News -> Cover Story

Rehab

20110817-cover-0101Wednesday, August 17, 2011
By Heather Miller
Photos by Robin May

Mismanagement at its Abbeville treatment facility and the evaporation of outside funding sources have left Acadiana Outreach Center reeling.

Newly appointed Acadiana Outreach Center CEO Jill Meaux is no stranger to the organization that’s been serving homeless and drug-addicted clients in Lafayette for 20 years.

Hours into her new top post, the former community relations director for Outreach was tasked with laying off half of the agency’s employees whom she had worked alongside for almost two years.

20110817-cover-0103
Jill Meaux, CEO of Acadiana
Outreach Center

Meaux’s sudden move to the top of the Outreach ladder is indicative of the agency’s problems. While not insurmountable, it is a painful and rugged hole from which to climb out.

Like many nonprofits, an unstable economy and continued cuts in state funding over the past few years have hit close to home at AOC, one of the largest private nonprofits in the area. The downward funding trend created a need for more steady income, one that wasn’t overly reliant on charitable donations and government grants, according to Outreach board member Rob Robison. The brainchild of that notion was Three Graces, AOC’s 75-bed alcohol and drug addiction treatment center in Abbeville.

“The goal was for it to be a positive cash flow that would support our traditional mission, which is addressing the root causes of homelessness,” Robison says.

After a national search for a new CEO, the board in January 2010 hired Rick Newton of Little Rock, Ark., to head the outreach center and its pursuit of a profitable treatment hospital. Before joining AOC, Newton spent 30 years working with recovery patients in a clinical setting.

The plan was for Three Graces to take in a mixture of both traditional Outreach clients and patients with their own health insurance or other means of paying for treatment.

Market surveys commissioned by the board showed the project to be a viable vision, prompting AOC to lease a former nursing home in Abbeville and begin the conversion process into a full-fledged treatment facility. Its opening was nine months later than planned due to permitting delays and other factors, but Robison says the volunteer advisory board for AOC had no reason to believe the project wasn’t coming together as planned.

“We were led20110817-cover-0104 to believe there would be a patient population; once the doors were open it would be populated,” Robison says. “In reality that just didn’t happen. They were overly optimistic all along. Until mid-June, we were under the impression that everything was fine. Once it was made clear to us that this wasn’t the case, we became more actively involved to get a clear reading of the whole situation.”

By mid-July, the board learned that Three Graces wouldn’t be self-sustaining for at least another six to eight months. It was a dire outlook for a nonprofit with limited resources.

“The budget only allowed us to carry it for a fixed amount of time,” Robison says. “We had to shut it down. There was really no other option.”

The patients who were residing at Three Graces have since been transferred to Lafayette. Meaux says the clients are still receiving the same recovery services that the nonprofit agency’s been offering since its inception.

“They’re just not getting them at a nice, big, beautiful facility in Abbeville,” she says.

But the 15-16 months of pouring money into a facility that never came to fruition has had a ripple effect on AOC’s operations here at home.

In addition to slashing the agency’s staff in half from 20 to 10, AOC is temporarily scaling back some of its services. The Recovery Action Center, where people in need can stop in during the day to shower, use the phone or to wash a load of laundry, is no longer staffed full-time. The action center, along with the Well-Mart clothing and food donation center, will only be open on Thursdays unless volunteers come in to donate time.

20110817-cover-0105
AOC board member
Rob Robison

Despite the setbacks, critical services that the agency provides to the under-served in Lafayette are still moving forward. The AOC school supply drive concluded recently with 250 children receiving full bags of materials they need to kick off the school year.

“It’s those things that make my heart happy,” Meaux says. “There are many businesses in the country right now going through economic challenges, as are we. We’ve had to downsize our operation, but we hope that soon we’ll be able to get back to full speed. The board has worked tirelessly to make sure we’re still here working on our core mission, and we are committed to that, committed to continuing the services to the addicted and the poor that we’ve always been committed to.”

Board members have even dipped in to their own pockets to help out. Robison explains that board members give hefty donations to the agency every year through its annual fundraiser, Palates and Paté. The yearly event is months away, but some board members have already stepped up and given their $10,000 donation to help cover payroll and day-to-day needs.

“We haven’t had much time to do anything but react, a kind of triage if you will,” Robison says when describing the past few weeks. “We’ve been identifying problems and seeking solutions. It’s like drinking water out of a fire hose right now.”

The board hasn’t found any evidence of theft or abuse of funds, though Robison says they’ve discovered “a fair degree of sloppiness” in reviewing the program’s management. Robison declined to be more specific because the issues deal with personnel, he says.

“The whole rationale for bringing Rick on board was to run the facility, so we told him we couldn’t work with him anymore,” Robison says. “The whole reason for this was to counter the funding and grant cuts. Now we’re back to the reality of continued cuts in Baton Rouge.”

Since news spread about AOC’s financial overhaul, the community has raised questions about the potential impact on Joie De Vivre, a six-building, $16.5 million mixed-use, affordable housing development near downtown that’s expected to break ground in September and be finished next year. The project has received mixed reactions from community members. Though most have spoken out publicly in favor of the project, some Mills Addition residents have concerns about the project’s potential impact in their neighborhood.

20110817-cover-0107
AOC's operations have been scaled back.

“Our detractors in the neighborhood were detractors even before Joie De Vivre,” Robison says.

The Joie De Vivre plans remain intact, and Robison says the completion of the project and developer’s fee — approximately $750,000 — that AOC will receive from it will be a key factor in the agency’s reopening of its scaled-back services. Meaux is quick to point out that although housing applicants must meet income requirements to be accepted into Joie De Vivre, there is no limit on how much money residents bring home once they’re living there.

“It encourages people to work and make more money. They’re nice apartments. They’re safe apartments. To live there, you have to pass a drug screen, have to pass a credit check, have to pass a background check. You have to be able to pay your rent. Economically, it’s a redevelopment of, in my opinion, some pretty ugly lots,” Meaux says. “It’s an urban feel where cooks, and bank tellers and artists and waitresses who work downtown can live downtown and afford to live downtown. That’s part of our mission. It’s helping people get sober, housed and employed.”

Just like the critical services offered by Outreach, Meaux says Joie De Vivre is “a wonderful project, something our community needs.”

And just like the countless Outreach clients who have hit dire financial straits at least a few times in their lives, the nonprofit that’s helped them for so long is facing its own rehabilitation, one that started in disappointment but will, according to plans, rebound to the service level Outreach was achieving before Three Graces disgraced the agency’s day-to-day work.


Comments (50)add
...
written by eiswright , August 17, 2011 - 05:09 pm
Kudos to Jill Meaux for tackling this. She is braver than most.
...
written by krista fontenot , August 17, 2011 - 05:16 pm
Ugly lots, most of those are unattended lots owned by AOC, and our neighobrhood is in the shape it's in becaus of AOC and their coplete lack of regard for the people who live here. get ready for homeless people bating in the proposed fountain. where do you live ms meaux?
...
written by krista fontenot , August 17, 2011 - 05:30 pm
sorry i did not spell check that!
...
written by babyboomer , August 17, 2011 - 06:47 pm
“It’s an urban feel where cooks, and bank tellers and artists and waitresses who work downtown can live downtown and afford to live downtown. That’s part of our mission. It’s helping people get sober, housed and employed.”

So...AOC's mission is to help bank tellers, artists, waitresses, and other who work downtown to find affordable housing downtown? I thought the center's focus was on helping the homeless and addicted.

...
written by The homeless are more diverse than you think , August 17, 2011 - 08:13 pm
You apparently are not familiar with the homeless and addicted- many of them are bank tellers, artists, and waitresses who live downtown.
...
written by hector , August 17, 2011 - 09:07 pm
Reality Check #974:

2/3 of the development's foot-print was an industrial site, owned by Magnon Electric (a gravel yard and metal warehouses) plus a couple of abandoned buildings across Pierce Street.
...
written by realitycheck , August 17, 2011 - 11:40 pm
The opposition to the development hired attorneys to represent them. Assertions that cheerleaders from outside the community outnumber the opposition are absurd! More than 50 property owners/business owners who are most familiar with AOC's reputation in the neighborhood presented opposition. Opposition continues....





...
written by realitycheck , August 18, 2011 - 12:00 am
Ms. Meaux should do some research on HUD restrictions for maximum income in LIHTC:
INCOME RESTRICTIONS
To ensure that LIHTC properties serve low-income households, the program restricts maximum household incomes of prospective residents by measuring their incomes against the Area Median Income (AMI).

The federal rules impose a maximum household income limit of either 50% or 60% of AMI, depending upon the building's minimum set-aside (20-50 or 40-60), as discussed above.

In addition to the federal 50% and 60% set-asides, states may also impose their own more stringent income restrictions, adopting maximums that are lower than the prevailing federal limits.

AMI also varies depending upon household size. Household size is taken into account when qualifying the incomes of prospective residents.

MAXIMUM RENTS
Maximum allowable rents are calculated based upon formulae that account for (a) AMI, (b) imputed utility costs and (c) the rental unit's number of bedrooms.*

The maximum allowable rent is equal to 30% of the Area Median Income (AMI) associated with the unit's designated set-aside (e.g. 60% of AMI, etc.), less an imputed "utility allowance" (a budgeted amount of resident-paid utilities.) The theory is that a household earning the maximum income associated with the unit's set-aside should not spend more than 30% of its gross income on housing and utilities costs.

The maximum allowable rent also accounts for a unit's number of bedrooms. The AMI used for calculating the maxmum rent is based upon a hypothetical household size of 1.5 occupants per bedroom for those units containing one bedroom or more, or 1.0 occupant in studio/ bachelor (0 bedroom) units.

It should be noted that the income, utility allowance and household size assumptions used to establish maximum rents are based upon imputed, rather than actual, amounts:

•The rent limits are not set based upon the tenant's actual income, but upon the AMI of the set-aside of the unit being rented. Actual household income is used to determine eligibility for renting LIHTC units, but is not used to set the rent.
•Utility allowances are imputed based upon generalized cost estimates made by local housing agencies or utility companies. The utility allowance is not based upon a specific property's budgeted or actual expenses, nor is the utility allowance adjusted retroactively to reflect a building's past operations.
•The household size used in selecting the applicable AMI is imputed based upon bedroom count, not the actual size of the household. Although the number of members of a household will determine its maximum qualifying income, the number of members does not impact the allowable rent.*
The utility allowance includes the tenant's imputed costs of essential utilities, such as water, sewer, trash service, and natural gas and electricity costs associated with normal household usage, heating, air conditioning and cooking. Expense categories paid for by landlord are excluded from the utility allowance. The imputed costs of cable television and telephone service are also excluded from the utility allowance.

The maximum allowable rent, based upon the 30% of AMI amount but excluding deductions for the utility allowance, is commonly referred to as "gross rent." The maximum rent amount that can be charged to the tenant, which is inclusive of the utility allowance, is referred to as "net rent." The tenant's actual rent burden may not exceed the "net" amount. In those cases when landlord pays all utilities, the net and gross rent amounts will be the same.


...
written by hector , August 18, 2011 - 01:05 am
.

A duly elected Coterie representing the WHOLE neighborhood (and not just Madison St) voted unanimously FOR the project with only one abstention.
...
written by Don't you have anything better to do!? , August 18, 2011 - 10:05 am
Thanks for the cut-and-paste. Why don't you use your valuable time to HELP by volunteering at the Outreach Center or another charitable organization instead of complaining.
...
written by James Melancon , August 18, 2011 - 12:47 pm
written by hector "A duly elected Coterie representing the WHOLE neighborhood (and not just Madison St) voted unanimously FOR the project with only one abstention."
-----------------------

Who and how were they elected?
...
written by It's all about the money , August 18, 2011 - 02:16 pm
No wonder they were pushing to build Joy of Liviing - they needed the $750,000 up front money for float their other BIG mistakes. What do they call that? Check kiting? So everything that drives AO is about getting more money from taxpayers for bigger and grander things. That's the problem with America's budget today.
...
written by It's all about the money , August 18, 2011 - 05:13 pm
A duly elected board Hector? My impression is AO went to a lot of trouble to put members on that board that were supporters of AO and not people living in the neighborhood - so they could load the vote in their (AO's) favor and then back door and say they hand the neighborhood support. THe board did not represent the owners of property in that area - it was loaded and represent people who had a different agenda.
...
written by HISTORY , August 18, 2011 - 05:16 pm
This is for Anthing better. What is a more proper use of one's time than the charitable cause of preservation of the unique culture and architecture that those of us who have had families here for many generations are trying to preserve? I can see that people who aren't from here wouldn't appreciate our history and past, but it is a worthy cause for use to preserve as much of it as possible before it is all destroyed by people who are not rooted here and have other agendas.
...
written by krista fontenot , August 18, 2011 - 06:50 pm
the coterie is a joke. they do not actually represt the people who live there in a sufficent manner. YOU HECOTR should not even be on the thing, because you have an AOC agenda and not a neighborhood one. Put your money where your mouth is. Effin move in!
...
written by krista fontenot , August 18, 2011 - 06:56 pm
Do you think they will run background checks on boyfriend/girlfriend who stay with the renters?

I bet if it had been complete, everyone from 3 graces would have been moved there!
...
written by realitycheck , August 18, 2011 - 07:28 pm
Support of the project did not include any disclosure about the Land Use Restriction Agreements (Rent and price controls) that HUD will require for 30 years. Nor has there been any public disclosure of AOC's "target" population.
...
written by hector , August 18, 2011 - 08:03 pm
Here's the Coterie Membership that voted unanimously (but for one abstention)to approve JDV:

Sonya Lacomb-Boudreaux, Ken Veron, Sylvia McZeal Cluse, Hector LaSala, Stephanie Cornay Dugan, Gisele Menard, Lumas Williams, Sherrill Lorio, Kevin Senegal, Dee Riley, and Amy Dalcour
...
written by hector , August 18, 2011 - 08:10 pm
Krista, the AOC owns a lot of property in the neighborhood and so I--as a member of their board of directors--was representing their interests.

Which is no different than what everybody else was doing.

You might not like the AOC but that's how democracy works: everybody has a right to participate, even those one disagrees with.


...
written by hector , August 18, 2011 - 11:51 pm
.

Oops, I need to add that Mr Ken Veron was chairing the meeting, and thus could not vote, since in the event that there would have been a tie, he could cast the deciding vote.
...
written by krista fontenot , August 19, 2011 - 01:09 am
Oh, please, Gisele and Sylvia shouldn't be on that thing either, but at least they own property here. You are a member of linc, as you introduced yourself the other night, that in itself is a conflict of interest. You have no real vested interest here. You're also AOC, I wouldn't brag about how they have affected the neighborhood, cause they treat it like a toilet, literally!
By the way, None of this project seems to have been done on the up and up. Gachassin has his well documented problems. To continue to do business with someone who is so questionable is tantamount to "looking the other way"

AOC, can they pay the 1 mil mortgage they took out? Aren't they supposed to take out an additional 4.5 mil and be fiscally viable to participate, they are gonna own it in 10 to 15, or 30, depending on what meeting Gachassin is holding. What bout the past audits? Why is Valerie Keller gone? There are rumors! What about the Katrina money rumor? Remember, all rumors are based in some fact or another?

So who cares what the coterie votes. They are an ineffectual group. Put together by LINC to ease us into the project. They aren't even an actual representation of the neighborhood. IE: You! Pitiful.

Wouldn't is be nice to have honest, open civic leadership that didn't do things on the sly?
...
written by hector , August 19, 2011 - 12:00 pm
.

Good morning to you, too, Krista!



...
written by hector , August 19, 2011 - 12:12 pm
.

For the record: Valerie left in order to attend Oxford University in England to get her MBA.

She now lives in NYC.
...
written by realitycheck , August 19, 2011 - 12:49 pm
The coterie chairmanship was high-jacked. Opposition was not allowed to speak and denied agenda listing while more than ample time was given to promote the program in multiple meetings. and LURA has never been addressed; a convenient ommission. Democratic? hahaa
...
written by James Melancon , August 19, 2011 - 01:03 pm
by hector: Here's the Coterie Membership that voted unanimously (but for one abstention)to approve JDV:

Sonya Lacomb-Boudreaux, Ken Veron, Sylvia McZeal Cluse, Hector LaSala, Stephanie Cornay Dugan, Gisele Menard, Lumas Williams, Sherrill Lorio, Kevin Senegal, Dee Riley, and Amy Dalcour
--------------------

Duly elected? This is an appointed board, so where is the public vote?
...
written by NORTHSIDIAN SHOTGUN , August 19, 2011 - 02:09 pm
The Public Vote is yet to be seen, its revelation is forthcoming, its in a sealed capsule to be opened and revealed to the public on the fifty-fifth anniversary of its inception, along with, "WHO DID JFK ? Was it LBJ or Lady Bird ?
...
written by JMLLAF , August 19, 2011 - 02:23 pm
I love how all of these people are able to spend their time here b--ching and complaining. Ask one of them to volunteer? They will be too busy! One of the huge problems with our country today is that everyone wants to complain, but no one wants to get involved and do something. Maybe if you spent some time volunteering at AOC the "toilet" you speak of would be cleaned. I spent time volunteering there and found that my view of the organization changed drastically. I personally am tired of the N.I.M.B.Y. attitude! When I was young, you came together as a neighborhood. You knew your neighbors and helped them at any opportunity. We have gotten too conceited to see where we need to help. We are also very quick to complain, but not to offer assistance. I personally give no merit to someone who wants to b--ch but refuses to get involved, so all of you complainers How have you gotten involved? And I don't mean how have you opened your mouths to complain after the fact!!!
...
written by hector , August 19, 2011 - 02:48 pm
.

realitycheck wrote:

"The coterie chairmanship was high-jacked. Opposition was not allowed to speak and denied agenda listing while more than ample time was given to promote the program in multiple meetings.."

I cannot speak for the rest of the membership BUT those allegations are not correct; it might just be that a member's motion did not get seconded or majority support.

And that happens all the time in our democratic process and under Robert's Rules of Order.

...
written by Gisele , August 19, 2011 - 04:32 pm
Question to krista: why do you spend so much time hating your neighbors instead of contributing to worthwhile projects like tree planting, trash bash, fixing bikes and playgrounds for kids, and yes, sharing food with those less fortunate. It mades me smile EVERY TIME!
...
written by Anthony Boudin , August 19, 2011 - 05:20 pm
written by Gisele "and yes, sharing food with those less fortunate."
------------------------

Maybe we should consider stop sharing food and let the excess population die off.
...
written by Gisele , August 19, 2011 - 06:09 pm
...in addition, krista. I'm not sure why you would be so critical of Mrs Sylvia McZeal Cluse whose family has LIVED in the neighborhood AND opened one of the FIRST African American businesses over 60 years ago. Long before you or I, or the coterie, her family was here working hard, paying taxes and giving a helping hand to those in need.
Sometimes it helps to listen when others speak, Krista. Their stories may inspire you!
...
written by Gisele , August 19, 2011 - 08:47 pm
Let me tell you a little more about the so-called " jokers" who do not represent you on the coterie, Krista. Your neighbor, Ken Veron who worked dutifully as co-chair for almost two years giving ideas and insight for the master plan.
Loretta Glover started our first neighborhood organization, LaPlace DES Creole.
Kevin Senegal, cinematographer and historian who has spent countless hours archiving the WHOLE history of our neighborhood. Not just the parts that interest you.
Tessie Shelvin, community leader who works hard along side his sweet wife Daisyand other neighbors to keep the cemetery clean and beautiful.
Hector LaSala, who by the way,remained on the coterie even after we voted in favor of JDV. Why did he stay? To carry out the master plan WE all contributed to.
So if you want to criticize the organization, krista, you have every right. But don't criticize MY FRIENDS.
...
written by Sylvia Cluse , August 19, 2011 - 10:22 pm
Small minds cannot conceive of the greatness of serving fellow man, being a visionary, and acting on a noble conviction. After 28 years of serving a a licensed, professional social worker in the State of Louisiana under the inspiration of a father and mother who lived and had a thriving dry cleaning business on the 900 block of Simcoe Street, who fixed his neighbor's broken plumbing in the middle of the night as a favor, who brought people to the polls to vote, who at 67 years old received his GED, then taught upholstering at the Lafayette Regional College on Bertrand, who along with my mother, a day worker in someone's house, taught me to love my fellow man...I took it as an honor to be selected as Co-Chair with Ken Veron. I was not selected by the City..I responded to a mail out sent by the City of Lafayette's Planning Office. I sought to bring order out of chaos. At the end of our 1st year there was a renovated J W James Park, community trash bashes, a community meet and greet, a voted on set of Coterie goals for community improvement, established "Crime Watches in our area," to name a few. I can no longer stand the taste of bile when otherwise "intelligent" individuals spew out vile ideas that denounce the good that some may do for others. By the way I made some wonderful friendships on the way to the Coterie meetings...
...
written by Confused , August 20, 2011 - 12:05 am
So Syliva is the one that doesn't live in the neighborhood nor does she own property there? I'm confused. Also is she the one who stopped people from saying anything oppossed to JDV at that meeting at the church. She pulled them/ stopped them from talking and said something to the effect that we won't have that? I'm I confused or is that her.
...
written by Contributions , August 20, 2011 - 12:06 am
Watch the campaign finance reports of the current city council and look who got money from Greg recently when it gets published. the numbers may surprise you (or not).
...
written by hector , August 20, 2011 - 12:22 am
You are indeed VERY confused, Confused.

Ms Sylvia Cluse DOES own a business on Simcoe St.
...
written by Gisele , August 20, 2011 - 11:28 am
To Confused: let's follow your premise; do YOU live in the neighborhood? When was the last time YOU showed up on a Saturday morning to contribute to ANY community beautification project? I'm sure NEVER because I have participated in most, and organized many. The people who help are the same people I described earlier. Not the complainers like you.
Like Krista said, put your money where your mouth is. Better yet, put your effort where your HEART is, like those of us who have given two or more years to SERVE our community on the coterie!
My wise father, ALBERT SONNIER always told me to be part of the solution and not part of the problem.
You are part of the problem, CONFUSED.
...
written by Thanks to the coterie , August 20, 2011 - 12:30 pm
The whole community not just the neighborhood owe the coterie a wealth of thanks for working to improve the environment for all of us. Thank you on behalf of many.
...
written by Gisele , August 20, 2011 - 01:21 pm
I know I speak for Sherrill Lorio, who is working in the neighborhood at this very moment, in saying thank you. We have received many more blessings through our efforts than you will ever know.
What an honor to serve this great community!
...
written by krista fontenot , August 20, 2011 - 03:54 pm
Gisele, I am not opposed to planting trees and picking up trash. I am opposed to the coterie approving jdv. cause when it turns in to a giant halfaway house nobody will be knocking on your door at 2 am for money, or whatever. If you a too blind to realize that that thing is gonna be a problem because of AOC, you are not paying attention!
...
written by krista fontenot , August 20, 2011 - 04:01 pm
And by they way Gisele, i have never been invited to those things, and did not know aobut them, other that the tree planing Jimmy and I helped with. I don't hate my neighbors! Ask the ones who know me.
...
written by krista fontenot , August 20, 2011 - 04:03 pm
Yes Confused, you're not really confused. Sylvia was the one who stopped people from talking and she owns property on Simcoe but does not live here.
...
written by realitycheck , August 20, 2011 - 04:31 pm
How is Lasala to prove the negative? Especially in light of the priest denying any meaning discussion and the cheerleaders giving him a public apology for any one possibly having an opposition? Meanwhile, LaSala telling TAX PAYING (read here his salary) citizens in the area that their own property is the worst kind of blight? Where was the apology for that?!
...
written by Confused , August 20, 2011 - 04:46 pm
That's what I thought - many people who are on the coterie don't live there. That means they really aren't affected by what happens when the sun goes down. Then they down play the neighborhood concerns about all the nightime goings on of crime that goes on that "home owners" have to deal with. And then hector is neither a personally vested property owner nor does he choose to live in the neighborhood that he want to re-model.
...
written by hector , August 20, 2011 - 06:22 pm
.

Father Robert and Co-chair Cluse had to intervene once during a public meeting since the comments made by some of the attending visitors were inappropriate and improper, and not in line with Robert's Rules of Order.

I've never EVER said that the neighborhood is blighted. I have only corrected the PERSISTENT assertion that the site where JDV is being built has some historically significant structures; not so, it is AN INDUSTRIAL SITE and abandoned buildings.

FWIW: 2/3 of the members of the coterie who voted FOR JDV live in the neighborhood. The others own prosperous businesses, multiple rental houses, and property.




...
written by Confused , August 20, 2011 - 09:17 pm
Is that dry cleaner on the 900 block of Simcoe still open or is it just boarded up? A closed down dry cleaner really wouldn't qualify as a thriving business.


...
written by Witness , August 20, 2011 - 09:19 pm
Not so fast Hector, many many people have heard you say blighted. In fact, I have witnessed it myself. You said "all of that is blighted" and should be just torn down, and it wasn't industrial sites, it was historic homes you were pointing to. Emphasis on word "homes".
...
written by hector , August 20, 2011 - 10:01 pm
.

WITNESS, i've never used the word BLIGHTED to refer to the neighborhood or any other place for that matter.

It's just not a word I use.

In fact, for the neighborhood charette I conducted with my students, I walked every street, took over 100 pictures and prepared a powerpoint presentation that showed the quality of the housing stock, and the great design possibilities of the whole neighborhood.


CONFUSED, you're still confused; that's not Ms Cluse's place of business.



...
written by ibeenthere , August 20, 2011 - 11:17 pm
jmllaf: you are as lost from the what folks living near this place and the downtown businesses as anybody. Don't have a clue!! These people long been forced into "volunteering" to "help" by fixng paying for, picking up trash, used condems, and drug stuff, washing vomit off the sidewalks, calling in crazy and nasty stuff them people who come down to party (they call that getting help) all around AOC. Prolly ain't as warm and fuzzy to shovel crap and clean puke as passing out sugar and presents to kids! Business ghotta deal with beggars at their shops, workers afraid to go to the dumpster scared to find some bum or gross stuff, bums from all over the place washing in the fountain where kids should be playin. "NIMBY"! now, you crazy!! there is more social mess downtown than anywhere!! Looks more like they just want the rest of the city to have some of the crap and to quit being the craphole 4 the hole parish! You better not tell my uncle downtown to go help there! He say things been better since the cops sent bums back home, the diner moved and now, this slowing down.
...
written by realitycheck , August 22, 2011 - 01:29 pm
developer’s fee — approximately $750,000 — that AOC will receive from

Heather: Gachassin has been saying he is the developer. Reports indicate that in his earlier projects, he has received $500,000 as developer on each. Are there 2 developers here? If Gachassin also receives $750,000 that would be $1.5M that doesn't even go to the building materials. How many other developers are there?
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
LA LA Land
Advertisement

Read the Flipping Paper!

Click Here for the Entire Print Version of
IND Monthly
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it