News -> INDReporter THU, MAR 8 11:46AM by Walter Pierce

Kopplin wins “Friend of Darwin” award

A Baton Rouge native who last year led the fight the repeal the creationist-friendly Louisiana Science Education Act — an effort he is again spearheading in this year’s legislative session — is one of two recipients of this year’s Friend of Darwin award from the National Center for Science Education.

Zach Kopplin, now a freshman at Rice University, shares this year’s distinction with Judy Scotchmoor, assistant director for education and public programs at the University of California Museum of Paleontology. Kopplin was a senior at Baton Rouge Magnet High last year when his attempt to repeal the LSEA died in committee. State Sen. Karen Carter Peterson, D-New Orleans, is once again sponsoring the legislation that would repeal the 2008 act. Seventy-five Nobel laureates in the sciences have endorsed Kopplin’s effort.

According to the NCSE, the “Friend of Darwin award is presented annually to a select few whose efforts to support NCSE and advance its goal of defending the teaching of evolution in the public schools have been truly outstanding.” Recent recipients include Tammy Kitzmiller — plus six fellow plaintiffs — the namesake for “Kitzmiller, et al v. Dover Area School District,” the watershed 2004 federal lawsuit in Pennsylvania that tied Intelligent Design to creationism and prohibited instruction of the topic in public school science classrooms.

Read more about the LSEA here:  http://www.theind.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=10018:lsea-repeal-bill-filed&catid=84:indreporter&Itemid=93

For more on the Kopplin’s national accolade, go here: http://ncse.com/news/2012/03/friend-darwin-awards-2012-007242


Walter Pierce
About the author:


Comments (3)add
...
written by Theo Tsourdalakis , March 09, 2012 - 08:33 am
Getting an award from National Center for Science Education is nothing to be envied. They are meant to be furthering science education - but they are doing the opposite when they push for Evolution to be taught as propanda.
“Evolution” is a vague word.
Micro evolution is minor changes within a species, this is real and observable and uncontested.
The conflict pertains to Darwinian/Macro evolution which asserts that:
1) All living things had a common ancestor. This implies that your great….. great grandfather was a self replicating molecule.
2) The observable world has come into existence by totally natural, unguided processes and specifically WITHOUT the involvement of an intelligent designer.
The vague and changing definition is poor science and a thinly disguised strategy to make it easier to defend and propagate.
Do a YouTube search on “kansas evolution hearings” to hear real, credible scientists, present powerful arguments which debunk Darwinian/Macro evolution.
Dr John Sanford (Geneticists and inventor of the GeneGun) said .
“The bottom line is that the primary axiom [of Darwinian/Macro evolution] is categorically false, you can't create information with misspellings, not even if you use natural selection.”

...
written by Walter Pierce , March 09, 2012 - 03:08 pm
"[R]eal, credible scientists," as opposed to Nobel laureates in the sciences, Theo?
...
written by John Grimes , March 09, 2012 - 03:46 pm
"...you can't create information with misspellings, not even if you use natural selection.”

You are confusing human written language with biological systems; the two function entirely differently.

And John Sanford is a young Earth creationist who fails to understand – among many other things – that even if evolution were falsified tomorrow, Jesus would still be a myth.

At least in this post you were smart enough not to use Malcolm Muggeridge as a scientific authority; he was a satirist, you know, not a scientist.
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
LA LA Land
Advertisement
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it