Getting the piece is more than half the fun in antiquing. By Amanda Bedgood
Tuesday, Sept. 2, 2013
Proper antiquing is less shopping and more sport. It requires a healthy dose of knowledge, an ample eye and knack for keen observation. There are certain elements that a piece gives away — little somethings that go unknown by a novice but are just the clues that let experts like Merrick Valentino know exactly what they’ve discovered. And more important, what that piece is worth.
“I love the thrill of the hunt,” Valentino says.
The antique seller began years ago researching and purchasing antiques and 15 years ago became a seller. And now she’s sharing her inside tips for snagging a great deal in the world of antiques.
“If you have the money you can always go and find an expensive, nice, quality piece. But for me it’s finding things that are a great buy,” she says.
She breaks down the basics for us to determine whether a piece is truly antique or a reproduction.
“A piece is considered an antique if it’s 100 years or older, and some reproduction period pieces are still considered antiques,” she says. “You want to look for signs of early workmanship in the proportions, the finish and the materials used such as wood, hardware and design details.”
She says to research specifics before you begin the hunt. Note that certain styles have particular qualities and elements within that style.
“For example: a Queen Anne chair has a dutch foot, and there are variations on the balls of the feet. Those are different elements that identify the style of the antique,” Valentino says.
There are certain qualities that can help you determine the age of a piece, and certain little litmus tests even a novice can perform. Valentino points to wood worm holes.
“Some of the reproductions actually make those (wood worm holes) to make it look old. Take a little straight pin and if you can put it directly in the hole, it’s probably reproduced. Worms never eat in a straight line,” she says.
She warns to look at married pieces that have used two original pieces to create a new one.
“Look at the style and the finish and where it’s worn where the pieces are sitting on top of each other. Is it the same wood? Those are all clues as to whether it’s original or a married piece. The value of married pieces are affected only if not irreversible.”
Nails are another good indicator of age.
“Old pieces have wrought iron nails ... reproductions will use the old nails and make the furniture with them. The clue to look for — a blackened area in the adjoining wood. The iron creates a blackened area around the nail,” she says.
She also says to become familiar with different types of wood. Know that certain woods are used more likely in certain pieces.
“Look for soft wood on the backs of furniture. They didn’t use expensive wood except for on the front ... if you see a piece and it’s completely finished on the bottom of drawers and the back it’s probably not quite as old.”
As Valentino explains the intricacies of shopping — hunting — for antiques, it’s clear there’s a world of knowledge to be had. Enough information to overwhelm some. But it’s something she embraces with zeal — like any good hunter.
To post a comment, please log into your IND account. If you do not have an account, click the "register" button to create one. Facebook comments can be used as an alternative to creating an account at theIND.com.
DEC 12 Until recently, it seemed like NOLA Mayor Mitch Landrieu was going to skate to re-election. But John Maginnis writes in this post that he may face some unexpected opposition, from Michael Bagneris, who currently serves as a civil court judge for the city. The judge isn't saying he's thinking about it, because then he would have to step down, but let's just say Maginnis won't be surprised if Bagneris turns up to qualify for the job.
DEC 12 Louisiana Congressman Steve Scalise, chair of the Republican Study Committee, has dumped the RSC's director, this post on Politico tells us. The director, Paul Teller, is accused of leaking conversations with lawmakers, the post says, and "actively working against" strategies that committee members had come up with. Hmmmm....
DEC 12 Jeremy Alford gives us the latest on David Duke in this LaPolitics post. Duke is back in the headlines because he was expelled from Italy recently, accused of trying to start a Neo-Nazi group there. Alford's pulled some interesting bits from the recent media coverage and some older pieces as well about this state embarrassment.
DEC 12 So Louisiana has one of the highest rates of HIV infection in the nation, we've known that for a while. But this Picayune story tells us about a new report by Human Rights Watch that says our laws and law enforcement practices are to blame. Those practices impact two routes to infection: unprotected sex and shared needles, the story says.
DEC 12 Jim Brown blogs about a book, "Dumbest Generation," and bemoans our inability to attain a more positive adjective. Jim wants to know: with our constant, unfettered access to information, why aren't we greater? He may be answering the question himself, urging more focus on community service and less on self-enrichment.
DEC 12 Here's an interesting post from DIG Baton Rouge about the proposed City of St. George in Baton Rouge. This piece focuses on the school district the organizers want to create. They're confident they won't need to raise taxes (because, of course, they'll be grabbing huge chunks of tax dollars -- or at least they think so) to build new schools, the story says.
DEC 12 After weeks of "political gimmicks" aimed at trying to force a vote on something most people really don't understand, Sen. David Vitter has decided he will do exactly what Sen. Mary Landrieu already has done for his own Congressional health insurance, the Advocate reports here. Senate leaders offered him a vote, but he didn't want it -- some say because he hadn't milked all the political juice out of this alleged issue yet.
DEC 12 The fact that "amateurs" are running the education system in Louisiana is hurting our children, blogger Mike Deshotels writes in this post. In support of his argument, he goes through the recent vote on Common Core in Baton Rouge, and explains what the data showed. It's not a pretty picture.
Read the Flipping Paper!
Click Here for the Entire Print Version of IND Monthly