News -> News MON, APR 6 6:00PM by Walter Pierce

Separate Ways

20090408-news-0101.jpg
 Photo by Robin May
 
The Boy Scouts of America’s Evangeline Area Council, representing the eight-parish Acadiana region, has cut ties with the United Way of Acadiana in what may be the most amicable divorce ever. The kids will come through it OK, but it’s a divorce nonetheless. The split ends a long marriage; Boys Scouts of America was a founding agency of United Way. At issue is UWA’s adoption last year of its Plan of Action for Community Transformation United, more commonly called PACT United, which comprises a new priority for how it distributes funding to non-profit agencies in Acadiana. The priority shift has left some agencies that were once beneficiaries of United Way largesse scrambling to fill voids in their coffers.

“If you think of it just as pure market competition,” says Evangeline Area Council President-elect Gary McGoffin, a Lafayette attorney, “we are in direct competition [for funding] with United Way and we want to differentiate our brand. It may not be a real pretty way of saying that, but that’s what it comes down to.”

The split locally between Boy Scouts and UWA was made official in the last week after the Evangeline Area Council’s board of directors voted to break off ties. But the genesis of the split begins with UWA’s adoption of PACT United over the last 18 months. PACT focuses on “three Es”: education (to improve the graduation rate), earnings (to build financial stability) and essentials (to help people meet their own basic needs). And now, instead of simply divvying funding among partner organizations that do good works in the community, UWA focuses with PACT on funding programs that address education, earnings and essentials. “The bottom line is,” says Margaret Trahan, UWA executive director, “we all win when a child succeeds in school, when families are financially stable and people can meet their own basic needs.”

But UWA’s shift in funding priorities has not come without some “growing pains,” as Trahan puts it, although its overall financial contribution to local non-profits has hardly changed. Seven longtime UWA partner agencies were not funded this year, including Boy Scouts, but five new agencies came on board. In 2008, it funded 58 programs offered by 33 organizations. This year, 29 organizations and 53 programs are receiving PACT United grant awards. These include education programs offered by Big Brothers Big Sisters, Boys & Girls Clubs, Junior Achievement and the Lafayette Education Foundation; the community pharmacy program offered by the Lafayette Community Health Care Clinic; and the Vermilion Council on Aging’s home-delivered meals program. Beneficiaries are both secular (Acadia [Parish] Council on Aging) and religious (Lafayette Catholic Service Centers).

Yet some Acadiana non-profits that once relied on UWA funding, and which submitted applications for PACT United grants, are facing a funding shortfall and the grim decisions that go along with it. “We’ve got about three months of working capital,” explains Dr. David Barczyk, a Lafayette chiropractor who serves as president of the board of Stuller Place. Stuller Place, which operates the Children’s Advocacy Center (for victims of sexual and physical abuse) and the Sexual Abuse Response Center, relied on UWA for about 10 percent of its funding. But UWA determined that Stuller Place, while inarguably doing good in the community, does not benefit the three Es.

About a month ago, Stuller Place sent out a desperate plea for help, and the community responded: individual donations of $12,000 and $10,000, a donation of 100 teddy bears (given to clients at the Children’s Advocacy Center) from Amy’s Hallmark, and a $5,000 donation from District Attorney Mike Harson generated through his annual golf tournament. Eight-year-old Adrienne Wyble, a second grade student at Sacred Heart Elementary, even donated her birthday and allowance money totalling $191.73.

Stuller Place may have to pull back its operations from the Acadiana region and focus on Lafayette, but in the meantime, the recent donations were heaven-sent. “I choose to call it God,” says Faith Moody, Stuller Place’s executive director. “I think God is going to take care of this place.” Faith indeed. Moody says Stuller Place will soldier on in a post-PACT world and look elsewhere for funding. “It’s imperative that people do support the fundraising effort so that we can make up for that lapse,” she says, “because our children cannot go without these services, they simply cannot.”

There has been some grumbling in the community that because non-profits that may have been personal favorites are no longer being funded, donations would be given directly to the non-profits instead of to UWA. But Trahan says the response to PACT United thus far has been strong, both in sentiment and donations. “We understand right now that some supporters of organizations that did not earn a PACT grant award are disappointed. I’m just hoping that once the emotions settle and people have a chance to consider the work that United Way is doing, and that is to ensure that more children graduate from high school and their families are financially stable, that that will be something that will have meaning for them and that they will continue to support United Way.”

The Evangeline Area Council Boy Scout’s funding through UWA went from an annual average of $100,000 to $11,000 this year, according to McGoffin, and what the group did receive was through UWA donors who checked off Boy Scouts on their UWA pledge cards, indicating they wanted at least part of their UWA donation to go to Boy Scouts. But the Evangeline Area Council received no PACT United funding, although an application was submitted. “You can’t leave 10 percent of your general fund budget in the air until the first quarter of the budget year to see if you’re going to get it or not,” explains McGoffin. “How do you fund, how do you plan for that? It’s just not practical.” So the local Boy Scouts are pitching camp outside the UWA park. They’ve asked UWA to remove references to Boy Scouts from UWA promotional materials and pledge cards because council board members thought that would create confusion. “We want to make it clear to people,” McGoffin says, “that if they support scouting, and we certainly encourage everyone to do that, then the way they do that is by donating directly to the scouts, rather than through the United Way. And if you donate to the United Way, we want to make sure that people understand that now, going forward, a contribution to the United Way is not going to translate to a contribution to the scouts.”

The split between the Evangeline Area Council Boy Scouts and UWA is a local phenomenon, as boy scouts councils around the country remain vital members of their local United Ways. McGoffin still supports UWA, even as the two groups now find themselves competing for Acadiana’s altruistic dollars. “We applaud the three pillars that they’ve adopted and focused on for their efforts,” say McGoffin, “They’re a tremendous asset to our community.” And McGoffin says local scouts will continue to lend a hand at United Way events whenever called upon, in keeping with the scouting ideal of service. “I know there’s disappointment on both sides of the equation right now,” he says. “But the goal of both organizations is to strengthen our community, and that’s why it’s so important that we keep the lines of communication open and have these discussions.” And both groups are leaving the door open to reuniting at some point in the future.

A divorce, yes, but joint custody on many weekends.

Walter Pierce
About the author:


Comments (27)add
...
written by Soop , April 08, 2009 - 02:58 pm
The United Way of Acadiana can do what it wants with its donations. I'm fine with that.

But if "education, earnings and essentials" are what they want to focus on, how can they not see that Scouting fits that bill exactly? Conversely, how does funding "Meals on Wheels" for the elderly fit the bill? A great program, don't get me wrong. But does MOW educate the recipients? Help them increase earnings? Help them learn essentials?

I've said it before and I will say it again. I suspect our local United Way has made a political shift to the left. And since Scouting has been hated by the left for some time, then it had to go (the Catholic organization had better start looking for other funding too). Perhaps I am wrong. Regardless, if they can't see that Scouting benefits their alleged goals, then they don't deserve to be managing charitable funding no matter their political leanings.
...
written by Walter Pierce, Managing Editor , April 08, 2009 - 03:05 pm
Is providing shut-in elderly residents with food not essential, Soop?
...
written by Soop , April 08, 2009 - 03:28 pm
Again, MOW is a great program. Fantastic program. In addition to the food it also provides these folks with what is likely some of their only human contact of the day. That is priceless.

It certainly does meet a person's essentials. But does it help them to help themselves to meet essential needs? No. Provides fish but not making fishermen.

The criticism is of the United Way. Not Meals on Wheels or the folks they help. If you really want to help Meals on Wheels, donate to them directly instead of passing the donation through the United Way who takes an "administrative fee" cut off the donation.
...
written by ADS , April 08, 2009 - 03:41 pm
As a member of one of the UW's vision council, the truth of the matter is that politics played no role at all in the recomendations made by the council for the PACT's 2009 funding cycle. There is no doubt about it that these were tough decisons. In the end, the PACT programs that were funded do not sustain without performance accountability.
...
written by Margaret H.Trahan , April 08, 2009 - 03:53 pm
There is no hidden agenda here at United Way of Acadiana and we have no quarrel with the values for which Scouting stands. Many of our board members and volunteers have children involved in Scouting. In fact our board chair is an Eagle Scout himself and I have two sons who are Eagle Scouts. It is a good program. But we are looking for good programs that can help ensure that more children graduate from high school. Thus far, the Scouts are not set up to measure that. When they are ready to put those measuring systems in place, we would welcome the opportunity to work with them again.

As to food for the elderly, that does fit under our "Essentials" focus. Essentials is just a fancy name for safety net services. Food security has been identified as a key component of Essentials. In fact, we provided funding this year to Second Harvest who will ensure that an additional 240,000 pounds of food reaches the Acadiana area in 2009.
...
written by Soop , April 08, 2009 - 04:42 pm
I stand corrected on what exactly "essentials" meant. You only have to provide essentials. Teaching kids to be self-reliant adults counts for zilch. Got it. And even with UW's definition of "essentials," how again does Scouting not meet that given all the service projects Scouts and their Units perform on a monthly basis?

And since Ms. Trahan has seen fit to monitor the comments, I have a few questions that if asked haven't made it into the reporting:

1. Who came up with the change in funding procedures for UW? I'm sure it was board approved. But did you come up with the idea and bring it to the board or did the board come up with the idea and bring it to you? Or maybe this is change mandated by UW on a national basis?

2. Once the board approved the new change in standards, was the discretion of who met those standards left to the executive director or did the list need board approval?

3. If the final list was board approved, did the board make any changes to the recommendations of the executive director? Any programs added or taken off the list?

4. Since your website has been down since Gustav, could you please list the names of your board members?

5. What were the total donations taken in by United Way in your last fiscal year and what were the total amounts given out to charities?

I'd like to thank you in advance for answering these questions.

Soop
...
written by Sarah Berthelot , April 08, 2009 - 06:08 pm
Thank you for your comments. I am a staff member of United Way of Acadiana and work in support of fundraising and communcations efforts for the organization.

The blog entries indicate that more information about the PACT United and the change of process may be beneficial. I thought I would share more about the path to transition...

Two years ago, United Way of Acadiana began a process of systemic change to better serve our communities. The old model was not creating measurable improvements on key issues so United Way of Acadiana formed a committee of local citizens and stakeholders to discuss how to improve and find a better way to serve. You may remember a Community Solutions Summit at the Cajundome Convention Center in July of 2007 that began a series of public discussions.

Through the old model, success was defined by raising and allocating money and it took three year process for a new agency to qualify for funds. The fundraising blackout prevented organizations from raising their own monies part of the year, causing heavy reliance on United Way of Acadiana for funding.

The final analysis was that United Way of Acadiana was going wide rather than deep and it didn�t provide an avenue for lasting change.

United Way of Acadiana narrowed its focus to three areas that will change lives and address root causes. They are:

Education�to help more children graduate
Earnings�to build financial stability
Essentials�to help people meet their own basic needs

Anytime an organization goes through systemic change, especially after something has been done the same way for a long time, it is a difficult transition for everyone involved. To that end, United Way of Acadiana Board created an 18 month timeline for changing to the new process.

The key points of the timeline are as follows:
In April 2007, United Way of Acadiana announces to their current recipient organizations that there would be an 18 month timeline for systemic change.
During May 2007, United Way of Acadiana meets with current organizations, outlines new plan and guarantees 2008 level funding.
In September 2007, the fundraising blackout is eliminated and funded agencies are encouraged to begin their own fundraising pro�¬grams in anticipation of the eventual end of guaranteed funding.
During October 2007, United Way of Acadiana hosts outcomes measurement workshops for funded organizations.
In February 2008, guaranteed funding begins for the last time and historical partners are provided updates on coming changes.

From April through September 2008, the 3-issue framework of the PACT United is announced and 14 meetings are held throughout Acadiana to review the details of the new model and the RFP. Since the changes required a new RFP process, United Way of Acadiana provided multiple workshops and one-on-one sessions to assist organizations with how to fill it out.

Now, it�s an even playing field with all non-profits and faith-based organizations able to participate in the RFP. Local volunteers spent 700 hours reviewing 88 proposals to find the best programs based on the criteria of solving problems through Education, Earnings, and Essentials.

Why give to United Way?
United Way of Acadiana continues to provide a great service to its communities by thoroughly reviewing organizations and programs to find the best and requiring accountability from participating organizations. With a convenient donation system untilizing payroll deduction, it is easy to support multiple programs to address a problem from all sides. However, investing money is only one way United Way of Acadiana makes an impact in its communities. Through United Way of Acadiana, people can come together to create lasting change in the lives of others.

Many organizations have embraced the PACT United and have aligned their programs to be a part of the solution.

A few examples include:
� Faith House developed two new programs such as Ready Readers to teach children in the shelter to read and Economic Justice for Battered Women to help women open bank accounts

� Salvation Army developed a program to include financial responsibility classes, computer training, job skills training, etc.

� Junior Achievement is a new partner who recruits volunteers from the business community to teach 9th graders JA Success Skills; volunteers also serve as role models

The Mission and Vision of United Way of Acadiana have remained the same, having strengthened the strategies that will change lives and address root causes. The funding decisions are still made by local volunteers. United Way of Acadiana still collaborates with hundreds of organizations and still recruits and refers volunteers to serve non-profits. Most importantly, the customer is still the donor and the community is still the beneficiary.







...
written by Stephanie Mire , April 08, 2009 - 06:11 pm
My name is Stephanie Mire and I am Marketing and Communications Director for United Way of Acadiana.

Thank you for your patience regarding our website. During the fall
hurricanes, our site was hit by a virus. Look for our new site to go live later today. www.unitedwayofacadiana.org
...
written by Soop , April 08, 2009 - 06:18 pm
A nice press release but it still doesn't answer the questions!!
...
written by Soop , April 08, 2009 - 06:52 pm
I'm glad to see the website will soon be back up and running for the United Way. Hopefully that will scratch No. 4 off my question list.

Will we be blessed with answers to the other questions? Or does United Way refuse to be held to answer to even basic questions about it's new system?

And thanks to the Independent for hosting this little back and forth.

All the best,

Soop
...
written by Margaret H. Trahan , April 08, 2009 - 09:04 pm
Answers to Soop's questions:
1) No changes were mandated by our national organization. Community United Ways are locally governed, set their own policies, raise and disburse their own funds. The new funding model actually came from our grassroots here in Acadiana based upon our experiences after Hurricanes Katrina and Rita when UWA funded and collaborated with 60 organizations outside of its traditional partners. Approval went through three Vision Councils, a Community Impact Cabinet and the Board of Directors. All of these groups consisted of volunteers.

2. Approval process for actual grants awarded is the same as item 1 above. Staff did not vote or express opinions on the merits of any proposal during the review process.

3. The board did not make any changes to the recommendations presented by the Vision Council volunteers. After 600 hours of time invested in the review, the board had a high level of confidence in the recommendations.

4. Our website should go live today!

5. How are funds generated from the Annual Campaign used? 2008 Annual Campaign Total was $3,423,516

Operations $112,983 3.3%
PACT AWARD Funding/ Other External Programs$1,890,90655.2%
Direct Community Impact from UWA* 350,97810.2%
Designations (Restricted by Donor)$674,22619.6%
Anticipated Uncollectibles $280,4548.5%
2008 CFC Pledge Designations (Restricted)$113,9293.2%


*Direct Community Impact from UWA supports 10 internal initiatives and 9 coalitions

I can tell that you have a great deal of interest in United Way of Acadiana. We are happy to answer any questions that may come from the public or our partners. Should you want to talk in person, we welcome your phone call to our office.

...
written by Margaret H. Trahan , April 08, 2009 - 10:01 pm
Looks like the numbers to question 5 above did not post correctly as the percentages ran into the actual dollar figures. Hopefully the list below will be more readable!

Operations $112,983 (3.3%)
PACT AWARD Funding/ Other External Programs $1,890,906 (55.2%)
Direct Community Impact from UWA* $350,978 (10.2%)
Designations (Restricted by Donor)$674,226 (19.6%)
Anticipated Uncollectibles $280,454 (8.5%)
2008 CFC Pledge Designations (Restricted)$113,929 (3.2%)

*Direct Community Impact from UWA supports 10 internal initiatives and 9 coalitions
...
written by Jason D. Faulk , April 09, 2009 - 12:37 am
I have two thoughts to contribute here.

Firstly, I appreciate the United Way of Acadiana's interest in preserving and providing for a citizen's security to be fed day in day out when they should fall on hard times, between the cracks in between when government assistance in the forms it is available, is not otherwise available to a working person. Thankfully in Lafayette, times are less dire for now than they are and have been in other areas more stricken. Overall the food security question is one of provisioning the economically vulnerable not only with sustenance, but also nourishing foods. As nourishing foods are generally more perishable (fresh fruits and vegetables,) this has remained a challenge throughout the USA, and is a consequence of federal fiscal policy as it concerns the farming communities of this country.

I would like to suggest though, that the term "Food Security" is in danger of being reappropriated due to pending federal legislation that our members of Congress will be considering upon their return from Spring Recess on April 20th. Pending bills will seek to relegislate "Food Security" by affecting farmers, transporters, warehousers, retailers, and possibly, the home resident themselves, the end "consumer." This term "Food Security" is going to take on new meaning beyond the scope of our accepted connotation. This legislation may lead to a burden of regulation and a weakening of organics standards nationwide, along with a concentration of power to farm, and a restriction of seed-keeping rights for farmers.
...
written by Jason D. Faulk , April 09, 2009 - 12:38 am
Secondly, I would like to suggest a reader consider, that what the UWA is attempting to do in this current era, is prudently use resources by having measurable data that supports the use of their funds. This is your basic "means" testing. If the end results don't support the influx of money expended, then a program has to either adapt it's efforts or wither. That this is true of community non-profits as well as granting institutions privately held as well as agencies of the state, is for us all a good thing. These practices are what prevent "Bridges to Nowhere" from being built.

However, in certain occassions, a vehicle, program or object that does not serve a vested economic interest only, but that serves a public good, that can be measured should come up for review, there are always certain activities which we do as a community serve to support, because not every thing funded in a democratic republic is necessarily going to be profit-making, in order to vest community spirt and co-operation as well as civic literacy and wherewithal to maintain a functioning free-society, which believes in a rule of law, a fairness principle, that is in favor of free and competitive and co-operative markets, but not those which are corporately rigged and manipulated as oligarchies do.

My apologies for this ramble. What I would truly like to express in this second point I am attempting to make is that, I believe based on my current impressions, is that the UWA is an organization that can also serve as a specialist. As a clearinghouse for fundraising and support of partner agencies and non-profits, the United Way is able to receive corporate donations, that governments cannot receive directly, in order to facilitate public-private partnerships and social work and improvement. It can also specialize to do the fundraising that other organizations who partner with it, are less able to do on their own, or to alleviate the difficulties of maintaining separate staff to do the same work, pulling funds out of the same donor pools locally, statewide, and nationally.
As a specialist, my belief is that the UWA or others similar are able to target their efforts, such as the another national non-profit organziation proposed to do for Lafayette, in order to assist local efforts to secure private lands for public parks. Their expertise made the success of the effort more likely as it is their bread and butter. Sure one can donate directly to an organization, and that is fine, but often there are "win-wins" by partnering up. Sure we could save a farm here and there and do it ourself, and not pay the "administrative fee" to do so. Well I'm sorry to tell Soop, but even the directly benefiting agency would have an administrative fee if it expended additional salary hours recruiting the donations in the first place. Let's use this one example before I conclude....often retailers are given data, by credit card vendors...that convinces them to take the card machines, one, because customers expect the convenience, but also because data will show that their sales tend to increase beyond the level of cost associated with the transaction fees they are assessed. (While there is a side argument to be made for needelessly enriching corruptable banking institutions which exercise undue influence upon our government, and increasing the level of consumption of natural resources by us Americans) it is undeniable what the data will show, which is net benefit to the retailer.

A survey of charitynavigator.com will find that most of the large, well respected national nonprofits have administrative and advertising(member recruitment) expenses of budgeted expenses running from 8-15% per year. If those expenses are covered under "Operations" at 3.3% then I am supremely impressed. I mean, $112K, isn't that maybe 3 full time salaried employees? or less? Aren't school teachers paid that much now?

In summation, I would also like to say, that I have no involvement with United Way other than the 2 or 3 times I made donations in $10.00 increments to the Second Harvest Food Bank of Greater New Orleans and Acadiana, who appear to be a partner of theirs.
I have volunteered with EarthShare Gardens, CSA (no relationship to Earthshare, the national non-profit) and have volunteered to help Save the UL Horse Farm.
...
written by Walter Pierce, Managing Editor , April 09, 2009 - 12:48 am
Thank you, Jason. Soop, would you care to respond?
...
written by Sarah Berthelot , April 09, 2009 - 12:25 pm
Thank you Jason for your feedback. I will pass your comment regarding "food security" to our staff member working directly with Essentials.
...
written by Soop , April 09, 2009 - 02:12 pm
I would be glad to respond to Jason. The only problem is that his argument runs afoul of my criticism. As I said repeatedly, I have no criticism of Meals on Wheels or any program that helps feed the less fortunate. I've donated to Food Net. I've collected and delivered to Food Net. I've volunteered at St. Joseph's Diner. I understand that need.

MY ORIGINAL POINT: My criticism of the United Way is in the decisions that were made and whether this whole "new" system was just an attempt to insulate themselves from backing away from non-profits that they had supported for years. Simply saying "well they didn't meet this test" looks to me like an attempt to convince others that what is clearly a subjective selection process was instead something objective. Because if it was objective, then there should be no criticism, right? "We just plugged the numbers into our Community Visions Impact Council Selection Cabinet computer and 1600 hours later it spit out the names of some people we should give money too. We were just as surprised as anyone to see that certain organizations were left off."

I don't buy it. It appears UWA decided it did not want to continue to fund certain groups before the process even started -- and they must have made this decision otherwise why change the process? UWA was just happy as a clam with their previous process until "grassroots" made them change it? Silly me thought it was either the executive director or the board that wanted the change. But according to Ms. Trahan, it was neither. It was "grassroots." My mom always warned me about hanging out with "grassroots." He always got me in trouble.

To Jason's specific points. To his first, if feeding people is the penultimate concern, then why fund any other programs and is UWA now just a food bank? To his second, well ... admittedly this is the line of thinking that partly led me to presume the changes were lefty inspired in the first place. Two points on his second issue to address: means testing and "to facilitate public-private partnerships."

Means Testing: Jason likes means testing (objective) except in the instances where the public good is served but means testing wouldn't favor funding (subjective). In those instances, you should fund regardless of the means testing analysis. Got that? So you use means testing on the programs you don't want -- sorry you just didn't make the cut. And you don't use it on the programs you like -- hey you make the cut even though the morons around here don't really see the need. You think you've created an objective process but if you get to pick and chose who gets thrown in and who doesn't, then it is still subjective.

Facilitating Public-Private Partnerships: I hate to say I told you I saw this coming. "The United Way is able to receive corporate donations, that governments cannot receive directly, in order to facilitate public-private partnerships." Thank you Jason. I DON'T WANT THE UNITED WAY TO BE AN EXTENSION OF THE GOVERNMENT! UUUUUUUUUGH! I don't think it needs any more explaining. The quote either makes you nauseous or makes you say "YES WE CAN!!"

And a bonus point about it being cheaper for non-profits to collect through the UWA rather than do it themselves: First, most still have their own fundraising arm since they don't get 100% of their funds from UWA. And even if they did rely on UWA for all funds, they would still have to hire someone to (A) put the proposal together, (B) expend other precious time implementing the alleged safeguards and (C) still being subject to the UWA, sorry, I mean the grassroots up and changing the playing field.

I will respond to Ms. Trahan when I can but for now I have to run. I would like to thank her for responding.

All the best,

Soop
...
written by Walter Pierce, Managing Editor , April 09, 2009 - 02:20 pm
Calgon, take me away!
...
written by Stephanie Mire , April 09, 2009 - 03:14 pm
Our new site went live yesterday! Check out www.unitedwayofacadiana.org for more information and all details on the PACT United.
...
written by Gary McGoffin , April 09, 2009 - 03:30 pm
On behalf of the Evangeline Area Council Boy Scouts of America, I want to thank Walter Pierce for taking the time to understand and explain the evolution in the relationships between the United Way of Acadiana and many of its historical partner agencies.

For nearly 100 years, the Scouting movement has addressed the United Way's three pillars: education, earnings and essentials. That is validated every day by the many community leaders, employers, parents and volunteers whose values were shaped by their own Scouting experience. Next year's Centennial celebration will reaffirm our commitment to those same values for the next 100 years.

The bottom line is that everyone understand the impact of this change. For those who want to direct their support to the Boy Scouts, please do so directly through our web site or by calling the Council office at 235-8551.

Strong Values, Strong Leaders. Character Counts.

Gary McGoffin
Council President-Elect


...
written by Gary McGoffin , April 09, 2009 - 04:20 pm
Oops. I failed to include our web site address, eacbsa.org. Gary
...
written by Soop , April 13, 2009 - 08:48 pm
Back again. Hope everyone had a great Easter.

For Ms. Trahan,

1. I can appreciate that "grassroots" decided there needed to be a change but that does not really tell us much. Who got the ball rolling at the UWA? Someone had to bring it up. Even if it was as simple as someone saying "Hey grassroots was telling me the other day that we need to completely change the way we decide who we should fund ..." Was it the Board or Executive Director?

2. So, the process is Vision Council picks the finalists, reviews by a Cabinet, the Board and a Sink (hah, just kidding about the Sink). Does any UWA staff sit as a member of the Vision Council?

3. No changes by the Board.

4. Website went live. Great. No board member listing, though. Or how about the Vision Council? Can the members of these bodies be listed on the site or at least divulged?

5. Overhead is 3.3%? Is that correct? 96.7% of donations to United Way of Acadiana goes right back to local charities? Or is there a distinction between Operations and Overhead? Three staffers have posted, there was a reference to another: that is at least four staffers. The big building on Pinhook, plus utilities to run it. Putting on programs. All that gets done for $112K?

MY SUSPICION: the actual number is not 3.3% but other overhead is tucked into one or more of the other categories so that at a quick glance someone like Jason above only sees 3.3%. But again, perhaps I am wrong. Maybe we will see.

ONE MORE QUESTION: I was told the UWA even holds back portions of the "donor directed" collections. For instance, if I donated $5000 to Food Net through the UWA, FoodNet wouldn't get that $5000 because UWA holds some back. Is that true and if so how much is held back?

All the best,

Soop
...
written by Stephanie Mire , April 14, 2009 - 12:42 am
Soop, there is in fact a list of Board members on the site. Here is the link directly to the page: http://www.unitedwayofacadiana...sp?p1=5552

...
written by Sarah Berthelot , April 15, 2009 - 03:43 pm
Response to Soop:

Margaret Trahan is traveling today. If you don't mind, I will address your questions to your comments submitted on April 13.

1. One of the strengths of the non-profit business model is that decision making is a shared process. Shared decision making led to the strategic change to address root cause issues within Education, Earnings and Essentials.

2. Staff members do not serve as voting members of Vision Councils.

4. We hope you have enjoyed visiting our new website. If there are any problems with viewing the board list with the link provided, please alert us.

5. Your original question was "How are funds generated from the Annual Campaign used? 2008 Annual Campaign Total was $3,423,516." Margaret�s response provided a listing on how these funds were used, including $112,983 for overhead. This number is correct.

Thanks to the support of Corporate Cornerstone designations and multiple funding streams (including grants), the cost of overhead to our individual donors participating in the Annual Campaign is reduced to only 3.3%.

United Way of Acadiana's overall operating cost for all aspects of the organization is 15.72%. This includes facilities, fundraising and operations.

Thank you again for your interest. I can be reached at 706-1221 should you want to talk further.

...
written by Soop , April 16, 2009 - 05:05 pm
Thank you Ms. Berthelot for the response.

1. I guess "grassroots" and "shared decision making" is as close as we are going to get as to hearing who initially came up with the new funding model. Funny that no one wants to own up to it.

2. So staff members do serve on Vision Councils they are just not voting members. Thank you.

3. 15.72% is correct for overhead or operating cost and not really 3.3%. Thank you. And I understand how you come up with 3.3% -- it gets masked because some donors apparently designate their donations for overhead. Using that theory, if Corporate Cornerstone Designations and multiple funding streams were in excess of "overall operating costs" then you could actually say you have a negative "overhead." And presuming that overage went to donations, could you not claim UWA gives out more than 100% of donations? That would be cool.

All the best,

Soop
...
written by Sarah Berthelot , April 17, 2009 - 05:01 pm
Response to Soop:

Thanks for your comments. Our intent has been to be as helpful as possible and relay information in an understandable and accurate fashion.

I admit...the blog format is interesting! I have enjoyed participating and appreciate the interest in United Way of Acadiana's pursuit of lasting measurable change to benefit our communities in support of Education, Earnings and Essentials.

Nevertheless, the blog format does limit our ability to completely understand each other. I welcome blogging to discuss United Way, however speaking in person increases both of our chances of being completely understood.

I will continue to check this blog so I can comment in a timely manner. Should you want to discuss in person, my direct line is 706-1221.

Thanks,

Sarah

...
written by Soop , April 17, 2009 - 07:13 pm
Just saw Mr. Pierce's article on our little debate. No my puppy was never run over by a United Way motorcycle. It was grassroot's motorcycle. I told you that guy was trouble.

And I just have one correction. I do not think the UWA is run by leftists. The word I used was "lefty" and I think I said I suspected a shift to the left. But I never said leftist. In my book leftist equals communist or anti-capitalistic. I have many good friends and relatives who are lefty. And Lord knows as conservative as Acadiana is if someone around here shifts to the left they can still be right of center. So, you can be lefty and still a long way from being leftist and that is the intent I had in using those words.

The United Way's stock in trade is trust. This is because they ask people to give and THEN the United Way announces who gets the donations (unless you have earmarked your donation). You have to trust the United Way is not going to use your donation in a way you would not want. You have to trust their judgment -- or at least trust the judgment of their Community Visions Impact Council Selection Cabinet computer that grassroots loaned them.

Their judgment: Scouting does not meet their goal of "Education, Earnings and Essentials." Fine. I have no problem with them choosing some new programs to support. It's UWA money once you give it. But it leads to an honest question: Is judgment that leads to that conclusion the kind of judgment you want deciding who gets your blind donations?

Have a great weekend folks. With all the rain it's a good time to clean out some closets and find some donations to Goodwill.

All the best,

Soop
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
LA LA Land
Advertisement
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it