Home|Blogs|Publications|RSS Log In|Register|Search
The Grid |Shopping|Bridal|Party Girl|Food|Tourism|Fashion|Subscribe
IND Contents
Cover Story
Lead News
RE
Living IND
Finds
Pooyie!
Party Girl
The Pipeline
Health & Medical

Cialis Online

BP backs off ‘overbroad’ language in agreements with fishermen

Written by Walter Pierce
Sunday, May 02, 2010

A federal judge in New Orleans Sunday heard arguments from lawyers from Louisiana fishermen concerned that agreements they were signing with British Petroleum to serve as compensated volunteers in the cleanup effort from the oil spill would “seriously compromised the existing and future rights and potential legal claims” arising from their loss of livelihood.

Click here to read a pdf of the agreement BP required paid volunteers to sign.

U.S. District Court Judge Ginger Berrigan ruled that some language in the agreements was overbroad. In response, BP agreed to enter into a judgment stipulating that the provisions in question “are without effect.”

In a press release issued Sunday, Stuart Smith, an attorney for the fishermen, says, “This is an amazing example of how well our civil justice system works for the hard-working people of America, such as Louisiana fisherman who most need it right now.”

Among the language in the agreements deemed impermissible, according to Smith:

BP, which is mandated to take 100 percent responsibility for the oil clean-up, required that the volunteers indemnify it for any accidents that might occur from the volunteers' efforts.

BP demanded that the volunteers waive their First Amendment constitutional free speech rights about the volunteer's participation in the clean-up efforts of the disaster; for example, if a commercial fisherman signed this agreement he or she could not then speak to anyone about the disaster or clean-up efforts until BP first “approves” what the volunteer wants to say.

BP demanded a free ride on the volunteers' insurance policies so that if there is damage to a volunteer's vessel or other injuries, such as to a crew member, BP will be an “additional insured” and the financial responsibility for the damage will rest on the volunteer's insurance carrier, not on BP.

BP demanded 30 days notice before any volunteer is allowed to pursue legal claims against BP, and there were no exceptions made for emergencies.

Walter Pierce
About the author:
Comments (7)add
...
written by Gregory , May 03, 2010 - 12:53 am
I would think that the insurance language would likely preclude just about every fisherman from participating. I doubt very much that a fisherman's insurance policy would cover ANY loss resulting from recovery work for BP.
...
written by The Original Northsidian , May 03, 2010 - 03:12 pm
Why would anyone think you could trust BIG OIL!!! They are slicker than the oil slick they created!!
...
written by earthboppin' dove , May 03, 2010 - 08:55 pm
words can and do talk....providing everyone involved overstands the language being used. attorneys writing and interpreting law is not a good idea in the first place.

are there any lawyers at all?

we all want to know.

all of the life upon the planet are being harmed.

there truly is a difference atween a lawyer and an attorney.


...
written by Banderman , May 03, 2010 - 08:58 pm
Where is OBAMA on THIS ripoff? I guess these fisherman are not his paid supporters; consequently he stand mute. Nothing like having a (P)resident that represents all citizens equally - (hurl)
...
written by Goodtime Charlie , May 03, 2010 - 09:59 pm
Gregory, how the hell the oil industry service sector remains in business is beyond my imagination to comprehend...........
If you ever have the opportunity to read a Master Service Agreement, from an OIL OPERATOR to a service oilfield company, you will see that the Oil Operator lays all of the responsibility on the servicing company, and they expect the service company to indemnify them from most of the responsibility, and to let them ride the service companys insurance.......... Its offered to everyone like this, you want to service our wells, sign on the dotted line.

...
written by Sew Toro , May 04, 2010 - 05:10 am
The lawyers need to run fast into some hard blunt objects.
...
written by Bryan B , May 04, 2010 - 12:58 pm
Participation in clean up efforts should not require anyone sign anything it's a free country and we should be allowed to clean up a mess we find anytime we find one in public areas without incurring liability.
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 
:
:


|


Most Popular - News
  1. C’est What? DTL art for sale online

    Convicted serial killer Derrick Todd Lee is on Death Row at Angola State Penitentiary and is evidently earning a little extra money producing art

  2. LSEA repeal in the works — again

    Gov. Bobby Jindal may get a chance to further burnish those education-reform credentials if a successful attempt at repealing the Louisiana Science Education Act makes it to his desk.

  3. Lafayette smokes country in median income growth

    No other metro even comes to close to Lafayette’s 12.2 percent increase in median household income from 2007 to 2010.

  4. This week in awesome: an alternative to RedFlex
  5. Girard Park residents cry foul over city’s intervention

    At least 15 homeowners in the Girard Park area say they were never served when LCG intervened in a lawsuit that seeks to nullify a 1940 covenant that protects the residential integrity of their neighborhood and they want a new trial.

Home|News|About Us|Contact Us|Advertise|Customer Service
Awards|Past Issues|Events Calendar-