Supporters of a now-dead effort in the legislative session to enact reforms of Louisiana school boards are regrouping after a crushing check mate by the opposition, notably the Louisiana School Boards Association, which lobbied vigorously against any change to the status quo. Reformers ceded all hope last week with the defeat in the House of Representatives of House Bill 851, the last of four bills filed by Rep. Steve Carter, R-Baton Rouge.
“Reform is hard,” state Superintendent Paul Pastorek says flatly. “I said it would be very difficult to succeed on this from the beginning. There real challenge out there is, no one has really tried to push back on school boards for as long as I’ve been doing this — 20 years, 25 years — and I think the first time you try to push back on school boards, they push back very hard.”
Supporters of 851 had their fingers crossed when the bill cleared a House committee on May 19 with amendments that watered it down to what many thought was a digestible form. Gone was the requirement that a two-thirds super majority be required for a school board to hire or fire a superintendent. But the bill fell on a blade in the full House. It was rejected 51-46. HB 851’s kindred spirits — HB 371 (defining nepotism laws for school boards), 664 (imposing term limits), and 808 (placing a $200-per-month ceiling on school board pay) — never made it out of committee, and two were done within two weeks of the session’s start.
“We’re certainly disappointed with the House’s defeat of school board reform legislation this session,” acknowledges Barry Erwin, president of the Council for a Better Louisiana, a good-government group that lobbied for the Carter legislation. “What’s most disappointing is that this was all about politics, not the merits of the bill. For whatever reason many House members chose to listen to their local school board members rather than a diverse group of citizens and business groups who are extremely concerned about the education of children.”
Indeed, as Louisiana politics columnist John Maginnis observes in a recent column, some lawmakers acknowledged a desire to dodge tension with their own local school boards, and support from the governor’s office was tepid at best:
“... the governor’s staff put less pressure on members than they have on other measures. Some of the governor’s floorleaders told colleagues to feel free to vote with their local politics. A number of committee chairmen, including Appropriations Chairman Jim Fannin, D-Jonesboro, voted no. He said, ‘I don’t have a problem with my school board back home and I don’t want to create one.’”
“It’s unfortunate that legislators failed to pass HB 851,” laments Public Affairs Research Council President Jim Brandt. “We think it would have been a good first step in the school board reform effort because it would have clearly delineated the lines of responsibility for local superintendents and for school board members.”
Before 851’s demise, CABL and the Louisiana Association of Business and Industry commissioned a Southern Media & Opinion Research poll that found solid support among state voters for school board reform. “It showed,” says Erwin, “that citizens really do believe their school boards are too bogged down in small details that distract them from improving student performance.” The issue also received widespread endorsements from chambers of commerce in virtually every metropolitan area in Louisiana, including the Greater Lafayette Chamber of Commerce. But reform was strongly opposed — scoffed at even — by individual members of school boards across the state who argue they’re being made scapegoats for Louisiana’s poor educational performance relative to the rest of the nation. Teachers unions were also suspicious of reform.
Some observers, Maginnis included, attribute at least part of the reform movement’s failure to a general dislike in the state’s public education community of Pastorek, known to shoot from the hip when it comes to his support of reform and condemnation of school boards. But Pastorek says there was support within the education community — silent support. “A lot of retired educators and retired board members and retired superintendents were for this. In fact, people ask me, ‘How come superintendents didn’t speak up?’ and I say, ‘Superintendents can’t speak up. If the bill doesn’t pass they’ll be lunch meat.”
Many of the proponents of school-board reform acknowledged before the session began that there was virtually no hope of all four of Carter’s bills passing through the legislative gauntlet; one, perhaps two, reaching the governor’s desk would have been a victory. But virtually all of the movement’s supporters saw this year’s push as an opportunity to establish a beachhead — to educate the public and to chip away at the LSBA’s formidable ramparts. With HB 851 managing 46 favorable votes in the House, and buttressed by the statewide poll, the movement’s leading lights have reason for optimism. “These issues are not going away,” says Erwin. “The public knows more about them than ever before and we will be back next year to build on the foundation we laid this session. Real reform isn’t easy and takes time. This was real reform and that’s why the defenders of the status quo came out in force against it. But we will continue fighting for this and school board reform will become a reality in Louisiana.”
Hmmm. i'm a little confused. Pastorek says retired superintendents were in favor of it. he says they don't speak up because they will be lunch meat. how so? if they are retired, how so? I think this is another example of why legislators don't trust or like pastorek. the man talks a good game, but when you put it down in black and white and start to dissect it, it's all smoke. or something worse.
... written by Gary McGoffin , June 10, 2009 - 04:13 pm
Retired superintendents and and some former school board members did speak up. Read the article carefully. The question was ââ?¬Ë?How come superintendents didnââ?¬â?¢t speak up?ââ?¬â?¢ It wasn't 'How come retired superintendents didn't speak up?'
The important point is that the public discussion of reform has started. Change is always unsettling but it is coming. It has to.
... written by Just Curious , June 10, 2009 - 04:29 pm
It's curious that this and, unfortunately, other articles from the Independent on this topic display a complete lack of willingness to attribute the failure of the school board "reforms" to anything other than (implicity unfair) special interest pleading from the school boards.
There is a very revealing quote in this article: ââ?¬Å?For whatever reason many House members chose to listen to their local school board members rather than a diverse group of citizens and business groups who are extremely concerned about the education of children.ââ?¬Â Really? What diverse group? A narrow slice of organizations that represent business interests are cited. And that's really all that there were, aside from Pastorek himself.
Educators ARE, lock,stock, and barrel, dismissive. Maybe there's a reason for that? Oddly enough there are many good reasons citizens or legistlators might think educators and the people they elected to run their own schools might be the better people to trust than a Paul Pastorek and a pack of business interests. That sounds pretty sensible to me.
Fact is there is NO reason to think that changing the school boards will make one iota of difference in school achievementââ?¬â?and the proponents never managed to show any evidence to think so. Educators are damn tired of "reforms" and reformers that want to do everything to "fix" the schools except to address the real problems (which might just cost money and involve the grassroot commitment of local communities).
What this is, yet again, is the state reaching down and deciding that it should "fix" the mistakes local people make. The condescension is palpable. Baton Rouge does not know how to run the schools better than the locals who pay for them and bear the consequences of their decisions. The whole thing stank to high heaven. And THAT'S why it failed.
... written by Amused , June 10, 2009 - 04:55 pm
Rachel, you're correct about Paul Pastorek's positions. He has never explained how putting term limits or pay caps on school board members is going to result in Louisiana's children getting a "world class education," although he's implied time and time again that this would be the result.
Take that idea apart to examine it, and you'll see that it's just gobbledygook. It's astonishing that "good citizen" groups like PAR and CABL jumped on the bandwagon, accepting Pastorek'a assertion without question. Never mind that Pastorek has no education degrees or classroom experience. He's a lawyer.
If we want our public school children to get a better education, we need to focus on issues such as class size, curriculum, the culture of our schools, testing, social issues affecting students, early childhood education and school funding.
I've heard a whole lot of smart and experienced education people talk about what's needed for our schools to excel; not one of them ever mentioned capping the pay of school board members or the need for a supermajority vote to fire a superintendent.
... written by justwandering , June 10, 2009 - 05:22 pm
Re-read the article! He said a lot of retired board members, educators and superintendents were for it. The next sentence questions why superintendents didn't speak up, inferring to serving superintendents. Of course, any sitting superintendent would in fact be lunch meat if they voiced support.
... written by Gary McGoffin , June 11, 2009 - 02:32 pm
Let me start by thanking the Lafayette Parish School System for educating me, my brothers and my three sons. My mother and my wife both taught in the System. And, for the past nine years I have been involved in the System primarily through the Lafayette Chamber of Commerce.
In 2005, the Lafayette Chamber met with then state Superintendent Cecil Picard, his staff and CABL to discuss our five year experience with the Lafayette public school system. We had worked with our peers in the school system to evaluate technology, human resources, facilities, transportation and finance. What we found was a disconnect between the education professionals and the School Board members. The culture of the School Board was that it rather than the Lafayette parish Superintendent and his staff run things. And they were not particularly keen on a bunch of business men and women trying to tell them how to do things. As one noted School Board member often repeated "we are not a business". But they are. One of the largest in this region in terms of number of employees, employee benefit administration, a transportation system comparable in size to the New Orleans Transit Authority before Katrina, 3.8 million square feet of facilities under roof, the third largest utility consumer in the parish and host of the largest computer network in the parish. The list goes on and on.
What we realized then and remains true today is that the focus of our school system is on the adults rather than the students. Particularly the adults on the School Board. Now let's distinguish that from the classroom. Our teachers are focused on their students. But once we leave the classroom that dynamic changes. And why is that? It's because we have not made the fundamental distinction in the role of the professional educators and the role of the public through its elected representatives to the School Board. This is the system that we have inherited. Heck, it's the system that the School Board inherited. It's just always been that way.
The School Board should establish the goals that are important to our community. It should hire the Superintendent to meet those goals AND it should hold that Superintendent accountable. That's it.
Why were the micromanagement, hire/fire, and compensation bills in this past legislative session important? Because it's important that our School Board hire the person best capable of delivering on the goals. How do they best achieve that? By reaching a solid consensus on what those goals are and the person best qualified to achieve them. Why would we want someone as Superintendent if almost half the board voted against hiring them in the first place. That Superintendent starts out in a hole and if one of the majority gets upset for whatever reason, that Superintendent is out. No wonder we hire a new Superintendent every few years. How are we to build consistency and achieve progress when we don't have those qualities built in to our own governance process? And how do we hold a Superintendent accountable when every decision must be approved by the School Board instead of the education professionals.
Why is cutting School Board compensation appropriate? Because it should not be a job and it should not take the time that it does now because of the degree of involvement our School Board has in the day to day operations. But the salary isn't the big deal. Insurance benefits are. The Chamber reached the same conclusions in 2005 and Cecil Picard confirmed our findings. In fact, he said that was one of the biggest problems particularly in the rural parishes where so many ran for School Board for the insurance benefits they could not otherwise obtain. Imagine how it could impact your vote if your family's continued health care coverage could be affected by an unpopular but prudent position on an issue. (CONTINUED BELOW)
... written by Gary McGoffin , June 11, 2009 - 02:33 pm
Bottom line, the School Board members should not be required to spend the time that they do now. Pay them for the meetings that they attend, just like BESE does. That's not the problem. Realignment of interests and a clear definition of responsibilities should be the goal.
If we do this, we will enlarge the pool of potential candidates for School Board. You never have too many good people running for an office. The public only benefits.
As for the call for research based statistics to prove that these reform issues will enhance classroom performance, great. But let's extend that demand to all aspects of our educational system. It wasn't done with block scheduling before it was implemented at considerable cost. It wasn't done with our class size policy. That was proven when the Chamber brought Dr. Charles Achilles to town and he enlightened us to the fact that the only large scale study on the impact of class size was limited to its effects when implemented in the first year of education. Did we follow that advise? No. We implemented it wholesale because we were told that "a good teacher can teach in a tent". What happened? We went from an $8 million annual capital budget to $600,000 per year while increasing our facilities by 800,000 square feet. That same proponent of lower class size later complained of the deplorable conditions in our schools.
One last point. This is not a power grab by the State Superintendent. It's an attempt to empower the local Superintendent. We're supposed to do that with site based management of our schools by empowering the Principals. Why not be consistent?
... written by Myrick6 , June 16, 2009 - 01:27 pm
I think the State Superintendents of Louisiana, in recent history, are much like past State Insurance commisioners. Not on the up and up, just harder to put in jail. But hey, let's do what we usually do with education - let's give everyone involved another big raise!
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.
MAY 24 Blogger Robert Mann posts this entry about the Baton Rouge Chamber's recent report on Louisiana's higher education system. It's critical to economic development, and yet our system is facing a "funding crisis" with no way to resolve it, the report says. The Chamber says control of tuition and fees must be returned to the higher ed governing boards.
MAY 24 Here's a NBC33 story about Tyrann Mathieu. He has signed with the Arizona Cardinals, inking a $3 million, four-year deal. He gets a signing bonus of $265K, but gets another, larger bonus if he doesn't get cut from the team for doing drugs. The deal reportedly includes mandatory tests and meetings for the player.
MAY 24 Jarvis DeBerry posts here about the redonkulus rhetoric that would have us believe NOLA is a safe city with a murder problem. Maybe the city's crime stats don't compare with its murder stats because you can't manipulate a murder, he says: a dead body's a dead body. It just doesn't make sense, he says, and his readers agree: a poll asks if they believe the city is safe, and more than 90 percent say no.
MAY 24 Jindal administration officials announced Thursday that the privatization of public health care is going to cost a lot more than they budgeted for, the Advocate reports here. "I'm so surprised," said no one. Anywhere. The cost they're projecting now is more than $1 billion - a lot more than the $626 million budgeted for it. And, it's more than it cost the state to operate those hospitals. So why are we doing this again?
MAY 24 Blogger CB Forgotston ridicules the recent PR campaign by the state GOP in the wake of a legislative auditor's request to both major parties. The GOP (apparently unaware that the Dems got the same request) started yammering about being targeted because it had "killed" a tax increase. CB finds that laughable, but it's also pretty funny that the GOP was comparing this episode to the IRS scandal (Because the President has so much to do with our state auditor. Right?).
MAY 24 Politico details some recent fund-raising efforts by Sen. David Vitter, which have raised the question of his future political plans. This time, it is a $5,000 per head "bayou weekend" that includes "Cajun cooking" and an all-caps "alligator hunt," the story reports. Funds raised go to a super PAC that can spend money to support Vitter in federal or state races, the story points out.
MAY 24 The pink building on Royal in the quarter was sold at a sheriff's sale Thursday, this Picayune story reports. An injunction that would have halted the sale wasn't enforced because the family failed to post a $150,000 bond, the story reports. So the owner of the mortgages on the building bought it, for nearly $7 million. Now the feuding family will have to negotiate with that company to get a lease on the building that has housed their business for close to 60 years.
MAY 23 This post in Louisiana Voice tells us about a bill by a Winnsboro lege that would require all public high school students to take at least one Course Choice online class in order to graduate. (What?) Blogger Tom Aswell says it's a monument to "waste and corruption," especially in light of the problems he's exposed with the program in recent weeks. Idaho had a similar program, but voters removed it by a 2-1 margin, Aswell says.
There will soon be a whole lot of shakin’ going on at Benny’s Sportshack Supplement Depot, a new concept by Opelousas native Benny Nele. Located at 2002 Johnston St., the supplement shop, smoothie bar and café, featuring hot off the press paninis and wraps, plans to open in late May.
Philip deMahy Sr., a once respected New Iberia ad exec, was sentenced May 2 to spend the next two years (he faced up to 100 years) in a state penitentiary after state and federal investigators found dozens of images depicting children engaged in lewd sexual acts on his personal computer.
This year’s Cool Town issue is all about people who are not native to South Louisiana but made a conscious decision to be here, to be among us, to participate in our culture and contribute to it.
A shelved ordinance transferring $200,000 from a northside drainage project to a south Lafayette development may not break any laws, but it stinks to high heaven.
An effort to restore a shuttered dancehall and document other vacant or razed honky-tonks could serve as a model for saving an endangered species of entertainment.
Lafayette’s gene pool has been host to a long line of eccentric characters who have blurred the lines between crazy, genius, disturbed and curiously entertaining.
Pastorek says retired superintendents were in favor of it. he says they don't speak up because they will be lunch meat. how so? if they are retired, how so?
I think this is another example of why legislators don't trust or like pastorek.
the man talks a good game, but when you put it down in black and white and start to dissect it, it's all smoke. or something worse.