News -> News TUE, AUG 23 9:07AM by Heather Miller

Marketing the Mark-Up

Wednseday, August 24, 2011
By Heather Miller

The firm that crafted Lafayette’s school facilities plan has been hired to manage its implementation. Now it just has to convince voters to approve a hefty tax increase.

[Editor's Note: This story has been altered since its initial publication to correct an error in the last paragraph. The story incorrectly stated that there is no assurance that the new property tax revenues cannot be spent on other school system needs. Before the board gave final approval on the tax proposition, Citizens Oversight Committee chairwoman Sarah Walker requested that the prop include wording that specifically directs the tax money to the facilities master plan. The board upheld the committee's wishes and included the facilities master plan dedication in the tax proposition. The Independent sincerely regrets the error.]

A 5-2 vote cast by the Lafayette Parish School Board Aug. 17 could be remembered as a harbinger of paramount new construction and improvements for deteriorating schools district-wide — or enshrined as a premature vote of confidence in the public that voters may or may not reciprocate when they head to the polls Oct. 22.

CSRS Inc. of Baton Rouge has been selected to oversee the first phase of a $1.1 billion plan to address 240-plus pages of parishwide capital improvements, repairs and maintenance needs, leaving one task on the checklist before work orders are signed and bulldozing begins — convincing taxpayers in Lafayette Parish to foot the bill.

In its formal request for companies to provide proposals on the master plan’s program management, the school system made it clear that the job of overseeing the extensive facilities improvements is only employable if voters approve one of two new property taxes on the ballot in October.

That one-line stipulation gives CSRS — the same firm that crafted the facilities master plan and the only firm to formally apply for its management — upwards of 18 million reasons to hope the property tax passes.

The pending CSRS-LPSB contract, valued at an estimated $17 to $18 million, won’t mark the first time that CSRS has signed on to a mega public management deal sans secured funding. The Baton Rouge architecture and engineering firm, which has written and managed master plans for several school districts across the state, has been involved in seven school board tax elections over the past 11 years, says CSRS representative Chris Pellegrin. Not one has been voted down.

A proven track record of bond approvals could explain why the firm has been hired two months before the election and has also agreed to play an integral role in informing the public of what the $561 million in new revenues would bring to the parish’s fading facilities. CSRS is partnering with Architects Southwest of Lafayette for the LPSB program management contract if the tax is approved.

“We’re providing info to the district and whoever they want us to provide information to as part of their public awareness campaign, what’s in the plan, how much it’s going to cost, things like that,” says Pellegrin. “It’s not our responsibility to pass the tax; all we’re doing is providing info to the district. We’re hopeful that the citizens of Lafayette recognize the need to make some improvements and provide a good learning environment to the students.”

The facilities master plan is a vision years in the making for the school board, a means of getting a handle on critical improvements to structures suffering from serious neglect due to inadequate maintenance budgets that have often been tapped for other district needs.

Board member Hunter Beasley, who voted with fellow board members Rae Trahan, Mark Cockerham, Mark Allen Babineaux and Tommy Angelle to hire CSRS, sees no conflict in CSRS assisting with “public awareness,” though Beasley says he understands the perception that the company now has a vested interest in the passage of a new tax.

“If they’re going to do a job for Lafayette Parish School System, wouldn’t it be beneficial to them to provide information to the public?” Beasley asks. “I plan on having some forums prior to the bond election to inform the public. We’ll have Mr. Pellegrin there, available in case questions are asked. In that aspect, I’m glad they’re on board. I didn’t vote for an organization to come in and sell a tax.”

There may be no other firm in the state with as much experience in school facilities planning and management as CSRS. And though a few other companies asked for a copy of the school board’s request for management proposals, a CSRS/Architects Southwest proposal was the only one received.

“Districts are recognizing that there’s some value to having continuity between planning and implementation,” Pellegrin says. “The last three we’ve done have used that exact model. Two of those [Zachary and St. John the Baptist parishes] have hired us for the entire planning and management up front.”

With just one applicant for the position, the only factor considered in the evaluation process was whether CSRS’ fee for managing unprecedented new construction and repairs in Lafayette (3.3 percent of the overall cost, or an estimated $17 million to $18 million) is comparable to other school districts that have implemented similar facilities plans.

Information given to the LPSB before the vote reveals that three out of five school districts listed have slightly higher fee rates than what CSRS is billing Lafayette Parish. But the fee comparison board members received lists four Louisiana school districts that have also used CSRS for program management. Three of them paid CSRS more than the 3.3 percent LPSB has agreed to pay. The fifth district listed on the public document is in Beaumont, Texas, which hired a management firm at 2.3 percent of the total construction and repair costs.

The facilities property tax going before voters this fall would impose 23 mills to fund the master plan and an additional 2 mills for school maintenance. According to data provided by CSRS in the master plan, a home valued at $150,000 would pay approximately $200 a year more in taxes if approved. Businesses, however, “tend to share the burden disproportionately in that property values are considerably higher for business locations,” CSRS says in the master plan. Businesses also aren’t eligible for homestead exemption, a statute that exempts homeowners from paying property taxes on the first $75,000 of their home’s value.

“This makes it very important for the district to encourage business community support of the school system,” the master plan states.

But the master plan also points out that the 32.22-mill tax dedication to schools in Lafayette Parish ranks 49th out of 69 school districts in the state in terms of average millage rates.

“The most progressive districts in the state are paying an average millage rate of over 60 mills,” according to the master plan.

And though the 60 mills figure given by CSRS doesn't factor in sales tax revenues or whether those districts serve more students than LPSS, the new tax revenues in Lafayette Parish, if approved, will be placed into a separate account and can only be spent on the district's facilities and maintenance.

"It's going to be a very transparent process," Citizen Oversight Committee chairwoman Sarah Walker says. "That's what we were pushing for."


Comments (28)add
...
written by Huh? , August 24, 2011 - 05:04 pm
That last paragraph is a hum dinger and the first that I've heard that the tax is NOT dedicated to capital improvements. That seals it for me.

The reason we are in this deep of a hole is because our capital budget went from millions per year to squat. The irony is that David Thibodeaux (of Thib Tech fame) said a good teacher could teach in a tent and then led the charge to plunder the annual maintenance and capital budgets to lower class sizes. Then, in a remarkable turn, he decried the conditions of the buildings. Call me a cynic but it sounds like the plan was to let the buildings fall into ruins so there would be no choice but to raise taxes to repair the damage.

I'm voting NO!
...
written by Will never trust the school board , August 24, 2011 - 05:28 pm
There's absolutely no way I would consider a vote for the public school facilities WITHOUT the verbiage assuring that the funds are dedicated for facility improvement. I'm voting NO!
...
written by Angie Simoneaux, LPSS spokeswoman , August 24, 2011 - 09:07 pm
The Proposition does contain the dedication language, and also language that assures the citizens' committee oversees any spending. It's online for anyone to see here: http://esbstaff.lpssonline.com...7021fa.pdf
I encourage anyone who is interested to go read the actual text of the proposition for yourself.
...
written by Say what? , August 25, 2011 - 08:15 am
When the presentation was made to the Broussard Chamber of Commerce, board member Rae Trahan threw up her hands in frustration when she was unable to answer questions from the public. She then handed off the mike to Billy Guidry who danced around direct questioning. The sour note for the vast majority of those in attendance was that Lawrence Lilly was there to promote a hefty tax increase. Here is a LPSS employee gaming the system for almost $300,000 a year, the subject of much negative publicity, and arrogant to boot, telling people to vote for an incredible property tax increase. Not to mention that Lafayette Central Office staff has the highest percentage of rehired retirees in the State of Louisiana, the contract bus drivers are the highest paid in the entire country. Burnell Lemoine hired back Lilly, at a higher salary, after Lilly was dismissed for incompetence by the previous superintendent. Lemoine also hired back his very close personal friend, Ken Douet, after Douet was also removed for incompetence. Lemoine and Lilly wanted Douet appointed principal of the new technical school, but, thank God, the board would not approve the appointment. Douet now receives his retirement, his DROP, and his very high salary until his contract expires. These are not examples of how to positively promote and ask the public for a very hefty property tax increase. I will vote NO.

Angie Simoneaux is a former professional news reporter for "The Advocate" and is now a professional mouthpiece for the LPSS. She was hired to put positive spins on all that is negative about the LPSS. By the way, spin is a nice way of lieing or avoiding the true facts. I vote NO on the tax increase.
...
written by Lets talk about... , August 25, 2011 - 11:07 am
Our elderly property owners have not seen a Cost Of Living Adjustment in over three years, yet their Medicare premiums have increased yearly. Retired state workers and teachers have not seen a COLA increase in three years, yet their monthly health insurance premiums have increased yearly. State workers have had their salaries frozen for over two years with their health premiums increasing. LPSS teachers, administrators, including Lawrence Lilly, and contract bus drivers have not had any salary freezes and have received their yearly step increases. Rae Trahan has said that this exorbitant property tax increase is a priority. Yet, she adamantly refused to participate in a "Daily Advertiser" priorities survey sent to all board members and community leaders. She said that her work schedule was too busy to fill out the survey. Trahan's work schedule is not too busy to run around the parish on a regular basis with Lawrence Lilly promoting this high property tax increase. At the same time she is unable to adequately answer questions posed to her concerning the tax increase. How is it that the U.S. Government, the LA State Government, and the LCG are freezing salaries, cutting programs, and making sacrifices while the Republicans on the school board are proposing high tax increases, not freezing salaries, and not making intelligent adjustments? Are they Democrats masquerading as Republicans? So it would seem. The planning and the timing of this high property tax increase were/are very poorly thought out and implemented. Especially in this current economy.
...
written by the original northsidian , August 25, 2011 - 08:12 pm
Republicans in Lafayette are the only tax and spend GOPers in the country. VOTE NO FOR MORE TAXES!!
...
written by Huh? , August 25, 2011 - 09:52 pm
OK. So The Ind got it wrong and Angie got it right with regard to the dedication for capital expenditures, maintenance and equipment. But with all due respect to the volunteers such as Sarah Walker whom we should all respect and thank, the Citizens Oversight Committee has no real authority since it is appointed by the School Board.

I'm still going to vote NO in October. This plan needs more work.
...
written by Inept Rustic , August 26, 2011 - 04:39 pm
My question to everyone is, can we agree that our schools are in an abyssmal state of disrepair? That being said, what can we do to improve them?

I direct this question to "northsidian" and other staunch fiscal conservatives because, from my perspective, your beliefs are NO taxes PERIOD- What could the LPSS do to get you to vote YES to a new tax? What are your specific demands to get a YES from you on October 22?
...
written by ragin_cajun , August 26, 2011 - 06:07 pm
"What could the LPSS do to get you to vote YES to a new tax?" Nothing.

"your beliefs are NO taxes PERIOD". No, my beliefs are no NEW taxes period. The existing property tax millages go up every few years when the assessor re-assesses/rolls forward/whatever the euphemism is for raising my property taxes without my vote. So go and do whatever it is LPSS does with whatever it is they make, will continue to make, will continue to go up already, and will increase as the parish grows in population and property value.

I've answered your question, so now answer mine.

This question is directed to "Inept", and my elected officials at all levels of government, and to all the "forward thinking" leftist journalists and commentators out there -- what would it take to get a YES from YOU on a spending cut in a government program?

cut anything. Any government spending program at all, I don't care what it is. Cut it 20% right now. This year. Cut it.

Not gonna happen, is it?


...
written by realitycheck , August 26, 2011 - 09:21 pm
Throwing money at it has not helped before so there's no need to think it will be different now. Board needs to work leaner which would require competent management and careful budgeting.
...
written by Inept Rustic , August 26, 2011 - 09:30 pm
Ragin, thank you for the quick response to my questions.

I'm not sure if I've been labeled a liberal or not in your question however, were I in a position of authority to vote in favor of cutting government spending, I would do so.
Looking at the federal spending budget- where would you make cuts? For me, I would include cuts in international affairs, natural resources, transportation and technology progams. That MAY be 5%. It is tough to do but I'd have to make cuts in social security, military defense, and income security categories to reach your 20% requirement.

Perhaps I should heed Washington's advice here and, "utter not base and frivilous things amongst grave and learned men." Maybe I should just keep my big mouth shut.

As a person who has concern for the state of our school system- I am an adovcate for getting rid of the dead weight at the school board and, with that being taken care of, putting the tax initiative before the people to decide upon.


...
written by Lets talk about... , August 27, 2011 - 09:34 am
What inept rustic put forth. Yes, inept, we are all concerned "for the state of our school system." So at the risk of being redundant, "getting rid of the dead weight at the school board" has been expounded on many times over in various postings to this article. All you did was come off as psuedo intellectual with your off focus, dance around the facts but not reach a decisive conclusion and/or decision concerning the outrageous property tax increase proposal. Oh, and you do come off well as a redundant pseudo intellectual as well as pompous.
...
written by ragin_cajun , August 27, 2011 - 12:30 pm
I was crystal clear when I said "cut anything". I say cut 20% off of every program at ALL levels of gov't, not just federal. If they just cut the 5% you mention in discretionary spending at the federal level I'd be shocked.

That's where we're at in this country. No politician anywhere is really serious about cutting anything. The school board fully expects to get this tax hike passed, and they'll be pussed at the voters when it fails, too. Durel is STILL moaning about HIS tax hike getting voted down 5 years ago.

Think about that.
...
written by Inept Rustic , August 27, 2011 - 07:26 pm
I don't know what to say "Let's Talk About..." but... thanks?!?!? I really enjoy dancing around the bush and sounding pompous and arrogant. I came on this board yesterday to ask the folks who are strongly opposed to a tax increase what it would take to get a yes vote from them and I get called names. Not sure what you want to hear from me about the good old boy system at LPSS or redundancy or whatever.
Am I going to vote yes on the tax increase? probably. Laf. High is in atrocious shape and coming apart at the seams. My niece tells me that the wall is literally coming apart from the floor in a second floor classroom she sits in. She claims that it is possible to look through the crack in the floor and see the classroom below. Some 2,500 students attend a school built for 1500... I'm willing to pay for a new school if it improves the situation.

...
written by BoFred , August 28, 2011 - 02:14 pm
NO NO NO I CAN'T AFFORD IT! With insurance & the prop tax I already pay, I cannot afford it. The school system for decades was concerned only with personnel pay & building new schools (many of which are closed now..) I'm waiting for the assessor to lower the value of my house, as it is. I'm sorry the LPSB cannot learn to live within its means, & I'm sorry for parents of students who have to shell out for supplies LPSB should provide ea school. I have a GREAT WAY TO SAVE MONEY LPSB: Start school in September! How much money would be save in utilities, food prep, transportation expenses! No need to cut a single salary! More days have not equalled more learning, so scrap it! I will die from lack of oxygen yelling against more taxes for an irresponsbile pig headed school board!

...
written by BoFred , August 28, 2011 - 02:21 pm
So sorry about Laf High, but the whole intent is to LET IT FALL TO PIECES FROM YEARS, AND YEARS AND YEARS OF NEGLECT! That didn't happen in the past 4 yrs! The school system wants to REPLACE NOT REPAIR schools. Not enuf kickbacks in repair and upkeep! THERE IS NOTHING that will make me support a property tax increase for LPSB, NOT EVEN IF A WHOLE SCHOOL FALLS DOWN THIS AFTERNOON!!! I will NOT be responsible for the uncaring irresponsible school system of the past 20 + years! I AM NOT responsible for that. Until I see a school system fiscally responsible, making cuts in other areas, I will NOT make further cuts in my own budget for schools. I already support financially & I support my time by volunteering. I SAY START SCHOOL IN SEPTEMBER!
...
written by BoFred , August 28, 2011 - 02:26 pm
Oh & 1 more thing about Laf High, moved the da**ed Gifted school outta there. Poof, I've just lowered the # of students at that location! Now CLOSE DOWN SPECIALTY SCHOOLS & OPEN TRADE SCHOOLS, insead of community colleges! POOF! I've just lowered the # of students again! POOF! POOF! POOF! I'm working my magic cutting what isn't absolutely necessary - just as I have in my own life! Now, Laf High is down to 1500 students! I am really at the point that I cannot stomach the dog-and-pony show of the Laf parish school system. I don't buy into the Advertiser's "poll" cause I voted 3 times. The results were fabricated! I am NOT supporting more property taxes!
...
written by ragin_cajun , August 28, 2011 - 02:54 pm
" I'm willing to pay for a new school if it improves the situation. "

That's one way of looking at it. Here's another way of lookt at it, though.

A vote FOR this tax increase is a vote to hand over a HALF a BILLION dollars to an organization that has a long track record of inept and incompetent money management. The reason WHY Lafayette High looks the way you describe is BECAUSE of LPSS and LPSB. They have, for years, taken money dedicated to maintaining these schools and spent it on fun and trendy educational experiments that they've picked up "from the literature" and from "conferences" and "retreats" all over the country. All the while, the schools got worse, the facilities got worse, and more and more parents sent their kids to private schools.

Know what I've noticed? While all these public schools deteriorate, and everyone complains about low graduation rates in public schools, private schools are growing. How many new private schools have gone up in Lafayette Parish in the last 5 years? My kids go to school in a building that is 100 years old! Looks beautiful, it's clean, it IS a little small, but that's OK. My kid's school spends 30% less per year per child than LPSS spends per child.
...
written by Lets talk about... , August 28, 2011 - 07:44 pm
inept rustic, I guess you can read all of the rebuttals to your pathetic pandering. I believe YOU should vote for the tax increase so that we are witness to the democratic process as it takes place. Your vote will not be wasted, for you vote for that which you believe. But your foolish notion that a school system, that has proven it cannot be trusted with with hundreds of millions of dollars down through the decades, is to be trusted with a massive tax jump that will total in the millions of dollars very quickly if passed is noted as well. This tax increase is slap in the face to taxpayers and property owners throughout the parish. If it were not so sad, it would be hilarious.
...
written by Southsider , August 28, 2011 - 11:02 pm
Why not pass a sales tax to pay for it? Some say it can't be done. Of course it can be done! Why have only property owners foot the bill. Why should i pay for the rest of my life for schools when my kids will only be attending them for another 5 years? I am already property taxed to death thanks to an non necessary increase 3 years ago, along with rising insurance rates. Lets have everyone foot the bill for once. Make the sales tax higher. Oh, and have LPSB sell most of their property. INDY, do a report on just how much land the LPSB ownes and whats the true market value of the properties. Oh, and fire all the rehires, especially the central office staff that are WAY OVERPAID.
...
written by ragin_cajun , August 29, 2011 - 12:06 pm
"INDY, do a report on just how much land the LPSB ownes and whats the true market value of the properties."

??? What's this all about? Yeah, IND. Tell us what Southsider's talking about.
...
written by Hope , August 29, 2011 - 03:07 pm
I will not support a tax increase of any kind. I will not support a property tax or a sales tax. The school board has had millions upon millions in increases in the past 10 yrs and had burned it up. DO AWAY WITH THE DROP SYSTEM ESP FOR BUS DRIVERS. Start school later in the year. Close specialty schools - they are unnecessary. There are universities, community colleges & trade schools. Taxpayers already do not get much from Education in Lafayette parish for the money spent. If taxpayers knew some of the made-up positions in the schools system, they wouldn't be so quick to even consider giving that wasteful system more money. Of course, new schools would line the pockets of some companies - oooh, like the company that built that one elem school that is falling apart! Who's friend works for those architects?... NO NO NO no new taxes. If I have to become a tea whacko I will....
...
written by Morrow , August 30, 2011 - 09:14 am
I am furious about the "statistic" re Laf. being 46 out of 69 in millage rates. HOW ABOUT THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY??? Dog & Pony show! only $200 more on a $150 thou house... More like $400 more on a $200 thous house AND NOTHING THAT FORCES THE SCHOOL BOARD TO SPEND IT ONLY ON BUILDINGS & MAINTENANCE ! That dept can't spend money fast enough and I'm not giving them more to spend! Period. I'm agreeing with BoFred, NO MORE PROPERTY TAXES FOR ANYONE, NOT EVEN IF A SCHOOL FALLS DOWN THIS AFTERNOON. It took 20 or 30 yrs of neglect to get to this point & I agree the LPSB wants to build not maintain (not enough $$$ in back door deals in maintaining). NO NEW TAXES OF ANY KIND.
...
written by Morrow , August 30, 2011 - 02:35 pm
I have one question, has anyone reading this article or responding by commenting, have you ever had your property value lowered? Have you ever had your tax burden lowered? Mine goes up every year. Have you ever heard of a year, in recent memory, say 20 yrs, when the sales tax collections were down? Have you ever heard of an agency collecting taxes in Laf Parish saying "Oh, we can live on what we took in last year. We'd like to give some back."?

I would like for Ms. Simoneaux to go back to her bosses and advise them its time for the LPSB to cut their budget. Cut some programs. Go to the legislature & admit the extra school days haven't made for better education, so start cutting expenses & start school in Sept. Cut out the extras, like specialty curriculums. I know a Senior right now who goes to school less than 3 hrs a day. All of that costs money, money, money... DROP THE DROP PROGRAM !!! Ms. Simoneaux, tell the administrators & the school board members the public is NOT willing to incur more expense until they quit running the education system like a "Cash Cow". Education has had a lot of power in this state, in this parish, but the voters have had enough!
...
written by BoFred , August 30, 2011 - 02:39 pm
Dear Inept, You don't need to pay more cash, so you can vote NO if you want to. First, your neice will probably be outta college before Laf High is replaced. Second, if the school system really wanted to keep up, maintain, Laf High, it has had plenty of money, more than enought to do so.
...
written by iittssmmee64 , August 31, 2011 - 05:26 pm
How much longer do the children of Lafayette Parish public schools have to pay the price for current and past board members, superintendents, and every one else that has messed things up?!?

Without a doubt, I am voting yes! It is dedicated, has an oversight committee, and best of all......won't be managed by LPSS!! I would much rather it in the hands of a firm that has done this time, and time again with a proven track record!! Thank goodness for that!!
...
written by Pedro , August 31, 2011 - 05:28 pm
I read the proposition several times and I do not see "ironclad" language that eases my doubts. 4 million dollars was just recently diverted from maintenance to fund the new tech school....that once was a brand new facility with water intrusion, ignored by the LPSS. The Citizens Oversight Committee has no real power to direct tax money collected by the LPSS. Call it whatever you want Angie, as with the last tax proposal, the truth is, funds can be diverted from the original intent. It is easy and the LPSS/LPSB has been practicing this for over 30 years. Just say NO.
...
written by Morrow , October 16, 2011 - 12:07 pm
I'm with you Pedro. I think we see the handwriting on the future walls. Employee raises & benefits. I too believe there is no language to prevent waste & corruption. Funds are already being robbed & redirected. LPSB hired a PR firm to spin a tall tale of maintenance money not being enough. I hate to think of the money that's going to be skimmed off top, $18 mil that we know of, plus all of the percentage for that firm & the architects & the construction companies. 3 1/2 % of a billion bucks is a lot of change that should be spent in the classroom or refunded to the property owners! LPSB WANTS TO CONTINUE TO ROB THE TAXPAYERS & BUSINESSES IN THIS COMMUNITY WITHOUT ANY CONCERN FOR ANYONE BUT THEMSELVES. (I need to learn if any of these leeches have businesses so I can be sure to never give them any of my hard earned dollars.)
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
LA LA Land
Advertisement
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it