Wednesday, October 19, 2011
Repealing the Lafayette Home Rule Charter and returning to separate governments for the city and parish of Lafayette is an ideological exercise that everyone — no matter their political stripe — should support. It cuts to one of the most fundamental tenants of democracy: representation. It is rankly unjust that people who do not live in the city Lafayette, who are neither subject to its property tax nor stakeholders/customers of its utility system, would have a voice at the table. Where residents in the small towns, through their representation on the City-Parish Council, have a vote in matters pertaining only to the city of Lafayette, the Hub City enjoys no reciprocal influence. And it shouldn’t.
It is astonishing that the Tea Party of Lafayette, with its zeal for the Founders, would fail to support this most basic tenant of American democracy and instead oppose charter repeal on the myopic grounds that it will cost more and multiply the number of elected officials in Lafayette Parish. More government, in this case, is more democracy, with one council focused specifically on the parish and another on the city.
Indeed, splitting LCG into two governments will cost more. But even if former Lafayette Charter Commission member Don Bacque’s estimate that two governments will cost $2 million more per year is accurate — it’s inflated in our view — that comes to about $8.65 per resident per year. Eight bucks and some change. If fellow commission member Bruce Conque’s estimate is accurate — we believe it is more reasonable — and the cost is closer to a quarter million dollars, the annual per capita cost will be about a dollar. One dollar.
And for what? For what Broussard, Carencro, Duson, Scott and Youngsville have always had and will continue to have no matter what happens at the polls Saturday: self-determination.
There’s a clause in the Lafayette Consolidated Home Rule Charter approved by voters in 1992 that allows any municipality within Lafayette Parish to opt in to LCG, to join “consolidated” government. In the 15 years since the creation of LCG, none has opted in.
Why would the small towns not embrace consolidation? Because they knew in 1992 and they’ve known ever since that self-determination and autonomy are fundamental to effective governance. And how is it that while the smaller towns chose in the early ’90s to remain separate and sovereign, they nonetheless got to vote not only on whether to consolidate, but every four years they help elect members of the CPC?
Only one city in Lafayette Parish is part of “consolidated” government — the parish seat, Lafayette. And based on population trends, a day will come, if Saturday’s proposition fails, when the city of Lafayette will be the minority vote on the City-Parish Council, which is the governing authority for the city of Lafayette. The milquetoast slogan “Amend it, don’t end it” and talk of a “Hefner Plan” are Pollyanna poppycock: The current council wouldn’t have the will to initiate charter amendments, and who knows what the next council will look like? We can’t kick this can down the road.
LCG is a monumental misnomer, or a product at least of wishful thinking. Government in Lafayette is not and has never been consolidated. There are separate books for the city and parish within LCG. City-generated revenue must be spent on city projects and vice versa. What is consolidated are services, those shared by the city and unincorporated Lafayette Parish. And those services are provided by city of Lafayette resources — the trucks, the bulldozers and backhoes, the manpower, all of it belongs to or collects a paycheck from the city of Lafayette. This will not change if the charter is repealed and we return to the separate forms of government. Inter-governmental agreements will be transacted. Unincorporated Lafayette Parish will receive the same level of service it has always received, which was poor before consolidation and has been poor since due to annexations by the six cities in Lafayette Parish. This has always been the case, before consolidation and since. Recall the squabbles between Lafayette, Broussard and Youngsville over Ambassador South last year. Consolidation has never been a salve for inter-municipal acrimony.
If you live in one of the smaller municipalities in Lafayette Parish, ask yourself, would you be OK with someone from outside your city having a say, a vote, in the affairs of your city? How about residents from surrounding parishes having a decision-making role in LCG, or people from Arkansas, Mississippi and Texas having seats and votes in the Louisiana Legislature? They are after all neighbors who live across imaginary parish and state lines who share many regional commonalities with us.
Repealing the charter is not a divorce. This was never a marriage. A yes vote is a vote to give the city of Lafayette the fundamental right to self-governance that every other town in the parish has always had. It’s the democratic thing to do. The right thing to do. Vote yes.
NOT SO FAST ON THE LPSS TAX PROPOSITION
Because that’s what we’re doing: moving fast and possibly biting off more than we can chew, and doing it without sound, trustworthy leadership in place at the central office, which is central to our opposition to the property tax proposition at this time. That’s an important caveat — “at this time” — because we are prepared and eager to support an ambitious upgrade to our public education infrastructure, just not at this time. Notwithstanding that we now live in dire economic times and a 30 percent property tax increase will be onerous for many, we opined earlier this year that the lack of a competent superintendent in place would preclude us from supporting this massive expenditure. We believe that today.
This position is not taken lightly, and it is not the unanimous opinion of this editorial board. We don’t dispute the need for several new schools, major renovations and repairs to others and expansions elsewhere. Our public school students deserve good facilities, and most do not have them in 2011. We further acknowledge supporters’ argument that putting off the Facilities Master Plan will mean higher costs, but that is an argument that ignores low inflation and the likelihood that increased sales and property taxes in the future will at least partially offset an increase in costs.
Though we are encouraged by nascent progress made in the past few months in the search for a new superintendent, we have shaky confidence at best in the board’s maturity and ability to hire the kind of super who will inspire public trust in the management and academic outcomes of our school system.
Get us a good super and we’ll get behind a tax.
MAY 17 Here's a column from James Gill, this time in the Advocate. Gill, who has jumped ship from the Picayune, writes about the absurdity of dueling polls in this post. The numbers are so wildly different, it is obvious that both sides are "cooking the books," he writes. In particular, he looks at Sen. Mary Landrieu, and how her recent actions in DC have been received by those polled. Gill's acerbic, amusing prose is a welcome addition to a paper so conservative as to be occasionally lacking in personality.
MAY 17 Blogger Tom Aswell continues delivering bombshells about the state education department and Gov. Jindal's education "reform" efforts. In this post, he reports that students in the Shreveport area have been signed up for a charter school without their knowledge or consent. Most interesting to Aswell is how this Texas-based charter (with ties to GOP types) got the personal student information it has, if the students didn't give it.
MAY 17 This post by JR Ball in the Baton Rouge Business Report is an interesting tongue-in-cheek look at recent Baton Rouge economic development efforts. Among the items he examines is the idea that gaining a Costco makes BR a "world-class city." (Really? All you need is a different brand of Sam's? MK!) This effort, and other recent ones, are all built on the taxpayer's back, with tax zones, tax incentives and tax rebates, Ball writes.
MAY 17 Blogger CB Forgotston is critical of the legislature's reliance on a revenue-estimating committee's decision to include projected tax amnesty income in this year's forecast. That's a problem, CB posts, because the deadline for these people to pay their taxes is June 30, 2014. So when do you think these people who haven't paid taxes in years are going to pay their taxes? Surely not before June 30, and that means the money won't be there for this year's budget, he argues.
MAY 17 Here's an interesting blog out of California by a Hollywood writer, attorney and academic named Brian Alan Lane. He blogs about higher ed, and was a whistle-blower in a scandal over false credentials. In this post, he takes aim at LSU's new top dog, King Alexander. It's convoluted and a little confusing, but it sure makes Alexander a lot more interesting than he was yesterday.
MAY 17 Blogger Robert Mann writes about the LSU Board's refusal to allow Dr. Fred Cerise to testify before the legislature about Gov. Jindal's plan to close down all the state's charity hospitals and dump the poor on the private system. It's hard to imagine anyone more qualified than Cerise to testify about that, so why would anyone try to prevent him doing so? Mann thinks it is because the powers that be aren't interested in hearing any truth about the plan.
MAY 17 This post on the Louisiana Sinkhole Bugle, a blog that notes developments in the Bayou Corne and Jefferson Island salt domes, talks about a proposed expansion of the salt dome storage under Lake Peigneur in Iberia Parish. Residents are working against it for several reasons, including two biggies: the sinkhole disaster in Bayou Corne and the continuing, unexplained bubbling on the surface of the Lake.
MAY 17 NOLA police arrested more people Thursday accused of either being involved in the Mother's Day shooting or hiding the suspect afterward, this Gambit story reports. The NOLA police chief said he suspects the whole thing was gang-related and throws out a challenge to the gangs: he's got informants now, he says, and he knows a lot more than the gangs want him to know. The people who live in the neighborhoods terrorized by gangs are ready to talk, he says.
Most Read
in case you missed it
Subscribe to this comment's feed
Or the Acadian Homebuilders Association. Or the Farm Bureau. Or the Advertiser and Acadiana Gazette.
Or Senator Mike Michot, Senator-Elect Page Cortez, House Speaker Pro Tem Joel Robideaux, State Representative Nancy Landry, or State Representative-Elect Stuart Bishop.
And how about Councilpersons Bellard, Castille, Dore, Morrison and Theriot.
Or Mayors Brasseaux, Langlinais, Morrison, Thibodeaux and Viator.
Your reporting on this issue is increasingly ridiculous.