News -> INDReporter THU, MAR 15 11:03AM by Walter Pierce

SafeSpeed/SafeLight targeted

The Tea Party backed members of the Lafayette City-Parish Council are co-sponsoring an ordinance that effectively ends electronic enforcement of traffic laws by letting consolidated government’s contract with RedFlex expire later this spring. The ordinance, which will be introduced at Tuesday’s meeting and is co-sponsored by Councilmen Jared Bellard, Andy Naquin and William Theriot, needs five votes to advance to final adoption, which would take place on April 3.

LCG’s contract with RedFlex expires June 4. The controversial program using cameras at signalled intersections as well as “speed vans” has been controversial since it went into effect in 2007. Operated under the supervision of LCG’s Traffic and Transporation Department, many residents in Lafayette see SafeSpeed/SafeLight as simply a revenue generator for local government, although Traffic Director Tony Tramel has long argued — and has the empirical evidence to prove it in the form of crash data at intersections where the cameras have been installed — that the program’s purpose is to change driver behavior and make Lafayette streets safer.

It’s unclear at this time whether the ordinance will be voted on “in globo,” or within a batch of introductory ordinances, or if it will be pulled from the batch and voted on separately. Oftentimes controversial introductory ordinances are pulled from globo so council members can discuss them and hear public input.


Read the ordinance here.

Also on the agenda among introductory ordinances is a measure offered by Councilman Brandon Shelvin that would suspend the special law enforcement levy paid by downtown bars while a federal lawsuit filed against LCG over the levy works its way through the court system.


Walter Pierce
About the author:


Comments (9)add
...
written by Jack Cormier , March 15, 2012 - 09:28 pm
Why in the world would the tea-party or their "backed" council members possibly oppose a traffic enforcement system that "changes driver behavior (for the better) and makes Lafayette streets safer".
If it also "generates revenue for local government" while performing said service, Even Better!
...
written by Stephen Donaldson , March 15, 2012 - 10:28 pm
PHOTO enforcement claim by towns that it is about "safety" are a LIE!

Check out another Redflex city CHICAGO:

http://theexpiredmeter.com/2012/03/tribune-hammers-citys-pedestrian-fatality-claims/

Quote:

"For months now, Mayor Rahm Emanuel has been touting the safety benefits of red light cameras in regards to reducing pedestrian deaths, to make his emotional case to install speed cameras in Chicago.

60% reduction! Emanuel and his people claimed.

But when asked to provide the raw data or the reports, City Hall claimed it was secret. And even with FOIA requests being made for the info, the Trib never got their report.
So, reporters tried a different tactic. Use federal crash data on Chicago to do their own analysis of pedestrian fatalities at red light camera intersections, the Trib comes up with a 26% reduction in pedestrian deaths. Not 60%.

In addition, similar to what The Expired Meter discovered, that 26% mirrors the general citywide decline in crashes and pedestrian fatalities.

In other words, red light cameras may not be doing anything to improve safety."

also see: http://articles.chicagotribune...fic-deaths



FIGHT THE PHOTO FRAUD!

Ban the CAMS!

www.motorists.org
www.banthecams.org

(P.S. be aware that vendors like REDFLEX use ASTRO TURF GROUPS LIKE THE "Traffic $afety Coalition". http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/34/3445.asp

Quote: According to the March 3 Texas Secretary of State filing that created the Texas Traffic Safety Coalition, the group consists of three directors: David Goldenberg, Gregory Goldner and David Smolensky. All three are officers of Resolute Consulting, a public relations firm based in Chicago, Illinois. Redflex is one of the firm's satisfied clients.

...
written by Michael A. Moss , March 16, 2012 - 12:57 pm
I have a simple answer to this issue. Just let the people vote yes or no. Now can someone please tell me why this has never happened in the first place?
...
written by Jack Cormier , March 16, 2012 - 10:41 pm
If I DID live in Chicago, your post might be interesting?????? In Lafayette, LA (that's where I live) "Traffic Director Tony Tramel said — and has the EMPERICAL EVIDENCE to prove it in the form of crash data at intersections where the cameras have been installed — that the program’s purpose is to change driver behavior (for the better) and make Lafayette streets SAFER" (for me, for my children, and for you).
...
written by Michael A. Moss , March 17, 2012 - 01:06 am
Jack, I live in Lafayette also, and would like to vote on the issue. And I tknow I am one of many who feel this way.
...
written by Michael Urness , March 17, 2012 - 12:46 pm
Something the tea party and I can agree on. I have no doubt that there are countless safety benefits from the cameras, I think it reduces speeding and red light running and a host of other public goods.

What I don't believe is that it is an appropriate action to do that. Just like I am sure that cameras in every home would prevent domestic abuse and drug use, it would not be legitimate for government to do. These cameras aren't even government, they are a private, for-profit contractor. They only make money if drivers continue to break the law, what motivation do they have to change drivers' behaviors?

If these cameras were run by the City/Parish and issued actual tickets instead of the revenue generating print outs, I might have less of a problem.

I'm not living in Lafayette right now, but if I were, I would support these tea party backed council members (at least on this one issue), and that kind of surprises me.
...
written by chano leal , March 18, 2012 - 04:42 am
The same critics of the Tea Party Members also voted against women voting !
The same critics of the Tea Party Members also voted against intergration !
The same critics of the Tea Party Members also voted against taxes and the mininum wage !
The same Critics of the Tea Party Members also voted against legalized Gambling in Lafayette parish, and " Viola, REDFLEX was brought in only because the voters in the parish would not vote for a tax increase ".
These same critics are easily identifiable through their beady eyes, facial red veins, bulbous blue nose and their markalot printed initials on their big gulp dixie cup.
...
written by Michael A. Moss , March 18, 2012 - 06:05 pm
Chano, you hit the nail on the head my-man! And now we go to Opelousas with our tax dollars to gamble!! How do you think the Holier than Thou (local Taliban) feel about that!!
...
written by chano leal , March 18, 2012 - 06:51 pm
" Only In Louisiana " Couillion Capital of The World !
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
LA LA Land
Advertisement
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it