News -> News TUE, OCT 12 8:42AM by Nathan Stubbs

Mellowed Joie

20101013-news-0101Wednesday, October 13, 2010

Acadiana Outreach tempers plans for its Joie De Vivre housing complex near downtown based on financial constraints and neighborhood concerns. By Nathan Stubbs

Despite the controversy the project has generated among some Mills Addition residents who fear the complex’s impact on their historic neighborhood, Acadiana Outreach Center CEO Rick Newton sees his organization’s Joie De Vivre affordable housing development as a natural extension of the nonprofit’s mission to assist the poor and unemployed. And Newton is confident the development will be a community asset.

“We’ve always asked the question about the root cause of poverty,” Newton says, “helping people to become self sufficient. This is one more step to have an impact on the area itself, the community. To step in and reclaim and help revitalize an area. I think this project is going to be a tremendous example of that.”

20101013-news-0102

Planners have reorganized the Joie de Vivre development as a six building, $16.5 million project.


In May, Acadiana Outreach announced plans to build a $25 million, 10-building, mixed-use affordable housing development in Mills Addition near downtown. The project was to be funded largely through the sale of $20 million in yet-to-be-awarded tax credits. At the time, Acadiana Outreach and its main consultant, The Cartesian Company, were still awaiting the Louisiana Housing Finance Authority’s annual Qualified Application Plan, which governs all tax credit applications. When the guidelines were published in August, they included a $1.5 million a year cap for tax credit applicants. That limit, along with neighborhood concerns over the density of the development and some failed property acquisitions, has forced Joie De Vivre planners to scale back their plans.

AOC has now re-envisioned Joie De Vivre as a six building, $16.5 million project. The complex went from 118 to 72 rental units, a 39 percent reduction in density. While financing certainly played a role in the changes, planners insist their primary motivation was winning over support from the entire community.

“The biggest reason [for the changes] is what we heard from the public,” says Cartesian Company President Greg Gachassin. “We listened to those concerns and tried to reduce density where we could.” In addition to the lighter footprint, planners added a brick facade on the building’s lower level to tone down an ultra-modern design many Mills Addition residents thought clashed with the surrounding architecture. They also increased the development’s parking space ratio from 1.23 to 1.68 spaces per unit.

With the new design, the would-be developers lost some of their originally proposed retail space, including a large first floor space fronting Congress Street viewed as ideal for a grocery store (the design still includes space for a day care and community center). AOC still hopes to add more retail, and additional residential space, over time. Gachassin notes that splitting the project up in phases was something that was recommended by officials with the Downtown Development Authority, as a way to help soften the immediate impact of the development. Another issue was three pieces of property that AOC was unable to acquire for the development. “I think as we build it, we’ll be successful in picking up others as people grow in confidence in what we’re doing,” Gachassin says.

20101013-news-0103Gachassin also has busily worked to allay concerns over the type of residents who will be moving into Joie De Vivre. Because of its public funding, the development will have to meet strict guidelines aimed at pinning the development to its mission of providing affordable housing. Joie De Vivre will rent one-, two- and three-bedroom apartments exclusively to low-income workers making no more than 60 percent of Lafayette’s annual Area Median Income (a requirement of the federal tax credit program). Lafayette’s current AMI is $57,500 for a four-person household. That means a four-person family wanting to rent at Joie De Vivre can make no more than $34,980. A two-person household can make no more than $28,020 and a single person’s salary is capped at $24,540. Gachassin, however, says tenants whose salaries rise above these levels after they begin living at Joie De Vivre can stay and even renew their leases.

Addressing concerns that the development will admit residents with Section 8 vouchers, Gachassin says this is required by federal law and is no different from most apartment complexes in town, the majority of which are federally insured or financed. To make his point, he says the two big apartment complexes in River Ranch must also accept Section 8 vouchers, because the mortgage insurance on those projects is backed by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development — an assertion an assistant manager for The Crescent denies; she says neither The Crescent nor its sister apartment complex, Main Street at River Ranch, accepts Section 8 vouchers.

20101013-news-0104
A day care and community center are planned as part of Joie de Vivre.

Gachassin also is quick to point out that Joie De Vivre, like most apartment complexes, will have a third party property management company that will screen tenants through criminal background checks and have a zero tolerance drug policy. Joie De Vivre is targeting young professionals and artists who work in the downtown area. “It’s about how you market,” Gachassin says. “It’s about who you target. And it’s about how you set yourself up.”

In its tax credit application, AOC also scored points for electing to serve one of three classifications of special needs households: homeless households, disabled households and individuals with children. AOC elected to serve individuals with children, meaning that 20 percent of housing at Joie De Vivre, or 15 units, must be dedicated to low-income families.

AOC’s tax credit application was submitted in September for Joie De Vivre and requests $1.5 million a year in credits over 10 years, a total of $15 million. Developers project they can sell those credits up front for approximately $12 million (see funding breakdown chart). The development has also received $1.25 million in state and federal grants, and plans to secure a $1 million loan from the Lafayette Public Trust Financing Authority and a $2.2 million mortgage, contingent upon being awarded the tax credits.

The Joie De Vivre development is one of 70 projects competing for some $8 million in tax credits available this year for the entire state. The LHFA will announce tax credit recipients no sooner than December. If successful in its tax credit application, Joie De Vivre could break ground early next year and be open for business sometime in 2012.



Comments (13)add
...
written by Captain Underpants , October 13, 2010 - 07:44 pm
Joie De Vivre really means "the projects in new French"
...
written by Krista Fontenot , October 13, 2010 - 09:21 pm
I live in this neighborhood and they have not won us over. A few misquided individuals who own property here, but dont' live here are for it. But they don't suffer the day to day drama of AOC's clients like we do. They did bring us Jeffery Lee Guillory after all. Also isnit this the same Greg Gachassin who built the leaky roofs and peeling ceiling at Antoine Gardens?
If they are focusing on families, what schools are they going to. Have the addressed this issue? Are they going to give people rides on Sunday when the buses aren't running? This plan is not well thought out at all. If AOC is running this facility aren't they going to use it as a halfway house like they use the other properties they bought in this neighborhood? Which were bought under the name of shell corporations. This is an impending DISASTER for this neighborhood and the downtown. Just imagine the panhandeling an apartment complex full of AOC's clients can accomplish. If they want to help, why aren't they building Habitat for Humanity type houseing insead of warehousing? More money in warehousing!
...
written by ragin_cajun , October 14, 2010 - 12:39 am
Krista Fontenot --

You make very good points, most of which I hadn't thought about--especially the schools. I remember when I lived in New Orleans, the big push was to tear down the projects and scatter the tenants to single family housing all over the city. The idea was that it was better for all involved if they weren't "warehoused" like you said.
...
written by NORTHSIDIAN SHOTGUN , October 14, 2010 - 02:26 am
Someone should question the Greenambulanceman, if there is a project within the boundarys of jodu'nt domain, the greenman has bid on it and by now he has a tenured union card and has tied up all the concessions and all the doug ashy nailbags !
...
written by Stalin , October 14, 2010 - 02:34 am
All hail Hector LaSala, the righteous ULL professor who is right in claiming all who are against this project hate poor people!

LaSala and Chavez, our great leaders!!
...
written by Krista Fontenot , October 14, 2010 - 11:39 am
Thanks Ragin Cajun.
...
written by realitychecks , October 14, 2010 - 02:10 pm
“It’s about how you market,” Gachassin says. “It’s about who you target. And it’s about how you set yourself up.”

NO! It's about what the state requires done with these funds! Anything awarded this year requires preferential status to Katrina Evacuees; that would create a permanent 9th Ward downtown. "Marketing" is about propoganda to get this thing passed! AOC's connection was not disclosed in the beginning and every presentation seems to morph. We have experienced the "marketing" of AOC "clients" for years as merely poor women and children, when the truth is, they deal with people with serious criminal histories; our serial murderer was their "client"; listing AOC as a home address! The "marketing" in this article almost seems like AOC and Gacchassin are cooperating with the neighborhood. Yet, they will sign no contract for security and neighborhood benefits. So, at this point, it's just "talk" about what "might" come around. People released from prison or avoiding jail under the guise of "rehab" have children, don't they? Half truths and ommissions make the whole project suspect!

...
written by The Holy Goofus , October 14, 2010 - 05:36 pm
Need a new developer...and a new architect, too.
...
written by Buckley , October 14, 2010 - 07:46 pm
A lot less mouths this article, a lot less foam.
...
written by ragin_cajun , October 15, 2010 - 02:57 pm
What control do the council and mayor have over this housign project? What is the councilmembers' position on this? Durel's?

"they will sign no contract for security and neighborhood benefits. "

Would not our city government, planning and zoning, force this group to make some commitments before they build something like this? If a business were to set up in the neighborhood, and they were using toxic chemicals that could be dangerous, I'm sure the city would want to see permits, and safety plans, and disposal plans, and hazmat spill response plans, and written evidence of planning and coordination with fire department and other first responders.

Same thing for this, right? Somebody at the city must have done all this, and your councilman could get that information for you. Police Department has some plan, some knowledge of the building/development.
...
written by Stalin , October 16, 2010 - 12:06 pm
Sorry ragin cajun. When it comes to Acadiana Outreach our local politicians bow down and grant all wishes with no questions asked.

Keller, LaSala and Giles get to run the show. The long time residents do not matter. Any historically recognized sites do not matter.
...
written by realitychecks , October 16, 2010 - 08:38 pm
Keller, LaSala and Giles get to run the show.

HAAA!!! There are enough people challenging this project and going over their heads that any such days are now OVER! They have believed their own propoganda and thought this would be an easy and cheap project and they are already proven wrong!
...
written by NORTHSIDIAN SHOTGUN , October 17, 2010 - 11:27 pm
I'm siding with ragin-cajun 'NO MO Projects" lets cut the ARTs, the Elite hangout wine-head sippin donations, and use that tax payer money to build separate residential units for the less privileged, lets promote poverty, Government assistance checks, slow learnt, babymama checks and lets remove the limit (number) of dependents a babymama can have on government assistance with same surnames, and place a limit of 12 children a babymama can drop in 10 years with different surnames.
Repartion sheeeet, " Thaaaaaat would surely be an injustice.
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
LA LA Land
Advertisement
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it