Government press secretaries, current and former, reacted in various ways to last week’s cover story about their profession. By Jeremy Alford. Wednesday, May 23, 2012
Louisiana’s statewide departments and cabinet agencies will spend more than $4.4 million this year to underwrite the salaries of 72 press secretaries and media professionals. Another $640,000 will be spent on their related operations.
These were the over-arching findings of a report that was unveiled last week in this publication and penned by this writer.
Sam Irwin, a freelancer writer and photographer who also serves as the press secretary for the Department of Agriculture and Forestry, said it exemplified a journalist “arriving for an interview with their story already written,” borrowing a line from the story itself.
In particular, Irwin had a beef with a section of the report that cited ways press teams are navigating around the mainstream media to get their messages out. Here’s the rub, as he saw it: “The Department of Agriculture will put up roughly $100,000 publishing what it calls ‘Market Bulletins.’”
Irwin argued that 13,000 subscribers pay $10 a year for the publication to be printed and mailed to them. And in that respect, it should have been noted in the report that the supporting dollars are self-generated. He also said that most of the Marketing Bulletin is made up of free classified ads for cattle, tractors and so on.
However, the first two pages of the 112-year-old newsletter are usually set aside for stories and press releases containing plenty of quotes from Commissioner Mike Strain. The pages are his vehicle to get out a message without having to deal with reporters. If anything, it shows the department is proactive in promoting itself.
Bob Johannessen, former communications director for the Department of Health and Hospitals, commented that “Alford does not address how he or other reporters would be able to effectively cover state government without the assistance of a [public information officer].”
This is true. It goes without saying that PIOs and press secretaries are important to this thing we do. It would be difficult without them — sometimes; it just depends on the story. But it would certainly be boring; they’re the ones who pass along off-the-record stories for their bosses and tip off reporters to big scoops.
On more than one occasion they’ve saved me on deadline. I’ve also been led on by a few and provided with inaccurate information. There’s the bad and the good, mostly the latter. But as noted in last week’s story, “a department head without a flack nowadays is like a 4-year-old on the beach without sunscreen.”
Speaking of DHH, its initial reply to our public records request for media-related salaries produced two names making salaries totaling $100,484. The accuracy of that list, however, has come into question. In a follow-up request, the department’s attorney said Tom Gasparoli, who makes $71,000, was mistakenly left off. There’s also Kristen M. Sunde, who recently coordinated a story for New Orleans’ Gambit and held a title connected to the “Bureau of Media and Communications.” A PIO for the department says she filled that role only temporarily as new hands were brought on.
It’s an interesting twist. While many media professionals wanted to make sure it was known that they do much more than handle press requests, here’s an example of someone being pulled into the fray who typically never talks to journalists. That’s all to say it takes a lot to keep a government media outfit afloat.
Another press secretary from a bygone era of Louisiana politics offered these words on the classical relationship between hack and flack: “We may not always like the story you’re doing, but in the end we respect that you’re doing it.” Without question, that works the other way around, too. At least on good days.
Jeremy Alford can be reached at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .
MAY 21 Gambit columnist Clancy DuBos writes about the Mother's Day shooting, and how the stages of shock and blame and healing mirror those traveled by the same city following Hurricane Katrina. The city will recover, just as it did following the storm, by reaching out to help the people injured most seriously by the event, DuBos writes. It's how we heal, he says.
MAY 21 Here's a post on the Advocate (but buried on a subpage, not on the front) that reports something Louisiana Voice reported some time ago: a top DOE official lives in Los Angeles and "commutes" to Baton Rouge. The positioning of the story caused a stir on Facebook Monday, with several posters asking if the Advocate was covering someone's hiney. Sentell's stories on DOE are notoriously soft, and this one is no different: don't expect any hard questions in here.
MAY 21 Here's another post from blogger Tom Aswell about the "course choice" program. He's already reported on kids being signed up without their consent or knowledge, and has more here: For example, he tells of a six-year-old who was signed up for high school Latin. He also digs a little deeper into the sister companies of the main one operating in Louisiana; all of them seem to have complaints against them. Stinky.
MAY 21 Given the 80 percent cut in higher ed funding since he's been in office, it's clear Gov. Jindal would rather give tax cuts to out of state companies than have a functioning system, blogger Dayne Sherman argues in this post. The cuts have been such a disaster, Sherman says, that it will take 30 years to fix what's been broken. He says he believes the aim is to shut down most of the schools before Jindal leaves in 2016.
MAY 21 Blogger CB Forgotston says there are too many elections in Louisiana, and they're costing us too much money. The proof is in the pudding: turnout for most of these nonsensical pollings gets worse and worse, CB opines, even as millions of dollars that could be spent on health care or higher ed go down the tubes. The legislature must take action to stem the tide of pointless elections, he says.
MAY 21 Here's an interesting investigative piece by WVUE on the retirement benefits of some Jefferson Parish public employees. According to the story, the taxpayers are paying 100 percent of the retirement contributions of employees who started work prior to a certain date in April 1986 -- and have done for more than 30 years. It costs the parish millions annually, and might not be legal, the story reports.
MAY 21 This post on Bayou Buzz provides insight from Louisiana's intrepid pollster, Bernie Pinsonat, on the winners and losers from this year's legislative session. But to hear Bernie tell it, there's almost nuttin but losers: Jindal, the Republican party, the Fiscal Hawks all get big goose eggs in his win column.
MAY 20 This post on The Lens takes a look at a huge (either $500K or $250K) bill that one NOLA charter now has for school lunches. The RSD says the charter group didn't fill out the proper paperwork for federal reimbursement, but the story details how the RSD didn't ensure the people running the charter had the proper training, despite requests from hapless charter employees trying to fill out forms. Either way, somebody's asleep at the wheel.
Most Read
in case you missed it