In Lafayette Consolidated Government’s 2009 proposed budget, Joey Durel included what he describes as “an innovative plan,” — a plan which, Durel writes in his introductory budget message, “I believe has never been tried before in this government.” The proposal involves earmarking $100,000 for each of the nine council districts, $900,000 total, to use for capital improvement projects in the coming year. Each councilman will have the sole authority over how his hundred grand is spent in his district, without any required direction from the city-parish public works department or approval from a majority of the council. The funds can also be transferred from one district to another by budgetary revision, which would require a majority vote by the council.
Durel says he envisioned the system as a means for councilmen to address the smaller, neighborhood-type road and drainage issues that arise in their districts and aren’t top priorities for the overall parish. “This is simply a way to try and make government a little more responsive to the people,” Durel says. “I think it gives [councilmen] the ability to move a little quicker on certain projects.”
Durel’s proposal has been welcomed by some councilmen, who see it as a progressive move that allows them more control in assessing the needs of their districts. But it’s also generating some pointed criticism. For some, the plan opens the door to the type of patronage that plagued the old parish police jury government, where capital outlay funds were administered more based on political brokering than the parish’s overall needs and priorities. Two councilmen, William Theriot and Jared Bellard, have questioned the merit of the policy, noting that it puts representatives in a difficult position in deciding where to spend the money in their districts and may cause the public to look skeptically upon the capital outlay process.
Theriot has received several phone calls from concerned constituents over the issue after Durel introduced the proposal in July. Most raised questions over what type of projects councilmen would be using the money for and what the purpose for it was. “Even though what you do may be above board,” Theriot says, “the appearance of an impropriety is not good.” Both Theriot and Bellard are opting to give city-parish Public Works Director Tom Carroll the authority to direct the funds for their districts, to use for projects the department has listed as its top priorities.
Durel points out that he has recommended that any time a councilman elects to tap these funds for a project, it should be required that the project is reviewed publicly at a council meeting as a discussion item. Durel says that public scrutiny should provide enough of a check and balance. “When a councilman says, ‘I want to clean this ditch,’ he’s got to kind of answer to the rest of his district why that ditch was more important than their ditch. So for him to go put money in something that’s insignificant wouldn’t be really wise.”
“That was my theory,” Durel adds. “Now, if at the end of this year, we feel like it’s working very poorly, then we just won’t recommend funding that next year.”
Councilmen won’t have carte blanche to spend the money entirely as they see fit. Public bid law must be followed, and Durel says those projects requiring departmental involvement will have to be accomplished through prioritization within that department. The proposal is also structured so that city funds will not go to parish projects, and vice versa. For projects that fall outside the city limits, the source of the monies is either the parish road and bridge fund or the parish drainage fund — both of which are funded by parish property taxes. The city’s capital improvements project fund (created by a city sales tax) will be tapped for projects within the city limits.
The parish taxes, however, are strictly dedicated to road, bridge and drainage improvements and cannot be used for other capital outlay projects including parks and recreation and public safety. Because of that stipulation, Durel is recommending that city projects also adhere to these restrictions. Furthermore, he suggests a 50/50 split so that each council district will have $50,000 for drainage projects, and $50,000 for roads and bridges.
Given today’s construction costs, several councilmen have questioned how much can actually be done with $50,000. Councilman Bruce Conque, who chairs the council’s finance committee, says the limited funds give councilmen few options. (Conque plans to step down from the council Oct. 1, following its approval of the budget). He notes the funding can’t be rolled over and that councilmen won’t get the benefit of continuous projects. “You have to wonder,” he says, “if you’re limiting it to certain one-year capital improvements, just how far will that money go? How much significance will that money have?”
Pat Logan, LCG’s associate director of public works, says it’s not much. Recent street resurfacing projects are averaging around $105,000 a mile due to the high cost of asphalt and labor. Asphalt is now at $119 a ton, having tripled in cost over the past eight years. Paving a gravel road along with corresponding drainage improvements now costs around $500,000 a mile. Even sidewalks are expensive, running approximately $50,000 a mile without any drainage improvements included. Logan suggests small projects including replacing driveway culverts, excavating ditches or short areas of street overlay may be possible with the district funds.
“It’s not enough [money] to be corrupt,” jokes councilman Conque, who dismisses the notion that the system has any illegitimacy. He likens the proposed district funds to each council member’s annual travel expense fund of $4,000. “It’s discretionary spending on our part,” he says. “I don’t see the difference.”
The council will vote to approve Durel’s proposal, as a part of the overall 2009 operating budget, on Sept. 30. The district funds are listed in the budget as a single line item, identified as “District 1-9 Directed Capital.” LCG’s Home Rule Charter, which lays out the rules and guidelines for LCG to follow in approving its budget, does not prohibit this; however, it does note that the operating budget should include “detailed estimates of all proposed expenditures … to the extent of availability of such information.” Additionally, the charter requires any revisions to the operating budget be approved by a majority vote of the council. The charter also directs LCG to publicly plan capital projects as much as possible. It dictates LCG keep a five-year schedule of proposed capital projects in its Capital Improvements Budget, with “appropriate supporting information as to the necessity for such improvements and acquisitions,” and that a public hearing be held each year prior to its approval.
Along with Conque, council Chairman Don Bertrand says he is generally in favor of Durel’s proposal. While not a lot of money, he says he is already aware of a few small projects in his district the money could go toward. One involves lowering a water line along Verot School Road so that drainage improvements can be made. The state is scheduled to address the issue, but it’s not a top priority. “I don’t know if I want to wait for the state to do it,” Bertrand says.
District 4 Councilman Kenneth Boudreaux says he considers the plan innovative. “It’s an opportunity for council members to get a little bit more actively involved,” Boudreaux says. “This is an opportunity to put something in the proposal form and maybe meet some special needs of a particular district.”
Boudreaux says he plans to confer both with his constituents and the public works director before making any decisions about where to put the money. “I think if you have the confirmation of the public works staff, I think you could justify any work that is done,” he says. “If a councilman chooses to do it independently and on their own, well they may be subjected to more [public] scrutiny.”
For Theriot and Bellard, that’s the reason the public works department should be making the recommendations on which small-ticket capital projects get priority. “Each council member was given this, and they themselves are going to decide arbitrarily where this is going to be spent,” Theriot says. “I guess it was nice of the administration to do, but I just I felt a lot more comfortable letting public works have the authority. That way there’s no doubt; you cannot have the possibility of impropriety or brother-in-law deals if it’s out of my control.”
Bellard agrees, adding that there’s always a potential for abuse. “A lot of people don’t think it’s a lot of money, but it’s taxpayers’ money,” he says. “Any time it’s taxpayers’ money you have that concern.”
Durel says he is viewing the district funds as an experiment. “I thought it was worth trying, it was worth discussing,” Durel says.
“Even if the monies were not put in this form by the parish president,” Boudreaux says, “a council member could lobby and champion causes to appease people that are close to him.
“I think the checks and balances,” he continues, “are in being closely involved with your constituents and getting the input from the departments that ultimately will be most affected by it. You’re going to have to answer to somebody.”
JUNE 19 Former Saint Steve Gleason, who is paralyzed by ALS, released a statement Tuesday in response to the Atlanta radio station's skit making fun of him and the disease, this Picayune post reports. What did he say? He said he'd accepted the apology of the DJs who did it, notes that at least the incident has got people talking about ALS, and asks anyone who is burning to take action about it to do so -- by helping him fight ALS.
JUNE 19 Blogger Ian McGibboney takes a look at the Gleason incident in this post. He makes a good argument about the difference between having free speech and being free from consequences for your speech (which none of us is). He also admits that many of us got upset before we listened to the skit -- but lets us know that the reality is far worse than we can imagine. It was the incredibly bad judgment, even more than the actual speech, that probably got those DJs fired, he opines.
JUNE 19 Washington Post blogger Aaron Blake writes about Sen. Guillory's switch to the GOP in this post. He writes what most political watchers in Louisiana know: Guillory was a Republican before he decided to run for the senate seat in a mostly-D St. Landry district, and has switched back now that he plans to run for Lt. Gov. in a mostly-R state. But how come Blake missed Guillory's appearance on a TLC pageant show? Now that is a video we'd like to see. (Again).
JUNE 19 Here's another Washington Post blog post about a Louisiana politician, and it's just plain scathing. Ezra Klein says Jindal's Politico post was "insulting" to the intelligence of voters, and adds that Jindal is personifying the "stupid" he's railed against, by being an "elite" who convinces GOP activists of "things that aren't true." Me-ow.
JUNE 19 Here's Gov. Jindal's post in Politico, in which he asks the GOP to get over losing to Obama (again) and stop "the bedwetting." (Uh, what?) He gives his Republican buddies what is probably a nerd's idea of a coach's motivational talk, which starts with a list of accomplishments that they can't seem to exploit and ending with an absurd description of liberals that sounds like a character treatment for a Fox "News" movie scripted by Gordon Liddy. Sure, he's preaching to the choir, but even the choir's not this gullible.
JUNE 19 Lamar Parmentel read Gov. Jindal's post on Politico, but thinks it was so dumb it probably was published in the wrong paper. This post by Lamar on the Daily Kingfish opines that possibly Jindal's post was destined for the Onion -- because the governor couldn't possibly be serious here. If you listen closely, you can hear the staff of the Kingfish giggling.
JUNE 19 Blogger Robert Mann posts from Turkey, a country he has visited several times in the past few years. Mann gives an interesting overview of the current political and societal climate of the country, which -- if you're living under a rock and don't know -- is experiencing protests and turmoil these days. Mann promises to post as much as he can during his trip, which should be fascinating reading.
JUNE 19 Blogger CB Forgotston says the legislature is keeping the vicious cycle going with its funding of new buildings for the community college/technical college system. Universities across the state need maintenance and improvement on existing buildings, and the solution is to build new buildings at other schools? By the time the bonds are paid off, those buildings will be falling down, too, CB says.
Frank’s Casing Crew, now doing business as Frank’s International, will make its final appearance on ABiz’s list of the Top 50 Privately Held Companies in Acadiana this year, and once again, it will likely be at the top with more than $1 billion in annual revenues. The 75-year-old company specializing in tubular fabrication and installation services to the oil and gas industry plans to go public this year.
The defeat, or rather highjacking of House Bill 420 in the final days of this year's Legislative Session, say Reps. Vincent Pierre and Terry Landry, is the result of the propaganda spread by one unidentified local media outlet and an unnamed former state Representative, but nothing to do with the original legislation's lack of checks, balances or details.
He’s a singer. A songwriter. A piano man. A family man. He’s even got his own Wikipedia entry. He’s David Egan. And he knows ancient secrets about the monolithic stones of Stonehenge that he’s not willing to share.