There is nothing new under the sun and the green life is no different. Planet friendly living’s been done before. Take a look back for forward thinking green. By Amanda Bedgood
Monday, June 3, 2013
Some of us are takers and some givers. Consumers — we’ve been guilty of take, take, take for a while now. The generation that endured the Great Depression and those in the wake learned that to waste not was to want not. Something recent generations don’t seem to know a lot about. Yet it’s something that’s coming back around as vision shifts to living green — living green that is less about cool energy saving gadgets and space-ship looking houses.
“Going green means using fewer resources,” says Nathan Norris, the new man at the helm of Downtown Development Authority. “I am less interested in becoming more efficient with the resources I use than in making choices that eliminate the need for resources in the first place. At the scale of the home, this means enjoying a smaller home that lives larger through its thoughtful layout. At the scale of the city, this means living in a place that gives you the choice of walking or biking to your daily needs instead of being required to use a car.”
It’s the way of life for families like Brittany Broussard that have what we’ll call green glasses — looking at life through eyes aimed at saving the planet and wasting less.
“We don’t consume a lot of things,” she says. “Whether it’s a new piece of clothing or a toy.”
They live in an older house downtown with little storage space — suits them just fine. They don’t use disposable water bottles; they recycle and try to buy only what they need.
“Both of my grandparents were the least wasteful people I’ve ever seen,” she adds. “They have no waste.”
It made a great impression on Broussard, mother of a 3-year-old son as well as a stepdaughter; Broussard now wants to pass along the same lessons to the next generation.
“With Jacques he won’t know anything different, and I think that’s a good thing. I hope he will live a simple life and not need a lot around him to feel complete and loved and full. Things we do today affect him the most, and I hope that consumption people are a minority when he’s 30 or so,” she says.
Consuming less is something often easier said than done — marketers do a great job convincing us the superfluous is necessary. Broussard, a Moorgate loan officer, points to a very simple solution.
“We are mostly cash based. You think twice about what you’re spending money on,” she says.
Money, in fact, is one great motivator for living in a more sustainable way.
“There are many benefits of going green, but the one that resonates with most people is the opportunity to save money,” Norris says. “While I have saved money with energy-efficient insulation and a tankless hot water heater, my real savings come from living in a place that does not require me to get in a car for all of my daily needs.”
Broussard and her brood bike most everywhere, and she finds it to be not just better on the wallet but also on the soul.
“An urban lifestyle provides a lot of bonuses for enriching your life. Not having to get in the car … I think we can call them the hipster younger generation; they don’t want a car and they’re green but not always consciously doing it and it’s a way of living for them. Living in an urban area does that.”
Living the green life from planting your own fruits and veggies to using rain collection barrels for watering the lawn is becoming less and less about buying stuff to keep us from destroying the planet and more about just using less in every way possible. It can start where you live.
“Living downtown or in a town center that allows you to live, work and play within walking and biking distance of your home contributes substantially more to being green than a household gadget because the environmental and financial savings from not using a car dwarfs the savings from green gadgets,” Norris says. — AB
To post a comment, please log into your IND account. If you do not have an account, click the "register" button to create one. Facebook comments can be used as an alternative to creating an account at theIND.com.
OCT 30 If you're a Louisiana native of (ahem) a certain age, you might have fond (or fuzzy, as the case may be) memories of a Zebra concert and singing "Who's Behind the Door" until your ears rang. This post on NOLA Defender profiles the leader of that band, Randy Jackson.
OCT 30 The National Journal offers this analysis of Bobby Jindal's willingness to stump in any Senate campaign that's not in Louisiana. Why is that? The Journal asks some GOPers and finds that the answer is one we already know: he's so unpopular here, because he's been so busy running for President, that his support might be "toxic."
OCT 30 If you're not obsessed with the Texas governor's race - what's wrong with you? Here's another installment, from our own IND contributor Lamar White Jr., who explains why Wendy's "infamous" wheelchair ad was a shock to the national media - but not to anyone familiar with Greg Abbott's record.
OCT 30 Blogger Tom Aswell is still all over the OGB mess - and all by himself, apparently. In this post, he's revealing orders from the Jindal administration to destroy records from the state employee health insurance plan. Those orders (he's heard) have angered the Secretary of State and caused an administration lawyer to quit her job. Wow!
OCT 30 Blogger Crazy Crawfish is taking aim at state Superintendent John White again, this time for comments White made recently, claiming that there is no real opposition to Common Core in Louisiana. Crawfish is documenting proof to the contrary here, and lays down the gauntlet to "mainstream news media." (Don't hold your breath on that one, buddy.)
OCT 30 Gambit covers Advocate publisher John Georges' recent visit to Loyola in this post. Georges touches on how things are going in this new gig, what he thinks about the Pic's decision to move printing to Alabama, and how he feels about his political campaigns.
OCT 30 A NOLA lady has alleged she was drugged and raped at a Bywater club that had a clothing-optional policy until recently, and she's now become the victim of a smear campaign, columnist Jarvis DeBerry writes in this post. She chose to reveal her story and her name, and she's being punished for that now, he says.
OCT 30 BESE member Lottie Beebe pens this letter to the editor of the Advocate about the state Department of Education. The DOE isn't exempt from the state public records law, and because of recent lawsuits she tried to require regular reports about how many requests had been made to the department and how many remained unanswered. She wasn't successful.
OCT 29 Manny Schewitz blogs on Forward Progressives about recent Facebook posts from David Vitter, including one that purports to take you to a petition to stop Ebola (say what?) but actually signs you up for his newsletter or campaign email list or some such nonsense. Dave must think we're dummies, Manny says -- and Dave's probably right.
OCT 29 Usually, the copy on Red Shtick is satire. But in this post "from the publisher," we get a pretty astute political analysis of Edwin Edwards' charisma and old-school populist swagger. Edwards isn't concealing billionaire backers, or trying to make his opponent out to be "Satan," the post says. He's just running. Huh; imagine that.
OCT 29 Salon's Elias Isquith writes this fairly hilarious commentary on a National Review post about Bobby Jindal's attempts to "beef up" in preparation for a presidential run. But it's not just funny; Isquith seems to have Bobby's number, commenting on how the Gov "and his team are hopelessly ensconced in the Tea Party bubble."
Read the Flipping Paper!
Click Here for the Entire Print Version of IND Monthly