with this initiative. I, for one, cannot understand why we would not all want this to succeed. Our community will benefit as a whole from success. No one benefits from failure.
...
written by Terry Huval , August 26, 2009 - 04:17 pm
I have read the blogs and thought I should share a few other points with those of you who read and participate in this blog.

When LUS first got involved with fiber, it was for LUS's own internal purposes only. An electric transmission system requires a low-latency, high-speed communications system to react to interuptions on any part of the system. Failure to do so effectively can cause wide spread electrical blackouts, even if only one transmission line section was in trouble. Since the 1970's, we used a microwave communications system for those critical commmunications. LUS proposed an upgrade, and received council approval, to replace that microwave system with fiber connectivity. Many other electric utilities use a fiber system for this purpose.

After we did so, businesses (and residencies) kept pushing us to offer services from the fiber system. We studied the options and recommended a Governmental retail/Private Sector Wholesale model. That meant we would provide broadband and Internet connectivity to governmental entities directly (LCG, Courthouse, Public School System) plus we would sell that connectivity to entities in town that would resell our last mile connectivity to local businesses. The timeline for that initiative began with LCG Council approval in the fall of 2000 and our announcement that we were ready to serve wholesale customers under the brand "LUS Powered Network" in January, 2002. It was not until May, 2002 before we had service to our first customer - and it did not take long for some to suggest that LUS would not be successful with that effort. As it turned out, this initiative was more successful than we ever anticipated. Our business plan suggested that we would become cash positive in 4 years - we actually were cash positive in 2 years. It is now a $2 million a year business for us and it continues to expand. Our customers include major employers in the community whose operations critically dependent upon robust and reliable communcations connectivity. Beyond just the finances, the vast capabilities of the system are now being used by every public school in Lafayette parish plus by local government - allowing for advancing technology to be used by those entities.

Now to LUS Fiber (to the home and business)...we are still in the formative stages of deployment and are doing well. Any new business expects a few early challenges and ours is no different. We are dealing with targeted issues effectively and have already implemented software upgrades to make our system even better. We have even more upgrades coming soon. Our budget was based on continous improvements, just like we make in our conventional utility system. We are confident we will meet our deployment and financial targets.

We appreciate the huge support we have from the community and will be there to help any of you if you need. My office number is 291-5804. Call me if I can help with any questions or concerns.

Terry
...
written by Radio Controlled , August 27, 2009 - 02:27 pm
Huval says "Our business plan suggested that we would become cash positive in 4 years - we actually were cash positive in 2 years."

So it is a profit deal--just like Cox--but owned by the government and run by our trusted bureaucrats.
...
written by Terry Huval , August 27, 2009 - 04:22 pm
The difference between LUS and others is that 100% of the LUS dollars go back into the community in some form, whether it be for additional investments in our infrastructure or to help pay for the increased costs of providing government services, like fire and police.
...
written by Radio Controlled , August 27, 2009 - 07:56 pm
Huval "The difference between LUS and others is that 100% of the LUS dollars go back into the community in some form"

So trusted bureaucrats can have more money? I can't wait until LUS takes over the rest of Lafayette businesses.

...
written by CommonSense , August 27, 2009 - 08:56 pm
Interesting that the Independent removed Terry's words "purposefully skewed" after he got so much heat for it. At least the print edition still has the original content. Tsk, tsk, tsk, Independent, for selling your journalistic souls to political devils.
...
written by Walter Pierce, Managing Editor , August 28, 2009 - 05:45 pm
To CommonSense: The phrase "purposefully skewed" was not Terry Huval's, it was Nathan Stubbs'. Shortly after the story was posted on-line, a reader commented on the use of the phrase and drew from it a conclusion that was not intended: that LUS was somehow cooking the books in its business plan. In response, we determined that "skewed" does indeed carry a negative connotation and did not accurately reflect the intent of the writer, so we changed the phrase to "used," which of course led to the conclusion by the reader that the modification was done at the behest of Huval. It was not.
A moment ago I edited the on-line story (again!) and reverted it back to its original version, with "purposefully skewed" back in place. I do this not because we were caught in some nefarious plot to shove socialized fiber care down everyone's throat or to place a bureaucrat between you and your cable box, but to simply spray a little weed killer on the conspiracy theories before they take root.
In retrospect, the decision to modify a sentence to better reflect the writer's intent was the wrong decision. The editorial staff here has wrestled with this issue of late; on-line content, unlike the printed page, is malleable. This is new terrain, I'm sure, for many media. Hard and fast rules do not exist. The Associated Press, of which we're not a member, hasn't issued an edict. We'll figure it out. In the meantime, CommonSense, Soop and the rest of you eagle-eyed readers, please bear with us.
-Walter
...
written by Surpreme Leader (of the backyard) , August 29, 2009 - 08:41 pm
Oh gez, I thought it said "purposefully screwed" To wit, this is understandable, since the Fiber project is government owned.
...
written by Common Sense , September 02, 2009 - 01:13 am
Thanks, Walter, for writing to us, your loyal readers. That was a very great move and an excellent use of social media. I've mustered up some more respect for the Independent. ;)
...
written by NO-ONES AGENT , September 13, 2009 - 10:39 pm
WE AWAIT YOU NORTHSIDIAN > LUS VS US , " HAIL NAWTHSIDE " A FRONTAGE ROAD TO DA CASINAH !
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
LA LA Land
Advertisement

Read the Flipping Paper!

Click Here for the Entire Print Version of
IND Monthly
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it