News -> Cover Story

A Fighting Chance

20100519-cover-0101Wednesday, May 19, 2010
Written by Nathan Stubbs

Residents of Lafayette’s historic Mills Addition neighborhood — commonly referred to as Fightingville ­— have high hopes and deep suspicions about a proposal from Acadiana Outreach to bring urban, affordable housing to downtown Lafayette.

In the mid-1970s, Albert Sonnier tapped his savings to buy a second home: a single family house on Madison Street in the historic Mills Addition neighborhood that he planned to manage as a rental property.  He viewed it as the perfect investment: the 1940s, cypress-framed Arts and Crafts-style home would age well, and its location — a stone’s throw from downtown — would be ideal if and when the city ever revitalized its downtown. To boot, the house had celebrity connections: Sonnier bought it from the family of his distant cousin Marc Breaux, the Lafayette native who went on to work as a Hollywood movie choreographer on such classics as Mary Poppins, The Sound of Music and Chitty Chitty Bang Bang.

Dating back to 1856, Mills Addition — which runs between North University and the railroad tracks, north of downtown all the way to Cameron Street — is Lafayette’s oldest subdivision. As the place right outside the town of Vermilionville where residents would go to settle disputes, it also became known as Fightingville — a name that took on new meaning as crime, drugs and poverty took hold in the area throughout the latter half of the last century.

20100519-cover-0102
20100519-cover-0103
Acadiana Outreach's proposed Joie de Vivre development is a
$25 million, nine-building, mixed-use complex situated at the
intersections of Congress, West Second and South Pierce streets.

As Lafayette’s city planning director in the 1970s and 80s, Sonnier was a proponent of plans, just then starting to germinate, calling for the city to re-invest in downtown as a central arts, culture and business district . Sonnier’s daughter, Giselle Menard, often accompanied her father to the Madison Street house whenever he went to mow the grass, or clean out one of three apartments he set up there.


“I remember him telling me,” Menard says, “that there are these ideas about fountains and about ‘really making downtown the center again and that’s why I want this property. I want to have a place for the young, up and coming artists and musicians, people who make this city thrive. I want to have a place for them.’ That was his dream.”

“Unfortunately,” Menard laments, “[the neighborhood] started going down instead. He never saw his vision realized.” Albert Sonnier died in 1997.

In part because of her late father’s vision, Menard, who inherited her family’s Madison Street rent house in 2000, is now one of the enthusiastic supporters behind a proposed urban housing development sponsored by the Acadiana Outreach Center, a nonprofit organization that provides critical services to Acadiana’s addicted and homeless populations. The new development promises to be a magnet to young professionals looking for affordable housing near downtown and hopes to incite re-development throughout the area.

At a meeting last week of Le Centre Coterie — the Mills Addition neighborhood group formed at the beginning of the year by the city planning department — Menard joined several other members in voting to endorse the project.

Acadiana Outreach has zeroed in on about four blocks in Mills Addition, adjacent to its campus, an area many feel is ripe for redevelopment. The area is centered at the South Pierce intersection where Congress Street turns into West Second Street, directly across from downtown’s IberiaBank tower. Electrical services company Magnon Electric Inc. now occupies the bulk of the proposed development’s site. In addition, the site includes two adjudicated properties, about a half dozen privately owned homes, and five parcels already owned by Acadiana Outreach, two of which are currently serving as halfway houses. Acadiana Outreach is now in final negotiations to buy all the remaining properties.

20100519-cover-0104
Henry and Sonya Boudreaux

Plans call for a $25 million, nine-building, mixed use development with modern loft-style apartments above ground-floor retail space fronting Congress, West Second and South Pierce streets (planners aim to attract a grocery store, day care center and coffee shop). The project, still in the pre-development phase, is based on an Acadiana Outreach initiative to combat Lafayette’s shortage of affordable housing. Its sponsors hope to fund the development almost entirely through a combination of public sources: state and federal grant allocations, only some of which has been secured thus far, as well as some $20 million in federal tax credits it plans to apply for in August. If granted, the tax credits would then be sold to private investors for up-front capital (see Funding chart, Page 10). If all goes well, the development could break ground by early 2011 and open for business sometime in mid-2012.

Its proponents say it could be nothing short of transformative for the area — that it will be held up as a national model for publicly supported smart growth revitalization. Says Greg Gachassin, president and founder of The Cartesian Company, a real estate development and public finance company serving as the lead consultant on the project: “It’s never been done like this in a community of 200,000 people, not [one] that will make this kind of impact and use all of these different sources leveraged together. Not to this degree.”

The planned 118-unit complex — dubbed Joie de Vivre — will rent one, two and three bedroom apartments exclusively to low-income workers making no more than 60 percent of Lafayette’s annual Area Median Income (a requirement of the federal aid).
Based on Lafayette’s current AMI of $57,500, rent for the lofts will range from approximately $550 to $765 a month.

UL architecture professor Hector LaSala, a member of Acadiana Outreach’s board of directors and one of the visionaries behind the project, says the project will effectively extend downtown into the Mills Addition neighborhood — bringing young residents and active commerce with it. City leaders have long stressed the need for more housing downtown as the last piece in completing its rebirth as a vibrant community center.
More residents will create demand for a variety of retail businesses, the argument goes, and push back against downtown’s crime, litter and other nuisances.

The private sector has been slow to answer the call, LaSala says, because of the complications associated with developments in a dense urban area like downtown compared to the relative ease and low cost of building in the suburbs. “For us, we see this project as being capable of really changing our downtown and taking it to the next phase,” LaSala says. “Because once you do one [housing development] and it’s successful, I think the private sector will come and start developing. So we’re going to set a standard.”

20100519-cover-0105
Joie de Vivre's lofts will sport a contemporary, open layout.

Joie de Vivre was designed by a team that included architect Glenn Angelle and engineer Andre Montagnet working alongside representatives of the UL School of Architecture: professors LaSala and Corey Saft and graduate student Tim Dumatrait. Architectural renderings depict a sleek, modernist-style building with lateral windows and inset balconies. The apartment interiors sport a contemporary, open layout, with sliding walls and stainless steel kitchen appliances. The designers also hope to have Joie de Vivre become one of the first Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design certified developments in the state, an energy efficiency designation that will mean a substantial savings in utility costs for renters.

“Young people, buppies and yuppies are gonna fill up that place,” says Sylvia Cluse, referring to the abbreviations for black urban professionals and young urban professionals. Cluse, one of the co-chairs of Le Centre Coterie who owns an out-of-operation business on Simcoe Street she is currently trying to restore, says the development could go a long way in helping area businesses thrive. “I think people love the downtown area, there’s no doubt about it. They’re gonna make this thing overflow. I think it’s going to be beautiful.”

Not everyone in the neighborhood is gushing over the plans. In fact, several residents have serious doubts about the development’s success, expressing their sincere distaste for its hackneyed name — Joie de Vivre — and a soulless international style aesthetic they say would fit better in Stalinist-era Russia.

“We don’t want it,” exclaims Ty Hanes, who admits he has not seen the plans for the project. Hanes says he has little faith in a publicly funded project sponsored by Acadiana Outreach, especially one that will consist solely of rental units. “If there’s no ownership, there’s no pride,” he insists. 

Hanes has been at the forefront of an organic revitalization of Mills Subdivision. Last year, he and his partner, Kenneth Delavergne, bought two mid-century brick warehouses on Simcoe Street, and converted them into two new businesses: Hanes’ used and antique furniture store called retromodern and The Alamo, a work studio co-op for artists. This was their vote of confidence in the neighborhood, after five years of living in a restored Craftsman-style house on South Pierce and Simcoe. Just last week, Hanes and Delavergne signed papers to purchase the old St. Joseph Diner building at the corner of Simcoe and Madison streets. They’re planning their own development with the building — tentatively named Madison Square — that will consist of a two-story townhouse alongside three loft apartments and a restaurant.
Most of his apprehensions are rooted in a lack of faith in Acadiana Outreach, which he and other residents feel has only served to hold back progress in the neighborhood. Several point to arrest reports from the five “sober living” halfway houses that Acadiana Outreach now operates in the neighborhood, and the public relations nightmare that occurred last year when it was noted that alleged Baton Rouge serial killer Jeffery Lee Guillory had, on prior arrest, listed 124 Buchanan St., the location of Acadiana Outreach Center’s main campus, as his address.

“They are basically telling everyone here,” Hanes says, “that has worked to turn this neighborhood around over the last four years not to bother. All [this development] is going to do is turn [our progress] back around.”

Sonya LaComb-Boudreaux has a similar point of view. She and her husband Henry, an architect, live in the historic Brandt House, an Acadian-style home turned New Orleans town house by William Brandt, one of Lafayette’s first clerks of court, that lies one block over from the proposed site of Joie de Vivre. The Boudreaux home dates back to the 1820s, and the couple, who have spent the last 12 years renovating it, have identified it as the third oldest structure in Lafayette. Sonya and Henry fear how the impending development may impact the historic integrity of the neighborhood.
“I kind of feel like the Wetlands right now,” says Sonya, a museum consultant with expertise in antique interiors. “We’re in this kind of fragile ecosystem, and here comes this, not an oil spill, but here comes this development that threatens a lot we’ve been working toward.”

“We’re not afraid of this development,” Henry contends. “We’re not afraid of progress in our neighborhood. We’re a little afraid of what this could turn into. … And we’re a little afraid of the architecture.”

Ken and Andrea Veron, who own a restored Colonial Foursquare house on South Pierce that dates back to 1910, say they are cautiously optimistic about the development. “If they do exactly what they say they’re going to do, it can only be good for the neighborhood,” says Ken, who works as a real estate agent. However, as co-chair of Le Centre Coterie, he has been pushing for a little more assurance: he wants Acadiana Outreach and its partners to sign a Community Benefits Agreement that will bind them to certain obligations regarding security and maintenance of the development. “I’m just very leery about a bait and switch,” he says, noting that apartment complexes have a tendency to age quickly. “There’s concern that the business plan will change and that the neighborhood will be adversely impacted.”
Consultant Gachassin, who is packaging the financing for Joie de Vivre, says that both he and Acadiana Outreach are open to the idea of a Community Benefits Agreement, but that any contract would have to be reviewed and approved by all affected parties, including that of private investors.

In response to security concerns, Gachassin has stressed Joie de Vivre will be run by an experienced outside property management firm that will screen all tenants with a credit and criminal background check, hire professional on-site security, and enforce a strict rental agreement policy with zero tolerance for drugs and other criminal activity.  
Joie de Vivre has its roots in another proposed development from the Acadiana Outreach Center. In 2007, the center, under the direction of then-CEO Valerie Keller, announced plans for The Lofts at Olivier. The center envisioned converting a brick warehouse it was leasing at 114 Olivier St. into a 30-unit development that would blend subsidized apartments, including space for the center’s clients, with market-rate lofts and shared artist work spaces. 

In an e-mail to The Independent Weekly, Keller writes that the plan reflected the center’s expanding mission to address more than just the immediate needs of people living on the street. “We realized we needed to move further upstream,” she writes, “to focus on the root causes of why people weren’t self-sufficient — one of those is simply a lack of housing that’s affordable and near transportation and employment. And wanted to transition from charity more to a ‘social enterprise’ — providing market-based solutions to social problems.”

U.S. Sen. Mary Landrieu pledged her support for the project after visiting Acadiana Outreach’s campus and the surrounding neighborhood, citing the project’s aim to renew an area that had already been designated as a “qualified census tract” and “HUBzone qualified” neighborhood in need of revitalization, by the federal government.

To date, Landrieu has helped secure $992,500 in federal funds through the Transportation Housing & Urban Development’s Economic Development Initiative fund. In addition, the state Legislature (supporters include Sen. Mike Michot and Rep. Page Cortez) has thus far committed $265,000 in seed money to the project.
Gachassin says that to date, Acadiana Outreach has put approximately $125,000 of the funds toward acquisitions, while the rest of the money is still in the bank. Once an environmental clearance passes — Acadiana Outreach is still waiting on the Louisiana State Historic Preservation Office to complete its review — it will be cleared to begin using the rest of the funds to complete acquisitions. All professional fees tied to pre-development on the project are being covered by a $180,000 loan taken out by Acadiana Outreach.

This year, the center is requesting another $2 million from both the state and federal government for Joie de Vivre.

That request reflects the broadening scope of the project. Keller says that last year, after consulting with national development firm McCormack Baron Salazar, the center realized its plans were not financially sustainable and therefore shifted focus.
Enter Gachassin and The Cartesian Company. With his years of experience in both public financing and affordable housing developments (Gachassin is the prior chairman of both the Louisiana Housing Finance Agency and the Lafayette Public Trust Financing Authority), Gachassin formed The Cartesian Company at the start of this year to help foster developments looking to leverage a variety of public and private finance options. To make the center’s project viable, Gachassin recommended expanding the scope, moving retail space to front visible thoroughfares like Congress Street, and subsidizing the development up front through the sale of tax credits to private investors.

Here’s how the new business model will work:
This August, Acadiana Outreach will apply for a total of  $20 million in federal tax credits, to be taken in $2 million increments over 10 years, from the Louisiana Housing Finance Agency. If successful, the center can then sell the credits for approximately $15 million in up front capital to finance Joie de Vivre. Upon the sale of the credits, the buyer, known as an investor or limited partner — generally a major bank or other Fortune 500 company like Capital One or Dow Chemical — will then own 99.9 percent of the housing development. The limited partner maintains majority ownership through a mandated 15-year period. (It takes 10 years for the company to recoup its investment in the tax credits). As the project sponsor, or general partner, Acadiana Outreach will keep a .1 percent ownership interest. After that initial 15-year period is up, the limited partner typically donates or sells the property back to the general partner. Because the project will be seeking an extended use option with its tax credits, the development will still have to keep rent at fixed rates and abide by other federal compliance regulations for an additional 15 years.

Acadiana Outreach can still make money off the deal. Federal and state mandates do, however, limit profits for almost all parties involved. General contractors are limited to a 6 percent profit. On the overall development, a maximum 15 percent “development fee” can be shared between the sponsor, Acadiana Outreach, and any partners or consultants upon completion of the project (in this case, a total of $3 million).
In addition, based on an agreement hammered out with a limited partner upon sale of the tax credits, Acadiana Outreach also will likely receive a portion of monthly revenue profits. This profit is capped at 25 percent of total obligations for debt service and all overhead costs, to be split between the two partners.

“From a banking standard, it’s an extremely thin margin at the end of the day,” Gachassin says. “But in these situations, you’re able to be thin because there’s such a great demand, and you don’t have as much risk as you would in a more market rate environment.” As a 501c3 nonprofit, any money Acadiana Outreach collects through the development goes toward supporting the organization and its other initiatives.
Already, Joie de Vivre has garnered letters of support from a who’s who list of influential Lafayette organizations, including the Community Foundation of Acadiana, the Lafayette Land Revitalization Authority, the Stuller Family Foundation and the Lafayette Economic Development Authority. 

Cathy Webre, executive director of Downtown Development Authority, says the issue has not been presented before her board of directors yet, but that she has sat down with both project developers and concerned residents.

“The devil’s always in the details,” she says. “There are some concerns from residents about security and how this will fit in a very historic neighborhood, but it’s hard not to like the concept and see that this has at least the potential to be something really great for both the neighborhood and for downtown.”

Current Acadiana Outreach CEO Rick Newton, who took over from Keller at the beginning of the year (Keller still works for AOC as a contract consultant) says that the center is encouraging concerned residents to work with the organization. Due to concerns expressed about a perceived lack of communication from the center, Newton has touted having an open door policy.

“January is when we really went into pre-development,” he says. “That’s pre-development, and we’re having our formal presentation to the Coterie, the first public presentation, here at the beginning of May. That’s a relatively short period of time.

“I understand folks’ concerns, I really do,” he continues. “I’m aware of the history. All I can tell you is that I’m committed to being an active part of this community. We’re looking for ways to involve the community. I’m committed to going and being an active part of the Coterie, being a regular participant and looking for ways to increase the dialogue. I would just hope folks would give us a chance.”



Comments (56)add
...
written by Jason D. Faulk , May 19, 2010 - 02:12 am
Some are right to raise concerns as to whether the architecture fits within our local vernacular (it may well if it honors this critera on all 3 counts.) Also of good concern is whether this development should have future operations as a "complex," or if it should be simplified to a series of owner-resident occupied structures, with some to be sub-leased if at all for rental purposes, governed by an citizens' association compact. These are all important considerations for urban life and neighborhood stability.

Also of curiousity is whether the existing AOC owned properties and those which would need to be acquired are of any individual architectural/historical quality or if they are as a compositional series of structures in the part of the neighborhood. If the former is true, we would hope those 11 or so could be relocated to open lots elsewhere in the neighborhood, if the latter is true then the dynamics of this all would change. I hope to learn more from the Ind's coverage and from future meetings.

It is a hopeful point however that enhanced retail space is being considered. One might fantasize over the long unfulfilled dream of modern urban-scale grocery (to complement a downtown farmers' market.) Perhaps this location could fulfill the need.

Switching gears to another aspect of this discussion, there are matters to discuss about the notion of expanded retail downtown and the level of walkability to said retail and elsewhere in general. I would say that what has been left out in the total discussion over this Joie de Vivre project as far as I have heard and read is the nature of the Congress/Second streetscape itself. It is no doubt a beast with 40 mph traffic 5 lanes wide (in areas) that unless tamed, will continue to be a deterrant to neighborhood scale or even city scale developments. Essentially, downtown has a suburban artery running through its core when it cries for a more redundant grid, for more safe pedestrian crossings and for comfortable, easy promenading of the sidewalks. Unless the traffic is slowed, bicycle rights of way established and street front parallel parking permitted, I believe, we're likely to see this problem get worse, when, or if, the I-49 rebuild, converts Second and Third into an interchange zone. We will see a bulldozing of one or two blocks in the middle of the current 2nd/3rd streets alignment to make a railroad underpass. The whole area between Third Steet/South Buchanan up to Olivier will revert to a no- man's land.

Basically, walkability is already bad in the area. This development, regardless of it's architectural style could improve this, and it will require careful consideration from the Coterie, the planning office, LCG's traffic and transportation, DOTD (re: the interchange and realign) and finally, funding by LCG or other sources to properly streetscape the area.

Having said that, why does Madison Street still have open ditches 100+ years later? Did they just forget, or did the city run out of money once upon a time?

On the plus side, since the Ind last did it's Mardi Gras neighborhoods issue several years ago, it is a pleasant reminder to see the original and early names of these neighborhoods in print. One might hope for these names to be spoken of as commonly and referred to endearingly as many do when uttering "Freetown" from here onwards.
...
written by Conservatrice , May 19, 2010 - 07:18 am
Why focus on the people who don't live here; or whose business's are defunct & don't live here; or people who's opinions represent a conflict of interest, because they are part of the design team?
...
written by not black , May 19, 2010 - 08:38 am
So now we get the truth - it's only for black people?

"Sylvia Cluse, referring to the abbreviations for black urban professionals and young urban professionals"
...
written by math , May 19, 2010 - 08:45 am
the center realized its plans were not financially sustainable and therefore shifted focus.

Solution - build something to big to fail!
...
written by fees fees and more fees , May 19, 2010 - 08:47 am
a maximum 15 percent “development fee” can be shared between the sponsor, Acadiana Outreach, and any partners or consultants upon completion of the project (in this case, a total of $3 million).


Key word here is Consultant........how much of the $3m does she get of this taxpayer funded project!
...
written by Conservatrice , May 19, 2010 - 09:06 am
Merci Beaucoup & Amen Monsiuer Faulk!
...
written by Pork Belly , May 19, 2010 - 09:51 am
Cortez NGO allocation of taxpayer money was $350,000 - why does this article refer to it as $265,000.
Acadiana Outreach Center, $350,000 — Rep. Page Cortez, R-Lafayette
http://www.theind.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2549&catid=45&Itemid=12


Also, Mary thinks the target is low income. Someone should tell Mary that firemen and teachers aren't 'Low' income, before she blesses the project with an additional $2m of taxpayer pork.

Acadiana Outreach Center Smart Growth, Mixed-Demographic Housing Development
The Acadiana Outreach Center, Lafayette, LA
To develop mixed-demographic housing development for low and moderately low income individuals, and serve as catalyst for additional public/private development.
$2,000,000
http://landrieu.senate.gov/appropriations/upload/Transportation-HUD-Requests-FY2011.pdf

...
written by optimistic, but not yet convinced , May 19, 2010 - 09:53 am
With regard to this article, at least one quote from a long-time resident would have been helpful in showing a diverse perspective that reflects the diversity of this neighborhood. Just about all of these people quoted herein are folks who have moved into the neighborhood within the last 5 or so years.

It could be said that the failure of this development to live up to it's name would threaten the "investment" these people have in the community. This is certainly true. But what about those who have lived a lifetime here, and seen the decline of the neighborhood? Those who can't afford to leave, or to move somewhere else should things get worse as a result of this development? How do these people feel about this?

What if the new development is totally wonderful, and in time, those living on a fixed income can no longer afford their property taxes? How do those people feel about this possibility, and what rules can be put into place to protect long-time residents from the ugly side effects of gentrification?

It would seem like a Community Benefits Agreement would be the best thing this neighborhood could hope for (as we're all aware of the Outreach Center's innate ability to raise money), and we're going to need to raise awareness within the community about the progress of this project and find a way to voice our concerns outside the arena of the Coterie (which was not chosen by residents and consists mainly of non-residents of this neighborhood).

As a resident, I am cautiously optimistic about this development, and I feel that the key to getting the right types of people (not criminals and addicts) living in this development (and I think this is absolutely an attainable goal) is marketing the development as such.

Appealing to the right demographic is essential to attracting intelligent, community-oriented and at the very least, respectful people. I hope they use some of their $3,000,000 "developer fee" on a marketing and design firm to put together a strong campaign to strengthen this community, and perhaps that would be a good point for the proposed Benefits Agreement.
...
written by Lexi Tokeville , May 19, 2010 - 10:33 am
Ms.Cluse said buppies and yuppies.Don't be ugly.
...
written by marie broussard , May 19, 2010 - 11:35 am
To the developers and Acadiana Outreach. You deserve a chance at this if you take into account the concerns of others. No doubt affordable housing is needed in our community. I love the fact that this development in LEED certified. The problem I have is with the institutional,dormatory,architecture of this complex. It just does not fit into the neighborhood. It is very, very cold looking and needs to include ways that it can blend or assimilate with the historic nature of downtown Lafayette. Contemorary is great, if it tries to compliment the existing landscape. Add trees, connectors to important buildings forget the bright colors on your facade, blend instead. Man-made, synthetic siding only cheapens the development. Nice development, but not for this neighborhood. One other thing, how can the people be assured that in thirty years, this development won't be sold to the Lafayette Housing Authority or Section 8 Housing Investors/Managers and why can't these same federal tax credits be used to rehabilitate the existing historic homes with an agreement that homeowners keep them "affordable". The Federal Government seems to have an endless supply of money to give to those already have alot.
...
written by realitychecks , May 19, 2010 - 01:09 pm
I hope they use some of their $3,000,000 "developer fee" on a marketing and design firm to put together a strong campaign to strengthen this community, and perhaps that would be a good point for the proposed Benefits Agreement.
***************
Then again, what if the group continues with its past practices of giving itself glowing reports, nearly exclusively about helping "women and children" while the reality is that they were bringing in people with serious mental and criminal backgrounds? What if real police work continues to be suppressed to promote the glowing image? There should be no need for a fat advertising consultant's contract since it should generate great press if it holds true to promises. Such funds should go to neighborhood security, enhancement, etc.
...
written by Conservatrice , May 19, 2010 - 01:41 pm
To optimistic, but still not convinced:
We are long term residents & investors (12 years) & we were only minimaly quoted. The writer choose to focus on thoose that do not live here, why?
...
written by realitychecks , May 19, 2010 - 01:52 pm
If Lasala's work is already reflected by that mural, which is a ridiculous idea in any neighborhood and totally lacking in historical sensitivity, he needs to put this project at the ULL Horse Farm so he can stay hands on and get all of the credit! No problem with existing structures and he can make it as modern and/or ugly as he wants! His freshman students, who he thinks need to do volunteer work to be well rounded communists, I mean, citizens, can work amongst the handicapped and chronically mentally ill for their credits. And, where are the plans for phase 2 & 3?????
...
written by Conservatrice , May 19, 2010 - 02:15 pm
We gave the writer a quote from a man in his late 80's who grew up in Mills Addition in the 1940's, his family owned a business here for @ least 2 generations. His comment was "It makes no sense to stack poverty on top of poverty, we don't need that". The quote was not used. The gentleman I am referring to was once the bank president of First National Bank
...
written by UL Grad , May 19, 2010 - 02:51 pm
As someone who took classes at Fletcher Hall and had Hector LaSala as an instructor, his communist leanings were well recognized. Problem is, most art-associated majors agreed with him. Not surprising since most artists scream and shout that taxpayers should subsidize their products.
...
written by urban.org , May 19, 2010 - 03:20 pm
However, neither low-income families nor the communities in which they live will be well-served if affordable housing is rebuilt according to the patterns of the past.Historically, subsidized housing policies in New Orleans—as in cities across the United States—have isolated low-income families in large projects, earmarked exclusively for occupancy by the poor. These projects exacerbated racial segregation and isolation, polarized communities along lines of race and class, and helped create concentrations of minority poverty and distress (Schill and Wachter 1995).

.............need not repeat the mistakes of the past. Instead, affordable housing for low- and moderate-income renters should be incorporated into nonpoor communities. At the same time, distressed neighborhoods should be redeveloped to accommodate a mix of incomes, including people with very low income levels. These income-mixing strategies need not—and should not—simply displace low-income residents or discard the communities they have built.

A well-established body of social science research teaches us that concentrating poverty in this way undermines the well-being of families and children, and blights the surrounding communities (Ellen and Turner 1997

The special allocation of tax credits allocated in response to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita should give priority to proposals that will expand affordable housing in healthy, opportunity-rich neighborhoods, rather than concentrating it in distressed communities. And LIHTC projects should be designed to serve a mix of income levels

http://www.urban.org/publications/901042.html
...
written by Lexi Tokeville , May 19, 2010 - 03:44 pm
Try putting this in an "opportunity rich neighborhood" and see how far you get.
And if you are going to call a repected,recognized and published professor a communist ,at least have the courage to sign your name.What,did he give you a bad grade?
...
written by Lexi Tokeville , May 19, 2010 - 03:49 pm
...by the way, how many actual structures in this area are actually on the historic register? From the shrillness coming out of the more strident complainers, you'd think they were living in the New Orleans Garden District.
...just wondering
...
written by kristab , May 19, 2010 - 07:20 pm
dear optimistic. Greg G. admited at the coterie meeting that yes, poorer people who live here would probally lose their home to incresed property taxes. So... building something the majority of us who live here don't want, to house people, to possibly put other people out of their houses in the future. Sound exactly like a government plan. This neighborhood would be better served by single family housing. not a monolithic structure. But "they" all think they know better and NONE of the people proposing this plan live here. Even the new AOC director said he was moving to the south side.
...
written by realitychecks , May 19, 2010 - 08:46 pm
I’m committed to being an active part of this community.
......
should have ended with "from the southside of Lafayette where I will be living"..... not very convincing!
...
written by realitychecks , May 19, 2010 - 09:01 pm
lexi: "potential" applicants to the register is the standard for protective status. Hardly anything in the area is less than 50 years old.
...
written by Drone Attack , May 19, 2010 - 09:29 pm
Sylvia Cluse, buppies? I just hope they allow puppies.
Nonetheless, it is good to see there a desire to improve the area but not this.

Adding housing controlled by an organization running halfway houses, oh really? I would rather see Robert Daigle in charge.
...
written by Conservatrice , May 19, 2010 - 10:25 pm
To Lexi Tokeville:
Almost all (90%)of the structures in the Development site are older than 50 years old. This is the line of demarkation set by both the local & national historic registers for a property to be considered historic. Not all of the structures represent significant or contributing factures, but to answer your question: (1) National Register; (5) Local Recognition -(3) Register);(10)or more Significant structures that would qualify for both.
...
written by Conservatrice , May 19, 2010 - 10:42 pm
To Lexi Tokeville:
Mills Addition was once Lafayette's "Garden District". The list of historic register properties supplied shows how much of the City's history has been destroyed.
...
written by nope instead of hope , May 20, 2010 - 05:31 am
The new people should be required to live in their building!

BTW - does Carlus still live downtown - within walking distance? At least he wasn't ashamed to be considered among them. But thenn these new people see the homeless as a money to be cashed in - he saw them as human beings.
...
written by Lexi Tokeville , May 20, 2010 - 05:51 am
So there is one structure on the historic register. Every outhouse in the parish is a "potential" historic structure. I mean Broadmore would be an historic district if you went by the "50 years old" yardstick. More pourous argument.
...
written by C L Ludlow , May 20, 2010 - 07:04 am
My daughter lives in this neighborhood with my grandson. I am concerned that "project" housing for low income families will become what it has become in other cities. (example:NYC projects are notorious for crime and drug activity) Instead, building or re-building single family homes where residents become personally invested in the property and neighborhood, though slower, would be the better long term solution.
Use your money to help existing homeowners repair and improve their properties, build on vacant lots, affordable single family homes that compliment the existing architecture. (Your proposed design is unacceptably unattractive.) That is what will draw solid lower income people to the area. The opportunity to own their own homes. It's slower, but sustainable and will not draw criminals. I do not believe any kind of background screening for eligibility will successfully prevent dangerous tenants. That never works. Criminals will move in with their friends and relatives that DO pass the screening and there is nothing you can do about that.
If improving the area is what you really want to do then do it right, putting the development in the hands of the affected residents. Again, it is slower, but invested people make better neighborhood decisions than sterile, profit motivated entities.
If profit and AOC resource acquisitions are the primary objectives, do it where no one is currently living or wants to live.
...
written by Dennis , May 20, 2010 - 07:22 am
Devil is definitely in the details. Even without the concerns of residents and Historical Preservation societies (which have very valid concerns), I'm concerned about the business model.

$550-750 dollar a month rentals are already available in single family dwellings. In general people, especially musicians, require space and isolation from the noises of their neighbors. Why would I, a musician choose to live in an apartment for the same price as renting or OWNING a house? The people this will attract will not be artists and musicians. They will be the party going, disco hopping frat boys and girls who have taken over the downtown scene.

"If there’s no ownership, there’s no pride,” - I think this is true, especially in the case of high-rise apartments. This might sound great on the surface, but I hope everyone looks at the long range scope of building something like this in a neighborhood that's already coming back due to great strides by residents, musicians, artists & businesses who like the area for what it already is and the history it has.

BTW, Building it near the horse farm is not a bad idea, all joking aside. Apartment with balcony, overlooking park, near campus, priced right for students...
...
written by realitychecks , May 20, 2010 - 08:58 am
If you don't like what's happening in Washington, D.C., you must begin locally to take back the out of control spending and governement expansions. If Robideaux's bill goes through, ANY single family residence can be taken for being "underused" or "needed" greenspace. Here, the Poverty Industry Captains get big bucks from the feds; govt initiatives are being done through the thin veil of nonprofits and developers. They seek to dump middle class people out of their homes to create more housing for the poor. The developers will make big bucks and don't even offer enough money for people to move on if they actually desired to.
...
written by Jockimofinanay , May 20, 2010 - 09:48 am
Responding to Lexi Tokeville-

I encourage you to drive around to see the historic structures in this neighborhood. There is one on the National Reg, and that's only because the owners were so committed to preservation that they took the next step to honor the structure. There are many-- and by many, I mean several and by several I mean A LOT of houses in the neighborhood that would qualify for National Historic Registry. On one street alone I can count 7 that could be deemed historically significant enough to become nationally recognized. There are loads more that qualify for the local--it's up to the homeowner to do the legwork to garner that distinction; not the city, or the Preservation Alliance. Historic designations did not come about until the late 60s/early 70s when Vieux Carré spearheaded a huge movement to protect the quarter from what? Unscrupulous developers that {literally} wanted to demolish the French Quarter and replace it with {gasp} modernist architecture/new structures. And in one felt swoop, they would have been able to do just that if the Vieux Carré Historic District was not formed to rail against such an atrocity. I think you can see the trend here.

Its unfortunate that many Lafayette Residents are not aware of the true gems of this neighborhood--since it has been blanketed as "over there" and "undesirable". Did you know that the Saints Streets was actually where the 'working poor' resided for many, many years? Now everyone is clamoring for a 1000sf cottage to call their own b/c of the 'historical' and 'charming' nature of these properties. I agree, they are precious and its a great place to live and raise a family. But! A common misnomer is that this area is a cesspool of run-down shanty-houses of little or no value. Simply incorrect. If you wanted to be really technical about it, then the same could be said for Sterling Grove (a much smaller geographic area than Mills)--someone may venture to assert that there are only say, 10 historic houses in the area and hundreds of undesirable houses surrounding it, so why don't they just do away with all of it altogether and build anew..............see how far that goes with the incredibly vigilant homeowners of SG--not gonna happen!
...
written by Lexi Tokeville , May 20, 2010 - 10:25 am
Yea right, if he didn't see the homeless as money to be cashed in on the Pope ain't Catholic.Give me a break.
...
written by ragin_cajun , May 20, 2010 - 10:43 am
optimistic, but not yet convinced --

On Lafayette Tax Assessor's website, there's paperwork to apply for a property tax exemption type thing. It says that a person's tax assessment can never be raised if they're on a fixed income and meet some other requirements. Not clear on all the details, but it might be of use to you--lots of others, too. Check it out.
...
written by Conservatrice , May 20, 2010 - 10:46 am
To date we (preservationist) have found no extant outhouses in Mills Addition. If we were to locate 1 from the turn of the century it would undoubtly be listed on both the local & national register, if the owner permitted. I bet it would also smell better than the streets of DTWN after a weekend! I wish AO would look into outhouses for the clients they lock out after dusk, maybe then we wouldn't have the problems we currently have w/ public urination, etc. in our neighborhood. I guess I'm just an eternal optimist.
...
written by Solutions? , May 20, 2010 - 11:40 am
I used to live on Madison st. I can tell you this much, the crime is horrible. I had a police officer specifically tell me "do not walk around this neighborhood at night." You guys can try to defend this all you want, but this is a horrible idea. This will not revitalize anything in the downtown area. The crime in that area is rampant, along with prostitution and drug dealing. More revitalisation has been done by the people who live there and have established businesses in the area than this housing development (project) will ever do. BTW, there is affordable living all over lafayette. There is also affordable living in Carencro, Opelousas, Scott,..... get my point?

All things considered, the design is atrocious. DONT let this happen Lafayette. Street Scape established downtown as the arts and cultural center of this town. All this project will do is push it away.
...
written by Hugh Robertson , May 20, 2010 - 01:06 pm
I am the owner of a property on the other end of Monroe street from where this is proposed. A high rise, high density complex is the last thing I would like to see here. 7 stories? Out of your minds. A couple of stories might be ok, but just how over 3 - 400 people are going to cram into an area like this is beyond me. And this will be noisy. No way around that, unless the construction is a lot better than other modern buildings. Musicians and Artists? They need space to work and make noise that doesn't disturb neighbors. We are musicians and it is imperative that we have a fairly quiet neighborhood, this will push traffic way up making the whole neighborhood noisy. One parking space per unit? Guess you can rule out having any visitors. Who will want to live in such confined quarters? Not me, I don't even want to live down the street.
...
written by realitychecks , May 20, 2010 - 04:32 pm
The parking issue just might be indicative of what is to come. It is a warm and fuzzy feeling to think that here, in Acadiana, we will somehow lead the nation and be the new "standard" on green living and no need for autos. But, really? Is all of downtown set up for pedestrian living? Heck, the bars have to pay for police protection above and beyond taxation. Or, is it possible, that the "targeted" and "preferred" markets (read here reverse-discrimination-allowed-and-encouraged-by-HUD-funding) will not be able to afford cars or handle the responsibility for other reasons? just might, no matter what the spin and "promises" are....
...
written by realitychecks , May 20, 2010 - 04:43 pm
MESSAGE TO UPPER LAFAYETTE:

HUD litigation:
The Court bolstered its ruling with 160 pages of "Supplemental Findings" that chart HUD's role in decades of decisions that effectively restricted low income minority families to segregated neighborhoods in the central city. In conclusion, the Court announced that:

It is high time that HUD lives up to its statutory mandate to consider the effect of its policies on the racial and social-economic composition of the surrounding area...

How about development SOUTHSIDE?!!
...
written by Northsidian Shotgun , May 21, 2010 - 12:14 am
NPO'S future, and the future job security of their employee's can only be secured by a constant begging, and publically spoofing of assistance to the underpriveliged, its just odd that nowdays the underprivileged, ( In this scenario, earn much more than the national poverty level citizen ).
Someday the downtown will be like the Goliad Apartments in Houston,a Drug Addict or Drug Dealer in every apartment.......But, the Acadian Outreach must have a project going, else how can they divvy-up the governments Golden Eggs ?
...
written by MEMEL , May 21, 2010 - 09:36 am
not to take away concerns, those which are legitimate; here's a caution:

someone once told me that the acronym of FEAR could mean,

FALSE EVENTS APPEARING REAL.


...
written by Robert Walter , May 21, 2010 - 10:35 am
I like the idea of better development downtown but there are areas of concern: ongoing, upkeep, parking, and the design. Why build something that looks so out of place in an old downtown? Make it fit in. Also, if proper care is not given to ongoing upkeep, it will just degenerate into a 'housing project,' meaning a further blight to the area. Remember, when they redid Jefferson, they didn't foresee all of the bars moving in and now, the cross-generational nightlife they envisioned (visiting restaurants, galleries, etc) was overwhelmed by the "Bourbon Street" of bars for the 20-something. Buffalo New York tried something similar but their method was to promote the creationof small single family neighborhoods with ways for residents to own the home. Ownership builds pride. I fear the money could be better spent creating a more appealing neighborhood (one that requires existing landlords maintain their property) of small single-family housing.
...
written by Dennis , May 21, 2010 - 11:02 am
Re: Melmel

I love that quote and use it often, but I'll tell you these facts are real:

1. I am a musician and could never live in a place like that.
2. I don't know any other musicians that would choose to.
3. All my artist buddies live in modest places with their own character, little gardens, eclectic collections, etc. You know, places creative people like and are inspired to be in.
4. The price point is way off, because places like the aforementioned are already available at the same price or cheaper than these apartments.
5. Cramming a bunch of people into one tight space does not make crime go down.
...
written by Jason D. Faulk , May 21, 2010 - 01:26 pm
Robert Walter makes a good point, that ownership or at least, as was done in Curitiba Brazil, the option to remodel and customize public housing space for one's own needs, and permanence, resulted there at least, in a more rooted set of residents.
Having said that, this is not a public housing project. Any use of the word "project" as was instantly done by The Daily Rag framed the discussion of this topic in a negative connotation for the entire reading public that isn't even directly affected by this development.
This appears to be quite a step above any purely private corporate apartment "complex" or as I would prefer to call it, a "compound" such as the ones constructed over in Freetown.
If that project is informative to neighborhood fears towards what is expected to happen, it is no surprise that so many are at caution about this. Our historical record of action is not good, and we have few to no examples especially in Lafayette with which to counter this "project" mentality in our own minds.

One other thing, I'm not sure what conservatrice was applauding my first comment for, but what I'd like to say here is that it seems strange that so many believe this development would degenerate into housing for the shiftless and unskilled labor force, and the plethora of negative stereotypical personality types, when the requirements to get in are certainly not poverty wages. Last I checked, many of our skilled, college educated service level workers don't clear this 60% of the average income level in Lafayette, seeing as that our local economy is somewhat bloated by high-end medical salaries, oilfield sector wages and being a center of law and banking for the region.

I think there then is too much alarmism from many persons with respect to nature of your fellow citizens that would be eligible for, and WOULD DESIRE TO LIVE IN an urban loft arrangement such as this.
Not everyone wants to live in a detached single family home dwelling (though cottages on small lots are attractive to my own sensibilities.)
...
written by May Day, May Day , May 21, 2010 - 01:37 pm
Nice try, Bad idea. Clear out the bums then half the problem is solved.
...
written by MEMEL , May 21, 2010 - 02:58 pm
what is the PHOBIA about the design being contemporary?

would this people like to dress like they did in the 19th century, drive around in FORD Ts, give up electric stoves and go back to ICE BOXES?

silly nostalgia. FEAR OF THE NEW!

LAFAYETTE has a great local CONTEMPORARY ARCHITECTURE right next to traditional/ historic like the UNIVERSITY ART MUSEUM and the ACA addition right up against the old HARDWARE STORE.

question: why should architecture be the only art or technology that does evolve?
...
written by MEMEL , May 21, 2010 - 03:03 pm
well, DENNIS, obviously it is nor for you, but i can tell you that musician-son cannot wait to apply to live there.

to each his/her won: diversity being the spice of life, primarily in downtown, which is the attraction.

n'est-ce pas
...
written by MEMEL , May 21, 2010 - 05:21 pm
WOW, should have rechecked not just the spelling but also right eord usage:

corrections:

MY musician-son cannot wait to apply to live there.

AND

why should architecture be the only art or technology that does NOT evolve?
...
written by Conservatrice , May 21, 2010 - 05:22 pm
To Jason Faulk:
I appreciated you discussing 1)the ownership vs. rental option; 2) the concerns about relocating any historic structures that may be in the line of fire of the development; 3)the huge issue w/ crossings @ Congress St. I have watched numerous neighborhood children attempting to cross Congress to got to the library very nearly loose their lives, because people drive 50-70MPH @ Congress & Madison (Speed Limit 35MPH); 4) you spoke of the open ditches on Madison St.-I have been lobbying non-stop for a sub-surface drainage & culvert project, finished w/ hardscaping to increase streetside parking, non-stop for 12 yrs. I was told that the city no longer provides culverts & that owners can elect to instal them @ their own expense. All of these issues are issues that the newly formed Mills/Hopkins Addition Neighborhood Association have, all things we hope to address w/ our CBA
...
written by Existentialist Homme , May 21, 2010 - 09:32 pm
""" CONSERVATRICE, " The city does not provide culverts, to residential curbing
only in RIVER RANCH, but then that is, "Joey's GOLDEN GOOSE".
And a wall to muffle motorist vehiciles,and nice landscaping,only in JOEYWORLD.
...
written by realitychecks , May 22, 2010 - 06:24 am
It is not "phobia" and "fear". Complaints are based on REAL LIFE EXPERIENCE over many years with the sponsoring agency. Federal funds always come with strings attached, don't they? It is also based on the actual HUD REGULATIONS that will control the matter regardless of what the "promises" are. The unaccounted for 40% of residents will be what? Can't discriminate against HUD and AOC's NGO app says it will be a "service enriched" environment. Who needs those services? The chronically mentally ill? Prisoner reentries? Rehab "graduates"? HUD has sponsored Round Table discussions about housing such population for years.....
...
written by realitychecks , May 22, 2010 - 06:27 am
Land is available next to the Federal Court House and also the Horse Farm!
...
written by The Original Northsidian , May 23, 2010 - 04:59 pm
It's not about the people, it's about how much money they can make off the back's of people. None of the yahoo's promoting the deal live in the area!! This is typical for all of the do=gooders of the world. Try putting something like this in their neighborhood and see how much hell they raise!!
...
written by Cajun History , May 23, 2010 - 07:12 pm
memel must NOT be a cajun. His/her distain and hate for the cajun/french people and for lafayette's history is just to apparent. Tear it down and destory it.......that's the theme over and over when memel speaks. memel let's everyone know - there's no value in the history of Lafayette. Don't let outsiders like this destroy our community.
...
written by Continued.... , May 23, 2010 - 07:17 pm
written by realitychecks , May 19, 2010
I’m committed to being an active part of this community.
......
should have ended with "from the southside of Lafayette where I will be living"..... not very convincing!

And I would like to add.....
Or from New york - where to consultant lives!

Is there at least one paid employee of AO that lives in the neighborhood? Seems like if they created such a great environment and added so much value - that all of the employees would have wanted to live near their work!
...
written by realitychecks , May 24, 2010 - 08:00 pm
beautiful property wide open at Holy Rosary!
...
written by new road , May 24, 2010 - 08:48 pm
all kinds of property on the new extension they just opened. and there is a gold course right there......very very popular area. and good schools too. lots of land. brand new road.
...
written by realitychecks , May 25, 2010 - 05:51 am
If ULL has two architects contributing and acting as urban planners, planning on getting praise and accolades for participating, then if it goes awry, does the University have a liability to the community? I really don't think this social experiement should be designed by the kids at the university. Seems the University should put it on the Horse Farm if it supports this.
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
LA LA Land
Advertisement

Read the Flipping Paper!

Click Here for the Entire Print Version of
IND Monthly

Read the Dining Guide

Click Here for the Entire Print Version of
IND Eats Dining Guide
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it