News -> Cover Story

RE: The Benefit of Boorishness

CoverThe Benefit of Boorishness
By: Walter Pierce

Rep. Jeff Landry has been making an ass of himself, and it’s paying off.

It wasn’t exactly a broadside, but it was close. Still, U.S. Rep. Jeff Landry’s colleague in the House, Charles Boustany, better take notice because it was aimed at him.

It was a de facto announcement that he plans to challenge Boustany next fall when Landry’s office fired off a copy of a story in Politico reporting that Citizens United, it of the infamous U.S. Supreme Court ruling, had thrown its support behind Landry by dropping $5,000 in his campaign kitty “to boost his potential bid against four-term Rep. Charles Boustany.”

Citizens United President David Bossie was effusive in his encouragement for the first-term beau of the Tea Party: “It is imperative that Congressman Jeff Landry remain in Congress to fight for the conservative cause. [We urge] Congressman Landry to take this primary challenge head on and campaign on his reform-minded conservative credentials.”

Barring the highly unlikely success of state Attorney General Buddy Caldwell’s bid to restore the House seat lost to federal redistricting this year — Louisiana went from seven to six seats due to population stagnation between the 2000 and 2010 censuses — Boustany and Landry will have to square off for the new 3rd Congressional District next year. 

The low-key Boustany hasn’t expressly said he will seek a fifth term next year, but a spokesman suggested as much when he told the Associated Press that Boustany “looks forward to continuing to serve the families of South Louisiana...”

I’m calling Landry’s announcement de facto because his office included a caveat in last week’s newsletter: “(Please note: Congressman Landry has not made an official announcement regarding his future plans.)” There’s been some speculation that Landry might turn his sights to unseating Sen. Mary Landrieu. But the better bet at this point is that Landry will go after Boustany. Why else would he trumpet Citizens United’s backing?

The new 3rd District will be Boustany’s to lose. It’s basically his current 7th expanded a little eastward to fold in the western edge of Landry’s current district. The new 3rd will include Landry’s hometown, New Iberia, and the freshman congressman didn’t do any flesh-pressing west of New Iberia when he was campaigning last year.

But Landry has the beneficence of would-be kingmaker Sen. David Vitter who, despite some setbacks in statewide races this fall — Vitter’s shining countenance failed to get Billy Nungesser and Jim Tucker to the promised land — has been inserting himself into state politics with increasing frequency, possibly, as one thread of political innuendo goes, as a precursor to running for governor after Bobby Jindal moves on to whatever Bobby Jindal moves on to.

Landry appeared at events over the summer with Vitter in Lafayette and Lake Charles, Boustany’s turf, and he’s made a concerted effort at being the boorish bad boy in Congress this year.

He was the only member of Louisiana’s Republican delegation in the House to decline an invitation to meet with President Obama late last spring — a meeting that roughly 200 House Republicans attended.

In early September he characterized employees of the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement as “the Gestapo” because he had to wait and ultimately didn’t get to meet with BOEMRE’s director — who is Jewish — after showing up at the BOEMRE office in New Orleans unannounced.

And less than a week later he staged that ham-fisted stunt during the president’s jobs speech before a joint session of Congress, holding (rather sheepishly) a sign with the simpleton’s slogan, “DRILLING = JOBS.”

Some prominent Republicans joined a bi-partisan chorus on Capitol Hill and in the media critical of the Cajun congressman’s intemperate behavior. Yet Landry’s missed manners haven’t hurt him in the fundraising arena. Truth be told, they appear to have helped.

As the Politico article embedded in his newsletter points out, Landry outpaced Boustany in fundraising during the third quarter by more than $30,000 — $251,000 raised to Boustany’s $218K.
RE
But what’s really telling — read it as an indictment of the Tea Party’s knuckle-dragging level of discourse — is how Landry’s campaign has benefitted since the sign stunt on Sept. 8. 

Between Sept. 9 and the end of October, the Landry campaign, according to records collected by the Federal Elections Commission, raised $120,000, more than double Boustany’s $52,950 haul during the same period.

Boustany still has an overall cash advantage with $1.1 million in the bank compared to $401,000 for Landry. The former ran unopposed last year, saving him the expense of campaigning. But at Landry’s current fundraising clip, that cash-on-hand gap will likely narrow in the coming months. And if the mild-mannered Boustany is naive enough to think Landry won’t savage him the way he did Hunt Downer in the Republican primary last year, he could be toast.

Plus, with the deep-pocketed Citizens United backing him, the trajectory of Landry’s oily-black star may be more ascendent than ever.


Walter Pierce
About the author:


Comments (30)add
...
written by RCajunrunner , December 07, 2011 - 10:00 am
"the Tea Party’s knuckle-dragging level of discourse"

Hrm...wonder how Walter would label the Occupy crowd. The tea party protesters never staked out and trashed public parks for 30-60 days at a time.
...
written by jabbajaw , December 07, 2011 - 11:20 am
Louisiana has had embarrasing politicians in the past for which we have been proud of and very defensive of. The excepttion with "t-boy" here is that he is a republican. If he were a democrat, then he would be adored for his "antics". And at one time he would have been a democrat - just that now, the republican label is required to get elected. He's on a path so you got to track him. Lest we forget that David Duke once had enough popularity to make a serious run for governor. So it is no surprise that someone like "t-boy" here would find hisself holding a sign up for the drilling industry with the gulf coast still recovering from the biggest oil spill in history. And no surprise at his popularity (in Iberia Parish).
...
written by NORTHSIDIAN SHOTGUN , December 07, 2011 - 11:21 am
These are primitive communists protestors. If Hoover were still here he would clean up the perimeter and balance the social discourse moderately by jailing the protestors.
...
written by snaildarter , December 07, 2011 - 03:47 pm
The flow of partisan, hateful sophistry (and lies) about the TEA party from the Ind continues. I bet that alot of the business people that buy Ind ads agree with the basic TEA thesis. They should wake up and out thier money where they are respected.
...
written by Mah Nà Mah Nà - Do doo be-do-do , December 07, 2011 - 04:06 pm
As a moderate Independent, I find Boustany’s recent attacks on Jeff Landry’s push for offshore drilling safety particularly amusing. Landry defied his own party by pushing for reforms in offshore worker safety by having standby boats stationed at rigs far offshore. What did Boustany do, he said oilfield workers are safe enough. Did he learn this at med school? Does he even know anybody that has ever worked offshore before? I think not. Of similar amusement is local hired gun lobbyist Don Briggs. He is claiming that increased safety for oilfield workers will shut down the industry in the U.S. Did Briggs become an expert on the offshore oil industry in Miami, Florida where he grew up, and as everyone knows is known for abundant offshore drilling? Or did he learn about offshore drilling while working little land rigs in North Louisiana? Perhaps he learned it accepting checks from BP to discourage worker safety…
...
written by neutral party , December 07, 2011 - 05:04 pm
I find Boustany neither a friend or a foe to the oil and gas industry as should be.Landry on the other hand is whats wrong with the country now.Speaking in half truth and looking to divide.Showing disrespect and bringing shame to our state,not to mention Acadiana.
...
written by old connections , December 07, 2011 - 05:44 pm
Boustany is not worried about any challenge from Landry. Boustany has plenty of favors and connections lined up with the Edwin Edwards and Ted Kennedy circles that he will get more than enough of the yellow-dog Democrat vote. Kennedy and Edwards Democrats for Boustany! Bob Odom Democrats for Boustany! Good ole boy Louisiana politics lined up for Boustany.
...
written by snaildarter , December 07, 2011 - 06:17 pm
...business people that buy Ind ads agree with the basic TEA thesis. They should wake up and spend their money where they are respected...

(OOPS, my fins are slipping all over this particular touch-pad, it's not a case of knuckle-dragging)

...
written by Greene , December 07, 2011 - 06:57 pm
I hoped that as a Tea Party candidate Landry would not seek re-election, but would run for one term and one term only, so as not to become part of the Washington establishment.
...
written by Cracklin Patin , December 07, 2011 - 07:18 pm
Agreed Walter, Landry = Idiot. Nevertheless, I doubt you would be saying the same if Landry was a Democrat. Then Landry would be colorful, flamboyant, or at least out-spoken.
...
written by ragin_cajun , December 07, 2011 - 08:21 pm
I think that Landry will have a lot easier time answering for his antics than Boustany will have answering for the way he's voted the last 3 or 4 years.

Jeff Landry will make a very simple appeal to the voters of the new district to decide based on how Boustany voted on things like the Debt Ceiling Increase. Landry voted against that, as I recall, Boustany voted for it and then, like a dummy, came back and had town hall meetings where he tried to "explain" to the common folk back home what a great idea it was.

Well, the Super Committee didn't do its job like Boustany said they would, the Democrats pulled the football away at the last minute like the common folk said they would, and Boustany looks like Charlie Brown. So Boustany's gonna have to try to explain what happens to Medicare if another $500 Billion comes out of it...:) He just didn't think any of this through, he didn't get much help from the "leadership" with what to say, and he's gonna have a pretty tough re-election bid because of it.

As for all this "T-Boy" stuff, and veiled insults about how Landry talks, and how stupid he is....I think every one of you should go to a Boustany event and listen to him talk for 10-15 minutes, listen to him answer some questions. I honestly can't understand how he got through Med School.
...
written by justwundering , December 07, 2011 - 08:24 pm
"Boorishness, "making an ass of himself".........LOL



Hasn't that strategy worked well for the IND????? Pierce, et al have been making asses of themselves for years, yet Ind circulation hasn't seemed to diminish.................
...
written by Cartman , December 07, 2011 - 08:54 pm
Better keep his heinie away from Lake Charles. I don't think he's got the sand to make it in our part of the state.
...
written by ragin_cajun , December 07, 2011 - 10:19 pm
"Better keep his heinie away from Lake Charles. I don't think he's got the sand to make it in our part of the state."

Who? Landry, Boustany, or Walter?
...
written by Cracklin Patin , December 08, 2011 - 03:27 pm
"keep his heinie away from Lake Charles... Who? Landry, Boustany, or Walter?"
-----------------

Not Walter, we see his heinie each week in the IND.

...
written by ThingsDon'tHappenByThemselves , December 08, 2011 - 10:58 pm
Well, going by many of comments left on this forum by the readers of the Independent, I'd say that the paper and the subjects of its stories aren't the only places from which boorishness is emanating.

I hope that you guys aren't representative of the populace of Acadiana as a whole because compared to other metropolitan papers' comments sections I read across the country the readers of the independent seem to spout the most churlish and unlettered venom, ad hominem attacks and half-baked trash unsupported by any real higher-level thinking, none of which adds an iota of substance to the discussion.

The ruination of this country will not come from people so obviously wicked as to have horns growing out of their heads. It will come from what Arendt called the "banality of evil". That banality is on full display here.
...
written by neutral party , December 09, 2011 - 12:38 am
THE RUINATION OF THIS COUNTRY WILL BE BY DUMB A$$E$ LIKE YOU SELF.One more thing is unlettered venom the same thing as mocassin venom. Cause if you in a jam you can suckkk that poison out.

...
written by Cracklin Patin , December 09, 2011 - 02:31 am
By ThingsDon'tHappenByThemselves "will come from what Arendt called"
---------------------

Arendt you taking things way to seriously.
...
written by ragin_cajun , December 09, 2011 - 02:43 pm
"the readers of the independent seem to spout the most churlish and unlettered venom, ad hominem attacks and half-baked trash unsupported by any real higher-level thinking"

There are a handful of commenters here who are very thoughtful and often support their positions well. I don't think theIND is representative of the political or social views of the populace of Acadiana, either. Election results bear that out.
...
written by RCajunrunner , December 09, 2011 - 09:44 pm
"I don't think theIND is representative of the political or social views of the populace of Acadiana, either. Election results bear that out."

Wait...you mean despite the IND's best attempts, William Theriot and Andy Naquin did not lose their bids for City-Parish Council?
...
written by ragin_cajun , December 09, 2011 - 11:40 pm
:). Jared Bellard still around, too, huh?
...
written by Karma Police , December 10, 2011 - 03:33 am
Oh, the irony of Walter Pierce asserting that someone *else* is making an ass of himself...sweet, delicious irony.
...
written by ThingsDon'tHappenByThemselves , December 11, 2011 - 02:47 pm
"I don't think theIND is representative of the political or social views of the populace of Acadiana, either. Election results bear that out. "

Of course, when I stated that I hoped "you guys" aren't representative of the general populace of Acadiana, I was referring to the commentary on this message board, not to the IND or the positions taken by its staff.

I wold argue that, indeed, the results of local elections seem to be very much in keeping with what one would expect from reading the comments posted on this board.
...
written by ThingsDon'tHappenByThemselves , December 11, 2011 - 03:29 pm
"THE RUINATION OF THIS COUNTRY WILL BE BY DUMB A$$E$ LIKE YOU SELF".

Boorish - check.

Churlish (Vulgar or Surly) - check.

AdHominem - check.

Unlettered (lacking facility in reading & writing) - check.

Venomous (spiteful; nasty) - check.

Representative of Level 1 thinking - check.

Doesn't add to the substance of the discussion - check.

Half-baked - check.

Banal (lacking originality, trite) - check mate.

Representative of level of discourse on this board or of the general readership of the Ind. or the populace of Acadiana or reflective of local election results - well, that's the question, isn't it.
...
written by ThingsDon'tHappenByThemselves , December 11, 2011 - 04:34 pm
"Arendt you taking things way to seriously."

---

Yes, if you regard the purpose of commenting in this section to be picayune and flippant in the stead of informed and thoughtful.

No, if you consider the fact that this article deals with two candidates for a Congress that has a single-digit approval rating and you are concerned for what that means for the future of this country.

One of them compared a Federal Agency to the Gestapo because he didn't get to see its director without first making an appointment.

Is anyone aware of just what the Gestapo was and did? Of how unrelentingly evil it was? Of what it destroyed? Of what western civilization lost because if it that can never be replaced?

One would have to be completely ignorant of history, very caviler and lacking self-control in his thoughts and speech (so much so to be unworthy of the dignity high office would confer him), or be truly disturbed and sacrilegious to make such a comparison.

He does not sounds like someone who realizes that he, too, works for the taxpayers.

To say that one who takes issue with the breezy and contemptuous drivel on display in this comments section is being too serious when the representation of this district and the reputation of democracy itself is up for debate is to say that this is all just entertainment. That is indeed exactly the attitude that Aredt wrote about; that is indeed evil and does indeed lead to the downfall of nations.

Has anyone considered that Congress's approval rating, at 9%, is only a few points above the statistical margin of error - meaning that it could very well be next to ZERO.

No, not too seriously if it bothers you that more people approved of the King of England at the time of the American Revolution than now approve of this Congress.

No, not too seriously if you agree with Lawrence Lessig, who describes congress as a "farm-team for K-Street". He must have had Bob Livingston, Billy Tauzin, Bennet Johnson, John Breaux, Chris John, Richard Gephart, Tom Daschle and countless others in mind.

No, not if you want to understand why this state used to have eight districts and now has six, which ultimately is why we are having this discussion. You have that precisely because of politics as entertainment instead of as issues and governance.

...
written by Phil N deBlanc , December 12, 2011 - 03:55 am
aaarrgh, knuckles dragging....bleedy hurty..
as a TEA party member, i laugh at Walter's misanthropic characterizations of me. reminds me of a blind man poking at an elephant or donkey with a cane. or a rhino or yellow dog.
...
written by Mah Nà Mah Nà - Do doo be-do-do , December 12, 2011 - 12:16 pm
How much does the medical industry have to pay Boustany for him to do their bidding?
Perhaps the oil industry should bribe Boustany too so that he can also "support" this industry?
...
written by Cracklin Patin , December 12, 2011 - 02:08 pm
by ThingsDon'tHappenByThemselves

"Congress's approval rating, at 9%, is only a few points above the statistical margin of error - meaning that it could very well be next to ZERO."
-----------------

Yes, so why do they continue to get elected and re-elected? I guess we hate them but love the entertainment.
...
written by ragin_cajun , December 12, 2011 - 10:43 pm
"why do they continue to get elected and re-elected"

Because good people won't take the job.
...
written by rambeaux rawlings , December 13, 2011 - 10:43 pm
I always thought the role of an elected representative was to effectively promote his ideas, convince his colleagues of the soundness of his positions, and to do so honorably.
Boy do I feel foolish.
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
LA LA Land
Advertisement

Read the Flipping Paper!

Click Here for the Entire Print Version of
IND Monthly
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it