The audit shows that it's time for Langlinais' reign to come to an end.
Louisiana Legislative Auditor Steve Theriot's report found that Langlinais directed public funds to improve private property; was inappropriately reimbursed for meals already paid for with parish and state monies; entered into contracts in violation of the parish charter; used public funds for charitable donations and to pay for employee meals and social events; and pressured parish employees to solicit donations and work on his campaign fund-raising golf tournament during parish work hours.
That's quite a list.
It's not the first time Langlinais has abused the power of his office. This audit was sparked by previous charter violations and questionable financial dealings between Langlinais and a number of parish contractors.
The parish council requested the state audit after discovering an oral contract for legal services between Langlinais and attorney Shane Romero, made without the knowledge of the council and in violation of the parish charter. This revelation came as the council was investigating another illegal contract between Langlinais and Mosquito Control Contractors Inc. President Glenn Stokes.
The contract for mosquito spraying and source reduction between Iberia Parish government and MCCI began in 1982 and lasted until 2004 ' the longest continual contractual arrangement in the parish's history. In 22 years, it only went out for bid once. In 2002, as the parish council was beginning discussions prior to the 2003 renewal of the MCCI contract, allegations of inconsistencies between work billed and performed by MCCI prompted the council to hire an auditor and monitor for the contract. The parish renewed the contract but built in a clause that if improprieties were found, they had the right to cancel the agreement. A subsequent audit and reports from the monitor confirmed billing problems, and the council canceled the contract with MCCI in September 2004.
Sixteenth Judicial District Attorney Phil Haney filed suit against MCCI. The case was settled in August 2005, before it went to court. But within the discovery period of the investigation, a one-page contract signed by Langlinais and Stokes surfaced. The contract, signed in 2000 without council knowledge, gave Stokes a potential 10-year extension that would have guaranteed an annual $1 million contract through 2008 and possibly until 2013. Neither Langlinais nor Stokes could explain why the contract was executed three years before a renewal was due.
In a March 4, 2005, letter to the parish council, Assistant District Attorney Wayne Landry pinpointed the guidelines for the parish president on expenditures of government funds. He cited section 5-06(A) of the parish charter as "the section which limits the power and authority of the Parish President from entering into contracts for which funding has not been approved by appropriate resolution of the council." Landry stated that he did not believe the parish charter gave Langlinais the authority to extend contracts without parish council approval or that the contract was even a legal document.
Upon discovery of what was dubbed "the phantom contract," parish council members passed a resolution requesting that Langlinais provide a list of all Iberia Parish Government contracts. Langlinais provided a list of 14 contracts ' several of which were only oral and unknown to the council ' in autumn 2005.
One contract Langlinais failed to include on the list was another oral contract ' this one a $750 monthly retainer for legal services with Shane Romero that dated back to October 2001. According to Romero's statement to the auditors, Langlinais contacted him and offered to put him on retainer for issues of right-of-way, servitude, on-the-job injuries, employee misconduct and threatened litigation.
That was already Phil Haney's job. According to the Parish Home Rule Charter, the district attorney serves as the legal adviser to the council, parish president and all parish departments, offices and agencies.
In April 2006, Haney issued a written opinion concerning the retainer contract and stated that there was no written agreement or council approval of the contract. The opinion also stated that "the contract was awarded contrary to and in violation of the Parish Home Rule Charter." Section 5-06(A) of the charter states, "authorization of payment or incurring of obligation in violation of the provisions of this charter shall be void and payment also made illegal; such actions shall be cause for removal of any official, officer or such obligation or who caused such payment to be authorized."
Langlinais' explanation of the Romero contract is cited in the audit:
"Mr. Langlinais stated that he placed Mr. Romero on retainer contract for threatened litigation and consulting. He also stated that he inadvertently left out Mr. Romero's retainer on the contract list requested by the council. He stated that the council approves the budget, and it should have questioned the legal fee line item under the professional fee category in the general fund budget."
The audit continued:
"Mr. Haney stated that when questioned about the contractual arrangement with Mr. Romero, Mr. Langlinais told the council he did not know it was against the Parish Home Rule Charter. Mr. Langlinais stated that he terminated the retainer contract as soon as the district attorney informed him the contract was in violation of the Home Rule Charter. He believes the retainer was a good savings to the Parish and he did it in good faith."
This was the second discovery in consecutive years where Parish President Langlinais committed public funds to private contractors without public knowledge or counsel ratification. Once the contracts were uncovered, Langlinais apologized for forgetting about them and said he also didn't realize they were illegal. Langlinais also said the council should have caught the line item buried in the budget.
That prompted four Iberia Parish councilmen to launch the state audit. It took Theriot 10 months to complete his findings, and the results clearly show a disturbing pattern of Langlinais' ethics violations. The parish council has now directed Haney to "seek monetary recovery from the responsible party for unauthorized expenditure of parish funds and to investigate possible abuses of the resources of the Parish President's office for private political purposes and possible ethics violations." Haney is subpoenaing the legislative auditor's office for all records of interviews and information gathered during the audit. After all files are reviewed, Haney has the authority to convene a grand jury to see if there are criminal charges to be brought against Langlinais.
Langlinais shrugs off the audit's findings, claiming the whole thing is a political move by councilman Bernard Broussard, who's rumored to be eyeing Langlinais' seat in the October election. Maybe that's partially true. State auditor Theriot, however, has no political ax to grind and simply fulfilled his obligation to "determine the propriety of certain financial transactions" involving Langlinais.
Let's review, one more time, what Theriot's audit found:
Langlinais directed public funds to improve private property.
Langlinais was inappropriately reimbursed for meals already paid for with parish and state monies.
Langlinais entered into contracts in violation of the parish charter.
Langlinais used public funds for charitable donations and to pay for employee meals and social events.
Langlinais pressured parish employees to solicit donations and work on his campaign fund-raising golf tournament during parish work hours.
With our post-hurricane political environment demanding governmental and ethics reform more than ever, Langlinais' actions are an embarrassment not just to Iberia Parish, but to the whole state of Louisiana. We urge the Iberia Parish Council to commence impeachment proceedings against Will Langlinais for violating the Iberia Parish charter.
MAY 24 Blogger Robert Mann posts this entry about the Baton Rouge Chamber's recent report on Louisiana's higher education system. It's critical to economic development, and yet our system is facing a "funding crisis" with no way to resolve it, the report says. The Chamber says control of tuition and fees must be returned to the higher ed governing boards.
MAY 24 Here's a NBC33 story about Tyrann Mathieu. He has signed with the Arizona Cardinals, inking a $3 million, four-year deal. He gets a signing bonus of $265K, but gets another, larger bonus if he doesn't get cut from the team for doing drugs. The deal reportedly includes mandatory tests and meetings for the player.
MAY 24 Jarvis DeBerry posts here about the redonkulus rhetoric that would have us believe NOLA is a safe city with a murder problem. Maybe the city's crime stats don't compare with its murder stats because you can't manipulate a murder, he says: a dead body's a dead body. It just doesn't make sense, he says, and his readers agree: a poll asks if they believe the city is safe, and more than 90 percent say no.
MAY 24 Jindal administration officials announced Thursday that the privatization of public health care is going to cost a lot more than they budgeted for, the Advocate reports here. "I'm so surprised," said no one. Anywhere. The cost they're projecting now is more than $1 billion - a lot more than the $626 million budgeted for it. And, it's more than it cost the state to operate those hospitals. So why are we doing this again?
MAY 24 Blogger CB Forgotston ridicules the recent PR campaign by the state GOP in the wake of a legislative auditor's request to both major parties. The GOP (apparently unaware that the Dems got the same request) started yammering about being targeted because it had "killed" a tax increase. CB finds that laughable, but it's also pretty funny that the GOP was comparing this episode to the IRS scandal (Because the President has so much to do with our state auditor. Right?).
MAY 24 Politico details some recent fund-raising efforts by Sen. David Vitter, which have raised the question of his future political plans. This time, it is a $5,000 per head "bayou weekend" that includes "Cajun cooking" and an all-caps "alligator hunt," the story reports. Funds raised go to a super PAC that can spend money to support Vitter in federal or state races, the story points out.
MAY 24 The pink building on Royal in the quarter was sold at a sheriff's sale Thursday, this Picayune story reports. An injunction that would have halted the sale wasn't enforced because the family failed to post a $150,000 bond, the story reports. So the owner of the mortgages on the building bought it, for nearly $7 million. Now the feuding family will have to negotiate with that company to get a lease on the building that has housed their business for close to 60 years.
MAY 23 This post in Louisiana Voice tells us about a bill by a Winnsboro lege that would require all public high school students to take at least one Course Choice online class in order to graduate. (What?) Blogger Tom Aswell says it's a monument to "waste and corruption," especially in light of the problems he's exposed with the program in recent weeks. Idaho had a similar program, but voters removed it by a 2-1 margin, Aswell says.
Most Read
in case you missed it
Subscribe to this comment's feed