News -> Cover Story

Smoke Signals

20110316-cover-0101Wednesday, March 16, 2011

SMOKEOUT
Smoking in bars — is 2011 the year a ban comes to Louisiana?

Health nuts, privacy whacks, cigarette lobbyists and all of our favorite lawmakers will be throwing down during the spring regular session over how much smokes should cost and where they should be burned down. (Plus $18,430 in donations worth knowing about.)  By Jeremy Alford


Whether it’s Gov. Bobby Jindal’s chief of staff spitting in a cup just off the House floor (the lower chamber subsequently adopted an internal ban) or campaign donations spread around by cigarette manufacturers, tobacco has always had some role to play in modern Louisiana politics. Dating much further back to the Bayou State’s most primitive politics, circa late 1700s, the Choctaw and Chicksaw tribes grew a specialized tobacco known as perique for their own cultural and economic needs. It’s actually still harvested today in St. James Parish and has cultivated an international fan base for its supposed fruity and complex flavor.

Only a few dozen acres are being farmed these days. But in 1922, there were some 1,000 acres of perique growing around the area of Grand Point. That was the beginning of the Golden Age of Smoking. Just watch an episode of the period series Mad Men or any of the historical Mardi Gras documentaries on WYES and you’ll see throngs of glamorous people smoking anywhere and everywhere.

It’s also around the time government started to sniff out the policy potential of tobacco. In 1926, the Louisiana Legislature passed its first ever tax on cigarettes — a penny for every dime worth of the price on a pack.

This particular issue comes with enough statistics to keep the fire burning well into the spring regular session. According to the Louisiana Tobacco Control Program, more than 734,000 people in this state smoke cigarettes and one out of every 10 pregnant women continues smoking while carrying a child.

Louisiana has the second highest rate of cancer in the nation, and the state Department of Health and Hospitals has posted the following as “fact” on its Web site: “Even if it doesn’t kill, secondhand smoke can cause all types of illnesses, including lung cancer, heart disease, nasal sinus cancer, respiratory disease, bronchitis, middle ear infections, asthma and pneumonia.” Then there’s all the stuff they print on and include in cigarette packs.

Just last week, the mother of the late Maceo Bevrotte Jr., a former card dealer at Harrah’s New Orleans, filed a federal lawsuit against Harrah’s owner Caesars Entertainment Corp., claiming her son’s cancer was due to prolonged exposure to secondhand smoke in the workplace. The suit asked the judge to certify the lawsuit as a class action, meaning 1,000 nonsmoking Harrah’s employees could become plaintiffs. As The Independent Weekly went to press, Caesars Entertainment had no comment.

When lawmakers convene their session on April 25, these are the kind of sound bites you’ll hear most often. First and foremost, it seems like everything is lined up for another political battle over smoking in bars and casinos, which are the last bastions for tobacco consumers under Louisiana’s Smoke Free Air Act. A complete ban was approved by the state Senate last year but later failed to gain traction during a hearing before the House Health and Welfare Committee. In anticipation of a rematch, sources say bars and casinos are already working on various marketing campaigns.

“There will be a bill filed for consideration this year,” says state Sen. Rob Marionneaux, D-Grosse Tete. However, he isn’t ready “to disclose the details of the bill at this time.” Marionneaux, a term-limited lawmaker prepping a run for Iberville Parish sheriff, grabbed headlines statewide last year for pushing legislation to ban smoking in bars and casinos.

A gifted trial lawyer, Marionneaux oftentimes crafted the debate as David versus Goliath. As far as campaign finances, it’s easy enough to see on paper.

In May of last year, after passing the Senate by a vote of 23-12, Marionneaux’s drive was dealt a fatal blow when the House Health and Welfare Committee rejected his bill by a vote of 8-4. No big surprise really; the committee has a reputation for sacrificing just about any bill that would discomfort the tobacco industry. Just consider that in 2009 and 2010, members of the House committee drew at least $18,430 from tobacco companies, related subsidiaries and connected lobbying firms, according to the Louisiana Ethics Administration. Committee Chairwoman Kay Katz, R-Monroe, leads the way, of course, with $4,150 such contributions. She voted against Marionneaux’s proposed ban last year, along with Reps. Richie Burford, R-Stonewall, $1,000; Jean Doerge, D-Minden, $1,274; Robert Johnson, D-Marksville, $1,500; John LaBruzzo, R-Metairie, $2,250; Bernard LeBas, D-Ville Platte, $579; Scott Simon, R-Abita Springs, $1,750; and Thomas Willmott, R-Kenner, $1,427.

But remember, practically everyone on the committee has tobacco-related loot in their campaign kitties. Voting for Marionneaux’s ban were Reps. Regina Barrow, D-Baton Rouge, who received $750 in donations; Walker Hines of New Orleans, then a Democrat but now a Republican, $1,750; Rickey Nowlin, R-Natchitoches, $1,250; and J. Rogers Pope, R-Denham Springs, $750.

If the push for a complete ban falls short, anti-smoking advocates will probably have another policy horse to follow during this year’s regular session, which is dedicated chiefly to fiscal issues. Stewart Gordon, president of the Louisiana chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics, told the Baton Rouge Press Club on Feb. 28 that his organization is actively supporting increasing taxes on cigarettes. With the state facing a $1.6 billion budget shortfall, the idea is sure to stimulate more than a few lawmakers. “We do support a tobacco tax,” Stewart told the press club.
 
Go buy a pack of smokes today and you’ll pay 36 cents per pack in state taxes, well below the national average of $1.45; Louisiana is actually much closer to where it was in 1926. In 2009, the last time the Louisiana Legislature conducted a fiscal session, the House Health and Welfare Committee shot down a $1 tax hike, which would have created a new state tax of $1.36 per pack.

For now, it’s all about the statistics — you know, those sound bites that are about to take over the airwaves as the regular session draws near. There will be musicians, black jack dealers and bartenders carted out in an all around dog and pony show. But the stats will still top everything else, like a recent study released by the Institute of Medicine, the independent health arm of the National Academy of Sciences, which suggests that approximately 1,000 children and adults in Louisiana die each year due to secondhand smoke exposure. While a sobering stat on its face, the report also gets to the point of politics and reveals that smoke-free air laws and regulations are effective at actually reducing the risk of heart disease.
 
What the report doesn’t cover, though, and what few can easily predict right now, is what kind of fate such anti-smoking bills have when faced by a governor who refuses to pass taxes — no matter the cause and effect — and a Legislature that is largely up for re-election later this fall. There’s also no way to tell if lawmakers are actively collecting money from Big Tobacco prior to the session’s start, since the next reporting period is still several months away.
For all parties involved, it’s enough to make you want to light one up.

Jeremy Alford can be reached at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .


Kill Bill
Eight members of the House Health & Welfare Committee, all of whom received tobacco money, voted last year against a bill prohibiting smoking in bars and casinos.

Rep. Jean Doerge    $1,274
D-Minden 
 
Rep. Richie Burford    $1,000
R-Stonewall

Rep. Bernard Lebas    $579
D-Ville Platte

Rep. Robert Johnson   $1,500
D-Marksville

Rep. Kay Katz    $4,150
R-Monroe

Rep. Thomas Willmott   $1,427
R-Kenner

Rep. Scott Simon    $1,750
R-Abita Springs

Rep. John Labruzzo    $2,250
R-Metairie


20110316-cover-0103
Grammy-winner Chubby Carrier, left, Lafayette
businessman Zachary Barker and
musician David Egan are fighting to end smoking
in Lafayette bars.

Not Just Blowing Smoke

Lafayette’s David Egan is taking his fight to the streets of Lafayette, hoping to make it the first city in the state to ban smoking in bars.
By Heather Miller


Lafayette musician David Egan profoundly recalls the empty looks on the faces of state lawmakers who sat on the House Health and Welfare Committee last year as he shared his cancer survival story and his charge to ban smoking in bars and casinos statewide.

Egan, a poster child for the Let’s Be Totally Clear movement to end smoking in the only two public places in Louisiana where smokers can still light up indoors, was soundly defeated.

But where there’s smoke, there’s fire — and Egan is marching on in his role of “putting a beard” on the fight to end smoking in bars and casinos, venues he and countless other musicians, like Grammy-award winning zydeco band leader Chubby Carrier, frequent to earn a living. Though new smoke-free legislation may be filed during the upcoming session, Egan, Carrier and others with a stake in public health have left the steps of the Capitol and are taking their message to the streets of Lafayette — the city they hope will be the first in the state to extinguish smoking at bars through local ordinance.

When the Louisiana Smoke-Free Air Act was enacted in 2007, Tobacco-Free Living Program Manager Carrie Broussard says the measure not only barred smoking in most public places, it also gave local governments the authority to establish their own smoke-free policies — stricter laws that could include bars and casinos.

“There hasn’t been any traction in Baton Rouge, but local leaders have the ability to protect every employee in every workplace, whether you’re in an office, or you’re making the drinks, or you’re playing the music,” Broussard says. “Why should anybody have to put their health on the line for a paycheck? We have a great culture that exists only in Lafayette. Why don’t we protect that?”

On the state level, the defeat of the smoke-free legislation is linked to the tobacco lobby and its stronghold over state lawmakers. For Egan, Carrier and Lafayette businessman Zachary Barker, a Hub City newcomer from Nashville who has joined the cause, the local opposition includes several layers of arguments that, for the most part, trace back to long-standing traditions and ideology.

“For some, it’s about government intrusion. You’re telling someone who smokes that the establishment, or Big Brother, or whatever you want to call it is saying you can’t do this,” says Barker, owner of the adult networking and intramural sports group Acadiana Sports League. “But no one’s saying you can’t smoke. Just don’t smoke inside. You’re not taking away people’s liberties. Look back at prohibition. Did it stop anyone from drinking? No. You think it’s going to stop anyone from smoking? No. It’s just going to stop them from smoking in an environment where the smoke is trapped and forces people who have chosen not to smoke to take in those toxic fumes.”

Carrier, who has been performing for sold-out crowds in smoky bars and dance halls since he was 10 years old, says bar and casino owners often claim that smoke-free events will draw the smoking crowd to other smoke-friendly venues and thus have a negative impact on bar business. After witnessing the record crowds at his smoke-free shows in California almost 20 years ago, Carrier disagrees.

“If you give the people a chance, let them know [they’ll] come hear some good music in a clean environment, I think more people will come,” says Carrier, whose father died of lung cancer. “When I get on stage and say it’s a non-smoking event, I get a lot of applause. I think in Lafayette people are afraid to take chances and make good choices.”

Blue Moon Saloon owner Mark Falgout has his doubts on whether larger audiences would suddenly appear if smoking was outlawed in bars, he says, but also points out that the issue for bar owners is slightly more complex.

“Most of the money at the door goes to the musicians,” says Falgout, who has hosted smoke-free events at Blue Moon for Carrier and Egan in the past. “People who smoke drink more. If people come in and pay but don’t drink as much, then I can’t survive. I understand the health argument. But it’s a choice.

No one’s making them smoke, and no one’s making them go to places where there is smoking. People would live longer lives, and eventually it’ll come to that. Bars are one of the last-standing places. But as a business owner, it’s tough. There are mixed thoughts. There’s a correlation between people who drink and people who smoke.”

But what if all local bars and night clubs were smoke-free? Would a clear stage for all still discourage smoking patrons from a night out to see local musicians at the quintessential live music venues that largely define Lafayette’s culture?

Legends partner and manager Steven Canedo says two out of five Legends locations are smoke-free, and Canedo hopes to eventually transition all of Lafayette’s Legends to non-smoking establishments — a task he believes would be made easier if all bars were smoke-free.

“It’s hard right now because people are so used to it,” Canedo says.

A recent study by Louisiana Tobacco Free Living maintains that 17 out of 22 bars in Lafayette where smoking is permitted have “unhealthy,” “very unhealthy,” or “hazardous” air quality levels, according to standards outlined by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The average air quality levels of the smoking bars were 16.6 times unhealthier than the average air quality levels found in the five non-smoking bars tested in Lafayette, Broussard says.

“The people who were smoking in the establishments, they’re going to come back because that’s where they like to go,” Egan says. “They’ll be angry for about a week and then they’ll get over it. But then there’s a whole other demographic of people who didn’t come otherwise. We romanticize things about the Old South, and smoking is something some diehards are holding on to. But we don’t pine for the days of open sewers or lynchings on Main Street, and a lot of other filthy things we’ve let go of because the day came where we just had to let it go. This day has come, or will come very soon. Why doesn’t Lafayette be on the leading edge of that and not be one of the holdouts? It’s inevitable.”



Comments (22)add
...
written by ragin_cajun , March 16, 2011 - 10:58 am
Why can't the bar owner have a choice? Either ban smoking in your bar, OR you can install a ventilation system that removes smoke from the entire building?

You could install a ventilation system in a building that creates a strong enough draft that second-hand smoke wouldn't be an issue.

That way people could still smoke in the bar, AND bar workers and musicians would still be safe.

If second hand smoke is REALLY the issue, then the problem is solved by requiring ventilation.
...
written by Tabacco Road , March 16, 2011 - 12:01 pm
Will tobacco be available for religious purposes?
...
written by question? , March 16, 2011 - 02:04 pm
how good is this ventilation system if the person next to you is blowing the smoke over their shoulder and into your face? Its worthless.
...
written by Smoking Blows , March 17, 2011 - 06:13 am
All the Louisiana business owners fighting this ban have to do is to see how smoke-free laws have affected other states who've already enacted bans. The bans have either no-effect or have conversely been a boon to bars and restaurants.

It's pretty simple, the only think in the way of smoke-free laws are the tobacco industry and their foolish minion militant nicotine addicts.
...
written by ragin_cajun , March 17, 2011 - 07:37 am
" if the person next to you is blowing the smoke over their shoulder and into your face?"

I see your point, now. You're right, this scourge of tobacco smoke MUST be eliminated NOW--at ALL COSTS. After that, we must quarantine anyone who has a cold, flu, or any other communicable disease. Second-hand spit is at least as serious, if not more. And it is much more common than second hand smoke, too.

I think that there should be fines for anyone in a public place with any communicable disease or tobacco product. That would increase public revenue, increase public health, and ultimately spur economic development. We MUST do it now, FOR THE CHILDREN!!!

In fact, I think that this new cadre of local enformcement agents for these public health ordinances should be drafted from the public at large. It is each citizen's obligation to serve the public, and we should have mandatory service on the new enforcement division for every citizen for 3 weeks a year.

That way, the city would get this new revenue, public health benefit, and economic development, and it wouldn't COST A THING!


...
written by RCajunrunner , March 17, 2011 - 08:44 am
Easy solution. If you don't want to inhale second hand smoke, don't work in or patronize bars that allow smoking inside. There are smoke-free bars in Lafayette.

Have we really become that inept as a society that we have to ask government to protect us from cigarette smoke by banning it on bars, the one place you'd normally expect smoking?

By the way, I don't smoke and really don't care to have my clothes and hair smell like it. But we have the individual freedom to choose, don't we?
...
written by ragin_cajun , March 17, 2011 - 01:07 pm
" But we have the individual freedom to choose, don't we? "

No. We don't. This is what it's come to in our state, and in our country. We do not have the freedom to choose anymore. And many people in our state, our country, our city, would prefer NOT to have the freedom to choose.
...
written by Stephen Clark , March 17, 2011 - 03:36 pm
Sorry, but I don't think an individual has the right to smoke any where but in their own home or on their property and even then with certain restrictions. Personal rights and perogatives takes a back seat to other concerns. So I shall fund your health care needs merely because you suffer from a laryngeal or esophogeal cancer? Yes, because its the moral thing to do. But we must also tax the hell out of tobacco products so that we can pay for that treatment. You may not enjoy you carcogenics at my expense. I went into a Jackson Mississippi breakfast shop a few years ago and almost chocked within 30 seconds of entering. The soke was sickening. I commented that here in lafayette we don't smoke in restuarants and the waitresssmailed and said " Tank Gawd theres a fewh places where we can still smoke ." then took a hit off that Marlboro. I quit 20 years ago, thank you Dr. Earnie Wong but I'm still hacking. Ban the damn things! I have a right to breathe. You do not have a right to smoke.
...
written by ragin_cajun , March 17, 2011 - 07:14 pm
"So I shall fund your health care needs merely because you suffer from a laryngeal or esophogeal cancer? Yes, because its the moral thing to do."

You've GOT to be KIDDING me!! How do you figure YOU pay MY health care needs?! You don't, and you shouldn't. I have no right to anything that you have to provide for me. That's madness.

And even if you DID fund my health care, that doesn't give you the right to dictate how I'll live. What I smoke. What I eat. Who I screw. How much I drink. How I think.

Because you fund others' health care, do you think you should be able to tell them they can't be gay? Gay men have MUCH higher incidence of AIDS--that's a very expensive disease. Should you be able to tell people what food they can and can't eat? Perhaps we should ban sex out of wedlock--now THAT has a VERY high social cost.

I've paid my entire working life for government services that OTHERS consume. Not once have I EVER wanted to tell others what they can and can't do. Difference in people.
...
written by RCajunrunner , March 17, 2011 - 07:42 pm
Wow. Are we that inept as consumers that we are incapable choosing a place to drink a beer where smoking is not allowed by choice of the bar owner?

You've never heard of the Tap Room or Wine Loft? If you don't want to drink in a bar with smokers, then don't drink at those bars.

FYI, I don't smoke. Never have, never will. But I don't need the nanny state to protect me from smoke-filled bars. Restuarants, I can start to see your point, but bars? Seriously?
...
written by Walter Pierce , March 17, 2011 - 08:36 pm
Some of this commentary speaks to cultural norms and ignores what seems to be well-established science regarding second-hand smoke.
RCajunrunner and ragin, would y'all be OK with someone spraying an equal parts-per-million of pesticide in a bar you're hanging out in? What about something as innocuous as hair spray?
How 'bout smoking in a day care center? Y'all OK with that? Children are resilient; they heal fast.
Why is it that bars/casinos are the last stronghold for smokers aside from the dumpster out back?
The tobacco and liquor lobby have anything to do with that?
While it may be the "choice" of patrons to go to a particular bar, it's not nearly as much the choice of the people who work there, especially the musicians.
We should condemn them to emphysema because of their poor "choices"?
I'm a smoker by the way. Initially by choice but now by addiction, a lack of will power and cultural norms.
...
written by Walter Pierce , March 17, 2011 - 08:38 pm
Addendum to my last sentence: And because smoking is sooooo damn satisfying!
...
written by Northsidian Shotgun , March 18, 2011 - 12:55 am
Yes Walter, smoking is soooo satisfying, so is personal masturbation, and its quite easy to quit both, both are messy and nasty...get help and dump the crutches. Join the order of the Crucifible Sebastian Monks.
...
written by RCajunrunner , March 18, 2011 - 05:19 am
Walter, there may have been two things you missed.

1) I stated that I can see the concerns of those who don't want smoking in restuarants. I don't know if outright ban is the answer, but fine. Obviously, no. I don't want someone smoking in a daycare either near my children.

2) No, I would not be ok with someone spraying pesticides in a bar while I'm hanging out. Certainly, if I know a bar owner allows such a thing to be done, I won't go there in the first place. I'm sure just like smoke-free bars, there would be pesticide free bars opening up and advertised.

Look, it is a bar. It's not a restuarant where there could be children under 18. Everyone who walks into that bar (in most Lafayette bars) is 18 or older, meaning old enough to vote, old enough to join the military, old enough to smoke, and as far as I'm concerned, old enough to drink.

At most bars, you are expected to encounter drinking, smoking and cussing. Again, go play music or work at a smoke-free bar. Plenty of restuarants, which are now smoke-free, have live music.
...
written by question? , March 18, 2011 - 09:03 am
I do only go to the "non smoking bars" that you speak of. Thanks for the suggestion but why should I be limited to by choices of bars because of the smoking? Go outside
...
written by SmokingIsForLosers , March 18, 2011 - 09:31 am
Walter - thanks for pointing out the actual point of this article which everyone seems to be missing. It's not about the patrons as much as it is about the employees. All employees should have the same protection under the law. We cherish our musicians, so let's stop making them sick. And dancing is just easier when you can breathe!
...
written by Northsidian Shotgun , March 20, 2011 - 12:29 pm
Its a Fng choice it does not fall under "RIGHT, no-one should have a fng say over ones, fng choice, rights are what we stand up and are willing to fight for, choices are personal,
and no-one should subject their self to an affronty of ones space.....
...
written by Northsidian Shotgun , March 21, 2011 - 07:56 am
Walter , I stopped smoking 3 years ago and gained 20 lbs. I paid a seamstress to stressfree the waist line of all my pants, spread some coins around and helped the economy locally, did my share of recycling for this year, Saved a small rayon/poly field, and beat the "GoodWill, outta their growing individual profits, I know this will not put me at the forefront of Lafayette's," Man Of The Year. Walter, ya think possibly, I'll break into the top 100, EH ?
"I'm just not convinced that any serious comment posted receives the attention it deserves, nor aids in a solution to any local problem brought upon us by man, therefore, my contribution is to inject a little spice into these problems which seem to always, arise locally, and impart a little flavor to the problem making it easier to ingest by all the population.
" I could have been ah contender, I just did'nt train and get with the program.
...
written by Atchafalaya Woodpecker , March 21, 2011 - 08:00 am
N.S, pooyie dude, ya strong, I can smell ya from heah.
...
written by ragin_cajun , March 21, 2011 - 09:36 am
" nor aids in a solution to any local problem "

My comment proposes an excellent compromise that preserves the rights of ALL concerned. No one liked it.

So then I proposed ANOTHER solution that stops the scourge of second hand smoke, increases city revenue through fines, creates a new enforcement division at LCG, AND does it without paying salaries and benefits to the new enforcement agents.

No one likes that, either. So I'm with shotgun -- serious comments posted do NOT receive the attention they deserve. :)
...
written by lets see this another way , March 21, 2011 - 01:17 pm
Lets look at this another way...Remember the days that people smoked next to your desk the whole time you worked? It was not a pleasant experience and you probably got sick alot. But those are days past and Now you have smoke free air in your workplace.
Musicians and bartenders are All musicians and bartenders are asking for is that same right to work in a smoke free environment like we all .. BUT NOT THEM..enjoy. That's what the bill boards mean by Equal Air for All.
YES they choose to work in bars BECAUSE that is their workplace...
but everyone chooses their profession, we all certainly do according to our talents. The difference is we get smoke free air in our office and they do not.
So lets look at it from their point of view ( a very smoky one) .. and think of the days when we had to endure smoke filled offices.
Would we want to go back to that?
...
written by Jeffrey Duplechain , March 24, 2011 - 12:55 pm
My son plays music and I regret to say in places where it is not smoke free.I worry about this because he does take care of himself physically so inhaling smoke at bars is not good.There is more room outside than inside so go outside if you must smoke and let everyone breath better.
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
LA LA Land
Advertisement

Read the Flipping Paper!

Click Here for the Entire Print Version of
IND Monthly

Read the Dining Guide

Click Here for the Entire Print Version of
IND Eats Dining Guide
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it