“Some people are going to scream, ‘You’re increasing our taxes.’ The actual taxing rate, the millage, is approved by the voter. That’s how taxes are supposed to be. The ugly loophole in this is the roll back, roll forward deal.” — City-Parish Councilman Keith Patin
Photo by Terri Fensel
For the past four years, Keith Patin’s 3-bedroom, 40-year-old home on Alonda Drive near Brentwood Boulevard has had an official assessed value of around $205,000. He’s been paying approximately $1,475 a year in property taxes on the home. This year, Patin has been told, his home value is shooting up to $277,000, and his property taxes could rise by as much as $737, a 50 percent increase.
“I was surprised,” says the first-term councilman. “Nobody likes their taxes going up. On one end I’m lucky that I’m in an area that has a lot of activity and increased value, and then you get the sticker shock.”
While initially caught off guard, Patin believes the assessment is fair. “Is it too much?” he asks. “Well, if my property’s worth more, then I think it’s accurate.”
Patin’s situation won’t be uncommon, as Lafayette Parish Tax Assessor Conrad Comeaux’s office is now finalizing work on the state mandated four-year re-assessment of property values. Prices are up significantly throughout the parish due to the robust real estate market the area has experienced over the past several years.
The previous assessments represented home values as of Jan. 1, 2003; by law, the new assessments will reflect property values as of Jan. 1, 2007. During that time, real estate statistics show home values have risen an average of about 35 percent in Lafayette Parish. “Our numbers will be reflective of that,” says Comeaux. He expects to begin sending out notices of the new values in late July.
Many factors have contributed to the recent upswing in home values. “The economy in the last four years, prices of housing has gone up,” he says. “People will want to blame that on Katrina and Rita, when in fact that is only part of the equation. The bigger part of the equation is what’s going on with the cost of the commodities.” Comeaux says the skyrocketing costs of basic home construction supplies like copper and concrete, due to increased global demand, have also had a major role in rising home values.
Some property values will remain the same, while increases will vary from neighborhood to neighborhood. “A lot depends on where people live and what’s been going on in the marketplace around where they live,” Comeaux says. Commercial property values are also up, but not as dramatically — nonresidential property assessments will see roughly a 20 percent increase on average.
Comeaux’s office has no control over actual tax rates, which are proposed by local government bodies and approved by voters. “That’s the misconception — that my office can affect taxes,” he says. “What we’re interested in are the assessed values — how does that value compare to what’s going on in the market? And that is all. It’s up to those taxing bodies to set the rates.”
How much property taxes will rise this year is a complicated question, as taxes vary according to where residents live. There are a total of 41 millages within the parish, some of which apply exclusively to Lafayette city residents and residents of the other smaller parish municipalities and special taxing districts. Local government bodies, including the sheriff, the school board, and city-parish government also have the option of deciding whether to take advantage of collecting more taxes from increased property values. This mechanism is known as a roll forward of millages.
In re-assessment years, state law mandates that local governing bodies cannot take in any more than the previous year’s collection of property taxes without a vote to roll forward its millages. This puts local officials in the difficult position — particularly in Louisiana’s anti-tax climate — of having to vote for more tax revenue.
“Some people are going to scream, ‘You’re increasing our taxes,’” Patin says. “The actual taxing rate, the millage, is approved by the voter. That’s how taxes are supposed to be. The ugly loophole in this is the roll back, roll forward deal. This is one [re-assessment] where if you roll this forward, the net effect of that is increasing people’s taxes that they’re paying.”
As a councilman, Patin is aware that the collective property tax increases tied to the new assessments could provide a much-needed boost to city-parish revenues. “I see both sides,” Patin says. “I don’t want my taxes going up, but yet I see the desperate need for additional revenue for the city.”
Patin has been trying to talk about the issue wherever he goes, so constituents aren’t surprised when they see the new assessments. When he met with Comeaux about the issue, he had the assessor look up his own house so he could use it as an example. “I’m a visual person,” he notes. “I can understand if you tell me using a house as an example. I’m going to have some neighborhood meetings, and I’m asking people what they think. If I vote to roll forward, yes you’re going to pay more taxes. Is it fair at this point?”
In August, the council will be voting on more than a dozen millage roll-forwards, more than any other government entity. (The school board has four millages, while the sheriff, who already has published his intention of rolling forward millages, controls two. Other millages, which have recently been renewed for this year, will be automatically reset to rates approved by voters.)
Both Comeaux and Patin say voters need to view their property taxes in perspective. In a state of low property taxes, Lafayette Parish’s property taxes are among the lowest. Comeaux points out that all of the more urbanized parishes, including Calcasieu (Lake Charles), Rapides (Alexandria) and Ouachita (Monroe) pay significantly higher property tax rates than Lafayette Parish residents.
“There is a need to update, and there is a need for additional revenue,” Patin says. “We’re providing all these services, and things keep getting more and more expensive. We’re still trying to provide the same amount of services. Where does the extra money come from? This would be one source, and it’s something we’ll have to consider when the time comes.”
MAY 21 Gambit columnist Clancy DuBos writes about the Mother's Day shooting, and how the stages of shock and blame and healing mirror those traveled by the same city following Hurricane Katrina. The city will recover, just as it did following the storm, by reaching out to help the people injured most seriously by the event, DuBos writes. It's how we heal, he says.
MAY 21 Here's a post on the Advocate (but buried on a subpage, not on the front) that reports something Louisiana Voice reported some time ago: a top DOE official lives in Los Angeles and "commutes" to Baton Rouge. The positioning of the story caused a stir on Facebook Monday, with several posters asking if the Advocate was covering someone's hiney. Sentell's stories on DOE are notoriously soft, and this one is no different: don't expect any hard questions in here.
MAY 21 Here's another post from blogger Tom Aswell about the "course choice" program. He's already reported on kids being signed up without their consent or knowledge, and has more here: For example, he tells of a six-year-old who was signed up for high school Latin. He also digs a little deeper into the sister companies of the main one operating in Louisiana; all of them seem to have complaints against them. Stinky.
MAY 21 Given the 80 percent cut in higher ed funding since he's been in office, it's clear Gov. Jindal would rather give tax cuts to out of state companies than have a functioning system, blogger Dayne Sherman argues in this post. The cuts have been such a disaster, Sherman says, that it will take 30 years to fix what's been broken. He says he believes the aim is to shut down most of the schools before Jindal leaves in 2016.
MAY 21 Blogger CB Forgotston says there are too many elections in Louisiana, and they're costing us too much money. The proof is in the pudding: turnout for most of these nonsensical pollings gets worse and worse, CB opines, even as millions of dollars that could be spent on health care or higher ed go down the tubes. The legislature must take action to stem the tide of pointless elections, he says.
MAY 21 Here's an interesting investigative piece by WVUE on the retirement benefits of some Jefferson Parish public employees. According to the story, the taxpayers are paying 100 percent of the retirement contributions of employees who started work prior to a certain date in April 1986 -- and have done for more than 30 years. It costs the parish millions annually, and might not be legal, the story reports.
MAY 21 This post on Bayou Buzz provides insight from Louisiana's intrepid pollster, Bernie Pinsonat, on the winners and losers from this year's legislative session. But to hear Bernie tell it, there's almost nuttin but losers: Jindal, the Republican party, the Fiscal Hawks all get big goose eggs in his win column.
MAY 20 This post on The Lens takes a look at a huge (either $500K or $250K) bill that one NOLA charter now has for school lunches. The RSD says the charter group didn't fill out the proper paperwork for federal reimbursement, but the story details how the RSD didn't ensure the people running the charter had the proper training, despite requests from hapless charter employees trying to fill out forms. Either way, somebody's asleep at the wheel.
David Calhoun and Elizabeth “EB” Brooks are the first two employees of Lafayette Central Park Inc., the nonprofit charged with turning Lafayette Consolidated Government’s 100-acre Johnston Street Horse Farm property into a passive public park. Calhoun was named executive director, and Brooks is director of planning and design.
There will soon be a whole lot of shakin’ going on at Benny’s Sportshack Supplement Depot, a new concept by Opelousas native Benny Nele. Located at 2002 Johnston St., the supplement shop, smoothie bar and café, featuring hot off the press paninis and wraps, plans to open in late May.