News -> News TUE, MAY 5 6:00PM by Nathan Stubbs

Former superintendent supports school board reform

Former Lafayette Parish Superintendent James Easton says he was surprised to read in The Independent (“Class Action ,” 4/22) comments from School Board President Carl LaCombe about how the local school board does not and has not micromanaged superintendents. “I’m disappointed,” Easton says. “For him to say it didn’t happen. It happened routinely.”

“Maybe what he meant to say,” Easton continues, “is that they never did not micromanage.”

Easton’s comments underscore the tumultuous working relationship he had with the school board toward the end of his tenure — a struggle that ultimately ended with the board buying out the remaining 18 months of Easton’s contract in June 2007.

Because of his experience in Lafayette, Easton says he is a strong supporter of state Superintendent Paul Pastorek’s proposals to revamp school district management. “I believe Superintendent Paul Pastorek is 100 percent correct about identifying certain school board behaviors as being counterproductive,” Easton says. “I’m not saying every single board member in the world gets involved in [micromanaging], but clearly the culture of board members is to micromanage.”

Easton is a stark contrast to current Lafayette Parish School System Superintendent Burnell Lemoine, who opposes school board reform and says he has never been micromanaged.

Easton’s last days as superintendent were marked by his frequent complaints of school board interference. For its part, school board members often countered that it was their job to request information from the administration and bring to light concerns they had regarding some of Easton’s staff reorganizations. In particular, the school board and Easton were at odds over grants administrator Amy Trahan. Several board members blamed Trahan when the school system’s Title I and other grant funding did not come in on time, causing problems in some schools. The school board favored placing then-Chief Academic Officer Lemoine in charge of the district’s Title I funding — a job he oversaw prior to Easton’s 2005 reorganization. Easton persistently defended Trahan.

The board also irked Easton in other ways. In January 2007, one of the first acts of the newly elected school board was to remove Easton from the board table at meetings to reduce his control of discussions. Easton also wrote frequent letters to board members complaining about micromanaging and attempting to define what the board’s role should be.

Specifically, Easton says several board members would routinely come to him and make suggestions about the hiring of principals or other staffing decisions within their district. Board members also typically wanted to be notified ahead of time about any recommendation for a principal hiring or firing in their district.

“I didn’t leave [the school system] as a bitter guy,” adds Easton, “but I think what Pastorek is doing, I support him 100 percent, because I think it’s the right thing to do.”


Comments (3)add
...
written by John St. Julien , May 06, 2009 - 10:26 pm
You're kidding right? This article was left over from the April fools issue and got shuffled into the mix somehow this week?

It cannot be possible that it is anything but a sly trick to designate James Easton as the "go to guy" on the issue of supporting Pastorek's whacky ideas. The same James Easton who was in control the whole time the "declines" in scores took place? He gets a platform to blame it on the school board that kicked him out in part because of those same declines? The same James Easton that starred in embarrassing article after embarrassing article in the Advertiser concerning his odd personnel picks? The same Easton who refused to get rid of his hand-picked grants operator after stuff like failing to apply for 13 million in state funds laying on the table and then staving off an investigation after her office (and only her office) was supposedly burgled? That James Easton? The same James Easton who, when he was the one being grilled about the falling test scores while he was in control citedââ?¬â?in a letter printed in these pagesââ?¬Â¢Ã¢â?¬â?excuses ranging from poverty, to changes in the test, to Katrina and Rita-related population changes? (Not that these arenââ?¬â?¢t valid points; they are....but suddenly Easton has forgotten them and only recalls ââ?¬Å?micro-managementââ?¬Â as the causes of these problems? How convenient.) The same noble guy who, when the going got tough got going to the tune of 280,000 for missing 18 months work?

James Easton is the best possible poster child for the _anti-Pastorek_ position imaginable: a superintendent who was unable to produce the changes he promised, with at best questionable hiring practices who cost the community dearly in both pride and cold, hard cash and who, in the end, was supported by only a minority of the board elected by that community. Under the Pastorek regime such a superintendent would only be fired by a supermajority of the board who would be specifically denied any right to question the quality or caliber of the people he choose to employ and for which the community must pay.

I can�t imagine......

�http://www.theind.com/content/view/633/69/
...
written by Pedro , May 07, 2009 - 01:38 pm
Many good points, Mr. St. Julien!
Simply stated, this article is nonsense. Easton micromanaged every department in the LPSS. Easton also managed the LPSB just like he did central office. Beverly Wilson, Judy Cox, Mike Hefner, Kay Gibson all voted the way they were told to vote by Easton.
Fact is, we are still paying many of Easton's political favorites in central office.
...
written by BO , May 30, 2009 - 01:17 pm
Go to the Louisiana Legislative Auditors site and read LPSS audit findings. This information about the way he managed the system proves the need for both trying to manage or guide him then finally buying him out was necessary. He really should have been terminated.
Amazing that any one would still listen to this guy.
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
LA LA Land
Advertisement
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it