News -> INDReporter MON, MAR 26 11:25AM by Leslie Turk

Shelvin: Waste Facilities claims $17M in damages

Waste Facilities of Lafayette, which had the rug pulled from under it last year when the City-Parish Council voted unanimously to revoke its permit for a waste transfer facility in unincorporated Lafayette Parish, told Lafayette Consolidated Government officials in a recent executive session that claims for damages total about $17 million, according to City-Parish Councilman Brandon Shelvin. Shelvin apparently divulged the amount that had been discussed privately to The Advocate for its March 26 story.

The Independent was able to confirm independently that demand letters from Waste Facilities and the company it contracted with, IESI La Corporation, did estimate damages at $17 million. However, Waste Facilities' much-expected March 25 federal lawsuit against LCG does not specify a dollar figure it is seeking to recover.

IESI thus far has not filed suit.

In its suit, Waste Facilities asserts that the case belongs in federal court, which has both original and supplemental jurisdiction over state law claims. Federal courts sometimes hear takings disputes arising from the actions of state and local governments, and at least one lawyer contacted for this story believes the case will stay in federal court. That’s significant because, unlike what happens in state courts (which can’t force governments to cough up judgments), it won’t be up to LCG on whether it will pay any potential judgment or how it will pay. The feds can even seize local government property to satisfy monetary judgments — “a hell of a stick for the plaintiff to wield,” says the attorney, who asked not to be identified.

(Readers might recall that in 2007 six bank accounts belonging to the Orleans Parish District Attorney’s Office were frozen by a federal court order seeking payment for the $3.4 million judgment resulting from former DA Eddie Jordan’s firing of numerous white employees in 2003.)

But before the first nickel is paid out, it’s sure to be a long, drawn-out process as settlement talks are likely to commence before Waste Facilities attempts to prove its case in court.

The Advocated reported that in July 2011 Waste Facilities paid almost $400,000 for the property, a 16.38-acre site at 340 Sunbeam Lane that was to be used as a transfer station and waste hauling facility. A month before that purchase, in June of 2011, Waste Facilities and IESI La Corporation signed a lease agreement giving IESI an option to purchase the facility.

Waste Facilities then hired a contractor to prepare the site and construct the facility at a cost of $2.57 million, according to the suit. Two change orders after construction commenced — one a $774,000 commitment from IESI La Corporation — added another $787,000 to the project.

Waste Facilities was granted its construction permit Sept. 19, but when neighbors who were unaware that the facility had been permitted began complaining, Shelvin introduced an ordinance to block it, in essence revoking Waste Facilities’ permit. Before the council’s vote, however, City-Parish Attorney Mike Hebert issued an urgent warning to council members about the potential repercussions of the ordinance. Hebert said none of the permits or approvals had been issued by mistake or error and that all complied with state and local laws, ordinance and regulations. “If Waste Facilities has acquired a vested property right to its building permit, a withdrawal of that permit would likely be held a ‘taking’ of property obligating LCG to pay compensation to Waste Facilities,” Hebert wrote the council.

Hebert said potential damages could extend into the millions of dollars and might also include relocation costs and economic damages such as loss of profits.

Despite the warning, the council voted unanimously for Shelvin’s ordinance just days before the October election. It became law after City-Parish President Joey Durel refused to sign it.

Waste Facilities is seeking to recover the cost of the property and construction, real estate and leasing commissions, claims by contractors and subs, claims of IESI La Corporation, lost rental proceeds, lost profits, lost opportunities, attorneys fees, court costs, and all expensed associated with investigating its claim.

IESI spokesman Dave Clabo did not immediately respond to a request for comment.



Comments (11)add
...
written by Michael A. Moss , March 26, 2012 - 07:18 pm
Who would pay $24,000. an acre on Sunbeam Lane? If this was not a political payback situation I don't know what is! All the papers were filed before approval!
...
written by Monty Warren , March 26, 2012 - 08:02 pm
$24k per acre is very cost effective for commercial land. The land was on the market (available to the public) and listed for the price that was ultimately paid.
...
written by Gene Broussard , March 27, 2012 - 02:04 am
I wonder how Michael A. Moss reaches his conclusions. Does he have a crystal ball or do these visions just appear to him. Knuckle-head who makes stupid assumptions he knows nothing about.
...
written by chano leal , March 27, 2012 - 02:25 am
Aw Gene, get back on that govahment hind teat.
You have'nt the slighest moronic clue, cool hand ding a ling.
...
written by Gene Broussard , March 27, 2012 - 02:32 am
Unquestionably, the council did the wrong thing here. I would not want this facility in my back yard either but they got the permits fairly and honestly. Our laws and regulations did not require them or the city or parish to advise other property owners of their intent. Sad, but that's the way it goes and the council was wrong to cancel their permits.

Chano, I have not been on any Govt. teat, but you must need a teat to get some sort of brain food.
...
written by Guy Hebert , March 27, 2012 - 03:26 pm
Gene,
Maybe you don't know the facts here. They DID NO get permits honestly and fairly.
* Durel's office, and all of the city council, state that they worked on this project almost a year without any of them being advised that a trash facility was being looked at.
* No traffic study was ever done
* The permit process supposedly started in mid/late 2010, but Waste Facilities did not exist until April 2011.
* They violated DEQ rules and were shut down only weeks after starting

Someone is lying. There is no possible way their staff worked with zoning for almost a year and not one official was notified that a waste facility was being put in the middle of the city of Lafayette. It is standard procedure for zoning to advise the council liaison and executive branch of any substantial permit applications. Do you really think the director of zoning worked on this a year and didn't tell ANYONE?

Have you not read about the business deals between Durel and the owners of Waste Facilities and the seller of the property?

The council was put in a corner by someone. Either Durel or Zoning did not tell them until it was too late about a highly controversial project. One or both was either incompetent for not knowing they should have made this public, or they intentionally hid the project.

Hebert's opinion to the council was nonsense (as described by attorneys I had review it). The damages Waste Facilities is seeking will never be awarded as they are 90% speculative future profits. Their only possible damages are the improvement costs on the land from the time they received a permit and when it was revoked.

There is a BIG story here. It's not the council acting irresponsibly, it is why Zoning, Durel's office, or both intentionally hid this highly controversial permit from the public for almost a year.

Waste Facilities is involved in a similar lawsuit in St Tammany, which has been going on for years. They bought land from a business partner of a council member, then had it rezoned to allow for a similar station without public hearings. Does this sound familiar?

Someone needs to get an explanation of how something like this can go on for a year and not a single person outside of zoning knew about it.
...
written by Michael A. Moss , March 27, 2012 - 10:18 pm
Gene Broussard: I might be a knuckle-head. But I know you are pissed off because I called you an ENEMA MACHINE!! Have a nice day! Burn a candle for my redemption!!

P.S. Gene, what say you about Guy's post?
...
written by Krista Fontenot , March 28, 2012 - 12:29 am
I can attest to back room deals and cheating. look at Joie de Vivre, know who's district were in?

That project was a go from the minute the "boys" got together and decided to make money.
...
written by chano leal , March 28, 2012 - 12:33 am
As usual Gene is waiting to consult with a Tutorial Firm in Mensa, Colorado before he makes any more foot in mouth assertions as to what is realistic and what seems surreal.
Methinks... Gene retired as a BFI driver with commendations after nevah evah dumping a load.
...
written by Monty Warren , March 29, 2012 - 06:44 pm
How has Waste Facilities been involved in a lawsuit in St. Tammany if they did not exist until April 2011?
...
written by Guy Hebert , April 02, 2012 - 03:17 pm
Monty Warren, I incorrectly typed in Waste Facilities when I meant to type IESI, the company Waste Facilities is building the site for. Sorry about the mistake and hope the editor will make the correction in my original post.
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
LA LA Land
Advertisement
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it