News -> News TUE, FEB 22 10:50AM by Leslie Turk

All in a TIF

Wednesday, February 23, 2011

Proponents of a private luxury hotel make a strong case for government incentives, but they should have serious reservations about whether that’s enough to make it work. By Leslie Turk

 City-Parish Councilman Keith Patin is taking a beating over a project that promises to bring a four- or five-star hotel and convention center to Kaliste Saloom Road — if, and only if, it gets the City-Parish Council to incentivize the hotel by creating two special taxing districts. “My thoughts are from A to Z [on the proposal],” says Patin. “I’m lucky I don’t have to vote today,” adds the District 8 councilman, who remains steadfast in his commitment to study every pro and con of the developer’s request before casting his vote, scheduled for March 15, despite mounting pressure and threats from the Tea Party of Lafayette.

The proposed economic development districts — also called a Tax Increment Financing district — are located on 34 acres of prime real estate at Kaliste Saloom Road and Camellia Boulevard, across the street from upscale River Ranch, in District 7, which is represented by Councilman Don Bertrand. River Ranch is a traditional neighborhood development that has successfully built up in the past dozen years without requesting such incentives, made possible by the Louisiana Legislature in 2002 when it amended decades-old incentive laws to allow for a wider range of economic development projects.

Developer Glenn Stewart, a radiation oncologist who no longer practices medicine, has already dumped about $20 million of his own money into the land and infrastructure of his proposed “lifestyle center” over the past two years; the hotel he is seeking help for is a $30 million project. City-Parish President Joey Durel, with the support of Lafayette Economic Development Authority President/CEO Gregg Gothreaux, is the driving force behind Parc Lafayette’s plan to construct a 124-room luxury hotel and connecting convention center; Bertrand says while he supports this particular TIF, he is still studying the issue and awaiting more information.

Both Durel and Gothreaux hold up a feasibility study conducted by a national firm showing that this type of amenity is not feasible without the incentive. And both argue fervently that it will boost our growing community to world-class status and serve as an economic shot in the arm. “It’s a question of whether we want to go from good to great,” Durel says.

20110223-news-0101
Developer Glenn Stewart, a retired doctor, has already put $20 million of his own money into land and infrastructure at Parc Lafayette, a proposed lifestyle shopping center at Kaliste Saloom Road and Camellia Boulevard. Stewart is now asking the Lafayette City-Parish Council to allow him to charge additional sales and occupancy taxes at the 34-acre site to help pay for a luxury hotel that he says will connect with a planned convention center.
They say Parc Lafayette’s proposed luxury hotel neatly fits the description of what the state law is designed to do because it offers a unique product to the market. Both believe the TIF law should be applied judiciously and neither thinks it will lead to TIF districts popping up all over town, as opponents fear. They do, however, believe the tool will — and should — be applied more in Lafayette Parish. “They are used all over the country by municipalities,” Gothreaux says. “I don’t really understand the grief about a person wanting to add a penny to their project as long as they’ve got something to hang their hat on. It’s got to be something unique, though, [like] public infrastructure in a blighted area. Specifically this is being used to support a four- or five-star hotel. It needs to be done on a project-by-project basis.”

The TIF legislation allows local governments to set up these districts and use additional tax revenues to fund private development; the Louisiana Avenue Target center was Lafayette’s first TIF district but is different from the current proposal in that the state also gives up 1 penny of the 4 cents it collects on retail sales at the north Lafayette center. The state is not involved in the current plan on Kaliste Saloom Road, which calls for an additional 2 cent sales tax and 2 cent hotel occupancy tax at the hotel, and a 1 cent sales tax in the retail development that will surround the hotel. The base sales tax of 8 percent would continue to line the coffers of the state, local government and the Lafayette Parish School Board, and absolutely no tax dollars are on the hook if the development fails; the additional tax expires when the bonds are paid off. The revenue generated from the extra hotel and sales taxes would fund the hotel development only (any aspect of it), says Stewart, a Lafayette native who returned home from practicing medicine in Alaska and went full force into real estate development. Stewart owns apartment complexes in Baton Rouge and Lafayette and is in the process of selling some of them.

glen.stewart
Developer Glenn Stewart

And while he has a lot of skin in the game, not getting the TIF district is no skin off Stewart’s back. “It was definitely not my idea,” he says. “If, in fact, this thing does not pass, I’m going to go back to my original [50-60 room] luxury boutique hotel. The way the media has portrayed it is everybody’s doing me a favor and I’m asking the taxpayers of Lafayette to pay for my project. The way I’m looking at it is I’m doing the city a favor by taxing my own property to build them a convention center. I’m by nature a very conservative Republican. I don’t believe in all these government incentives, but if no one can build a convention center without some kind of city assistance, I think Mayor Durel and Gregg are far-sighted to want to bring a modern convention center/hotel to Lafayette,” he continues. “We have the culture and the food and everything else these people want. The only thing we’re lacking is the facility to host the meetings. There is no reason why we couldn’t be the best tourist town in Louisiana outside of New Orleans.” Stewart says Lafayette is losing convention business to cities like Shreveport and Baton Rouge. “We’re competing primarily for regional conventions, not really national conventions. The Cajundome is great, but there are no hotels and restaurants there.”

While the Hilton Garden Inn is across the street from the 100,000-square-foot Cajundome Convention Center, it is not a luxury hotel, and it’s not connected, which conventioneers desire. Even a higher end three-star hotel, if connected to the convention space and offering more rooms (the Hilton Garden Inn has 153 rooms), would have made Lafayette much more competitive in its efforts to attract convention and meeting business.

Proponents argue that if you don’t want to pay, you don’t have to play. Shop and stay elsewhere. “You do get to vote with your steering wheel,” Durel says. “This does not tax the people. It taxes persons. This tax is not forced on anybody.”
That is not placating the Tea Party of Lafayette.

Patin visited with about a dozen TPL members five days before the Feb. 15 meeting, in which the council — including Patin — voted to move the proposal to a March 15 vote. “The Parc was the item that started the hoorah,” says Patin, noting that his pragmatic approach was not what they wanted to hear. “They chewed me up.” Two or three of the members were “screaming and yelling,” Patin says, and threats were made. “If you don’t get straight with the party,” he recalls one member saying, “we’re going to run somebody against you.” The next day, three TPL members called Patin to apologize for fellow members’ behavior.


If the Jeremiahs (a reference to real estate developer Jeremiah Supple) show up and turn my meeting to shit, I'm going to get the cops to put them out." -- District 8 Councilman Keith Patin, who is hosting a town-hall style meeting tonight, Feb. 23, at 6:30  p.m. at the Southside Regional Library to address constituents' concerns about the proposed TIF district. Patin has invited the developer, Glenn Stewart, to attend, and the councilman is adamant the discourse will be civil.

What the tea party-types won’t even consider is that this may very well be good project in a prime location offering adequate road access, proximity to the airport and existing shopping, restaurants, entertainment and other amenities those staying at the hotel would favor.

LEDA’s Gothreaux believes that kind of stubborn opposition could affect Lafayette’s pro-business, pro-growth reputation the next time someone with a niche product comes calling. And Lafayette could miss out big to another community. But is this established need enough to make the project work? Stewart undoubtedly has personal wealth, much he says from selling apartment complexes in Alaska, and the extra taxes will help pay off the bonds. But he’s still going to have to get a bank to get behind the development.

And what is the downside if it fails? Absolutely none for taxpayers. It’s all on Stewart and those who buy the bonds.
Failing, however, could set a bad precedent. When the next proposal comes up, particularly one even more worthwhile that may be in economically distressed area — as many argue TIF districts were originally designed for — the council may not be as willing to go out on a limb.

That’s why we need more information before moving forward.

Lafayette missed an opportunity by not having a better plan when the Cajundome Convention Center was constructed. We have a chance to do that now, and we should seize it. The council’s March 15 vote is one of several hoops the project will need to jump through, but the council must ensure that the Cooperative Endeavor Agreement it eventually enters into with Stewart requires him to build the convention center — an essential component for the hotel to realize its potential — and connect it to the hotel with a covered walkway. If he violates the agreement, the supplemental tax collection stops. Additionally, the updated feasibility study, which Stewart is funding, may reveal that both the 124-room hotel (he does have a second planned if the first is successful) and 25,000-square-foot convention center need to be larger.

Stewart should also prove that he has the financial wherewithal to pull this off, along with a bank’s commitment to finance it. And he needs to show that he has an experienced management group and reservations system to ensure the hotel’s success, since he does not have firm plans for a recognized flag.

Patin is meeting with his District 8 constituents Wednesday, Feb. 23, at 6:30 p.m. at the Southside Regional Library to hear from them and to address their concerns about the project, which borders his district. He’s invited Stewart to attend, and the councilman is adamant the discourse will be civil. “If the Jeremiahs (a reference to real estate developer Jeremiah Supple) show up and turn my meeting to shit, I’m going to get the cops to put them out,” Patin says.

Parc Lafayette’s Economic Impact

LEDA’s study of the 34-acre, $150 million-$200 million development’s impact on the local economy is based on it offering two full-service hotels, a convention center and retail/office tenants. A separate feasibility study commissioned by LEDA and conducted by Houston-based PKF Consulting in December 2008, for a proposed Westin hotel in River Ranch, is being updated for the current economic environment and this project. That study reveals that a four- or five-star hotel and convention center in Lafayette can only be successful with a government incentive, such as the proposed economic development district. Developer Glenn Stewart says units in the first phase of his lifestyle center development — 100,000 square feet of shopping and office space — should begin opening in July. It consists of 70,000 square feet of retail (Stewart says only 7,500 of this is not yet leased) and 30,000 of office (with half of that remaining for lease). The anchor is an unnamed women’s high end department store, which Stewart says has signed a lease.

Total Economic Impact on Lafayette Parish from Construction: $326.32 million

Direct Jobs from Construction/Equipment Purchases: 1,006

Direct Annual Jobs from Operations: 604

Annual Tax Revenues from Operations: $1.25 million for Lafayette Parish; additional $849,527 for city of Lafayette



Comments (25)add
...
written by Positive attitude , February 23, 2011 - 12:09 pm
Wow,
I agree that we need more info and that we need to have a strong cooperative endeavor agreement.
But look at the possibilities!
Another great development with a 4 or 5 star hotel. The city is not at risk. Over 600 jobs in our community. Almost 400 million pumped into the area. Tax benefits for the city.
Thank you Dr. Patin and thank you Mr. Patin for having an open mind and for not being bullied by some of the Tea Party people.
.
...
written by Positive attitude , February 23, 2011 - 02:15 pm
Oops, meant Dr. Stewart, not Dr. Patin
...
written by James Melancon , February 23, 2011 - 04:19 pm
The TIF issue aside, this development is an extremely high risk venture.
Hotel vacancies are off and there are at least two new hotels will open soon. The
River Ranch retail business, with some exceptions, is pocked mark with empty spaces and
and marginal businesses. With the Oil & Gas business in the Gulf at a near stand still, only a
gambler would do this development.

...
written by Hidden in the pumpkin , February 23, 2011 - 04:38 pm
Joey-
With all due respect, it's not about going from good to great, it's about going from mediocre to sort of OK.
...
written by Hidden in the pumpkin , February 23, 2011 - 04:44 pm
Councilman Patin-
Stay the course;this is a decidedly lowbrow bunch of muddled thinkers you are up against and you are fighting the good fight.If they act up at the meeting throw 'em some beads; that's their idea of a cultural opportunity.
...
written by Garbage , February 23, 2011 - 05:10 pm
“If the Jeremiahs (a reference to real estate developer Jeremiah Supple) show up and turn my meeting to shit, I’m going to get the cops to put them out,” Patin says.

Keith Patin owes an apology to Mr. Supple. And Mr & Mrs. Patin needs to resign their position. We don't need a Gadhafi-Patin. That's just not the type of respect you show for taxpayers - that if they don't agree with you, you're gonna have them put out.

Someone is gonna show these elected ones some true respect really soon and humble them.
...
written by Banking 101 , February 23, 2011 - 05:15 pm
If it is an extremely high risk venture, he will not get financing. The TIF will only cover 20 million of the 320+ million project.
...
written by Al , February 23, 2011 - 06:34 pm
Dear Positive Attitude
It's always nice to have a positive attitude, but being naive is something else.
In the investment world no matter how positive you might want to be, being positive won’t get your money back. I don’t mean to be negative but the numbers never turn out like the Politicians project and by the time it is all over and all the fees are made the tax payer is always left, one way or the other, holding, the bag,
1.LUS Fiber is losing 5mm a year, they just cut their projections in half and just raised your utility rates to cover the losses. They lied about the projections and they lied about LUS being on the hook for Fibers losses and they lied about the rate hikes.
2.The lite building cost 26MM dollars and has vacancies and is losing millions, we have over 1mm sq feet of vacant office space in the private sector and the city is going to invest in more?
3.The convention center is losing money every year and we need another one?
4.The Cajun dome costs us 700M a year, we need new ball rooms.
5.You just built an new building to lease to AOC in an area that is 20% vacancy, only the Government can be that stupid.
6. The number of hotel rooms in Lafayette have doubled in the last 3 years, and occupancy rates are plummeting and you want to invest in a new Hotel? Please not with my money and yes it will cost the city, they are speaking in half truths.

At the risk of sounding negative, At what point do we say “Just stop the insanity”. Do you really want the government making investments for you? When has that ever worked out? Politicians will sell the sizzle but never honestly show you the bill. Thank God for the Tea Party, someone has to have the courage to stand up for free enterprise.
Keep that positive attitude, I have really fine bridge you might be interested in at a bargin.
AL
...
written by Parish Pal , February 23, 2011 - 07:18 pm
Garbage--- you just don't get it! Two for the price of one let alone
two hard working tax payers--- you need to clorox the can and think again!
...
written by Al , February 23, 2011 - 07:30 pm
Dear Positive Attitude
It always nice to have a positive attitude, but being naive is something else.
In the investment world no matter how positive you might want to be, being positive won’t get your money back. I don’t mean to be negative but the numbers never turn out like the Politicians project and by the time it is all over and all the fees are made ,the tax payer is left, one way or the other ,holding, the bag,
1.LUS Fiber , cut their projections in half, now losing 5mm a year, they and just raised your utility rates to cover the losses. They lied about the projections and they lied about LUS being on the hook for Fibers losses and they lied about the rate hikes.
2.The lite building cost 26MM dollars and has vacancies is losing millions, we have over 1mm sq feet vacant office space in the private sector and the city is going to invest in more?
3.The convention center is losing money every year and we need another one?
4.The Cajun dome costs us 700M a year and we3 need more ball rooms?
5.You just built an new building to lease to AOC in an area that is 20% vacant, only government can be that stupid.
6.The number of hotel rooms in Lafayette have doubled in the last 3 years and occupancy rates are plummeting and you want to invest in more rooms? Please not with my money.
At the risk of sounding negative, At what point do we say “Just stop the insanity”. Do you really want the government making investments for you? When has that ever worked out? Politicians will sell the sizzle but never honestly show you the bill. Thank God for the Tea Party, someone has to have the courage to stand up for free enterprise.
Keep up that positive attitude; I have a really fine bridge you may be interested in at a bargain.
Al

...
written by Bovine Waste aka Bullshipper , February 23, 2011 - 07:43 pm
Resign their position? Come on, Garbage, how can we have better representation?
We're getting two for one. Lou, Mrs. Patin is much better qualified than a few
others we have on the council, and you haven't read about Mr. Patin being dishonest or
pulling any shady deals. Give me a man who speaks his mind
any day over one who is just going to tell me what I want to hear.
...
written by Bovine Waste aka Bullshipper , February 23, 2011 - 07:53 pm
resign their position? Come on Garbage, where else can you get two qualified servants of the
people for the price of one. Lou, Mrs. Patin is better qualified to represent us than some of
the ones currently sitting on the council, and you never read about Mr. Patin being dishonest
or pulling any shady deals. Give me a man who speaks his mind any day instead of someone who
just tells me what I want to hear. You go Mr. and Mrs. Patin.
...
written by Economics 420 , February 23, 2011 - 09:02 pm
written by Banking 101 "If it is an extremely high risk venture, he will not get financing."
---------------------------

High risk does not equal no financing. Everything has risk. In a slow economy, overbuilt with commercial
buildings, financing may be still be available. Just look at the apartment complex next to the Acadiana Mall.
It failed but was pickup about two years latter (on the cheap no doubt). Perhaps the project will work quite well,
for the second owner.

...
written by Tourist , February 23, 2011 - 09:58 pm
We already have a new convention center that the taxpayers are already on the hook for. WHy does this administration think it's a good venture to build another one. The one we have isn't utilized like it should be. Why are they pushing this on Dr. Stewart? Who really benefits?
...
written by Positive attitude , February 24, 2011 - 12:49 am
Al,
You are right, it is great to have a positive attitude because I don't have to distort the truth as you have. Yes, LUS maybe "losing" money, but the original projections always expected that(just like most start up companies.).But, that doesn't mean that Fiber is not a great asset. We are all benefiting from the competition. You say they have raised rates on other utilities to subsidize fiber. That is an absolutely untrue, maybe you didn't know that, so now you can correct that bit of wrong information. The LITE center I cannot speak to accurately, so will leave it alone
but based on your "facts" about LUS, I would doubt that you can speak to it accurately either. The cajundome and convention center (tied together, which you didn't seem to know), might "lose" money, but what does that do for all the private sector hotels, restaurants, and other businesses that benefit from it's existence? Might be a little deeper answer than you are willing to delve into. I suspect that the city, parish, school board and state do just fine with the taxes that come back as a result. As to the overbuild of hotel rooms, I would point out that it was private sector investors that made those decisions, not government. And I would bet that they hope the cajundome keeps on doing what it does. And by the way, the projections for the new development are coming from private sector investors and accountants, so that should make you feel better, right? In the end, if it doesn't work, it will be because they got it wrong at no risk to the government or taxpayers. There, now you probably feel better with the truth and will keep an open mind about this new development.
...
written by ragin_cajun , February 24, 2011 - 07:33 pm
Positive Attitude --

"But, that doesn't mean that Fiber is not a great asset. We are all benefiting from the competition."

Prove that. Offer some data to support that, please? Last time someone said that on these boards, I got quotes from Cox and ATT for residential Internet in Lafayette, and compared that price to quotes for Internet in St. Martin Parish. No difference. I used St. Martin Parish because I know the phone numbers out there and you need an address and phone number to get a quote.

Fiber IS losing money, and LUS did raise electrical rates. Both of those facts are 1000% true. The only dispute is whether or not you believe LUS' stated reason for raising electrical rates. They said to pay for upgrades to the electrical grid (?), I think. Many people think that's not true. Also, if you look at the 2011-2012 budget, you'll see very clearly in there a loan from LUS to LUSFiber of 5.5 Million dollars. It's in there, they MUST think it's going to happen this year. What do you think about that? You think it's OK for LUS Fiber to lose millions of dollars every year because "it's a great asset"? It's OK if you think that...I just want to hear you say it...er..see you write it...:)

"LUS maybe "losing" money, but the original projections always expected that" You're right, LUSFiber is losing money, and that was expected as you state. So since you're so familiar with the projections, can you state for the rest of us at what point in time the projections expected LUSFiber to start turning a profit? Is that point in time behind us now, or is it still in the future?

Now for the larger point the writer made, and listed points to support--that LCG is a very bad investor and the record shows it--can you address that? Because the point seems very valid to me. I'd forgotten just how many stupid building projects LCG has been involved with over the years.
...
written by Comments from the others , February 25, 2011 - 02:24 am
so this issue boils down to this. Is it the role of government to pass legislation to support one businessman, not the entire industry, over another. Or is it the role of government to insure the rules and laws apply equally to everyone? What will happen to to value of the existing hotels. Will you agree to that pragmatism in the future with the next administration. that the logic behind all corporate welfare. To give up ones principles to the pragmatic arguments will lead to no principles at all.
...
written by Caps a Lot , February 25, 2011 - 04:04 am
I like the points from A1 and positive attitude. I am pro-business like positive attitude, but smart development depends on a lot of factors. A1 brought up several good points; I think he may be confused if he thinks it costs 700 million dollars to run anything in lafayette parish. Unfortunately, the majority of the things he listed are secondarily connected. I don't think they would drive hotel business like fiber internet connections. If the government subsidizes another convention center, what will be the plan for the cajundome? Fight for business; not a good idea esp. if it's a public entity.

No need for names. If you don't like the TIF, then tell your legislators to vote against the particular bill and let the developer go on with his boutique hotel then. How do you know if Lafayette hotel biz. is suffering? Do you have access to STR reports or are you a hotel owner? I suggest the hotel owners get together and form a legal/political fund to take action if they are threatened.
...
written by BoFred , February 25, 2011 - 10:20 am
Baton Rouge Advocate has two interesting stories: one is about a developer who started his hotel a few yrs ago & how he's not personally liable now that his opportunity has turned to dust. He's rich & his hotel is being taken from him. It was financed with "GO Money". Very similar sounding.

Second: there is ANOTHER develope in BR who wants the same tax incentive as the other hotel was given....

I believe Mr. Patin is smart enough to weather this. In fact Bravo for him taking us this issue and not being just a "yes" man. I hope he's paying attention & noticing a lot of area citizens aren't interested in financing a RR hotel. I DON'T SEE ONE STATEMENT ABOUT WHY A LUXURY HOTEL IS NEEDED IN LAFAYETTE. THERE ARE HUNDREDS - HUNDREDS OF NEW HOTEL ROOMS WITHING WALKING DISTANCE OF THIS LOCATION AND NONE ARE NEAR THE CAJUNDOME. I THOUGHT THE MENTION OF NOT ENOUGH HOTELS NEAR THE DOME WAS REALLY UNTHOUGHFULLY STUPID. So, there are some big names, really ticked off to be getting so much back talk, and I'm even more interested in who really is going to bank on this project. I suggest Mr. Stewart go to Plan B, smaller, financed by himself & his investors.
...
written by Positive attitude , February 25, 2011 - 12:48 pm
LUS has been an asset! Easy to prove just in my household. I switched to LUS and saved a considerable amount of money. Not long afterwards, I got an offer from my former company reducing rates. This has happened all over town. My mom was about to switch and she was offered over a $ 50 savings not to switch.
LUS gives the citizens( every citizen) the same rate..You don't have to sign long contracts for 2+ years. They offer speeds (upload speeds) no one else can touch.
Our FTH program has brought national attention to Lafayette, evidenced by all the awards we have received from national associations & publications. Jobs have been created and 2 of my friends, who work from home, have decided to move here.These are just a few of the benefits.
How long should FTH be able to lose money?I'd say 5-10 years. Many companies expect to lose money for 5+years before they turn a profit. I think I heard Mr Huval confirm that it would take about 5 years . I suggest that you give him a call. He is always willing to answer questions and has even participated in some of the blogs.
As to LCG being a bad investor...Are you suggesting that city/parish governments are supposed to turn a profit? Parks, libraries, etc, will never make money but they are a good investment for the citizens.
...
written by Northsidian Shotgun , February 26, 2011 - 05:08 am
Positive Attitude is on the juice again.I got a thousand to a donut the fiber is a pyramid scheme
...
written by ragin_cajun , February 28, 2011 - 05:58 pm
Positive Attitude --

As soon as LUS can save me some money, I will switch. I look at it every 2-3 months, and I don't yet see a substantial savings over my current bill with Cox and ATT. Did your mom get a $50 per month savings, or a one time $50 credit on her bill?

As for 5 years to turn a profit, I'm sorry but that's just unacceptable. In five years, LUS Fiber will need to spend some money updating network gear to keep the network supported by manufacturers. That's an important difference between a network and a library/park/power plant. Networks need continual reinvestment to stay viable and supported by the vendor. Much like home computers that have a realistic useful lifetime of 3-5 years.

Also LUS Fiber is significantly behind schedule signing up customers to reach their projected penetration rate. Huvall said that was because the marketing campaign got a late start. I can see that, I think that's alright as long as it's true. That was some months ago, and I'm sure there'll be another update from LUS Fiber pretty soon. We'll see if the market penetration is improving then. Hopefully the loan from LUS budgeted for this year won't be necessary. It was always claimed, I believe, that LUS would never need to loan money to LUS Fiber.

And I'm not suggesting that LCG needs to turn a profit. But it should, on the other hand, not sink 100's of millions of dollars into buildings all over town for questionable benefit/use to the public, either. LCG should be able to quickly and clearly state the expected use and future benefit of its investments, and that statement should hold up 2-3 years later. Problem is, many of LCG's "investments" over the last 5-10 years do not make much sense now that we look back on them. Also, LCG is beginning to make less and less sense when it describes the use and benefit of its "investments". A good example of that is the long sales pitch Durel gave for the Parc Lafayette TIF--sizzle on the steak, he said. But not one word about what the borrowed money would actually be used to buy.


...
written by Retiredcajuncop , March 04, 2011 - 01:06 am
So, as I understand this, if the TIF hotel and Convention Center succeed, the taxpayers who pay the addtional taxes are no longer on the hook. Then Dr. Stewart gets to profit from something financed by taxpayers.
What if the project fails miserably? Will the taxpayers be required to issue more bonds based on more taxes? Will the project just sit there and deteriorate?
I do not like the idea of government financing a private business. The investors, not the taxpayers, will reap the rewards if the project is successful. That almost sounds unconsitutional.
...
written by the original northsidian , March 10, 2011 - 07:56 pm
Why is it the powers that be always bend over backwards for the out of town carpet baggers? Oh, and the reason Durel wants a convention center on Kaliste Saloom is this: he will be able walk from his house and save the city money on fuel for his gov't issued vehicle!


...
written by Al , March 12, 2011 - 12:57 am
Positive attitude
You have gotten most of that wrong, you are obviously listening to JOEY's spin, perhaps you are Joey. Fiber will be obsolete in 3 years much less 5. And we will still owe 100 Million Dollars (100MM) plus the negative carry.
Don't mean to be negative, but typical government deal, BAD.
Al
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
LA LA Land
Advertisement
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it