News -> Cover Story

October Surprise? - Page 6

Article Index
October Surprise?
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
All Pages

TEMPEST IN A TEA POT?
Lafayette voters could put the TEA Party out of business.

The TEA Party movement in general and the Tea Party of Lafayette specifically take some pleasure in being small-government curmudgeons. Whether the movement locally is conscientiously opposed to discretionary spending by government or simply peddling right-wing claptrap remains a point of debate, and maybe it’s a bit of both. After taking on commercial real estate developer Glenn Stewart over the tax increment financing district Stewart wanted to create for his Parc Lafayette project — a confrontation that got ugly — The TPL proudly posted on its website a quote from the mercurial Stewart: “I think they are a bunch of wannabes who go around threatening our elected officials, and I think they ought to be ashamed of themselves. I think they’re the lunatic fringe.”

Ultimately, Stewart’s TIF ordinance was pulled. And to an extent the TPL can take credit for helping scuttle a pair of bills in the past legislative session that could have established other TIF districts, but the group remains largely a bunch of middle-aged and elderly white people at the loud, angry margins of our political life.

So now is put up or shut up time for the TPL, and it appears the group has its sights set on the City-Parish Council. Counting incumbents Jared Bellard (District 5) and William Theriot (District 9), the TPL has endorsed four candidates for the CPC. (Challengers Craig Spikes and Andy Naquin round out the TPL quartet.) And if we throw in Republican Joan Beduze, who is challenging fellow Republican Don Bertrand in District 7, it’s fair to say the TEA Party movement at the least, if not the Tea Party of Lafayette specifically, is backing five candidates for City-Parish Council.

Naquin is challenging Sam Doré in District 6 and Spikes wants incumbent Keith Patin’s District 8 seat. Beduze is not identified as TPL-endorsed on the group’s website, but her Facebook page resonates with a simpatico for TEA Party issues and with superstars such as Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann. And the candidates — Beduze, Theriot, Bellard, Spikes and Naquin — were the beneficiaries of a so-called “Conservative Caucus Fundraiser” last week in Broussard. An invitation to the event was posted on the TPL’s website.

While Spikes has no party affiliation, his fellow hopefuls from the Taxed Enough Already contingent — Naquin and Beduze — fit a profile that bit the establishment GOP in the rear in last year’s primary races: “more conservative” Republicans hoping to unseat “less conservative” Republicans. If you follow the chatter on the blogs and comment sections in Lafayette media, you know that Patin and Bertrand, who have voted for such “frivolities” as funding arts/culture, the comprehensive master plan and the horse farm, are frequently herded together under the RINO label — Republican in name only.

Both Theriot and Bellard have contenders on Oct. 22: fellow Republicans Walter Campbell and Britt Latiolais, respectively.
The Tea Party of Lafayette has also staked out positions against repealing the Lafayette Home Rule Charter and the school system property tax.
But at this point, even if their candidates sweep their respective races and the charter repeal and the school tax go down in flames, it might be fair to give the TEA Party movement an Incomplete; this will be, after all, the group’s first major election cycle in Lafayette Parish. But if its candidates and positions are rejected, it could be its last. — WP



Comments (21)add
...
written by South of I-10 , September 14, 2011 - 12:11 pm
Walter, isn't Jared Doise also running in District 6? That is what the signs up around Legend's on Bertrand tell me.
...
written by Pawn in the game of life , September 14, 2011 - 02:21 pm
I have known Ricky Hardy for the past 25 years. He is honest and has been very active in cleaning up corruption in this area. When he was on the schoo board he took on the bus drivers who did what ever they wanted to . He was not afraid to take them on.
As a legisitlator he fought to raise the GPA to 2.0 . He got a lot of resistance but he fought on and won. He is a man of his word and he returns phone calls.
I have know Lloyd Rochon for many years. He is probably the most qualified City/Parish council candidate that ths city has ever had. I was so disappointed in Brandon Shelvin who betrayed friends and even his on minister. He needs to go.
Another person that need to stay is Sam Dore He is very honest and does the right thing. He has one of his opponents that is running because he is always violating the noice ordinance at his bar. Sam is only addressing the needs of the area by taking care of all the complaints.
Another pick of mine is Guillory for Senate. It is time to end the Cravins dynasty.
...
written by ben , September 14, 2011 - 07:16 pm
Bishop should walk house to house for Ricky, so he can know what it feels like to talk with people who vote. He never asked one stranger in his district what was important to them. He will not represent his district well if he doesn't go house to house to find out what they need and want.
...
written by teapartygal , September 15, 2011 - 11:00 am
Mr. Pearce
You are yet to understand the heart of the Tea Party movement. That may or may not be of interest if you are set in your ideology.
The heart of the Tea Party is based in common sense, common decency, integrity and general conservative views and values. It has nothing to do with whether they win or not. That is built into the character of the people dawned to the movement. It is in doing what they believe is morally right. Supporting politicians commitmented to "do the right thing" regardless of their chances is a matter of principle. Not typically conducive to raising money. Their interest is altruistic as opposed to courting the “pay-to-play” crowd just to win for the sake of control. I am sure this may be hard for you to understand.

...
written by Gaius Cilnius Maecenas , September 15, 2011 - 07:52 pm
[T]eapartygal:

I only wish you were accurate in your portrayal of the Tea Party crowd! You are discussing yourself! You have "commonsense" [Latin, sensus communis, "common feelings of humanity" (Aristotle, De Anima, Book III, Part 2)]!

You possess "common decency" [Latin, decens, (present participle), "being fitting"]!

You have "integrity" [Latin, "wholeness, complete"]!

You capture in your words here "general conservative views and values" [Since 'conservative' is a rhetorical-psychological stance, it can be equally captured in radical, liberal & progressive philosophical systems.]

You are sincere; the actual candidates appealing to your noble, honest and straight forward nature are selling you a commercialized product of themselves to deceive you. It is this crowd of elected officials, that are financed by a very narrow corporate interest, that wish to make your life and your children's lives horrible!

Don't pay attention to their pretty teeth, nor their mindless claptrap, that are pedestrian stale cliches; watch you is shoving money in their pockets! Observe when these Tea Party candidates go back into their caves, which ogres, with human flesh still clinging in their teeth, are their "real" friends!

The "real" Tea Party citizens are predominantly poorly educated people, who perceived they have been abused by both the business community and the governmental system. This group has, also, been very badly educated by their ministers and priests!

Do not forget the three mantras of the "insane" [Latin, "not healthy or wholesome"] Tea Party movement:

Less Government [Less Protective Regulations on Business]!
Lower Taxes [Run Government on Debt]!
Less Government Expenditures [Spending]!

Who would not want these matters? What a pity that the Bush Administration incurred $5.4 Trillion Dollars of Debt; the Obama Administration $1.44 Trillion Dollars of Debt so far.

If our nation follows the Tea Party ideology, our nation will be permanently ruined; you and your family will be dead in an untimely manner!
...
written by R. Reagan , September 16, 2011 - 08:18 am
WOW Gaius!
I can respect that you actually beleive these things, obviously from what you have been told, but my friend, I can also say first hand and for a fact, that you are the one buying the Koolaid. Youre portrail is so opposite of reality I dont know where to begin.
...
written by ragin_cajun , September 16, 2011 - 12:36 pm
Gaius is harmless. He lives in an alternate reality, and his capacity for linear thinking has been seriously compromised--I suspect by way too much exposure to mysticism, and its modern equivalent, religion.

I was, at first, deeply concerned about his insistence on redefining words and confusing etymology with actual definitions of words in modern usage. Now, I've come to see that, although seriously misguided and a committed Socialist, he at least means well.

He doesn't actually realize how condescending and elitist he is, and he occassionally gives GREAT book recommendations.

If I were to actually respond to his comment, I think I'D begin with his logically inconsistent interpretation of the "three mantras" of the Tea Party movement.
...
written by Compassionate One , September 16, 2011 - 01:35 pm
I'd just like to know where he's finding all those "magical mushrooms."

Think he would have come down by now!
...
written by Gaius Cilnius Maecenas , September 16, 2011 - 02:25 pm
R. Reagan & [R]agin_cajun:

Read the 31 page monograph, "Common Sense and 'Literal Meaning'" by Michael Israel, Department of English, University of Maryland, College Park. It will deepen your understanding of the English language.

It should not be forgotten that when William the Bastard conquered England, our Anglo-Saxon [700-1250 CE] tongue altered. Learned Norman French, Latin and Greek terms entered into our language. We lost 80% of our native Old English words. It is very easy to abuse our language; it has been observed by more than one wag, it is very easy to talk pure nonsense in English, and be absolutely saying nothing! Hence, my appealment to lexicography to uncover mental rubbish!

I am NOT a Socialist. I am a Socialist-Capitalist! Population demographics demand such a response. As population expands, the need for government expands! Furthermore, in the classical model, there should be a healthy tension between Government & Business: if Government gets out of hand, unemployment results; if Business gets out of hand, taxes increase!

Our present collapse of the labor market was not induced by Government taxes; it was caused by Financial collapse of our Financial Economy on Wall Street!

My three mantras reflect what I hear the dolts on Fox screaming at me daily! I do not think I err in these matters.

I was bred by my "conservative" up-bringing to be a snobbish elitist! I thought I had rid my mind of that Roman Catholic nonsense years ago!

Lastly, it was your recommendations to me (which I am still reading) that occasioned these reflections. To strengthen your understanding of "real" conservatism, I suggest you read three political treatises: "Memoirs of Prince Metternich" edited by Pierre Richard Metternich (1881) [Prince Klemens Metternich's "Political Confession of Faith"; Alexander I of Russia had asked this statesman to draw up a "confession of faith" in 1820]; "On the State of Society in France before the revolution of 1789" [English translation by Henry Reeve, 1856] by Alexis de Tocqueville; and "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity" by James Fitzjames Stephen (1873).

This dry, mental rot of the presumed Tea Party has been with us for quite a while! There is an old saying among men of learning, "A Fool cannot act as a Wise man, since, indeed, he is a Fool; however, this does not mean, that a Wise man cannot act as a Fool"! There is more than one Wise man amongst us, pretending he is a Fool, to gain filthy lucre!
...
written by ragin_cajun , September 16, 2011 - 07:13 pm
"I am NOT a Socialist. I am a Socialist-Capitalist!"

I suspect you apply these terms in their purely economic sense since you indicate how you would create an ideal economic system. I think you gloss over the philosophies of which these economic systems are merely an expression. Perhaps others here do this, as well, and that is why I'm often misunderstood?

Here's how I use these terms, and think about the underlying world views. Socialism is rooted in collectivism. In order to have a Socialist/Communist/Fascist, or even "mixed" economy, there must be acceptance of the idea that the needs of the "collective" outweigh the needs or desires of the individual.

Capitalism is rooted in individual liberty. In order to have a Capitalist economy, there must be a truly free society. In order to have an actually free society, there must be consistent commitment to and acceptance of the idea that the needs and desires of the collective/society/goverment cannot be placed above the needs and desires of the individual.

My perspective on this is a bit different from Karl Marx, and I suppose every other Socialist who came after him. I strongly suspect that Marx's characterization is prevalent, so I suppose my view is unorthodox even if it IS consistent with the view of many "educated experts" in this area--men of letters.

The problem with your conception of a Socialist-Capitalist is that such a thing is just not possible. A society is either free or it is not. It either respects individual rights, or it does not. A "mixed economy" that respects an individual's property rights, for example, most of the time, or in all instances but a few, cannot be called a free society, can it?

I suppose that my recommendations that occasioned these reflections could be FA Hayek? He wrote a bit about the shortcomings of "conservatives", and held that the "liberal" was the one that was truly a friend of freedom. I would agree with him.

But let's also keep in mind that the meaning of "conservative" and "liberal" has changed drastically over the last 35 years. We, (you and I both, Gaius) need to be very careful of this when we read older writing. People today, arguing politics in America, don't mean anything like what Hayek meant when HE used these terms.

Liberalism to Hayek was nothing like the wanton iconoclasm of modern Liberalism in America. Liberalism to Hayek was in no way compatible with the big government welfare state and identity politics proposed by modern day liberals in America.


...
written by ragin_cajun , September 16, 2011 - 08:00 pm
So, Gaius....

You see the Tea Party as Jacobin type insurrection against the modern day equivalent of the "great monarchs"? Or do you see the Tea Party as a modern day Metternich trying to influence the modern day monarchs to do the right thing?

It's hard to say, because much of what I hear the Tea Party saying is what Metternich advised the Monarchs to do.
...
written by Gaius Cilnius Maecenas , September 17, 2011 - 11:31 am
[R]agin_cajun:

You raise a series of very good points here. I am certainly mindful as to how notions change in the human mind over time. Labels stick, but the inner nucleus of ideas that first formulated these "Labels" are usually forgotten. Why astute scholarship is demanded!

I would think that the origin of Socialism is to be found in the communal culture of the Roman Catholic Church in the High Middle Ages. This particularity does not negate your lucid comments on the stupidity of Lenin-Marxism.

Furthermore, I am always leery of people who scream about Freedom. They usually are the ones who end up giving you serfdom! Your insights on the battle between the social riff-raff and Monarchs require further reflection on my part.

I will conclude this posting with a little known philological datum: Our English-Germanic word 'freedom' comes from the proto-Indo-European root for "sex." Think of the pagan Norse Germanic sex goddess, Freya [Freyja], and our week-day name, Friday, named in her honor. So when I hear lunatics shouting about our Freedoms, I whimsically think, "They must not be getting enough sex in their lives!"

By the same Indo-European method, our English-Latinate term 'Liberty' means "growth"! Have a good Saturday afternoon. Give my affections to your lovely wife!

P.S. I have been thinking about your charge against my writing of "logical consistency." I think I need to beefen up my skills in this department. I would like to recommend for your library a delightful little book: "Think" by Simon Blackburn (Oxford University Press, 1999) 312 pages. He was an Oxonian, Fellow and Tutor at Pembroke College, Oxford (1969-1990) who migrated to the University of North Carolina. I am re-reading it for obvious reasons.
...
written by ragin_cajun , September 18, 2011 - 10:48 am
I've not read Blackburn's survey of philosophy. I have read several of them by other authors, and I'd say that the best one I've ever read was Bertrand Russell's "History of Western Philosophy". It is not real approachable, but it continues to make sense for years and years. I've also read Russell's "The Problems of Philosophy".

But...the most inspiring, straightforward, reasonable, and enlightening essay I've ever read about Philosophy is "Philosophy: Who Needs It". It very quickly lays out what Philosophy is, why it's important, and what it does to a persons personality and emotions. This particular essay has NOTHING to do with her particular philosophy, so it has no axe to grind. It is indispensable.
...
written by Gaius Cilnius Maecenas , September 18, 2011 - 01:03 pm
[R]agin_cajun:

Since our purpose here is not to discuss philosophical matters, I must, perforcely, be brief. Professor Blackburn calls himself a "Concept Engineer," since Philosophy is, generally, reviled in our anti-intellectual 'Age of Silly' now. However, I would recommend to you Father Frederick Charles Copleston, S.J., his massive nine-volume treatise, "A History of Philosophy" (1946-1975)! I have read Lord Russell's philosophical historical treatise (which you cite) as you have. I found it amusing---a mathematician-logician pretending to survey the European philosophical tradition. Lord Russell's magnum opus is one of my prized books in my classical library: Principia Mathematica (Cambridge, Three volumes)!

Now back to the topic at hand: As you know, the international financial system of the global community is about to collapse, unless Italy can be bailed out by the $3 Trillion Dollars in Global Government Reserve Funds! This suggests that Investors are the Lords who rule us, not politicians. [As Ludwig von Mises asserts with his famous rule: The First Job of an Economist is to Tell Governments What They Cannot Do!]

What is your suggestion or suggestions for immediate and long-term re-growth in our Society? You know, as well as I, all the dreadful socio-economic statistics [I have given a few in my previous posts]. My concern is singular here: Once a Society is stupid enough to destroy its Middle Class, it takes half a century or three to four centuries to bring it back. Do you think a social caste system, such as we have in Louisiana, will be good for the American people as a whole? Is the American Experiment essentially over with? Like maniacs we have exhausted our natural resources by poor management over the last 200 years. Should we accept the untimely Death of millions of our people by the well-understood principles of Stress-Disease, Hunger & Madness?

You know my position: I want a 5,000 $1 Billion Dollar Bill package [$5 Trillion Dollars] over ten years to make our Future for the realities of the 21st Century globally! I, also, know who to rob to get this small amount of cash [I view the Financial Economy as mathematical fraud; it devalues human labor; it inflicts oppression within family households.]

I await your reply. Take your time. With gentlemanly urbanity, I remain "Gaius"!
...
written by the original northsidian , September 18, 2011 - 06:22 pm
Gaius & Ragin, What da **** are ya'll talkin about!
...
written by ragin_cajun , September 19, 2011 - 08:47 am
Gaius--

We have NOT exhausted our natural resources. We produce more oil, food, and have more forested land now than ever before. The US is the worlds 3rd largest oil producer, and largest food producer.

I don't see a "caste system" in effect anywhere in the US, or Louisiana.

And I strenuously reject the idea that "we" should "rob" any class or group of $5T for any reason whatsoever. Nothing but chaos and anarchy can possibly result from something like that.

Untimely death? How, then, do you explain the steadily rising life expectancy of Americans? I'm starting to really wonder if you and I are living in the same universe.

The best thing the US government could do right now is absolutely nothing, as Thomas Jefferson once quipped. Surprisingly enough, that is what Obama and Congress seem to be doing.


...
written by ragin_cajun , September 19, 2011 - 08:54 am
northsidian --

philosophy, history, books, writers, and our limited view of the grand sweep of human history and thought.
...
written by ragin_cajun , September 19, 2011 - 10:47 am
The US is also the world's top lumber producer, too. Considering we've been producing lumber the entire time that White Men have been on this continent...that would mean that we MUST have been pretty good stewards of the environmnent.

Oregon, where the enviro-nuts are most against timber, and howl the loudest about destruction of the forests, is the biggest lumber producing state in the US, the biggest lumber producing country. Has been for centuries. SOMEONE must have "renewed" and "managed" this natural resource all the years BEFORE there were twenty-something bearded/pierced enviromentalist college dropouts running around "protecting" the "environment"....

Gaius -- Surely someone as well read and, presumably, well educated as you are doesn't actually believe in the myth of environmental appocalypse?
...
written by Gaius Cilnius Maecenas , September 19, 2011 - 01:51 pm
[R]agin_cajun:

I thought we had evolved in our playful bantering here beyond boilerplate, claptrap & poppycock! I had asked you to take some time to make a more thoughtful reflection or reflections.

You need to beefen up your intellectual skills on Environmental Issues. Read the various books published by Island Press. I have five of them in my classical library.

Also, Life Expectancy is trending downward in the U.S.A. This is due to the indefatiable labors of our wonderful Insurance businessmen.

I have the aristocratic Roman Stoic bias, as embedded in its ancient laws & legal codes, that "all" business is sordid [Latin, "dirty"], since it is based on treachery, fraud & deceit. How uneducated people become wealthy! I need to work on that bias in my mind. I have seen too many workers cheated of a just income to support their families by the pretty wolves they work for here in Louisiana! My brothers and sisters inform me this sickness has spread to our whole society now!

I await a lucid response from you, Lord [R]agin_cajun!
...
written by Southsider , September 19, 2011 - 02:14 pm
Pasted:

written by teapartygal , September 15, 2011 - 11:00 am
Mr. Pearce
You are yet to understand the heart of the Tea Party movement. That may or may not be of interest if you are set in your ideology.
The heart of the Tea Party is based in common sense, common decency, integrity and general conservative views and values. It has nothing to do with whether they win or not. That is built into the character of the people dawned to the movement. It is in doing what they believe is morally right. Supporting politicians commitmented to "do the right thing" regardless of their chances is a matter of principle. Not typically conducive to raising money. Their interest is altruistic as opposed to courting the “pay-to-play” crowd just to win for the sake of control. I am sure this may be hard for you to understand.

TPG...i have to take it that Mr. Don Bacque is a member of your movement since he has letters on your website. With that being said, it was reported today in the local newspaper than he represented a family that sold land across the street from a residental neighborhood for a waste transfer site. If what you say is true about the teaparty and what it stands for, please read the article of how in one swift transaction, the Bacque family has lowered everyones property value, with no regard for anything but $$$$. While the transaction was legal, the Bacque family has no moral compass. Mr. Rochon is also a member of Mr. Bacques 'friends' list on his PAC website. Explain it to me again the part about the 'character' of the members and how they will to the 'right' thing? I guess they missed that part.
...
written by Gaius Cilnius Maecenas , September 19, 2011 - 08:23 pm
Southsider:

Thank you for your posting. It demonstrates once again the the gap between Reality and Pretty-Sounding Mindless Slogans [Fantasy] by Fools, being played for the Fools they are, by ruthless scoundrels to make easy money for personal gain. There is no moral compass now. It is brutally dog eat dog. There use to be quoted often an acient Hebrew saying, "A live dog is better than a dead lion." Now neither dog nor lion lives!
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy

 
LA LA Land
Advertisement

Read the Flipping Paper!

Click Here for the Entire Print Version of
IND Monthly

Read the Dining Guide

Click Here for the Entire Print Version of
IND Eats Dining Guide
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it